Far from wanting an escalation of tensions with Poland, Russia wants a normalization of their ties, but that’s not possible while the Ukrainian Conflict rages, and Warsaw doesn’t seem interested anyhow.
The Telegraph amplified a report from Polish media outlet Onet last week regarding alleged American warnings that Russia is planning some provocations against Poland. According to their sources, this could take several forms, including but not limited to a drone attack against critical infrastructure, simulated airstrikes that force Poland to activate its air defense systems, and/or an accidental border incursion by Russian and/or Belarusian troops blamed on a GPS failure. The goal would be to reduce aid to Ukraine.
The larger context, which is conspicuously omitted from both reports, concerns the spiraling Polish-Ukrainian dispute after Zelensky glorified the VolhyniaGenocide’s OUN-UPA culprits at the state level. Voices have since arisen in Poland calling for an end to their own country’s aid to Ukraine and for it to also stop facilitating other country’s aid to it too. Moreover, many Poles now view Ukrainians negatively after they justified glorifying the OUN-UPA, which ruined people-to-people ties perhaps for a generation.
Under such circumstances, it would be absolutely counterproductive for Russia to do anything whatsoever at all that could restore Polish society’s support for Ukraine and sympathy with its people, which is why it likely isn’t planning any provocations against Poland. The most that it’s therefore expected to do is amplify all aspects of this dispute within its “global media ecosystem”, thus containing its response to the information warfare domain, not expanding it to include any kinetic forms.
Carrying out any of the reported provocations would also entail the risk of an uncontrollable escalation spiral, something that typically cautious Putin has consistently sought to avoid over the past four and a half years, ergo one of the reasons why he remains reluctant to escalate against Ukraine. Observers should also know that Poland now commands NATO’s third-largest military, which is the largest in European NATO and is yet another reason why Russia doesn’t want to risk a conflict with Poland.
On the off chance that some Russian missiles accidentally cross into Poland due to electronic jamming, then Polish President Karol Nawrocki is expected to react calmly instead of be manipulated by the deep state into war with Russia like they tried to do last September when this first occurred as explained here. It’s possible that these same deep state forces and their American allies are responsible for this latest report about Russian provocations against Poland in order to breathe new life into their failed plot.
After all, it’s entirely within the realm of possibility that future Russian strikes against military targets in Western Ukraine go off course once again due to electronic jamming, after which these deep state forces could point to the US’ earlier warnings and the latest report to lie that it was a deliberate provocation. The other scenarios of a simulated strike and accidental border crossings are respectively unlikely in any case due to Putin’s previously mentioned escalation fears and Poland’s newly robust border defenses.
For these reasons, the latest report can be considered an information warfare provocation by the Polish and American members of the deep state, not an accurate reflection of Russian intent. Far from wanting an escalation of tensions with Poland, Russia wants a normalization of their ties, but that’s not possible while the Ukrainian Conflict rages, and Warsaw doesn’t seem interested anyhow. Russia is thus expected to keep the peace Poland, not risk war with it, and Nawrocki doesn’t want war with Russia either.
All that he has to do is threaten to stop having Poland serve as the transit state for 90% of Ukraine’s military-technical imports from NATO, which would either be sufficient for Ukraine to comply before they’re cut off or it would likely do so shortly thereafter, but he lacks the political will.
The denazification of Ukraine is one of Russia’s explicitly stated goals in the special operation, yet it’s remained elusive ever since the UK and Poland sabotaged spring 2022’s peace deal due to their joint desire to inflict a strategic defeat on their historical (millennium-long in Poland’s case) Russian rival. Lavrov vaguely elaborated on Russia’s understanding of this objective in spring 2025 by suggesting that his country now envisages denazification to mean restoring the rights of Ukraine’s Russian minority.
This can only be achieved through domestic legal mechanisms, which is why spring 2022’s draft peace deal contained relevant clauses to this effect. Russia never planned to occupy all of Ukraine, impose full denazification, and then uphold it through an indefinite law enforcement operation across the country. Military force is seen by Russia only as a means to coerce Ukraine into doing what’s demanded of it in this regard. Russia’s aforementioned difficulty in denazifying Ukraine is nowadays relevant for Poland.
