Tag Archives: #USA

The US Has Lost the War Against Iran: American Influence and Its Military Bases Occupying the Middle East Has Ended

Stone eagle statue on cracked desert ground with mountainous horizon and sunset in background

By Timothy Alexander Guzman at Global Research.

The US has lost the war against Iran.

From members of congress to the senate, both Democrats and Republicans, from influential neocons to the mainstream media, all admit that the US has lost another war, this time against Iran.

Zionist Neoconservative warmonger Robert Kagan, the husband of Victoria Nuland, another Zionist warmonger worked under both the Obama and Biden regimes as the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, U.S. ambassador to NATO and as acting deputy Secretary of State wrote an article for The Atlantic, ‘Checkmate in Iran:  Washington can’t reverse or control the consequences of losing this war’ that openly admits that the US has been defeated in its ‘war of choice’ against Iran:

It’s hard to think of a time when the United States suffered a total defeat in a conflict, a setback so decisive that the strategic loss could be neither repaired nor ignored. The calamitous losses suffered at Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, and throughout the Western Pacific in the first months of World War II were eventually reversed. The defeats in Vietnam and Afghanistan were costly but did not do lasting damage to America’s overall position in the world, because they were far from the main theaters of global competition. The initial failure in Iraq was mitigated by a shift in strategy that ultimately left Iraq relatively stable and unthreatening to its neighbors and kept the United States dominant in the region

Kagan clearly says that the outcome of the war can never be reversed, that Washington’s status quo has been permanently damaged. In other words, there is no turning back:

Defeat in the present confrontation with Iran will be of an entirely different character. It can neither be repaired nor ignored. There will be no return to the status quo ante, no ultimate American triumph that will undo or overcome the harm done. The Strait of Hormuz will not be “open,” as it once was. With control of the strait, Iran emerges as the key player in the region and one of the key players in the world. The roles of China and Russia, as Iran’s allies, are strengthened; the role of the United States, substantially diminished. Far from demonstrating American prowess, as supporters of the war have repeatedly claimed, the conflict has revealed an America that is unreliable and incapable of finishing what it started

The New York Times recently published an article ‘President Trump Lost this War’ which also admits the obvious:

Since the war began, he has said the United States would achieve “total and complete victory” and that Iran must agree to “unconditional surrender.” He suggested that regime change would occur. He said that Iran would be permitted “no enrichment” of uranium and that “the United States will, working with Iran, dig up and remove all of the deeply buried” near-bomb-grade nuclear material that it already holds.

None of this appears to be true. Iran’s hard-line government remains in place. The specifics of the nuclear agreement will apparently be negotiated over the next two months, but the terms seem likely to resemble those of a 2015 deal that President Barack Obama negotiated and that Mr. Trump canceled in 2018

The mainstream media still manages to downplay Iran’s military capabilities when it can. It is true that Iran has suffered losses of its navy (which is not a major part of its military), army, air force and military-industrial production plants that manufactures their lethal missiles and drones, but they still have military capabilities that can counter any attack and cause considerable damage to both the US and Israeli militaries. In fact, Iran still has a standing army, navy and air force and enough missiles that can last for at least a decade or more despite their losses:

On balance, Iran emerges the strategic winner of the four-month war. It did suffer substantial losses, including much of its navy, air force, military-industrial capacity and political leadership, including Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, who was killed on the war’s first day

In fact, The New York Times had to admit the reality of Iran’s true capacity, ‘U.S. Intelligence Shows Iran Retains Substantial Missile Capabilities’, Iran has rebuilt 30 out of 33 missile facilities and more than 90 percent of its underground storage facilities, in other words, Iran is prepared for an endless war with the US and Israel:

The Trump administration’s public portrayal of a shattered Iranian military is sharply at odds with what U.S. intelligence agencies are telling policymakers behind closed doors, according to classified assessments from early this month that show Iran has regained access to most of its missile sites, launchers and underground facilities.

Most alarming to some senior officials is evidence that Iran has restored operational access to 30 of the 33 missile sites it maintains along the Strait of Hormuz, which could threaten American warships and oil tankers transiting the narrow waterway

With missile sites already rebuilt, Iran still has more than 70 percent of their mobile launchers and its most advanced missiles intact, “Iran still fields about 70 percent of its mobile launchers across the country and has retained roughly 70 percent of its prewar missile stockpile, according to the assessments.” So, Iran has most of its mobile launchers and missiles, and on top of that, they still have about 90 percent of its underground missile storage facilities. Various reports from multiple intelligence sources and satellite images that were analyzed say

“that Iran has regained access to roughly 90 percent of its underground missile storage and launch facilities nationwide, which are now assessed to be “partially or fully operational.”

