Hello everyone it’s that time again! It’s time to cover our expenses for the month and we have some new expenses that have popped up thanks to the censorship at YouTube. We are going to expand the storage on Vimeo and Dropbox among other things in order to combat the censorship!
Help us stay in the fight and support us at the link below or in the donation section of the website. Thank you and God bless!
The Fundraiser link is HERE. Thank you once again.
And just like that here it comes, less than a week after we reported it here on Don’t speak news! If you recall last week we reported to you that Canada was headed for a second wave lockdown and that the rest of the world would follow. Well it appears that time has arrived because as predicted the new mutated strain of Covid19 is here and if the information we have holds true, they’ll call this new mutation Covid-21! This is the reason the first round of vaccines won’t work and you’ll need the new and improved version!
First here is last weeks show to help put this into context:
And now today’s video on the new mutation found in Norway and the implications moving forward!
This is the video that was banned from YT. It shows you have they’re using the temperature scanning to acclimate you for the new mark of the beast technology. Everything is in place, its just a matter of when they roll it out. Stand firm and be ready!
And if you refuse you get sent to camp. Period. These videos would get taken down from YouTube so I had to put them here. I had to separate the two videos in order to get them to work. Please share with everyone you know. God bless and keep praying and prepping!
Today I’m sharing a video from Leeland Jones who came up with some excellent information on this subject! The “God Gene” video isn’t a hoax, they’ve been working on eliminating this gene since 1917! Once again nothing new under the sun.
I’m sharing the video here instead of on my main YouTube channel because it may get taken down and I want to preserve the information. Plus it could result in another guidelines strike due to the nature of the information. Sadly we are not firmly in the era of big brother and the extreme censorship of anything that goes against the mainstream narrative.
You can find Leeland Jones’ channel HERE with a TON of video on this and many other end time subjects! Below are the links he provided in the video description.
One big reason masks are useless is that ASYMPTOMATIC PEOPLE DON’T TRANSMIT THE VIRUS! The WHO came out and said this on June 9th, 2020 but the story was buried quickly as they knew the mask mandates were coming. Below you can see a video I made on this subject back in June.
Below are links from thehealthyamerican.org that show you the science behind what I’m saying. Peggy Hall deserves a round of applause for posting these links and her videos! Please share these far and wide before they disappear!
Science Says Healthy People Should Not Wear Masks
“How can a person be forced by any business or government entity to wear a mask (which affects the respiratory system) without having a physical exam by a licensed doctor who approves such an action?” ~ Peggy Hall
Science Says Healthy People Should Not Wear Masks
Masks reduce intake of oxygen, leading to carbon dioxide toxicity
Germs are trapped near your mouth and nose, increasing risk of infection
Wearing a mask causes you to touch your face more frequently
There is no scientific evidence that supports healthy people wearing masks
Masks obscure your facial features and impede normal social interaction
Masks make it hard for hearing-impaired people to understand you
Masks symbolize suppression of speech
MASKS DO NOT PREVENT SPREAD OF VIRUS
NOTE: Many links are being scrubbed (removed) from the Internet. We are updating as possible.
A study on health effects of wearing masks. While the study does not show long term health effects they will eventually be unavoidable because physiological short term symptoms are still present.
