Category Archives: Uncategorized

“Our Species is Being Genetically Modified”: Humanity’s March Toward Extinction? Analysis of the Microbiome and Virome

person holding a mug

This is an excellent article written by David Skirpac regarding viruses and the lies surrounding pathogens and how they’re transmitted. As you’ll see Western medicine is based on the flawed (to say the least) “germ theory” put forth by Louis Pasteur. As you will see NO VACCINE is safe or effective and is based upon flawed “science” that brings massive amounts of liability free profits to big pharma. I have also made a video on the subject posted below. Reposted with permission by globalresearch.ca.

First published by Global Research on October 4, 2021

This year marks a seminal turning point in human history. For the first time since human civilization began, our species is being genetically modified. Vaccine manufacturers have now made it possible for the human genome to be permanently altered—and humanity’s relationship with nature forever changed—by means of an experimental pharmaceutical injection that is being falsely referred to as a “vaccine.”

In light of this defining event, I believe we must take a sober look at the motives and acts that are revamping humanity as we know it. Simultaneously, we must examine our increasingly destructive treatment of the natural world. 

In order to investigate the many variables that are hastening the demise of humanity and sabotaging our unique role as stewards of the earth and its billions of plant and animal species, I have divided this study into four main parts, which will appear as separate articles: 

In Part I: The Microbiome and The Virome, we will discover that we are literally swimming in a vast sea of genomic information that was essential for life to begin and flourish on this precious earth and that is still trying to help all species survive. The matrix of organisms that make up the microbiome have built a viromic information stream that has allowed for adaptation and biodiversity to occur on the planet. And that very same viromic information stream is responsible for building the human species.

In Part lIOur War Against Nature, we will explore how our own reckless behaviour is destroying the environment, thereby moving us toward the sixth mass extinction. By that I mean, I will be covering the real environmental catastrophe, not the billionaire-funded “global warming/climate change” hoax initiated by the Club of Rome and further promulgated by the World Economic Forum (WEF). 

In Part III: What Happened in 2020, we will examine how this real environmental devastation has contributed to the “pandemic” that was rolled out in 2020, that led to the mass experimental injections of unknown substances into human “subjects” in 2021, and that has no foreseeable end. (I put “pandemic” in quotes because of its fraudulent character. Indeed, it is more accurately and aptly described as a plandemic, a scamdemic, a pseudo pandemic or any other term indicating fakery.)  

In Part IV: Our Response, we will analyze the irresponsible and irrational response of most people on the planet to this so-called pandemic. 

Parts II, III and IV will be published later by Global Research.

The Microbiome  

The microbiome (derived from the Greek words micro, meaning “small,” and biotikos, meaning “pertaining to life”) is a massive ecosystem consisting of trillions of microorganisms. Incredibly, some 40,000 species of bacteria, 300,000 species of parasites, 65,000 species of protozoa, and between 3.5 million and 5 million species of fungi inhabit the environment around us and live in or on the human body. This complex world of microorganisms continually secretes a sea of viruses, which serve as a communication network for the bacteria, parasites, protozoa, and fungi. And, as we will discover shortly, these viruses have always been here to help us, not hinder us. In other words, they are life-affirming, not death-inducing.

Here’s a hint of the microbiome’s intricacy, incredible diversity, and infinitesimal size: The number of genes within the fungal kingdom is at least 125 trillion! The human genome, by comparison, consists of a mere 20,000 genes. A fruit fly has 13,000 genes, a flea 31,000. Thus, in terms of genetic complexity, the human genome has just a tiny fragment of genetic information compared to the vast world of genomic information contained within the microbiome. 

One fascinating aspect of the microbiome is its symbiotic communication network, which allows the transmission of protein information from one microorganism to one another. For example, the mycelial network (a matrix of fine white filaments) in fungi allows the fungi to communicate with each other over distances that can stretch to several kilometers. These mycelial structures are capable of transferring mineral and protein resources more than a kilometer. How? They use light energy and electrons that flow through the pathways within the soil system. In this way, the microbiome helps plants and other multicellular life forms flourish. It is no exaggeration to call the mycelial network in the fungal kingdom the literal “brain” of the planet. Incidentally, all of the tiny, intelligent organisms that make up the microbiome are powered by the biophotonic energy of the sun.

Hard as it is to fathom, at least 1.4 quadrillion bacteria and 10 quadrillion fungi live inside the human body. Within the human colon alone are 3.8 x 1013bacteria cells. Every single organ in the body, including the brain, has its own microbiome. The purpose of the bacteria and fungi in our bodies is to nourish and nurture our cells, keeping us healthy and in equilibrium with the larger microbiome surrounding us. 

The Virome

The virome is the immense world in which Mother Nature’s messengers exist. It is composed of trillions upon trillions of viruses produced by the aforementioned microbiome’s bacteria, parasites, protozoa, and fungi.