Once again, The Atlantic published another article by Jonathan Lemire admitting that the US lost the war against Iran with severe consequences, in ‘Trump in Defeat’ it says that

“The United States is left weaker, diminished militarily, strategically, economically, and perhaps morally” and that “The war, which the United States fought alongside Israel, accomplished none of the goals that Trump named at the outset.”

Of course, The Atlantic would continue to call Iran a threat by saying it wants a nuclear weapon despite that fact that the Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa against developing nuclear weapons. 

“Instead, it only empowered the hard-liners in Tehran and arguably emboldened them to someday seek a nuclear weapon.” 

The article also admitted that Trump was desperate to end the war and then eased-up on his threats that he would supposedly end Iran’s civilization,

“Despite that, the president was so desperate for the war to end that he repeatedly backed off his threats—allowing Iran to call his bluff—and upbraided his close ally Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for responding to attacks in the region in a manner that jeopardized the negotiations.”

Trump literally allowed Netanyahu to convince him to attack Iran, setting himself up for a trap that he would not be able to get himself out of:

Trump won’t admit to any of this. He has spent recent days furiously spinning the tentative deal as a clear win and has seethed at unflattering comparisons with the deal that President Obama struck with Iran more than a decade ago, aides and outside advisers told me. Trump, they said, has privately denounced Iran hawks, some of whom are among his closest allies in the Republican Party, for questioning the strength of the agreement. Within the administration, there is a divide on the deal, but Trump sided with those advocating for the war to wind down, no matter the terms, as fears mount about the economic toll on Americans and the political costs for Republicans in the midterms

The End of US Dominance in the Middle East: US Military Bases have been Destroyed

More than 20 US bases and other military sites used for ‘Black Ops’ by the CIA and other intelligence agencies have been destroyed with hundreds, possibly thousands of soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines who have been killed, but Washington is not releasing the real numbers despite claims that Trump made that there “only” has been 13 US soldiers killed in action. 

According to the ‘BBC Verify’ who investigated the extent of the damages inflicted by Iran, and confirmed that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has destroyed more than 20 US military sites by verifying satellite images and various videos. 

“Iran has damaged 20 US military sites since the start of the war, satellite images and videos analyzed by BBC Verify show, suggesting the attacks are more extensive than publicly acknowledged.” 

It further went on to say that

“Tehran has targeted both US bases and shared military facilities in retaliation to the US-Israeli strikes across Iran and Lebanon over the past three months. The Pentagon says it has hit more than 13,000 targets in Iran since the start of Operation Epic Fury.”

All US military bases in the Middle East will eventually have to shut down permanently since Iran’s defensive capabilities proved that the US military cannot protect the Gulf monarchies. The New York Times‘Gulf Countries Confront Questions About Relying on U.S. for Protection’ interviewed Sanam Vakil, the director of the Middle East and North Africa program at Chatham House said that, “The U.S. security guarantee is no longer reliable in the way they thought it was.” Why?  well, Iran did considerable damage to US military bases and at the same time, they gained complete control over the Strait of Hormuz:

During almost four months of war, Iran and its allies struck military bases, energy facilities, and hotels in countries throughout the region and shut down the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway for oil and gas shipments. The preliminary deal, Gulf leaders hope, will allow their countries to resume exporting oil and gas without Iranian interference, and permit their residents to return to daily life without fear of Iranian missile and drone attacks.

Some Iranian drones were able to evade American defense systems, and the U.S. government and military appeared unprepared for Iran’s closure of the strait

Unprepared indeed, now that the Strait of Hormuz is under Iranian control, the Trump Regime is in a bind that they cannot get out of. This alone proves that the US was defeated on the world stage militarily. 

The Memorandum of Understanding is Just a Piece of Paper Because History Tells Us So

Does the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) guarantee peace in the Middle East? No, not at all, it’s just a piece of paper and the Iranians know this. It does not mean anything. It is sort of like the 368 Treaties the US signed with Indigenous nations between 1778 and 1871 to establish a so-called “peace” by recognizing their sovereignty that defined their borders, but with westward expansionist policies, the U.S. government constantly violated or simply ignored those same treaties that resulted in massive land losses which led to forced relocations. 