“Wearing an N95 for an entire 12-hour shift had statistically significant negative effects on some physiologic measures and subjective symptoms. Over time, nurses’ CO2 levels became significantly elevated, from a statistical standpoint, compared with beginning-of-shift baseline measures; perceived exertion; perceived shortness of air; and complaints of headache, lightheadedness, and difficulty communicating also increased over time (Tables 3 and and4 ). CO2 levels increased from a baseline average of 32.4 at the beginning of the shift to 41.0 at the end of each shift. There were no changes in nurses’ blood pressure, O2 levels, perceived comfort, perceived thermal comfort, or complaints of visual difficulties compared with baseline levels.” Source: Physiologic and other effects and compliance with long-term respirator use among medical intensive care unit nurses – Study
When a person has negative physiological symptoms for a long period of time it can cause stress and anxiety. “Being stressed out for a long period of time might increase anxiety, a new study shows. The study, published in Behavioral Neuroscience, lays some of the blame on stress hormones. Those stress hormones — such as cortisol and corticotropin-releasing hormone — can help respond to an immediate threat. Source: WebMd
Stress is a major contributor to disease manifestation since it is known to lower the immune system. “When we’re stressed, the immune system’s ability to fight off antigens is reduced. That is why we are more susceptible to infections. The stress hormone corticosteroid can suppress the effectiveness of the immune system (e.g. lowers the number of lymphocytes).” Source: Stress, Illness and the Immune System | Simply Psychology Website Study pdf link: Physiologic and other effects and compliance with long-term respirator use among medical intensive care unit nurses https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132714/
Face masks: “In our systematic review, we identified 10 RCTs that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018. In pooled analysis, we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks” Source: Article, Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures | From the Center for Disease Control Website
“Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids (36). There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.” Source: Article, Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures
Dept of Labor OSHA guidlines… Human beings must breathe oxygen to survive, and begin to suffer adverse health effects when the oxygen level of their breathing air drops below [19.5 percent oxygen]. Below 19.5 percent oxygen air is considered oxygen-deficient. At concentrations of 16 to 19.5 percent, people engaged in any form of exertion can rapidly become symptomatic as their tissues fail to obtain the oxygen necessary to function properly (Rom, W., Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2nd ed.; Little, Brown; Boston, 1992).
Wearing a mask can reduce oxygen intake by 20% or more causing the individuals oxygen inhalation to be well below the necessary 19.5 percent.
(1) New England Journal of Medicine: “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” LINK HERE
(2) CAL-OSHA Regulations: ”Cloth face coverings do not protect against COVD -19” LINK HERE
(3) California Department of Health: “Face coverings may increase risk if users reduce their use of strong defenses.” “There is limited evidence to suggest that use of cloth face coverings by the public during a pandemic could help reduce disease transmission.” LINK HERE
(4) FDA – “Even a properly fitted N95 mask does not prevent illness or death” LINK HERE
(6) Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock : ”There is no scientific evidence that masks are effective. If you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.” LINK HERE
(7) Columbia University: Psychological Harms of Face Masks: “Many young children burst into tears or recoil when someone wearing a mask approaches. By putting on masks, we take away information that makes it especially difficult for children to recognize others and read emotional signals, which is unsettling and disconcerting.” LINK HERE
(8) US Surgeon General Jerome Adams: ”Masks are not effective in preventing the general public from catching coronavirus.” LINK HERE
(9) Dr. Anthony Fauci: “People should not be walking around wearing masks. Masks do not provide the protection people think they do.”LINK HERE
(10) WHO, Dr. Mike Ryan: ”There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any potential benefit. In fact, there’s some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly. LINK HERE
(11) US Department of Labor — OSHA: ”Oxygen deficient is any atmosphere that contains less than19.5%.” This happens when the oxygen is displaced by inert gas such as CARBON DIOXIDE and is the leading cause of FATALITIES.” LINK HERE
As I said please share this and other posts like it with everyone you know before they’re all taken down! God bless and stay ready!
A recently published book explains in detail that there is no ‘decisive drop’ in cases due to stay-at-home mandates.
(LifeSiteNews) – Three U.S. professors argue that government-“mandated lockdowns” in the name of stopping COVID-19 had “little effect on the spread of the coronavirus.”
f lockdowns really altered the course of this pandemic, then coronavirus case counts should have clearly dropped whenever and wherever lockdowns took place.
“The effect should have been obvious, though with a time lag,” wrote professors Jay W. Richards, William M. Briggs, and Douglas Axe in an October 4 report published in the National Review.
“It takes time for new coronavirus infections to be officially counted, so we would expect the numbers to plummet as soon as the waiting time was over …
“To judge from the evidence, the answer is clear: Mandated lockdowns had little effect on the spread of the coronavirus.”
In the National Review report, the professors asked, “Did the lockdowns make a difference?”