The average adult human body contains 1 x 1015 viruses. By contrast, in the air enveloping the earth there are 1 x 1031viruses; in the earth’s soil there are 2.5 x 1031 viruses; and in the earth’s oceans there are 1.2 x 1030viruses. To provide some perspective on these awe-inspiring numbers, 1 x 1031is 10 million times greater than the number of known stars in the entire universe.

Simply put, a virus is genomic information, either DNA or RNA, wrapped in a protein envelope. The small strands of protein protruding outward from the outer surface of a virus’s protein envelope are called spike proteins. Viruses are not living organisms. They do not produce their own fuel. They have no metabolism for producing energy. And they cannot reproduce. 

Viruses have been traveling globally, above the atmospheric boundary layer, for millions of years, long before machines for air travel were invented. Their genetic codes have been blanketing the earth for eons, creating biodiversity and allowing for adaptation throughout the ecosystem. By adaptation, I mean that viruses are always seeking to adapt their genetic codes for the purpose of creating resilient health in all of the planet’s life forms. It is ridiculous to suggest that, in order to travel from one region of the globe to another, a virus must hop on an aircraft, as RAND’s National Security Research Division would have us believe. 

Furthermore, viruses—including coronaviruses—do not come in waves and then disappear without a trace, only to miraculously reappear later in the same spot or a different one. Instead, viruses never leave, never expire. They inhabit every element in the environment around us. In short, they are omnipresent and ever-present.

Our relationship with particular viruses can change as a consequence of our harmful actions toward nature. Whenever humans poison and pollute the air, soil, and water, they create an imbalance between humanity and the virome—an imbalance that can cause us to come into disequilibrium with a particular virus.

Unfortunately, the allopathic medicine regime, which plutocrats John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie forced on most of the world with their 1910 Flexner Report, still has a large segment of the scientific community believing that bacteria, fungi, and viruses are our enemy.

The foundation of Rockefeller’s allopathic medicine scheme is Louis Pasteur’s flawed “germ theory,” which claims that outside microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses attack, invade, and infect the body, thereby causing disease.

Most of the Western world credits Pasteur (1822–1895) with playing a fundamental part in establishing what we call “modern medicine”—a paradigm that traces the origin of each disease to a single germ.

Without Pasteur’s theory, most modern drugs would never be produced, promoted, or prescribed—a fact that explains why today’s medical establishment and its codependent pharmaceutical industry refuse to recognise their flaws or own up to their ineffectiveness. 

By contrast, “terrain theory,” which was initiated by Claude Bernard (1813–1878) and later built upon by Antoine Béchamp (1816–1908), alleges that the terrain—that is, the internal environment of the body—and not an external germ determines our health or lack thereof. What Béchamp referred to as “terrain” is very close to what modern medicine has now termed the innate immune system. As we will see in the following paragraphs, Béchamp was definitely on the right track in discovering how the human body really interacts with the outside environment.

Unlike Pasteur, Béchamp did have an academic background in science. He believed disease to be a biological result of the changes that take place in the body when its metabolic processes become imbalanced. When the body is in a state of imbalance, Béchamp alleged, germs become symptoms that in turn stimulate more symptoms, which eventually lead to disease. 

Although Béchamp was moving in the right direction with his terrain theory, Rockefeller’s germ-dependent pharmaceutical tyranny has prevailed, due largely to substantial infusions of money, which Rockefeller and Carnegie gladly supplied in the form of grants to universities, hospitals, and medical research facilities. Their “philanthropic” largess, which easily exceeded $100 million, enabled them to influence the policy of the entire US medical establishment and eventually most of the Western nations, steering them toward an exclusively chemical-based allopathic regime.   

I contend in this article that, contrary to what Rockefeller medicine has been teaching us for over one hundred years, viruses are not here to attack our cells or to harm us in any other manner. On the contrary, the DNA and RNA genetic molecular information contained within the viruses are literally the building blocks of life on earth. To use a modern analogy, we can think of a virus’s information stream as a software update carrying important molecular intelligence that can be uploaded, when required, to any cell of a living multicellular organism—including any one of the 70 trillion cells contained in the human body. Our cells regulate which new genomic information is received and which information is not received. The viruses are simply seeking to adapt to the cells for the purpose of creating resilient human health.

A word here about the immune system. There are two kinds of immunity: innate and adaptive. 

The innate immune system is the initial and primary means by which our bodies interact with a virus. The innate system helps the body find a genetic balance with each new viral update that is being presented to it. The body does not need to replicate or reproduce the new viral information after more than 4 or 5 days of updates.

The innate immune system functions on healthy boundaries in the human body, such as the physical barriers between the gut and the bloodstream, or on the blood vessels that tightly regulate the movement of ions, molecules, and cells between the bloodstream and the brain (termed the blood-brain barrier), or at the genetic level in our cells (like the mutagen proteins in our cells). Also, the innate immune system operates through a variety of enzymes—like the APOBec3A/3G and CAS9. These enzymes are now considered central to innate immunity. 