A trail of broken treaties, peace deals or MOUs is in the US government’s DNA. Washington’s main ally, Israel has violated numerous UN resolutions regarding illegal settlements and military conduct that has resulted in numerous war crimes. In this point in time, who could be surprised that the US has already violated the MOU?

As the MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) was signed by both Iran and the United States, Israel continues its genocide on Gaza and Lebanon making the MOU meaningless. The first point of the memorandum is clear which does call for an “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon” obviously, that part has been ignored by Israel since they recently declared that they will not leave southern Lebanon“The final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon and other provisions of this paragraph” but since Trump signed off on the MOU, the US military and Israel has violated Lebanon and Iran’s borders numerous times. Now Israel is trying to permanently occupy Lebanon’s southern sphere as part of the Greater Israel Project. 

Press TV reported on a statement released by the IRCG who said that the

“attacks carried out by the enemy against five Iranian coastal outposts earlier in the day” and that “the aggressor enemy, whose very nature is characterized by breaking commitments and violating agreements, attacked five coastal outposts of the Islamic Republic in the early hours of today under the pretext of responding to the IRGC Navy’s confronting a trespassing vessel [in the Strait of Hormuz.” 

The MOU is clearly a way for Washington and Tel Aviv to buy time in an effort to prepare for another attack on Iran. The Trump Regime, Washington’s political establishment and Israel will not accept a defeat although Iran has destroyed more than 13 major US military bases and several other military and intelligence installations who now controls the Strait of Hormuz which is a major transit point for 20 percent of the world’s oil; however, the US and Israel will continue to attack Iran even though thousands of US soldiers, sailors and marines will be sacrificed by a five-time draft dodger who still claims in his delusional world that he is the “peace president.” 

The US lost this war decisively which signals that the US is a declining hegemonic power in the Middle East, but Trump will continue the war with American taxpayers paying the bill while their grocery bills and gas prices are increasing due to Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump claimed that Iran was about to build a nuclear weapon that would have destroyed the world which was an absolute lie. Trump believes that he made the right decision regardless of the US economic consequences of his reckless decisions to go to war since he didn’t think about “Americans financial situation” when dealing with Iran in the first place. This tells you its about keeping US domination in the Middle East intact while serving Israel’s interests regardless of what the American people think, even if they go hungry. That is sort of Trump’s “let them eat cake” moment in history.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

Commercial Oil Tank Bottom is Here

rusty silos in an industrial district

With this and the fuel rationing we saw in Texas yesterday, the US will be in trouble heading into the month of July! I would expect prices to rise again once the reality of the shortage hits the public. Some folks are telling me that Trump knows this is coming and that’s why he moved the 250th birthday for America up to today instead of the 4th. Well I’ve had a gut feeling about this week and next to be on guard so keep your head on a swivel.

No fear, just stay prayed up and prepped up as best as you can.

Main story link.

Russia Must Defeat Ukraine Before Trump 2.0’s “War Of Attrition” Really Gets Going

Drone flying over a war-torn city with multiple fires and thick black smoke rising

By Andrew Korybko. Reposted with permission.

The only reprieve in that dark scenario, other than obliterating Ukraine to neutralize the NATO threats emanating from there once and for all per the special operation’s goal, would be for Russia to sell stakes in its natural resource and other critical industries to the US as a “security guarantee”.

It was warned last fall that “The US Plans To Wage An Intensified Proxy War Of Attrition Against Russia”, and now that Trump just signaled that he plans to “escalate to de-escalate” with Russia per the arms- and sanctions-related terms of the G7 joint statement that he signed, this might now begin to happen. As a reminder, the Wall Street Journal reported that this three-phase strategy involves helping Ukraine surpass Russia’s drone capabilities, more secondary sanctions, and provoking unrest inside of Russia.

Ukraine’s long-range drone strikes have targeted energy infrastructure in St. PetersburgMoscow, and even Tyumen (the latter possibly by drones launched from Kazakhstan without Astana’s knowledge). Ukraine then hit an electronics plant in Voronezh and a satellite communications center in Moscow Region on Monday. Two days prior on Saturday, the Head of Crimea suspended fuel sales for everyone but the government, which highlighted the consequences of Ukraine’s “drone blockade” of Crimea.