They provided evidence through charts for 13 U.S. states with and without lockdowns.
“The charts … show the daily case curves for the United States as a whole and for 13 U.S. states. As in almost every country, we consistently see a steep climb as the virus spreads, followed by a transition to a flatter curve.
“At some point, the curves always slope downward, though this wasn’t obvious for all states until the summer,” the professors wrote.
“The lockdowns can’t be the cause of these transitions. In the first place, the transition happened even in places without lockdown orders (see Iowa and Arkansas).
“And where there were lockdowns, the transitions tended to occur well before the lockdowns could have had any serious effect.”
The professors explained the only exception could be California and Connecticut, which were the first states to lock down.
“Even in these places (California and Connecticut), though, the downward transitions probably started before the lockdowns could have altered the curves.
“The reason is that a one-day turnaround for COVID-19 test results probably wasn’t met in either state,” the professors wrote.
The professors also pointed out that there is no “decisive drop on the dates” whereby the lockdowns would have affected the course of the curve.
They also claim that if one is shown the curves in the charts without markings, they would not be able to tell when lockdowns took effect.
“Instead, the curves gradually bend downward for reasons that predate the lockdowns, with no clear changes 10 days later,” they wrote.
“Lockdown partisans might say that the curves would have been higher after the 10-day mark without the lockdown.
“While we can’t redo history to prove them wrong, the point is that the sudden and dramatic changes we should see if they were right aren’t there.
“If we showed people these curves without any markings, they would not be able to discern when or even if lockdowns went into effect.”
The professors’ charts are cited from a book they recently published titled The Price of Panic: How the Tyranny of Experts Turned a Pandemic into a Catastrophe.
Their National Review report concluded with them saying the scenario in the viruses’ decline is “likely attributable” to changing seasons or herd immunity.
“Something caused this overall decline. It couldn’t have been lockdowns, which weren’t maintained (or heeded) in full force through June. At the moment, we can only speculate,” the professors wrote.
“But if this virus is like others, its decline is likely attributable to some mix of changing seasons and the gradual onset of herd immunity. Another factor, of course, could be the widespread use of masks as the year progressed.”
The professors’ book, The Price of Panic, goes over the COVID-19 crisis, asking questions such as “How did politicians, who know nothing of the science, decide whom to trust?”
The book also asks, “What role have national and global health organizations such as WHO played in this? To whom are they accountable?” along with “How did science bureaucrats, relying on murky data and speculative computer models, gain the power to shut down the global economy?”
In summary, The Price of Panic asked, “We need to know what and how it happened, to keep it from ever happening again.”
Richards is an assistant research professor in the School of Business and Economics at The Catholic University of America, a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute, executive editor of The Stream and a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute.
Axe is the Maxwell Professor of Molecular Biology at Biola University and the founding director of Biologic Institute.
Briggs’ website lists him as a previous professor at the Cornell Medical School and former statistician at DoubleClick.
His website also says he is a “wholly independent vagabond writer, statistician, scientist and consultant.”
This post was taken down off the internet, probably to cover up potential war crimes. Armenia has been accusing Azerbaijan of using banned cluster bomb weapons on civilian areas (gee kind of like Israel in Gaza) publicly for days and now photographs and video are coming out proving the point, but they are being censored to death by YouTube and social media. I have put together some news reports and videos I’m finding to help get the word out. This conflict is getting worse and has the potential to spread quickly and possibly ignite WW3. Below is the article I found on the WayBack machine and my video on this subject.
1 Soldiers Have Died Since the Attacks Began on Sunday
Azerbaijani forces escalated their attacks on Artsakh by bombing the capital city of Stepanakert throughout the day on Friday, causing extensive structural damage and injuring scores of civilians, reported the Artsakh Defense Ministry.
Azerbaijani forces essentially carpet-bombed the city using Smerch and other advanced military hardware. Most residents sought refuge in bomb shelters, with damage detected to main infrastructure.
One of the worst hit facilities in Stepanakert was Artsakh Rescue Service Center, where Azerbaijani forces using cluster bombs attacks the first-responder center causing heavy damage.