Zelensky’s state-level glorification of the VolhyniaGenocide’s OUN-UPA culprits sparked a political crisis in their ties that continues spiraling by the day. The ruling liberal coalition’s Defense Minister recently declared that “With Bandera, Ukraine will not join the European Union”, thus showing how public opinion in this issue is causing his government to harden its stance towards Ukraine. 74% support conservative President Karol Nawrocki’s revocation of the Order of the White Eagle from Zelensky.
Ukraine’s consequent transformation into an anti-Polish state, which wasn’t inevitable but was helped along to a large degree by Germany as explained here, is now a daily source of discussion among Poles and will likely remain so indefinitely due to Zelensky’s plan to establish a “National Pantheon”. Many expect that such infamous anti-Polish figures as Stepan Bandera and Roman Shukhevich will be honored along with Andrey Melnik, whose remains were recently repatriated and reburied with honors.
Worryingly, “A Senior Ukrainian Sergeant Threatened Poland With Drone Strikes Against Its Cities” in the latest sign of just how radicalized Ukrainians are becoming against Poles. If the new anti-Polish manifestations of Ukrainian Nazism are allowed to spread uncontrolled throughout the state and society, then post-conflict Ukraine will undeniably become a major security threat to Poland. The denazification of Ukraine is therefore nowadays in Poland’s interests, which it could achieve without firing a single shot.
All that it has to do is immediately stop functioning as the transit state for 90% of Ukraine’s military-technical imports from NATO, that’s it. If Poland signaled this in advance as part of an ultimatum to Ukraine and then held firm in the face of predictable German and possibly also American pressure, then Ukraine might comply without Poland having to go through with this. If Ukraine didn’t comply, then Poland would have to do what it threatened, after which Ukraine would likely comply shortly thereafter.
Poland refuses to do so under its ruling liberal coalition, however, because of Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s closeness to Germany and the misguided belief that Ukraine continuing to kill more Russians is more important to Poland’s national interests than ending Ukraine’s new status as an anti-Polish state. As suggested by their recent hardening towards Ukraine’s EU aspirations, a public pressure campaign might push them in this direction, albeit solely with fall 2027’s next Sejm elections as their motivation.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida from Global Research. Reposted with permission.
Once again, the Kiev regime demonstrates its terrorist nature, attacking civilian targets without any strategic relevance.
On June 17th, Ukrainian armed forces carried out a drone strike against a bus carrying a children’s soccer team from the Republic of Belarus. The children were hit in the Russian region of Bryansk, where they were on their way to a sports competition.
As a consequence of the attack, one adult woman died and six people – including four children – were injured. The murdered woman was working as a guide, leading the foreign children to the resort town of Gelendzhik, in the Russian Krasnodar Region. According to Deputy Health Minister Aleksey Kuznetsov, the death toll may rise, as at least one of the injured people was hospitalized in serious condition.
In total, there were 44 passengers on the bus, 28 of whom were children. The passengers were from the town of Rechytsa in Belarus and were in Russia to participate in sporting events. The bus that was hit obviously had no military or strategic importance, the bombing being a deliberate act of terror.
The incident shocked Russia, Belarus, and much of international society. Despite the silence of Western countries, many public figures commented on the case, openly condemning the Ukrainian terrorist attack. For example, Pentagon senior security policy analyst Michael Maloof made it clear that there was no military aim in the attack, therefore it was an international crime and should be condemned by all countries. Furthermore, he also said that the Ukrainian intention seems to be to bring Belarus into the conflict – thus being a major provocation to destabilize Minsk’s peaceful stance.
“It was clearly not a military target (…) The fact that these children were from Belarus, it almost makes me think that the Ukrainians want to invite Belarus into the conflict,” he said.
In the same vein, Moscow-based Dutch journalist Sonja van den Ende commented:
“Europe, with all its big talk about democracy and about human rights, is not saying a word.”
Van den Ende made it clear that Western countries act hypocritically and dishonestly when it comes to war crimes – always condemning enemy countries and accusing them of committing illegal acts, even without any evidence; while on the other hand they ignore crimes committed by partner and allied countries, such as Ukraine.
In fact, attacking civilians is a common tactic of the regime. Targeting non-military objectives is part of Ukraine’s failed “strategy” for the war with Russia. Lacking sufficient military power to fight a regular war with Moscow, Ukraine resorts to terrorist attacks hoping to at least have some effect on Russian society. The goal is to divert Russian attention from the front lines and expand the feeling of insecurity among ordinary Russians in cities outside the operation zone.