The “war of attrition” that Ukraine is now waging against Russia through its strategic strikes on energy and other infrastructure is timed for September’s next Duma elections. United Russia might not maintain the 49.82% of the popular vote from the last elections in 2021, which could force them into a coalition with the communist or nationalist opposition depending on how high the protest vote is. Putin’s foreign foes believe that this would weaken Russia, instead of rejuvenate it, and want to help make this happen.

The aforesaid strikes are thus being paired with Zelensky’s ultimatum to Lukashenko to withdraw air defenses and drone relay stations from the border or Ukraine will do it for him. It was assessed here that Putin now has a chance to restore deterrence if Zelensky authorizes attacks against the 500 targets that one of his top drone commanders earlier claimed had been identified in Belarus. If deterrence is restored, then Russia might maintain the tempo to defeat Ukraine, thus swiftly ending the conflict.

If everything turns out differently, such as if deterrence isn’t restored by Russia after a large-scale Ukrainian attack against Belarus or no such attack occurs and the conflict drags on, then Trump’s “war of attrition” might really get going and begin systematically destroying all Russian targets one-by-one. Former top Russian spy Andrey Bezrukov recently admitted that “we were not prepared” for Starlink aiding strikes against critical infrastructure and advised maximally protecting all targets without delay.

That’s difficult to do with a country as large as Russia is, so if Trump “escalates to de-escalate” in a way that radically scales Ukraine’s strategic drone attacks, then Russia might be at a disadvantage where time would no longer be on its side like previously assumed by many in Moscow. Ukraine’s logistics are nowadays under NATO’s nuclear umbrella, so unless Russia risks World War III by striking them and gambling that no one (let alone the US) will retaliate, then it might face “death by a thousand cuts”.

The only reprieve, other than obliterating Ukraine to neutralize the NATO threats emanating from there once and for all per the special operation’s goal, would be for Russia to sell stakes in its natural resource and other critical industries to the US as a “security guarantee”. Knowing Trump, he’d likely demand that they be sold for pennies on the dollar and possibly include controlling shares, which would essentially cede Russia’s sovereignty. That’s why Russia must defeat Ukraine before his “war of attrition” really gets going.

The Merging of Israeli and USA Intel and Military is Treason

the word betrayal spelled out in scrabble tiles

Of course the fake Satanic Jews running Israel believe they’re the chosen ones who will rule and reign over the world, so they see this merging as a logical step. Like Dr. Sansone says in the opening of his article, these bills prove that any “rift” between Trump and Bibi is likely staged for the cameras and nothing more, like WWE television (that’s professional wrestling for those who don’t know).

The alleged rift between Trump and Netanyahu over Israeli criminal bombings in Lebanon that assisted in derailing the peace process with Iran, appears to be political theater to distract from the current attempt by Israel to overthrow the United States government. If Trump and Vance were really upset with Israel, then President Trump would state clearly that he will veto the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) if Section 219 remains (formerly 224), and the Intelligence Act Bill if Section 622 remained.

Prayed up and prepped up, time is short!

The Main Story by Dr. Joseph Sansone

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Peace Sells but Who’s Buying?

Multiple large cylindrical oil storage tanks labeled T-14 to T-17 arranged in an industrial area by the coast under overcast skies.

Who actually won the war in the Persian Gulf? Well it wasn’t the USA, that much is certain! Also the oil storage in Cushing OK will be EMPTY by June 22nd…tick tock goes the Mad Max clock.

Sticking around a bit longer

Cushing Empty by Tuesday June 22nd 2026

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Who Won the Third Gulf War?

Convoy of tanker ships sailing in a bay toward the setting sun

Guest Post by Andrew Korybko

Iran is poised to gradually return to the US-led Western order within certain limits exactly as Iran’s moderate faction has long wanted, its hardline faction has successfully preserved the armed forces and their missile stockpile, while Israel achieved none of its goals in its most epic defeat ever.

Iran and the US plan to sign a Zarif-inspired memorandum of understanding (MoU) on ending the Third Gulf War this Friday in Switzerland. The exact details aren’t yet known, and Fortune reported that there were at least three competing texts, but all of them “include similar elements around reopening the vital Strait of Hormuz waterway, giving Iran sanctions relief and opening the door to longer-term negotiations around its nuclear program.” That’s already enough to arrive at several very important conclusions.

