The Merging of Israeli and USA Intel and Military is Treason

the word betrayal spelled out in scrabble tiles

Of course the fake Satanic Jews running Israel believe they’re the chosen ones who will rule and reign over the world, so they see this merging as a logical step. Like Dr. Sansone says in the opening of his article, these bills prove that any “rift” between Trump and Bibi is likely staged for the cameras and nothing more, like WWE television (that’s professional wrestling for those who don’t know).

The alleged rift between Trump and Netanyahu over Israeli criminal bombings in Lebanon that assisted in derailing the peace process with Iran, appears to be political theater to distract from the current attempt by Israel to overthrow the United States government. If Trump and Vance were really upset with Israel, then President Trump would state clearly that he will veto the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) if Section 219 remains (formerly 224), and the Intelligence Act Bill if Section 622 remained.

Prayed up and prepped up, time is short!

The Main Story by Dr. Joseph Sansone

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Bill Gates mRNA Ebola Vaccine Grant Matches Deadly Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of The Congo (DRC). “Rare and Deadly Virus Strain”

Illustrated filaments of Ebola virus labeled Specimen-432 with zap and buz buzz sound effects

By West Africa Weekly on Global Research. Reposted with permission.

A new Ebola outbreak in central Africa has ignited a firestorm of criticism against billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates, as the timing of a major vaccine funding grant aligns almost precisely with the emergence of a rare and deadly virus strain.

The controversy has deepened further with news that the FBI is investigating an American scientist accused of smuggling pathogen samples out of the Democratic Republic of Congo, the same region now fighting the epidemic.

The outbreak involves the Bundibugyo Ebola strain, which was confirmed by the DRC’s Ministry of Health on May 15, 2026, in Ituri Province. Two days later, the World Health Organization declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Hundreds of suspected cases and dozens of deaths have been reported in an area already suffering from armed conflict and mass displacement.

Just four months before the WHO declaration, in January 2026, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, or CEPI, awarded 26.7 million dollars to Moderna and Oxford University to develop a multivalent mRNA vaccine against Ebola, specifically including the Bundibugyo strain. CEPI was launched at the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2017, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was one of its founding donors. Bill Gates has personally championed the coalition since its beginning.

Health researchers on social media have called the timing suspicious, with one widely shared post asking how a vaccine grant for a rare strain could be funded months before that strain caused a global health emergency. Others pointed out that Moderna began developing its mRNA Ebola vaccine using artificial intelligence at the same time the grant was awarded.

The situation took a darker turn when an X account belonging to a public health professional alleged that an NIH virologist named Vincent Munster was caught at a U.S. airport smuggling deadly pathogen samples from the Congo.

The post claimed Munster runs Ebola field sites in the country and regularly conducts gain of function experiments, adding that he is now under FBI investigation. Independent news reports have confirmed that the FBI is indeed investigating Munster over allegations that he smuggled dangerous virus samples, including monkeypox virus, from the Democratic Republic of Congo into the United States.

.

Watch on X

.

Supporters of Gates and CEPI argue that the coalition was created specifically to prepare for future epidemics after the catastrophic 2014 to 2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa.

They note that the 26.7 million dollar grant was part of a broader effort to develop vaccines against multiple filoviruses, including several Ebola strains and Marburg virus, not just the Bundibugyo strain.

The WHO has also confirmed that no licensed vaccine or specific treatment currently exists for the Bundibugyo virus, meaning the vaccine development is a legitimate public health priority.

Yet the controversy does not exist in isolation.

For years, Bill Gates has faced deep skepticism across Africa over his foundation’s health and agricultural programs. A recent 50 million dollar AI driven health partnership with OpenAI drew sharp criticism, with many Africans accusing Gates of using the continent as a testing ground. Agricultural programs promoted by the Gates Foundation have also been described by some African experts as pushing farmers toward patented seeds and chemical intensive farming, a model they have called a new form of colonization.

As the Ebola outbreak continues to spread and the death count rises, the real world consequences of this distrust are already visible. This week, an angry crowd in the DRC set Ebola hospital tents on fire, demonstrating the dangerous gap between international health efforts and local belief. With the FBI investigation ongoing and the vaccine timeline raising unanswered questions, Bill Gates faces his most difficult challenge yet in Africa.