“The Rescue Service building in Stepanakert is partially destroyed, windows are shattered, walls collapsed, vehicles at the parking lot were damages,” said head of the center, Armen Narimanyan.
According to preliminary reports, one person was killed and four wounded during the bombing of Stepanakert.
In addition to the Rescue Service Building, two residential buildings were heavily damaged.
Reports circulating on social media that claim Stepanakert residents have been evacuated is false, Artsakh officials said late Friday local time.
“This was the heaviest strike on Stepanakert,” said Artsakh Human Right Defender Artak Beglaryan.
Artsakh authorities vowed “adequate response” to the Azeri bombing of the capital city of Stepanakert.
“An adequate response will take place, the entire responsibility of which falls on the Aliyev family,” Artsakh presidential spokesperson Vahram Poghosyan said.
A Smerch rocket launcher
A vehicle traveling to Martakert with 10 international and Armenian journalists on board came under heave shelling on Friday. No casualties were reported.
The Azerbaijani Armed Forces have fired a Smerch heavy multiple rocket launcher at the town of Hadrut in Artsakh, Armenian Defense Ministry spokesperson Artsrun Hovhannisyan said.
“Moments ago they shelled the town of Hadrut with a Smerch. There are wounded civilians,” he said.
Artsakh Defense Ministry reported that fighting continued along the entire border of Artsakh and Azerbaijan for the sixth day, with Artsakh Armed Forces valiantly fighting to push back enemy combatants and destroying their military equipment.
“On October 2, the military-political leadership of Azerbaijan continued the criminal targeting of the civilian settlements of the Republic of Artsakh. This time Stepanakert, the capital of the Republic of Artsakh, and the city of Hadrut were attacked, resulting in casualties among the civilian population,” said an Armenian Foreign Ministry statement.VIEW GALLERY: Azerbaijani targeted homes in Hadrut
“Having failed to achieve any success in the battlefield, the armed forces of Azerbaijan, reinforced by foreign terrorist fighters, resorted to the perpetration of mass atrocities against the civilian population of Artsakh,” explained official Yerevan. “The attacks are mostly carried out with coordination of the Turkish military specialists and with the military equipment and armaments provided by Turkey to Azerbaijan within the framework of their military-political cooperation.”
“At the same time, in an attempt to justify these and other gross violations of international humanitarian law committed during the hostilities instigated against Artsakh, Azerbaijan is spreading fake news that the Armenian side is targeting its civilian settlements,” added the foreign ministry.
“The Republic of Armenia strongly condemns this crime of the Azerbaijani-Turkish alliance and reiterates its determination together with the authorities of Artsakh to neutralize any existential threat to the people of Artsakh by all means,” said the foreign ministry in its statement. Late Thursday evening local time, Armenian authorities reported downing four Azerbaijani drones over the Gegharkunik and Kotayk provinces of Armenia. Kotayk is located about 13 miles from Yerevan.
“On October 1, the Azerbaijani armed forces used artillery in the direction of Shatvan village of the Gegharkunik province of the Republic of Armenia, as well as launched a missile attack from a combat UAVs at Mets Masrik settlement, as a result of which Gevorg Vardanyan, born in 1967, was killed and two civilians were wounded to varying degrees,” said an Armenian foreign ministry statement.
“Later, the adversary’s UAVs invaded the airspace of the Republic of Armenia and carried our surveillance flights near Yerevan, the capital city of the Republic of Armenia. All the UAVs were destroyed by the air defense forces,” explained the foreign ministry.
“Notably, hours from the statement of the leaders of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair countries on immediate cessation of hostilities Azerbaijan has opted for further escalation,” said the foreign ministry referring to a statement issued Thursday by the presidents of Russia, France and the United States.
“The Republic of Armenia strongly condemns these actions of Azerbaijan and considers them as a step aimed at further aggravating the conflict. We view this attempt of undermining regional security provoked and directly supported by Turkey as a response to the efforts and calls of the international community, particularly the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship to establish peace,” added the foreign ministry.