For starters, reopening the strait without Iran’s wartime petroyuan toll booth in place would represent a significant concession by the Islamic Republic, whose media surrogates celebrated this model as an historic multipolar milestone. The same goes for resuming negotiations on its politically sensitive nuclear program. The sanctions relief in exchange might arguably be worth it, however, judging by this estimate here of the profound economic-financial damage caused by the US’ (imperfect) blockade.

On that topic, it was explained here in late March that “The US will have lost the Third Gulf War if China can still rely on Iran as a reliable low-cost energy supplier while turning the yuan into a global reserve currency that challenges the petrodollar”, so preventing both is imperative from the US’ perspective. With the petroyuan reportedly out of the picture, that leaves Iran’s oil export dependence on China, but sanctions relief could help gradually redirect its sales (such as to India) without disrupting the market.

Likewise, if reports about a $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran are true (even if the final sum is much lower but still tens of billions of dollars), then US and Gulf investments in Iran’s energy industry could lead to them controlling its exports. It was assessed in January that “The US Wants To Replicate The Venezuelan Model In Iran”, which would be on the path to implementation in that scenario. The resultant interdependence could advance collective security and facilitate the US’ regional withdrawal.

Iran’s moderate (“reformist”) and hardline (“principalist”) factions would therefore achieve some of their goals, the first with respect to sanctions relief and the second with regards to preserving the country’s (arguably battered) armed forces as well as their missile stockpile, not to mention their political system. Nevertheless, the factional balance would have shifted in the moderate’s favor since the US wouldn’t sign a MoU if the moderates couldn’t control “rogue” hardliners, who could potentially rekindle the war.

It can therefore be concluded that the moderates beat the hardliners in Iran’s deep state power struggle, but this was due to the US and Israel killing dozens of top hardline figures, after which their respective institutions (especially the IRGC) were weakened and ultimately tamed by the moderates. To be sure, “rogue” hardliners – regardless of their relationship to the IRGC – could still sabotage the MoU, but Trump 2.0 feels comfortable enough that they won’t otherwise it wouldn’t go through with the signing.

A new regional era is emerging whereby the Third Gulf War might very well lead to Iran’s gradual reincorporation into the US-led Western order, albeit within limits, which lays the groundwork for better ties with its Gulf neighbors. In that scenario, Israel would stand to lose since it could no longer divide-and-rule Iran and the Gulf, nor would the US have its back if Israel resumes hostilities with Iran due to the recent revival of the possibly irreconcilable Trump-Bibi rift. Israel is therefore the war’s biggest loser.

Editors Note: In regard to the war with Iran I believe it’s part of the War of Armageddon playing out slowly since Oct. 7th 2023. Therefore I don’t believe there will be a lasting peace in the Persian Gulf region until Jesus Christ returns. The formal signing won’t take place until this coming Friday, June 19th, 2026 and a lot can happen between now and then, especially with Israel looking to sabotage the peace.

Stay tuned, prayed up and prepped up at all times because when this war fires up again look out!

Johnny

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21PayPal Link

The United Kingdom is Poking Russia: The Royal Navy is “Toothless”: All of its Nuclear-powered attack Submarines Are Inactive

Three rusted warships with numbers 38, 41 and S-109 docked at a harbor with cranes and industrial buildings

By Drago Bosnik from Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Editors Note: This is why I find it hilarious when the UK talks smack about Russia, they have NOTHING to back it up! The picture below is one of their nuclear subs sitting in dry dock doing nothing. The UK has very little to fight with and their soldiers train with broomsticks instead of firearms. They should really keep their traps shut.

In its prime, the United Kingdom was one of the most powerful thalassocracies in human history, probably eclipsed only by the United States after WWII.

By the early 1920s, The British Empire as a major colonial power managed to occupy and “enslave” approximately 25% of the globe’s landmass and population (over 35.000.000 km² and around 450 million people, respectively).

How did such a small island nation accomplish this? The answer is – the British Navy, the most powerful armed maritime force of its time. Thus, it could only be expected that the “Perfidious Albion” would do everything in its power to preserve this naval dominance or at least maintain its power projection capabilities for as long as possible.

However, as the British Empire shrank to a mere shadow of its former self, its ability to sustain a large navy dwindled, resulting in massive reductions over the last several decades.