The real result, however, has been quite different. The more they are attacked, the more the Russians react to Ukrainian provocations by endorsing the special military option. In practice, the terrorist attacks increasingly reinforce the pro-government and pro-special operation stance among ordinary Russians – which shows how the Ukrainian strategy is an absolute failure.
However, the Belarusian factor also needs to be analyzed. It is known that Ukraine has a clear intention to involve Minsk in the war. The regime is desperately seeking an escalation and internationalization of the conflict as a way to try to garner more military and economic support. It is possible to say that, by attacking Belarusian children, the Ukrainian regime attempted to deeply provoke Belarus, possibly dragging it into war.
It is unlikely that Belarus will take any deeper reactive initiative. As the attack occurred in Russia, it will be up to Moscow’s forces to carry out an appropriate retaliation. The most likely scenario is that Russia will launch a special offensive as a retaliatory measure, possibly targeting the Ukrainian capital itself with massive missile attacks.
Countries that carry out attacks against children should be isolated in the international community. Kiev needs to become a pariah among major international institutions, with widespread condemnation from various countries and organizations – as well as sanctions and coercive measures. Only by isolating the regime will it be possible to compel it to stop attacking civilian targets.
Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Nearly 80 years after George Orwell wrote “1984”, Western media still use it to describe totalitarian governments and societies, particularly if they’re non-Western.
The general premise used by the mainstream propaganda machine is that Orwell was writing about others and that his works could never be used to describe “democratic” countries of the political West.
And yet, it seems not even he could have ever dreamed about the levels of dictatorial control his own homeland would be subjected to. Namely, the extent to which the United Kingdom has descended into darkness is not exactly easy to put into words. The level of control exerted by the British government is beyond the worst of Orwell’s nightmares and now includes what can only be described as “thought police”.
In a typically bureaucratic manner, the secretive police unit engaged in sanctioning these “thought crimes” is called the Research, Information and Communications Unit (RICU). It has come under the spotlight in recent days and weeks after a string of crimes across the UK, with the government responding not to the actual crimes, but to those calling for the perpetrators to be held accountable. RICU has been caught advising police to portray everyone protesting the rise in crime as “raging racists”. Worse yet, police are now arresting “the worst offenders” (i.e., regular people who voiced their concerns online or in public). Any criticism of the British government and its decades-long failed migration policies is presented as “right-wing extremism”.
The brutal crackdown on protesters comes amid protests after a migrant attacked Stephen Ogilvie in Belfast.
Ogilvie is a man with special needs who was nearly decapitated by an immigrant. The incident was caught on video and sparked outrage across Northern Ireland and Britain. However, instead of dealing with violence perpetrated by anyone, regardless of their background, police specifically target the so-called “right-wingers” (i.e., regular people sick and tired of escalating violence). Apparently, this now also includes schoolboys under the age of 10, with videos showing multiple officers restraining a child protesting the arrest of his father. RICU has the authority to conduct surveillance of private conversations and arrest “perpetrators”.
Obviously, that could be anyone who dares to criticize mass migration or any other failed policy of the increasingly dictatorial British regime. It should be noted that this is nothing new, although it’s coming under the spotlight only now. Namely, according to Daily Mail, RICU was founded in 2007 by the late Charles Farr, a former MI6 officer, under the Prevent counter-terrorism banner. Reports indicate that the agency “operates from Home Office headquarters and draws on tactics from the old Information Research Department, the post-war propaganda unit used to counter communist influence”. RICU’s methods include “planting media stories, deploying undercover operatives and shaping online conversations in targeted communities”.
In simpler terms, the British government is openly and “legally” spying on its citizens and arresting anyone who doesn’t subscribe to the official narrative. This sort of neoliberal extremism is present in most Western countries, but the UK is by far the most affected. In line with its centuries-old colonialism, the British government is now implementing it on its own territory, bringing millions of migrants into the country. Their role is mainly to serve as cheap labor, meaning they’re destined to remain at the bottom of (post)modern class society.
Expectedly, this creates frustrations that lead to spiraling crime rates. In turn, the domestic population reacts, leading to more violence. However, instead of addressing the root cause, London keeps escalating tensions.