The adaptive immune system is the secondary means by which our bodies interact with viruses.

The adaptive system mounts a highly specific response to a virus by utilizing the body’s white blood cells, known as lymphocytes (B cells and T cells). The B cells are responsible for releasing antibodies into the bloodstream. Antibodies are the body’s second—not first—method of interaction with a virus after it receives a new viral update or after it develops an imbalance with a particular virus. Antibodies are specific, targeted defences. They usually show up on the scene 3 to 6 weeks after the body’s initial exposure to a virus. Simply put, antibodies act like a cleanup crew, assisting the body in cleaning out viruses and bacteria that are no longer needed. Meanwhile, the T cells are responsible for stimulating the B cells into making antibodies.    

To understand how quickly the human body adapts when exposed to the virome, consider a seven-day-old infant. He has 1 x 108 virus particles in just one gram of feces. Even though that child does not have the capacity to develop any antibodies at such an early stage in life, he nonetheless instantly adapts to these virus particles, remaining perfectly healthy. Instead of developing a fever, he remains in stable equilibrium—homeostasis—with the virome, both microbially and genetically. That fact alone proves that we do not interact with the virome through our adaptive immune system but, rather, interact with it through our innate immune system.

What is the key takeaway from these facts? To me, it is that the body’s decision to take in genetic information is a highly intricate and controlled biological process. There are numerous ways our bodies stay in equilibrium with the huge sea of genetic information that we breathe in and come into contact with every moment of our lives.

Since a virus is not a living organism, our innate immune system cannot kill viruses—nor would it want to. Instead, as mentioned above, the innate immune system simply comes into genetic balance with a new virus. It does this by replicating or receiving updates from that virus—and by immediately responding to that new viral upload. Once genetic balance has been achieved, typically 4 to 5 days after initial exposure to the virus, our innate immune system refuses to receive further updates. 

From these facts, we may conclude that humans cannot stop an “epidemic” from occurring, nor can they change the trajectory of an epidemic. In other words, it is useless—actually, worse than useless: it is harmful—to try to check an always-helpful virus by deploying an unapproved experimental gene-editing device that is designed to produce an antibody response (otherwise known as an adaptive immune system response induced by the injection). That antiquated scientific model is biologically illogical and can never work. We now know that it interferes with our beautifully designed innate immune system, which is perfectly capable of handling any virus with which we may develop a temporary imbalance. (Exactly how we develop an imbalance with a particular virus, like the HIV virus or any coronavirus, will be explained later in the article).

Furthermore, contrary to the official narrative propagated by vaccine makers and governmental health agencies around the world, our immune systems do retain a memory of the viruses that our bodies have interacted with and of the genes that were inserted naturally—upon receiving a new viral update—into our cells. In the innate immune system, for instance, the Cas9 enzyme, which is responsible for cleaving excess DNA when too much of a viral upload is presented to a cell, is the natural memory data bank that will remember which DNA pattern it encountered. 

In addition, the permanent records kept by an innate immune system are passed down to succeeding generations of humans, who therefore will never have an inflammatory-inducing reaction to a particular virus. Even in the adaptive immune system, the B cells (the source of antibodies) and T cells (the B cells’ stimulus) provide lasting immunity. 

A multipronged NIH study presented by the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) in 2008 proved conclusively that antibody immunity can last for a lifetime. In that study, a group of scientists, led by Dr. Eric Altschuler, collected blood samples from 32 survivors—between the ages of 91 and 101—of the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic. (Actually, the correct name for that pandemic is the Kansas Flu—its place of origin.) To their amazement, the scientists discovered that, almost a century later, all of the study’s participants still carried the antibodies to the same strain of influenza. 

Based on the findings of that 21-year-old study, we can dismiss the propaganda foisted upon us by the mainstream media and medical organizations. It is not true that natural immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus may wear off six months to a year after initial exposure. And it is not true that an experimental injection is the only way one can reach immunity. Such unfounded claims are simply ruses invented to further the avaricious agenda of the pharmaceutical industry and the other technocrats operating behind the scenes. 

Bottom line: The power of natural immunity will always outperform any perceived immunity to a virus said to result from an injection, whether experimental or government-approved. 