The last time the UK managed to muster a respectable naval force was during the 1982 Falklands War against Argentina.

Ever since, the British Navy has been fading away, reducing both the quantity and quality of its ships. According to various reports over the last 20 years, London now has nearly twice as many admirals as it does actual warships. Worse yet, many of those formally combat-capable vessels are in such a dilapidated condition that they’re barely usable as ships (much less warships).

This ranges from frigates and destroyers to aircraft carriers and submarines (including nuclear-powered). However, while the surface fleet is undoubtedly still relevant, it’s nowhere near as important as the British Navy’s underwater component, which provides the most critical segment of the UK’s strategic power projection. Namely, the Vanguard-class SSBNs (nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines), armed with UGM-133A “Trident II” (also known as “Trident D5”) submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), are the cornerstone of London’s thermonuclear arsenal. Still, it seems this isn’t enough for the “Perfidious Albion” to take them seriously.

Back in December last year, Rear Admiral Philip Mathias lamented that “Britain is no longer capable of running a capable nuclear submarine program”, warning of “catastrophic failures” that have “driven the UK’s nuclear deterrent to the brink”. Mathias, who served as a director of nuclear policy at the British Ministry of Defense (MOD), highlighted its “inability to produce attack submarines at the scale required for putting strain on crews and extending the length of deployments”. He compared this to the (First) Cold War, stressing that “the silent service” could deploy for around 70 days at the time, but that this has risen to around 200 days at present.

Mathias quoted the 2025 Strategic Defense Review (SDR), which stressed the need to expand production capacity. However, problems with the British Navy’s SSBN component are nothing new, as many authors (myself included) questioned years ago whether the UK’s strategic arsenal was functioning properly. Although such information is certainly a state secret, these doubts were confirmed after London admitted that one of its UGM-133A “Trident II” SLBMs failed during a launch test. This was the second time in a row that the troubled missile, a weapon of strategic importance, failed, as it did in the previous test conducted in 2016. The last successful launch was by HMS “Vigilant” back in 2012.

This means the UK hasn’t had a successful SLBM test in nearly a decade and a half, yet it still believes it can go up against Russia, a country with the world’s largest and most powerful strategic arsenal. The latest “Trident II” launch was from the lead ship of its class, the HMS “Vanguard”, with reports indicating that London’s then-Defense Secretary, Grant Shapps, was overseeing it. The SLBM’s booster rocket failed and it fell into the sea “close to the launch site”, as the Sun reported at the time (the “launch site” being the HMS “Vanguard” itself). And yet, Shapps insisted that he has “absolute confidence in ‘Trident’s’ submarines, missiles and nuclear warheads”.

As previously mentioned, London relies solely on these submarines and missiles for its strategic capabilities. Had the “Trident II” damaged the HMS “Vanguard”, it would’ve taken one-quarter or 25% of the UK’s strategic arsenal out of service, as the “Perfidious Albion” has only four such vessels, each armed with up to 16 SLBMs. It should be noted that HMS “Vanguard” finished a seven-year-long overhaul and refueling just last year. However, to make matters even worse, both Shapps and the then-Head of the Royal Navy, now disgraced Admiral Ben Kay, were on board the submarine during the launch test, meaning their lives were also in danger.

The failures are also an embarrassment for the United States, as the missiles are manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Pentagon’s premier military supplier. Still, all this didn’t prevent Shapps from adding to the general embarrassment by saying that “an anomaly did occur during the test on 30 January [2024], but that the ‘Trident II’ SLBM is still the most reliable weapons system in the world”. According to his assessment, the test “reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK’s nuclear deterrent” and that the “anomaly was event specific”, with “no implications for the reliability” of the UK’s strategic arsenal. The British MoD made similar statements.

Namely, it insisted that HMS “Vanguard” and its crew had been “proven fully capable in their operations” and that “the test had reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK’s nuclear deterrent”, essentially repeating Shapps’ statement that “Trident II” is the “most reliable weapons system in the world”. However, while this (now decades-long) issue is yet to be resolved, the British Navy has somehow managed to reach a new low point. Namely, of the six Astute-class SSNs (nuclear-powered attack submarines) in its service, not a single one is combat-ready. The UK has five “active-duty” submarines, one undergoing pre-sea trial testing and one more under construction (projected to be completed by the end of this decade).