Kiev Regime’s Terrorist Nature: Drone Strike against a Bus Carrying Belarusian Children in Russia’s Bryansk Region

Drone flying inside a bus with children seated in the background

By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida from Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Once again, the Kiev regime demonstrates its terrorist nature, attacking civilian targets without any strategic relevance.

On June 17th, Ukrainian armed forces carried out a drone strike against a bus carrying a children’s soccer team from the Republic of Belarus. The children were hit in the Russian region of Bryansk, where they were on their way to a sports competition.  

As a consequence of the attack, one adult woman died and six people – including four children – were injured. The murdered woman was working as a guide, leading the foreign children to the resort town of Gelendzhik, in the Russian Krasnodar Region. According to Deputy Health Minister Aleksey Kuznetsov, the death toll may rise, as at least one of the injured people was hospitalized in serious condition.  

In total, there were 44 passengers on the bus, 28 of whom were children. The passengers were from the town of Rechytsa in Belarus and were in Russia to participate in sporting events. The bus that was hit obviously had no military or strategic importance, the bombing being a deliberate act of terror.  

The incident shocked Russia, Belarus, and much of international society. Despite the silence of Western countries, many public figures commented on the case, openly condemning the Ukrainian terrorist attack. For example, Pentagon senior security policy analyst Michael Maloof made it clear that there was no military aim in the attack, therefore it was an international crime and should be condemned by all countries. Furthermore, he also said that the Ukrainian intention seems to be to bring Belarus into the conflict – thus being a major provocation to destabilize Minsk’s peaceful stance.   

“It was clearly not a military target (…) The fact that these children were from Belarus, it almost makes me think that the Ukrainians want to invite Belarus into the conflict,” he said.  

In the same vein, Moscow-based Dutch journalist Sonja van den Ende commented:

“Europe, with all its big talk about democracy and about human rights, is not saying a word.”

Van den Ende made it clear that Western countries act hypocritically and dishonestly when it comes to war crimes – always condemning enemy countries and accusing them of committing illegal acts, even without any evidence; while on the other hand they ignore crimes committed by partner and allied countries, such as Ukraine.  

In fact, attacking civilians is a common tactic of the regime. Targeting non-military objectives is part of Ukraine’s failed “strategy” for the war with Russia. Lacking sufficient military power to fight a regular war with Moscow, Ukraine resorts to terrorist attacks hoping to at least have some effect on Russian society. The goal is to divert Russian attention from the front lines and expand the feeling of insecurity among ordinary Russians in cities outside the operation zone.  

The real result, however, has been quite different. The more they are attacked, the more the Russians react to Ukrainian provocations by endorsing the special military option. In practice, the terrorist attacks increasingly reinforce the pro-government and pro-special operation stance among ordinary Russians – which shows how the Ukrainian strategy is an absolute failure.  

However, the Belarusian factor also needs to be analyzed. It is known that Ukraine has a clear intention to involve Minsk in the war. The regime is desperately seeking an escalation and internationalization of the conflict as a way to try to garner more military and economic support. It is possible to say that, by attacking Belarusian children, the Ukrainian regime attempted to deeply provoke Belarus, possibly dragging it into war.   

It is unlikely that Belarus will take any deeper reactive initiative. As the attack occurred in Russia, it will be up to Moscow’s forces to carry out an appropriate retaliation. The most likely scenario is that Russia will launch a special offensive as a retaliatory measure, possibly targeting the Ukrainian capital itself with massive missile attacks.  

Countries that carry out attacks against children should be isolated in the international community. Kiev needs to become a pariah among major international institutions, with widespread condemnation from various countries and organizations – as well as sanctions and coercive measures. Only by isolating the regime will it be possible to compel it to stop attacking civilian targets.  

Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Orwellian Nightmare: UK Confirmed to have “A Secretive Thought Police”. Towards a Totalitarian Government

Cybernetic humanoid with glowing brain and laser eyes scanning and analyzing data

By Drago Bosnik from Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Nearly 80 years after George Orwell wrote “1984”, Western media still use it to describe totalitarian governments and societies, particularly if they’re non-Western.

The general premise used by the mainstream propaganda machine is that Orwell was writing about others and that his works could never be used to describe “democratic” countries of the political West.

And yet, it seems not even he could have ever dreamed about the levels of dictatorial control his own homeland would be subjected to. Namely, the extent to which the United Kingdom has descended into darkness is not exactly easy to put into words. The level of control exerted by the British government is beyond the worst of Orwell’s nightmares and now includes what can only be described as “thought police”.