Biologically speaking, all life on earth is built from the RNA and DNA molecular genetic sequences contained in viruses. These viruses are exquisitely designed genetic delivery systems essential to initiating and sustaining life on earth. In fact, more than 50 percent of the 20,000 genes inherited by today’s humans were inserted millions of years ago into the mammalian genome by these tiny marvels of nature. At least 8 percent of those genes were inserted by RNA retroviruses similar to the HIV retrovirus. (A retrovirus is an RNA virus which inserts a DNA copy of its genome into the host cell in order to replicate itself.) Equally intriguing is the fact that millions of years ago retroviral updates played a key role in the emergence of placental mammals

Interestingly, a 2017 study published by the National Institute of Health (NIH) demonstrates that many of us are carrying the HIV retrovirus without even knowing it. In this study, the researchers “explored non-human sequence data from whole-genome sequencing” the blood of 8,240 adults living in the US and Europe—none of whom were ascertained to have any infectious disease. They found that a full 42 percent of the participants tested positive for the presence of 94 known viruses. These viruses included the HIV virus, the hepatitis B virus, the hepatitis C virus, and the influenza virus.                                                                      

We have been trained by the medical community and the corporate-controlled media to believe that the HIV virus should predominate in people living in Sub-Saharan Africa. After all, we are told, 95 percent of all “HIV positive” cases come from that region of the globe. If that were the case, we would expect to see in other regions very little HIV and a far higher prevalence of, say, hepatitis C or influenza. Not so: It is just the reverse! In fact, the 2017 study found a fivefold higher prevalence of the HIV virus than of hepatitis C and influenza in those 8,240 asymptomatic Americans and Europeans. Amazingly, each one was completely in balance with the HIV virus, even though none of them had ever travelled to Africa. We must conclude from this study that not only has the world completely misunderstood the prevalence of the HIV virus in all corners of the globe but that our fear of it—and of the virome in general—is entirely unjustified. 

Given that many powerful organizations, both public and private, profit from the huge grants and donations that perpetuate the endless AIDS movement, it is unsurprising that no scientific peer-reviewed study has been done to provide conclusive evidence that a virus called HIV causes a disease named AIDS. Were any such study to be undertaken, it would prove that the HIV-leads-to-AIDS hypothesis is baseless and, more to the point, fraudulent.

The question scientists should be focusing on is: What is taking place in Sub-Saharan Africa that is creating such an abnormal relationship between people living in that area and the HIV retrovirus, causing 95 percent of them to test HIV-positive? 

For an answer to that question, we need to look at the terrain where viruses reside and stay in balance with the human body. (By “terrain” I mean a geographic area with its associated ecosystem. I am not referring here to the aforementioned Bernard/Béchamp terrain theory.) When a terrain is disrupted by anything unnatural to it—for example, poisoning of the environment by irresponsible human behaviour—the viruses become overexpressed and the body’s balance with the virome is lost. 

Taking account of the terrain, we find that the number one factor common to all so-called infectious disease epidemics or pandemics is the destruction of the ecosystem. In other words, the natural terrain has been altered by irresponsible human behaviour to such an extent that our innate adaptation to all the genetic information surrounding us is undermined. 

It is not that the viruses are causing a disease. Rather, it is that they are simply presenting the body with a new genetic adaptation option. The body’s innate immune system then determines how much of that new information it will absorb. If the cells are in dire need of repair—perhaps as a result of poor dietary choices, a sedentary lifestyle, or toxicity in the environment—the virus will create an inflammation event as the body goes through its regenerative process. This is usually accompanied by a fever, loss of appetite, and an elevated white blood cell count. Such an inflammatory event is what we commonly refer to as “the flu.” 

What we derogatively call an inflammatory event—implying it is bad for the body—is actually a part of the body’s healing process. The inflammation is needed to create regeneration within the body. It is acting on behalf of the body, not against it. But if the body’s microbiome is replete instead of wanting, it will not need an update, and therefore no inflammation will take place. 

In the case of Sub-Saharan Africa, the ecosystem is dying. The collapse of nutrient-rich soil systems, poor water hygiene, a lack of basic sanitation, a chronically undernourished population, and the complete elimination of traditional organic farming—overtaken by the oxymoronic Green Revolution, foisted on developing countries by industrial agriculture—have caused a large portion of that population to develop an imbalance between their innate immune system and the environment. The syndrome known as “AIDS” is an expression of that imbalance. The HIV virus, which was first discovered by French virologist Luc Montagnier, has been falsely accused of being the primary culprit responsible for AIDS—a form of guilt by association. In actual fact, the HIV virus is benign and is not trying to take over the mechanics of any cell. 

The real root of the problem is that the innate immune system of the Sub-Saharan African people has been degraded by a lack of nutrition to such an extent that they are falling prey to a myriad of illnesses, which have been collectively grouped under the single title “AIDS.” However, instead of coming to terms with the reality of what the dire ecological disaster is causing, “scientists” are blaming the HIV virus as a cover to hide decades of government and corporate environmental and economic crimes.