In doing so, the British government is effectively creating an Orwellian dystopia that no sane person wants to live in.
Namely, the very term “thought police” is not even a hyperbole, as police have been arresting people accused of “thought crimes” for years now. Back in November 2022, Isabel Vaughan-Spruce was arrested for silently praying across the street from an abortion clinic. Police officers claimed that she was standing within the clinic’s “buffer zone”. Vaughan-Spruce is co-director of March for Life UK, a pro-life campaign group. Her silent prayer was deemed “an intimidating action”. Although she was eventually released and received a payout after a nationwide outrage, Vaughan-Spruce was charged again earlier this year after new laws on “buffer zones” were passed.
“I was there simply to pray for women facing very difficult situations and decisions. Prayer isn’t a crime. Neither is standing,” she stated at the time.
Apparently, both prayer (i.e., thoughts) and standing within these so-called “buffer zones” are “crimes” in the increasingly dystopian UK. Vaughan-Spruce’s trial is set for October. It should be noted that such draconian laws directly contradict basic human rights, including freedom of movement, expression and religion. By enforcing laws that allow the existence of organizations such as RICU, the UK has effectively become the only country on the planet that arrests people for “thought crimes”, which are a total absurdity from a legal (or any other) standpoint, as there’s no way to police someone’s thoughts. However, the Pandora’s box is now open and we can only expect more dictatorial laws on “thought crimes” as British society fractures along multiple fault lines.
This article was originally published on InfoBrics.
Drago Bosnicis an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Editors Note: This is why I find it hilarious when the UK talks smack about Russia, they have NOTHING to back it up! The picture below is one of their nuclear subs sitting in dry dock doing nothing. The UK has very little to fight with and their soldiers train with broomsticks instead of firearms. They should really keep their traps shut.
In its prime, the United Kingdom was one of the most powerful thalassocracies in human history, probably eclipsed only by the United States after WWII.
How did such a small island nation accomplish this? The answer is – the British Navy, the most powerful armed maritime force of its time. Thus, it could only be expected that the “Perfidious Albion” would do everything in its power to preserve this naval dominance or at least maintain its power projection capabilities for as long as possible.
However, as the British Empire shrank to a mere shadow of its former self, its ability to sustain a large navy dwindled, resulting in massive reductions over the last several decades.
The last time the UK managed to muster a respectable naval force was during the 1982 Falklands War against Argentina.
This ranges from frigates and destroyers to aircraft carriers and submarines (including nuclear-powered). However, while the surface fleet is undoubtedly still relevant, it’s nowhere near as important as the British Navy’s underwater component, which provides the most critical segment of the UK’s strategic power projection. Namely, the Vanguard-class SSBNs (nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines), armed with UGM-133A “Trident II” (also known as “Trident D5”) submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), are the cornerstone of London’s thermonuclear arsenal. Still, it seems this isn’t enough for the “Perfidious Albion” to take them seriously.
Back in December last year, Rear Admiral Philip Mathias lamented that “Britain is no longer capable of running a capable nuclear submarine program”, warning of “catastrophic failures” that have “driven the UK’s nuclear deterrent to the brink”. Mathias, who served as a director of nuclear policy at the British Ministry of Defense (MOD), highlighted its “inability to produce attack submarines at the scale required for putting strain on crews and extending the length of deployments”. He compared this to the (First) Cold War, stressing that “the silent service” could deploy for around 70 days at the time, but that this has risen to around 200 days at present.
Mathias quoted the 2025 Strategic Defense Review (SDR), which stressed the need to expand production capacity. However, problems with the British Navy’s SSBN component are nothing new, as many authors (myself included) questioned years ago whether the UK’s strategic arsenal was functioning properly. Although such information is certainly a state secret, these doubts were confirmed after London admitted that one of its UGM-133A “Trident II” SLBMs failed during a launch test. This was the second time in a row that the troubled missile, a weapon of strategic importance, failed, as it did in the previous test conducted in 2016. The last successful launch was by HMS “Vigilant” back in 2012.