All five of the “active” ones are currently in port undergoing maintenance and/or repairs, indicating deteriorating fleet readiness. Former First Sea Lord Admiral Alan West warned that the situation leaves the UK “appearing toothless at a time of increasing Russian naval activity in the North Atlantic and Arctic”. At present, of the nine nuclear-powered submarines in the British Navy, only one or two (the Vanguard-class, but none of the Astute-class) are currently at sea and battle-ready. And yet, as previously mentioned, even those formally capable of conducting combat missions have very serious reliability issues and haven’t successfully launched a single missile since 2012.

Thus, London’s dangerous self-delusions show just how out of touch the warmongering oligarchies of the political West are, particularly when it comes to their assessments of starting a thermonuclear war against not one, but multiple global and regional superpowers, be it Russia, China, Iran or North Korea. In fact, the latter is often the first target of the mainstream propaganda machine’s ridicule, but Pyongyang has unequivocally proven that its strategic arsenal works flawlessly. In fact, North Korea has deployed at least one nuclear-powered submarine, thus becoming one of a handful of countries with such a capability.

This article was originally published on InfoBrics.

Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Welcome to Zionism 2.0 as the US and Israeli Militaries Prepare to Merge

We will also cover a story from Insight to Incite called Cut Off and Replaced: What Romans 11 REALLY Teaches About Unbelieving Jews.

Cut Off and Replaced: What Romans 11 REALLY Teaches About Unbelieving Jews

Welcome to Zionism 2.0

IDF Murders 7 month old with US Machinegun

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Dangerous Crossroads: Kiev Regime increasingly Relies on US AI Techno Companies to Wage War on Russia, Working Closely with the Pentagon

Military personnel managing drone operations with holographic terrain map and live feeds

Guest Post by Drago Bosnic from Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Combining unmanned systems and advanced AI is all the rage nowadays.

Despite decades of stark warnings about the dangers of using this combination, corporate interests of the warmongering oligarchy running the United States take prioritywhich is why we’re on a collision course (or should we say head-on collision) with this reality.

Namely, as the political West (and much of the world) now faces population collapse, reduced interest in serving in the military, incessant price hikes for traditional weapon systems, etc., the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) is gradually shifting toward this drone-AI combo as its primary alternative. And indeed, such systems seem to be taking over at virtually all levels, be it tactical, operational, strategic or doctrinal.

Numerous AI-focused techno entities have emerged in America in the last two decades or so. Although they’re competitors, they also work together toward dislodging the “old nobility” of the US MIC and ensuring a future where they’ll monopolize the massive weapons market.

Palantir and Anduril are the two most prominent AI companies working closely with the Pentagon. 

They’ve completely eliminated all ethical dilemmas regarding the use of advanced AI in warfare, thus opening the Pandora’s box for virtually every generation going forward.

Unsurprisingly, for the warmongering oligarchy in Washington DC, the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict is the perfect testing ground for such technologies, offering unprecedented possibilities for battlefield use.

Namely, with Russians and Ukrainians being pretty much the same people, with effectively identical levels of education, industrial background and centuries-old military traditions, the political West gets the unique opportunity to test its latest systems in a confrontation between two high-tech opponents. Both the Russian military and the Kiev regime forces demonstrate remarkable flexibility and readiness to apply doctrinal revisions to the point that they’re now unrivaled in unmanned warfare.

At present, drones are the only segment in which the Neo-Nazi junta isn’t behind Russia, primarily because its technologies come from the entirety of the political West. Given such unprecedented levels of support, one would expect the Kiev regime to be ahead of Moscow.

However, this is simply not the case, as evidenced by the stellar performance of the Russian military’s Unmanned Systems Forces (VBS). Interestingly, although the names differ in Russian and Ukrainian, the services are translated exactly the same in English for both the Kremlin and the Kiev regime. The latter’s Unmanned Systems Forces (SBS) are also heavily integrated with the infamous GUR (Main Intelligence Directorate). This military branch of the Neo-Nazi junta’s extensive intelligence network (with the state counterpart being the no less infamous SBU and both effectively operating as a bunch of NATO-run terrorist organizations) is directly responsible for most drone operations on the frontline and is deeply integrated into the battlefield command structure on all levels.