From the information covered thus far, we can rightly conclude that it is impossible for viruses or pathogens to create infectious disease pandemics and epidemics—for there is no such thing as an infectious disease in the traditional sense of the term—examples being “AIDS,” “Ebola,” and other unfounded “viral” pandemics. Yes, pharmaceutical propaganda has been pushing the infectious disease paradigm on world thought for centuries. But the belief that such diseases exist is no more than an outgrowth of Pasteur’s debunked germ theory. What we commonly refer to as an epidemic or a pandemic is simply the result of a degraded innate immune system showing up in a segment of the planet’s population. The reasons for this degradation can include chemical poisoning from herbicides, pesticides, or genetically modified foods, which we will look at in more detail below. 

As we can see by the above description of the virome, it is no exaggeration to say that the virome is the language of all life on earth. We are literally swimming in a vast sea of genomic information that was essential for life to begin and flourish on this precious earth and that is still trying to help all species survive. The matrix of organisms that make up the microbiome have built a viromic information stream that has allowed for adaptation and biodiversity to occur on the planet. And that very same viromic information stream is responsible for building the human species.

Thus, humans are not separate from the virome and the microbiome but are, rather, integral to the virome and microbiome’s vast, complex ecosystem. Yet we have increasingly placed ourselves in direct opposition to the very living system of which we are an intrinsic part: nature.

Original article here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/humanity-march-toward-extinction/5750260

Terrain vs Germ Theory

The Flexner Report

Bitchute Version of my video

Rumble Version of my video

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon and PayPal are gone so now we have Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below. 

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Situation for Kiev is “very, very difficult” – US top general

Lucas Leiroz, researcher in Social Sciences at the Rural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro; geopolitical consultant.

While Western journalists insist that Ukraine is “winning” the conflict, experienced military and analysts continue to point to the evident fact that Russia cannot be defeated so easily. In a recent interview, a top US general commented that the situation is very complicated for the Ukrainians, who will have many difficulties to fulfill their promise to “expel” Russian forces from territories already reintegrated into Moscow’s sovereign space.

According to the chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, Ukraine will face many problems in order to achieve its military objectives in the current conflict against Russia. He points out that most Western leaders, and even the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, despite the bellicose speech, believe that the resolution of the conflict will be done through diplomatic negotiations instead of by force. Milley seems skeptical of any possibility of Ukrainian success through the military dispute.

Milley also commented on the time it would take to end hostilities. Although some Ukrainian and Western politicians claim that they plan to expel the Russians as soon as possible, he does not believe in the possibility of this process being completed by 2023. The solid positions maintained by the Russian forces in the regions newly integrated into the Federation make it difficult to believe in the possibility of a rapid military reversal strong enough to guarantee Kiev the control of these territories.

“President Biden, President Zelensky, and most of the leaders of Europe have said this war is likely to end in a negotiation (…) From a military standpoint, this is a very, very difficult fight (…) I still maintain that for this year, it would be very, very difficult to militarily eject the Russian forces from every inch of Russian-occupied Ukraine (…) That doesn’t mean it can’t happen, doesn’t mean it won’t happen. But it’d be very, very difficult”, he said during the interview.

Milley’s views sound realistically. He makes it clear that Ukraine’s weaknesses will not be overcome so easily, despite Western help. The US alone has already sent over 110 billion dollars in military aid to Kiev, providing packages that include heavy weapons, combat vehicles, anti-aircraft systems and over a million artillery shells. Europe and NATO allied nations are also providing everything they can to the Ukrainian neo-Nazi regime. However, Russian military superiority sounds evident, as Moscow celebrates more and more important victories, such as the recent seizures of Soledar and Klescheevka.

There are many factors that explain Russia’s success despite Western aid to Ukraine. Moscow’s focus is on avoiding a war of attrition that needlessly kills Russian soldiers and civilians. For this, there is a strategic direction of the fighting forces to key regions, where the military victory makes viable the cutting of the supply lines of the Ukrainian forces. Also, Russian artillery focuses on big military zones and infrastructure facilities, while parallel troops, such as the private military company “Wagner Group” play the role of infantry force, mainly in urban areas.

On the other hand, Kiev seems to have difficulties in strategically managing the conflict. Despite NATO’s support, the Ukrainian forces, as already reported by several on the ground informants, are marked by disorganization and corruption. Most Western weapons are absolutely new to the Ukrainian soldiers, who do not know how to operate them correctly, often causing damages against their own side.

Furthermore, Ukrainians seem to prioritize territory over human lives, unlike Russians. While Moscow constantly promotes strategic retreats to save lives, Kiev keeps troops in the trenches even when the battles are virtually lost. The result is the death of thousands of soldiers in unnecessary combat. These soldiers are replaced by new fighters, with not enough training and no military experience, resulting in strategic errors and more deaths.

In addition, it is important to mention that since 2014 Kiev deliberately attacks civilians and this has been getting worse as heavy weapons from the West arrive in the country. Much of the equipment imported by Ukraine has been used in demilitarized areas in Donbass for the sole purpose of murdering ethnic Russian civilians, without any military gain, which makes it even more complicated for this Western aid to have any real impact in the conflict.