In a typically bureaucratic manner, the secretive police unit engaged in sanctioning these “thought crimes” is called the Research, Information and Communications Unit (RICU). It has come under the spotlight in recent days and weeks after a string of crimes across the UK, with the government responding not to the actual crimes, but to those calling for the perpetrators to be held accountable. RICU has been caught advising police to portray everyone protesting the rise in crime as “raging racists”. Worse yet, police are now arresting “the worst offenders” (i.e., regular people who voiced their concerns online or in public). Any criticism of the British government and its decades-long failed migration policies is presented as “right-wing extremism”.

The brutal crackdown on protesters comes amid protests after a migrant attacked Stephen Ogilvie in Belfast.

Ogilvie is a man with special needs who was nearly decapitated by an immigrant. The incident was caught on video and sparked outrage across Northern Ireland and Britain. However, instead of dealing with violence perpetrated by anyone, regardless of their background, police specifically target the so-called “right-wingers” (i.e., regular people sick and tired of escalating violence). Apparently, this now also includes schoolboys under the age of 10, with videos showing multiple officers restraining a child protesting the arrest of his father. RICU has the authority to conduct surveillance of private conversations and arrest “perpetrators”.

Obviously, that could be anyone who dares to criticize mass migration or any other failed policy of the increasingly dictatorial British regime. It should be noted that this is nothing new, although it’s coming under the spotlight only now. Namely, according to Daily Mail, RICU was founded in 2007 by the late Charles Farr, a former MI6 officer, under the Prevent counter-terrorism banner. Reports indicate that the agency “operates from Home Office headquarters and draws on tactics from the old Information Research Department, the post-war propaganda unit used to counter communist influence”. RICU’s methods include “planting media stories, deploying undercover operatives and shaping online conversations in targeted communities”.

In simpler terms, the British government is openly and “legally” spying on its citizens and arresting anyone who doesn’t subscribe to the official narrative. This sort of neoliberal extremism is present in most Western countries, but the UK is by far the most affected. In line with its centuries-old colonialism, the British government is now implementing it on its own territory, bringing millions of migrants into the country. Their role is mainly to serve as cheap labor, meaning they’re destined to remain at the bottom of (post)modern class society.

Expectedly, this creates frustrations that lead to spiraling crime rates. In turn, the domestic population reacts, leading to more violence. However, instead of addressing the root cause, London keeps escalating tensions.

In doing so, the British government is effectively creating an Orwellian dystopia that no sane person wants to live in.

Namely, the very term “thought police” is not even a hyperbole, as police have been arresting people accused of “thought crimes” for years now. Back in November 2022, Isabel Vaughan-Spruce was arrested for silently praying across the street from an abortion clinic. Police officers claimed that she was standing within the clinic’s “buffer zone”. Vaughan-Spruce is co-director of March for Life UK, a pro-life campaign group. Her silent prayer was deemed “an intimidating action”. Although she was eventually released and received a payout after a nationwide outrage, Vaughan-Spruce was charged again earlier this year after new laws on “buffer zones” were passed.

“I was there simply to pray for women facing very difficult situations and decisions. Prayer isn’t a crime. Neither is standing,” she stated at the time.

Apparently, both prayer (i.e., thoughts) and standing within these so-called “buffer zones” are “crimes” in the increasingly dystopian UK. Vaughan-Spruce’s trial is set for October. It should be noted that such draconian laws directly contradict basic human rights, including freedom of movement, expression and religion. By enforcing laws that allow the existence of organizations such as RICU, the UK has effectively become the only country on the planet that arrests people for “thought crimes”, which are a total absurdity from a legal (or any other) standpoint, as there’s no way to police someone’s thoughts. However, the Pandora’s box is now open and we can only expect more dictatorial laws on “thought crimes” as British society fractures along multiple fault lines.

This article was originally published on InfoBrics.

Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

The Secret Doomsday Book Trump uses to Abuse his Power

Large leather-bound book titled 'Presidential Doomsday Book' with presidential seal on office desk

They’re called Presidential Emergency Action Documents and other Presidents before Trump abused them as well, but it’s like all of this was set up for Trump and this term. This is way outside of any congressional oversight and it’s definitely being abused and misused against both illegal immigrants and citizens alike. If the Trump admin labels you an enemy they will use these powers against you.