This means the UK hasn’t had a successful SLBM test in nearly a decade and a half, yet it still believes it can go up against Russia, a country with the world’s largest and most powerful strategic arsenal. The latest “Trident II” launch was from the lead ship of its class, the HMS “Vanguard”, with reports indicating that London’s then-Defense Secretary, Grant Shapps, was overseeing it. The SLBM’s booster rocket failed and it fell into the sea “close to the launch site”, as the Sun reported at the time (the “launch site” being the HMS “Vanguard” itself). And yet, Shapps insisted that he has “absolute confidence in ‘Trident’s’ submarines, missiles and nuclear warheads”.
As previously mentioned, London relies solely on these submarines and missiles for its strategic capabilities. Had the “Trident II” damaged the HMS “Vanguard”, it would’ve taken one-quarter or 25% of the UK’s strategic arsenal out of service, as the “Perfidious Albion” has only four such vessels, each armed with up to 16 SLBMs. It should be noted that HMS “Vanguard” finished a seven-year-long overhaul and refueling just last year. However, to make matters even worse, both Shapps and the then-Head of the Royal Navy, now disgraced Admiral Ben Kay, were on board the submarine during the launch test, meaning their lives were also in danger.
The failures are also an embarrassment for the United States, as the missiles are manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Pentagon’s premier military supplier. Still, all this didn’t prevent Shapps from adding to the general embarrassment by saying that “an anomaly did occur during the test on 30 January [2024], but that the ‘Trident II’ SLBM is still the most reliable weapons system in the world”. According to his assessment, the test “reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK’s nuclear deterrent” and that the “anomaly was event specific”, with “no implications for the reliability” of the UK’s strategic arsenal. The British MoD made similar statements.
Namely, it insisted that HMS “Vanguard” and its crew had been “proven fully capable in their operations” and that “the test had reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK’s nuclear deterrent”, essentially repeating Shapps’ statement that “Trident II” is the “most reliable weapons system in the world”. However, while this (now decades-long) issue is yet to be resolved, the British Navy has somehow managed to reach a new low point. Namely, of the six Astute-class SSNs (nuclear-powered attack submarines) in its service, not a single one is combat-ready. The UK has five “active-duty” submarines, one undergoing pre-sea trial testing and one more under construction (projected to be completed by the end of this decade).
This article was originally published on InfoBrics.
Drago Bosnicis an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
On May 19, Russia and Belarus launched their joint nuclear drills that lasted until May 21.
These strategic maneuvers involved nearly 65,000 personnel, roughly 7,800 military vehicles and over 200 missile launch systems.
They stretched across a vast geographic area from Eastern Europe to the Pacific, encompassing nearly all of Belarus and most of Russia.
Everything from tactical, short-range assets to strategic weapons such as ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles) and SLBMs (submarine-launched ballistic missiles) was tested, once again proving that Moscow and Minsk are capable of defending themselves against any potential adversary foolish enough to attack them.
Russian President Vladimir Putin observed and later discussed the drills with his Belarussian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko, stressing that the use of nuclear weapons is “an extreme, exceptional measure for ensuring the national security of our states”. This demonstrates that the Kremlin understands just how dangerous such weapons are and how much responsibility nuclear powers have. However, there’s simply no other way to ensure the safety of both Moscow and Minsk. President Lukashenko was even more straightforward.
Namely, during an inspection of now legendary nuclear-capable 9K720M “Iskander-M” systems, he said: “I dreamed about this machine a long time ago.”
As previously mentioned, the Russian Defense Ministry (MoD) stated that the exercise involved over 64,000 troops, more than 200 missile launch systems, nearly 150 aircraft, 73 surface warships and 13 submarines, including eight SSBNs (nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine) with SLBMs.
The MoD also added that “the drills focused on the preparation and use of nuclear forces under the threat of [foreign] aggression”. In addition, this was a unique opportunity for Russia and Belarus to further integrate their command structures and improve interoperability, particularly with respect to the critically important weapons that ensure both countries’ strategic security.
Namely, Minsk is Moscow’s key ally that has been entrusted with hosting Russian thermonuclear weapons. The number of deployed warheads remains unknown, but it could be in the hundreds, as Russia considers the security of Belarus equally important to its own safety. To achieve this, the Kremlin needs to test the capabilities of its vast strategic arsenal, particularly the delivery systems.