In fact, Milley’s words just confirm what has already become a constant conclusion among military experts: Kiev is not able to defeat Russia – both because Moscow is militarily stronger and because of the lack of organizational and administrative capacity on the part of the Ukrainians. The possibility of a real military reversal would only happen in a scenario of more direct NATO’s intervention, but in this case the war would certainly escalate to the nuclear level and end without winners.

On the near horizon, only the Russian victory looks like a real scenario. The best to do is to resume the talks, with Kiev fully accepting Russian ceasefire terms. As Milley suggested, Western politicians themselves believe this, but they prefer to continue funding the conflict just to try to destabilize Russia’s strategic environment as much as possible, even if it costs the lives of Ukrainian citizens.

You can follow Lucas on Twitter and Telegram.

Vaccinated Elderly Woman Suffers the “Death Spin” but lived to tell the tale of the demons she saw…

She said the worst part was how real it all was, even the horrible smells!

WEF AT DAVOS SAYS YOU AND I ARE “HACKABLE HUMANS” AND THEY WILL KNOW YOUR VERY THOUGHTS

Nothing is sacred anymore and their agenda is out in the open. They want you dead or a complete slave to them. In today’s video you’ll see HOW they will achieve this and in fact already have achieved it through their nanotech! All of the links will be below.

Hackable Humans Article

DNA Imprinted onto your digital ID

Chemtrails, What is in them

Geoengineered Transhumanism Book

Bitchute Version of my Video

Rumble Version of my video

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon and PayPal are gone so now we have Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below. 

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

50% of Davos Invitees CANCEL, Including Soros, Russia and NATO War Updates

high saturated silhouette photography of three person standing near red and white cross printed flag

DAVOS Story

UK/NATO Tanks to Ukraine

NATO Alarmed by Russian Frigate

Former French Volunteer seeks asylum in Russia

Bitchute Link

Rumble Link

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon and PayPal are gone so now we have Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below. 

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

The CIA Warned Us and now its here, Geoengineered Transhumanism

The Bible warns us too, in Revelation 13: 16-17. Look at where this stuff migrates due to body temperature changes in the body…the forehead under the hairline or the back of the hand! All of that and more in today’s shocking video. You’ll be floored when you see how far along things are and how fast it’s moving! Oh and they’ve made it all “legal” by using the public health laws against us by reclassifying men, women and children as military targets.

It’s not a medical experiment to make you well, its a kill shot designed to kill you or force you to comply with their agenda by transforming and controlling you.

Weaponizing Laws for Genocide

CIA Warns of Future Bioweapons 2003

Geoengineered Transhumanism Book by Elana Freeland

Interview of Elana Freeland, Author of the above book

Bitchute Version of my video

Rumble Version of my video

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon and PayPal are gone so now we have Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below. 

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Japan and Britain sign military agreement aimed at containing China and Russia

Ahmed Adel, Cairo-based geopolitics and political economy researcher

The Prime Ministers of Japan and the United Kingdom signed an agreement on January 11 to formalise a military alliance between their two countries. The agreement, signed by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, stipulates joint military exercises, permits the deployment of troops in their countries, and determines the legal status of these personnel while they are abroad.

At the signing ceremony, Sunak said: “In the past 12 months, we have written the next chapter of the relationship between the UK and Japan – accelerating, building, and deepening our ties. We have so much in common: a shared outlook on the world, a shared understanding of the threats and challenges we face, and a shared ambition to use our place in the world for global good, ensuring our countries prosper for generations to come.”

As for challenges and threats, London and Tokyo believe they come mainly from China and Russia, and to a lesser extent North Korea.

James Crisp, a correspondent for The Telegraph, wrote: “Rishi Sunak and Fumio Kishida, the Japanese prime minister, signed a defence agreement in London that will provide the bedrock for large-scale drills to face down Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong-un.”

For her part, Hikariko Ono, Kishida’s press secretary, said “Unfortunately, we’ve been seeing that China and Russia have been conducting joint military drills very frequently.” She then criticised North Korea’s missile tests. 

More alarmingly for Moscow-Tokyo relations, the Telegraph reported that the new deal will allow Japanese troops to be based in the UK where they could help train Ukrainian soldiers alongside other nations, as well as British troops to be stationed in Japan. Despite the fact that the individual military power of China, Russia and North Korea far exceeds that of Japan, none of these countries are threatening an invasion or making territorial claims – in fact, it is Japan that has a longer history of attacking or threatening these countries.

However, Japan can attempt to justify its militarisation as it does neighbour three nuclear powers, two of which are ranked #2 (Russia) and #3 (China) according to Global Fire Power’s 2023 Military Strength Ranking. Proving that China, North Korea, and Russia also pose a threat to the UK is even more difficult considering the vast geographical distances.