THE SECRET ‘DOOMSDAY BOOK’ THAT ENABLES TRUMP’S ABUSES OF POWER

What happened on March 13th, 2020

Jack Boots and Billy Clubs

City skyline at night with storm clouds, rain, and lightning strikes

That’s what’s coming for citizens around the world when the fuel runs out thanks to Trump’s war against Iran, jack boots in your face and billy clubs for your skull. Things are about to go Mad Max soon unless there are fuel reserves we don’t know about.

Trump said fuel bottom is here

Cushing is empty

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Christine Anderson’s CBDC Warning: “Refuse an mRNA Shot? They Flip a Switch and ERASE Your Bank Account”

Cyberpunk cityscape with neon signs, flying cars, and futuristic skyscrapers under a moonlit sky

Yep take a MOTB mRNA shot or lose everything. They restricted everyone once and they’ll do it again very soon.

German Member of the European Parliament Christine Anderson warns that Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and digital identity systems could become the most powerful tools of government control ever created.

According to Anderson, digital currencies would allow authorities to instantly restrict or eliminate a person’s access to money, food, travel, and daily life with the “flip of a switch.”

She argues that the accelerating push for digital IDs and CBDCs is not about convenience but about expanding surveillance and control over citizens. Anderson claims that growing public awareness is causing governments and institutions to speed up implementation efforts before opposition becomes too widespread.

Her stark warning: if access to money becomes programmable and centrally controlled, dissent or non-compliance could carry immediate financial consequences.

As more people question these systems, Anderson believes the battle over digital freedom versus digital control is entering a critical phase.

Source: Global Dissident

DIGITAL SLAVERY IS COMING! German MEP Christine Anderson warns CBDC is the ultimate control weapon.

Refuse an mRNA shot? They flip a switch and ERASE your bank account.

No money, no food, no future. Instant starvation for noncompliance.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Peace Sells but Who’s Buying?

Multiple large cylindrical oil storage tanks labeled T-14 to T-17 arranged in an industrial area by the coast under overcast skies.

Who actually won the war in the Persian Gulf? Well it wasn’t the USA, that much is certain! Also the oil storage in Cushing OK will be EMPTY by June 22nd…tick tock goes the Mad Max clock.

Sticking around a bit longer

Cushing Empty by Tuesday June 22nd 2026

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Getting Rid Of Insane Asylums In America Put The Crazy People On The Streets

Abandoned multi-story mansion with boarded-up windows and overgrown vegetation under cloudy sky

Getting rid of large mental institutions in America over the past few decades shook up a lot more than just how psychiatric care works. Some people say, “closing the asylums just put the ‘crazy people’ on the streets and now we all get to deal with them.” I’ve seen how this plays out in real time, especially in places like Spokane, Washington. That’s where a sparkling new $33 million downtown library has ended up tangled in the fallout.

The Switch Up Away from Large Mental Institutions

The rise and fall of the psychiatric hospital system marks a wild chapter in U.S. history. Mental hospitals—sometimes called insane asylums—were all over the country by the early 20th century. They housed huge numbers of people with all sorts of mental health and substance use struggles. But stories about abuse, lack of dignity, and overcrowding inside these places grew over time. Geraldo Rivera’s 1972 report sealed their fates.

By the 1950s, new medications and changing attitudes fueled a movement called deinstitutionalization. Politicians and advocates figured the best way forward was to bring people out of locked hospitals and back into neighborhoods with access to communitybased treatment.

On paper, that plan sounds way more humane. People with mental illness would get care, support, and maybe even a real shot at life outside hospital walls. But the reality turned out far messier, leaving a gap that’s still felt today.

Public Libraries and the New Urban Reality

Here’s where things get personal for me. I remember when the Spokane Central Library reopened in 2022 after major renovations. The place was stunning; full of light, shiny new studios, meeting rooms, and spaces for kids. It was supposed to be a community hub, bringing creative energy and learning to downtown. It almost felt like walking into a dream version of what city leaders promised: a real crown jewel for Spokane.

But now, the library is packed all day with people who have nowhere else to go, many clearly struggling with untreated mental illness, addiction, or the stresses of being homeless. It’s basically turned into a lowbarrier day shelter with books. The hopes of using the library as a safe spot for activities like Girl Scout meetings with fifth graders flew out the window when we found syringes and chaos in the rooms we’d reserved. Even library staff and security felt overwhelmed. This new reality is part of a bigger story playing out in public spaces across the country.