In addition, NATO is also providing constant, real-time ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance), greatly improving the overall effectiveness of the SBS and GUR. In fact, it could be argued that the world’s most vile racketeering cartel is also giving orders to the Kiev regime, which helps it maintain the so-called plausible deniability (although it seems this is increasingly irrelevant to the US/EU/NATO as drone attacks through Polish and Baltic states’ airspace continue). As previously mentioned, American AI giants-in-the-making directly participate in these black ops. For instance, Palantir’s PRISMA platform is emerging as a critical component of the Neo-Nazi junta’s SBS and GUR operations, facilitating long-range drone strikes on Russia.

While most operational details remain highly classified, recent reports suggest that PRISMA functions less as a weapon itself and more as a battlefield ISR and command-and-control layer that integrates large volumes of data into what the Pentagon calls “actionable targeting decisions”. Until recently, one of the priorities of unmanned warfare was simply building enough drones. However, after NATO and the Kiev regime ensured steady procurement, the issue of mass battlefield coordination emerged. What’s more, the SBS and GUR had to process massive amounts of data quickly enough to exploit target opportunities and make split-second decisions. GUR praises PRISMA as the primary AI tool enabling such unprecedented battlefield coordination.

Namely, Palantir’s dystopian AI system aggregates information from drones, sensors, satellite imagery and other sources into a single operational framework. Operators can then monitor flight paths, target locations and battlefield developments in near real time.

This creates several key military advantages. Namely, PRISMA seems to compress the so-called “sensor-to-shooter” cycle.

Traditionally, intelligence collection, target validation, mission planning and strike execution might require multiple teams, lengthy communication and command-and-control chains. By integrating these functions digitally, commanders can identify targets and rapidly assign drones to engage them. Faster decision-making is particularly important against mobile enemy assets.

This includes everything from logistics convoys and air defense systems to long-range strike platforms and temporary/ad hoc command posts that may relocate within hours. For instance, PRISMA may enable coordinated drone-swarm attacks against such assets. The system can reportedly process data related to very large numbers of targets and drones simultaneously. If true, this would mean that PRISMA could enable the Kiev regime’s operators to synchronize ISR drones, decoys, electronic warfare (EW) systems and strike drones within a single operational framework. Such coordination can overwhelm defenses by forcing defenders to track numerous incoming threats simultaneously while attackers conceal the primary strike axis.

All of this is made possible by advanced AI that greatly enhances battlefield analysis. It should be noted that PRISMA is just one of the systems within Palantir’s broader military software suite designed to fuse satellite imagery, drone ISR, open-source intelligence, human reporting and mass surveillance into a coherent battlefield network. AI models can identify patterns, highlight anomalies and recommend potential targets that human analysts might otherwise miss. In the context of the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict, this means that the Neo-Nazi junta gets constant updates on various civilian and military targets in RussiaThis could explain how the world’s most vile racketeering cartel and the Kiev regime targeted Russian teenagers in Starobelsk.

Namely, this heinous terrorist attack was coordinated in such a way as to maximize casualties.

At least 16 drones struck the dormitory when students were asleep. This wouldn’t have been possible without systems such as PRISMA. It’s pretty much identical to how Google’s “Maven” was used against Russia just a few years earlier. Moscow’s world-class EW assets severely disrupted its functioning, forcing the Pentagon to stop using “Maven” in NATO-occupied Ukraine. However, the introduction of more advanced AI systems allowed the US MIC to dramatically expand the use of such programs. The overall implications of this technofascism are so multifaceted that they require an entirely separate analysis, but we can certainly conclude there’s nothing positive about it.

This article was originally published on InfoBrics.

Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

West Coast Tank Bottoms Fast Approaching

fuel pumping into car at a gas station

The short sighted clowns in the West (and the East like Japan) thought that the US and Israel would bomb Iran and that the war would be over in short order, so they weren’t concerned about oil prices in the long term. As the war drug on countries like the US and Japan used their strategic reserves to keep oil prices artificially low, once again wrongly believing that the war would end soon.

Now California will hit tank bottoms for jet fuel and diesel by July 4th. Everything runs on diesel. Without it nothing gets to the stores. Food riots will begin within a few days of fuel running out. Everything including the sh*t is going to hit the fan very soon. Prayed up and prepped up, time is almost up!

I found these tweets on Winterwatch.net. I definitely recommend subscribing to them for more updates.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

« Older Entries Recent Entries »