Not long ago, under the David Cameron government (2010-2016), relations between London and Beijing were described as being in a “Golden Age” because of close economic ties. When Donald Trump entered the White House in 2017, Britain quickly submitted to his anti-China policy. Like Washington, the British attacked the communist ideology of China’s ruling party and alleged human rights violations. Sunak also emphasised the common values ​​of the British and Japanese ruling classes, which are conservative liberalism and anti-communism.

However, it was not just the interests of defending Western values ​​that prompted London to sign a new military agreement with Tokyo. The military cooperation agreement with Japan confirms that the UK intends to reclaim a strong presence in the Asia-Pacific region. It can be said that this has been somewhat successful in the military front as British warships and aircraft repeatedly and provocatively pass through the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait, and then into Japanese ports. 

London also intends to expand its economic presence in the Asia-Pacific region. The British government has repeatedly signalled that they want their country to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

In this way, a new military alliance is being formed with the clear objective of opposing some sovereign states. It is recalled that Tokyo signed a defence alliance with Australia in 2022 and it is likely that the Japanese government will sign similar agreements with other Western countries. 

The US encourages close military ties between Japan and Britain as it serves its wider strategy to oppose and contain China and Russia in the Pacific region. It is for this reason that the AUKUS (Australia, UK, and USA) formation was established in September 2021, which was preceded by the foundation of QUAD (Australia, India, Japan, and USA) in 2017.

Washington encourages enhanced defence cooperation between London and Tokyo. A greater British military presence in the Asia-Pacific region and a Japan with a more powerful military means that the US will waste less resources. It will also advance the US’ strategy to confront and contain China and Russia.

However, if stability and security worsen as a result of the British-Japanese military agreement, regional countries, particularly those in Southeast Asia, will begin opposing such an alliance. This could have the opposite effect from Washington’s anticipated hope of having Japan and the UK cooperate in policing the western Pacific, especially as regional states are unwilling to cut ties with China and Russia.

Covid-19 bioweapons and the Defense Production Act of 1950

Bioweapons

This is a repost of Bailiwick Substack blog by Katherine Watt. First up some commentary from me.

Here are more facts that show you how the US government has been co-opted by the giant pharmaceutical companies who have now been folded into the Federal government. They are the ones in charge along with the heads of FEMA and HHS who have been implementing these emergency orders.

Also in today’s post we have a video detailing some of the documents that reveal that it was the Pentagon and DOD who were in charge of the vaccination program from the very beginning.

There will be NO RELIEF in the US courts as the public health laws have been rewritten to make sure that everyone from big pharma on down to the nurses administering the shots are immune from prosecution. Now for Katherines very informative blog.

Reader comment:

Karen Kingston just put up another piece about the contract and it’s getting weird because it seems like we’re talking about two different things entirely.

My reply, expanded:

I think the divergence lies in the difference between a pharmaceutical corporation operating as a private, commercial business, and a pharmaceutical corporation that has been folded into the government’s national security complex through invoking of the Defense Production Act of 1950, PL 81-774, 64 Stat. 798.

Nov. 22, 2021 – Domestic Funding for COVID-19 Vaccines: An OverviewCongressional Research Service

Research and Development, Manufacture, and Purchase

COVID-19 vaccine R&D, manufacture, and purchase have been largely supported by a collaboration among several federal agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) of HHS, and DOD— formerly Operation Warp Speed (OWS) and now the Countermeasures Acceleration Group (CAG).

Six vaccines were chosen for coordinated federal support under OWS. Some vaccine R&D has been supported by NIH, BARDA, and DOD separately from the OWS/CAG efforts.

NIH and DOD: FY2020 and FY2021 supplemental appropriations to NIH and DOD for COVID-19-related R&D can fund vaccine R&D. In the FY2020 and FY2021 supplemental appropriations acts, NIH received over$1.5 billion, available until September 30, 2024, broadly for COVID-19 related research.

The CARES Act (P.L. 116- 136) provided DOD with $415 million for COVID-19 medical R&D in the Defense Health Program account with some flexibility to reallocate other funds toward R&D.

BARDA and Other R&D, Manufacture, and Purchase:

In the FY2020 and FY2021 supplemental appropriations acts, over $50 billion in Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (PHSSEF) funding, available until September 30, 2024, is designated for a broad set of medical countermeasures and surge capacity purposes, including for the development, manufacture, and purchase of vaccines and related supplies.

The PHSSEF account funds BARDA, the main entity that has awarded large funding agreements to pharmaceutical companies for vaccine development, manufacture,and purchase.

Not less than $23.2 billion is set aside for BARDA in the FY2020 andFY2021 supplemental appropriations that can be used for vaccine-related efforts.