Why Deinstitutionalization Failed to Give a Boost

Community based care makes sense when it actually exists and is funded. The problem is, the old asylums were closed down way faster than new support systems could be set up. There are community mental health clinics and shelters, but these are usually underresourced and in high demand. So, when someone can’t get hospital level care, affordable housing, therapy, or substance use help, they’re left with only a handful of places: the streets, the jail, or (if they’re lucky) a hospital ER for a brief stay.

Fast forward to cities in 2024; emergency rooms, jail bookings, shelters, and public libraries have turned into catchall spots for people with nowhere else to go. When mental health is left untreated, crises break out in public, not behind locked doors. Case in point: the Spokane Central Library had 669 calls to 911 in just 18 months after renovation. That’s not the sign of a thriving library; it really signals a system pushed far past its limit.

Real Impacts on Neighborhoods and Families

This is not just an “urban” or “downtown” problem. Parents I know have stopped bringing their kids to the library because it feels too unsafe. That’s not an easy choice. But if you’re seeing your child walk past people in visible distress—maybe high, in crisis, or having public outbursts—when do you decide enough is enough?

As fewer families and community programs use these shared spaces, there’s less pressure on city leaders to step up and make things right. The result: libraries, meant to be hubs for everyone, end up as last resort day shelters, court annexes, and crisis centers. They’re now doing jobs they weren’t built or funded to handle.

Understanding Life After the Asylums: What Has Changed?

  • Homelessness rates: Cities with high living costs and limited mental health beds—like Spokane, Seattle, LA, and others—see larger homeless populations that include many with serious psychiatric needs.
  • Jail as mental institution: Local jails have replaced asylums as America’s leading mental health providers, according to groups like the Treatment Advocacy Center. Jail isn’t treatment, and people cycle in and out, often getting worse every time.
  • Lack of continuity: Instead of coordinated care, people bounce between police encounters, ERs, shortterm shelters, and the streets. There’s no one keeping track unless you’re lucky enough (or sick enough) to get rare intensive services.

Calls for Help: Libraries on the Front Line

Public libraries never asked to take on this work. In Spokane, library staff hand out food, call for help when someone overdoses or has a psychotic break, and try to keep the peace all day. It’s not only security issues—it’s everything from trauma to overdose to plain exhaustion. For many librarians, this isn’t the job they signed up for.

Hidden Costs: Resources Diverted From the Mission

It’s worth thinking about what else $33 million might have funded in Spokane—like supportive housing, mental health outreach, or crisis services that last. The stunning library now budgets for nonstop security, clean up, social workers, and frequent police calls. Even with all that, there is still no clear answer to the cycle. Sometimes the most public effects—fights at the entrance, overdoses, and stressfilled calls—don’t even make the news.

What Can Actually Help?

Stepping up for people with severe mental illness takes a serious commitment, and there’s no onesizefitsall solution. Here’s what has made a real difference in places I’ve checked out:

  • Housing first programs: Putting people into stable apartments—without strict requirements up front—can make daily mental health care possible.
  • Mobile crisis teams: Outreach workers and clinicians who actually go out to people on the street help prevent police involvement and ER visits.
  • Permanent supportive housing: Longterm, staffed apartments for folks with the highest needs. These programs are expensive but get the best results.
  • Community treatment teams: Wrap around teams that follow people wherever they go and stick with them for the long haul.
  • Peer support workers: People who’ve been there and know how to relate, whether it’s in a shelter, under a bridge, or at a library’s help desk.

Frequently Asked Questions

How did deinstitutionalization start in the U.S.?
Large mental hospitals began shutting down in the 1950s and 60s because of new treatments and worries about abuse and human rights. Government leaders vowed to replace them with community services, but those systems never reached the needed scale.


Why do people with mental illness end up in libraries or on the streets?
Many folks can’t qualify for inpatient care or find housing, so they use the few public spaces that are open and safer. Libraries, in particular, are welcoming and warm but aren’t equipped for daily medical or psychiatric needs.


What could cities do better?
Investing in a mix of lowbarrier housing, mobile crisis response, and coordinated case management has worked in cities that commit money and resources. No single plan alone solves it, but dividing up the load makes life better for everyone involved and lowers overall harm.


Where Things Stand, and Where We Go From Here

Watching something like the Spokane Central Library struggle to fill so many roles is a wakeup call. Shutting down psychiatric hospitals without solid new options left many people stranded, and places like libraries are left to pick up the slack. If we want public spaces to work for everyone, fixing mental health care and housing absolutely has to be part of the answer. Otherwise, these problems don’t vanish—they just pop up anywhere people are allowed to gather, even when that’s not what anyone intended.

Sources: Nextdoor.com

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21PayPal Link

Who Won the Third Gulf War?

Convoy of tanker ships sailing in a bay toward the setting sun

Guest Post by Andrew Korybko

Iran is poised to gradually return to the US-led Western order within certain limits exactly as Iran’s moderate faction has long wanted, its hardline faction has successfully preserved the armed forces and their missile stockpile, while Israel achieved none of its goals in its most epic defeat ever.

Iran and the US plan to sign a Zarif-inspired memorandum of understanding (MoU) on ending the Third Gulf War this Friday in Switzerland. The exact details aren’t yet known, and Fortune reported that there were at least three competing texts, but all of them “include similar elements around reopening the vital Strait of Hormuz waterway, giving Iran sanctions relief and opening the door to longer-term negotiations around its nuclear program.” That’s already enough to arrive at several very important conclusions.

For starters, reopening the strait without Iran’s wartime petroyuan toll booth in place would represent a significant concession by the Islamic Republic, whose media surrogates celebrated this model as an historic multipolar milestone. The same goes for resuming negotiations on its politically sensitive nuclear program. The sanctions relief in exchange might arguably be worth it, however, judging by this estimate here of the profound economic-financial damage caused by the US’ (imperfect) blockade.

On that topic, it was explained here in late March that “The US will have lost the Third Gulf War if China can still rely on Iran as a reliable low-cost energy supplier while turning the yuan into a global reserve currency that challenges the petrodollar”, so preventing both is imperative from the US’ perspective. With the petroyuan reportedly out of the picture, that leaves Iran’s oil export dependence on China, but sanctions relief could help gradually redirect its sales (such as to India) without disrupting the market.

Likewise, if reports about a $300 billion reconstruction fund for Iran are true (even if the final sum is much lower but still tens of billions of dollars), then US and Gulf investments in Iran’s energy industry could lead to them controlling its exports. It was assessed in January that “The US Wants To Replicate The Venezuelan Model In Iran”, which would be on the path to implementation in that scenario. The resultant interdependence could advance collective security and facilitate the US’ regional withdrawal.

Iran’s moderate (“reformist”) and hardline (“principalist”) factions would therefore achieve some of their goals, the first with respect to sanctions relief and the second with regards to preserving the country’s (arguably battered) armed forces as well as their missile stockpile, not to mention their political system. Nevertheless, the factional balance would have shifted in the moderate’s favor since the US wouldn’t sign a MoU if the moderates couldn’t control “rogue” hardliners, who could potentially rekindle the war.

It can therefore be concluded that the moderates beat the hardliners in Iran’s deep state power struggle, but this was due to the US and Israel killing dozens of top hardline figures, after which their respective institutions (especially the IRGC) were weakened and ultimately tamed by the moderates. To be sure, “rogue” hardliners – regardless of their relationship to the IRGC – could still sabotage the MoU, but Trump 2.0 feels comfortable enough that they won’t otherwise it wouldn’t go through with the signing.

A new regional era is emerging whereby the Third Gulf War might very well lead to Iran’s gradual reincorporation into the US-led Western order, albeit within limits, which lays the groundwork for better ties with its Gulf neighbors. In that scenario, Israel would stand to lose since it could no longer divide-and-rule Iran and the Gulf, nor would the US have its back if Israel resumes hostilities with Iran due to the recent revival of the possibly irreconcilable Trump-Bibi rift. Israel is therefore the war’s biggest loser.

Editors Note: In regard to the war with Iran I believe it’s part of the War of Armageddon playing out slowly since Oct. 7th 2023. Therefore I don’t believe there will be a lasting peace in the Persian Gulf region until Jesus Christ returns. The formal signing won’t take place until this coming Friday, June 19th, 2026 and a lot can happen between now and then, especially with Israel looking to sabotage the peace.

Stay tuned, prayed up and prepped up at all times because when this war fires up again look out!

Johnny

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21PayPal Link

« Older Entries