[American Rescue Plan Act, PL 117-2] further provides two relevant mandatory appropriations:

(1) in Section 2303, $6.05 billion, available until expended, to HHS for R&D, manufacturing, production, and purchase of vaccines and other medical products—available for COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 or its variants, and any disease with potential for creating a pandemic; and

(2) in Section 3101, $10 billion, available until September 30, 2025, for activities under the Defense Production Act (DPA) for the purchase, production and distribution of medical supplies, including vaccines and related supplies, among others. Both of these ARPA appropriations have been assigned to HHS accounts—the first to PHSSEF and the second to a new HHSDPA [Health and Human Services Defense Production Act] account.


For more on the HHSDPA, see March 27, 2020 Executive Order 13911Delegating Additional Authority Under the Defense Production Act With Respect to Health and Medical Resources To Respond to the Spread of COVID–19, and Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security June 30, 2022 PowerPoint:

The pharmaceutical corporations have essentially turned into a branch of the federal government, whose agents have been granted sovereign immunities and set beyond ordinary judicial proceedings, short of treason, sedition and bioterrorism prosecutions. Source is HERE.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon and PayPal are gone so now we have Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below. 

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Victory in Soledar shows how Russia militarily controls the conflict

Lucas Leiroz, researcher in Social Sciences at the Rural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro; geopolitical consultant.

Despite the unsubstantiated discourse of the western media about a possible “Ukrainian victory”, Russian forces continue to advance on the battlefield, obtaining important territorial gains and controlling strategic points that will be fundamental to defeat the Kiev’s neo-Nazi regime in the near future. In the second week of January, the city of Soledar was the main focus of the conflict, with Russian troops achieving total control of the region, imposing a great loss on the enemy.

On January 10, the Russian private military company Wagner Group notified that it had completely taken over the city of Soledar, neutralizing the enemy forces that were concentrated there. Hundreds of Ukrainian soldiers died or were captured during the intense fighting. The head of the Wagner Group, Russian businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin, commented on the case in a public statement about the takeover of Soledar. Prigozhin emphasized that only the Wagner Group worked in the region, without support from any other combat unit of the Russian forces:

“Wagner units have taken control of all the territory of Soledar. I want to emphasize that no units other than the Wagner fighters took part in the assault on Soledar”, he said on January 10. The next day he made another statement, updating about the number of casualties and highlighting that the entire city is under Russian control. He estimates that around 500 Ukrainians were killed. He also stated that, as the enemy troops were neutralized and all civilians previously evacuated, there is no need to create a humanitarian corridor in Soledar.

“I want to repeat that Soledar has been fully liberated and cleared of Ukrainian army units (…) The Ukrainian troops that refused to surrender have been destroyed (…) The entire town is littered with the bodies of Ukrainian servicemen (…) There can be no word of any humanitarian corridor”, he added.

The victory in Soledar is undoubtedly important from a military point of view, as it guarantees Moscow’s forces a privileged geographical position, which will be very useful for the next stages of the conflict. By controlling Soledar, the Russians can cut off some of the most important supply routes for the Ukrainian forces that still occupy some regions of the Donetsk People’s Republic, such as Bakhmut, which is expected to be also fully liberated soon. In this way, by expelling the Ukrainian military from the city, the Russians significantly advance in the objective of consolidating the reintegration of Donetsk into the Russian Federation.

However, there is another important factor in this event, which is the weakening of Western propaganda about a possible “Ukrainian victory” or “counter offensive”. As Prigozhin emphasized, only Wagner Group was involved in the fighting in Soledar, while other Russian units were focused on other regions. Therefore, the Russians managed to control a key strategic zone using only the power of a private military company, without having to deploy any of the recently mobilized soldiers on the field.

This shows how Moscow, despite recently increasing the number of troops involved in combat, continues to employ only a small portion of its military capacity in the special operation. There are basically two reasons for adopting this strategy: the first and most important is to avoid civilian casualties, which inevitably increase when combat intensity is high; the second is to avoid heavy losses of troops and resources in exhausting battles. With this strategy, the Russians have achieved a slow but safe progress, without major losses of soldiers and resources, in addition to maintaining the lowest ratio of civilian casualties in a war since the WWI.

Indeed, if it was the Russian intention to advance devastatingly and control as many territories as possible in a short time, Moscow could allocate a large number of mobilized soldiers in the regions controlled by Ukraine, as well as further intensify the use of artillery and air power. But, on the contrary, Russian strategy is focused on bombing infrastructure and advancing on the ground with the minimum possible number of soldiers. Thus, deaths of both Russians and civilians are avoided. 

In this sense, the victory in Soledar using only the potential of the Wagner Group shows how Moscow really maintains the military control of the conflict. By employing few resources and avoiding unnecessary casualties, important achievements have been made. While, on the other hand, the Ukrainians increasingly waste their resources, lose their soldiers and are unable to maintain any effective strategic planning, despite the support they receive from NATO.

 You can follow Lucas on Twitter and Telegram.

« Older Entries