This includes the state-of-the-art RS-24 “Yars” ICBMs and R-29RMU “Sineva” SLBMs (test-fired by “Bryansk”, a Delta IV-class SSBN in service with the Northern Fleet). Meanwhile, the even more advanced Borei-class SSBNs were also activated during the exercises to test their systems, protocols and readiness.
However, as previously mentioned, the drills also involved a plethora of tactical and operational-level weapon systems. Unlike ICBMs and SLBMs, these weapons are not designed to obliterate entire cities, provinces or even countries, but are used as tactical nuclear weapons intended to neutralize large concentrations of invading troops on the battlefield. Such weapons also include aerial delivery systems and warheads for short- and medium-range missiles and even artillery munitions. It should be noted that, in addition to being the world’s premier thermonuclear superpower, Russia maintains the largest arsenal of tactical and operational nuclear weapons in the world.
Apart from the “Iskander”, the shipborne 3M22 “Zircon” and air-launched 9-S-7760 hypersonic missiles (found on the 9-A-7660 “Kinzhal” systems) were also used. Belarussian troops even test-fired one of the 9M723s used by the “Iskander” inside Russia. No other country has such a privileged security status, especially now that Belarus is part of the Kremlin’s strategic architecture. Moscow revised its nuclear doctrine several times, including in 2024, when it made it clear that any large-scale conventional attack supported by another nuclear power would be considered a joint aggression on Russia. Obviously, this was a direct warning to the political West, its vassals and satellite states.
And indeed, the world’s most aggressive power pole keeps escalating its involvement in the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict, including with direct drone strikes from the Baltic states. The revised Russian strategic doctrine and the latest drills are there to discourage the political West from allowing the Neo-Nazi junta to strike Russia with longer-range weapons.
And while it may seem to lower the threshold for the possible use of nuclear arsenals, this mainly applies to those who are most aggressive and pathologically Russophobic. Perhaps more importantly, the revised doctrine also directly places Minsk under Moscow’s thermonuclear umbrella, shielding it from a potential NATO aggression.
The Kremlin still retains control of its nuclear weapons deployed in Belarus, but allows Minsk to select priority targets in case of a NATO land invasion.
This combination provides both Russia and Belarus with a possibility of preventing escalation while retaining the capability to deter any potential aggressor. And it seems to be working, because NATO jets started downing the Kiev regime’s drones over the Baltic states at around the same time. It remains to be seen why the world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel is doing it only now, but it’s highly likely that Brussels finally understands that it should at least lie low while nuclear drills last.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
This has been part of the plan all along with the war in Iran and the Persian Gulf, to raise the price of fuel and food to the moon and cause economic chaos. Of course they will have a solution, they always do and I’m sure it will involve a digital ID requirement to get your food rations. In order to receive your digital ID ration card you will have to catch up on all of your shots, i.e. COVID19 MOTB shots.
Prayed up and prepped up, time is running out!
“One-third of fertilizers are transported through the Strait of Hormuz. This route is also currently under threat, and this is particularly critical for the Southern Hemisphere, where planting is currently underway and fertilizers are urgently needed…. If the disruptions persist long enough, the current price correction, which we are putting up with for now, could turn into rationing—and that would have very different economic consequences……And I’m not even talking about what’s happening in the rest of the world. I have just returned from the IMF and World Bank spring meetings, ….. particularly from Asia, from some low-income and emerging economies that have been hit much harder than the U.S. and are already moving toward rationing!”
🔗https://t.me/voicesofrevelation1/18180
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Today Leeland is asking for our assistance and asking us to write an email or call the Embassies here in the US and/or the US embassy in Cyprus and demand his release! Here are the links you will need.
US Embassy in Nicosia U.S. Citizens with emergencies, please call 357 22 393939 and press zero (0) For American Citizen Services Email:ACSNicosia@state.gov
When I tried to download Leeland’s video today it showed me that it was downloading but now I can’t find it on my laptop. First it took far too long to download and then I couldn’t find it once it did. I also noticed that every video I have downloaded from Leeland in the past were moved into a folder I didn’t create called “Leeland Jones videos”. They are probably going to delete Leeland’s content so download any video of his you want to save before its too late.
I will post any updates I receive. Below is the video I made about today. Blessings to you! Please keep praying for Leeland’s safety and his quick release!
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Leeland Jones put out an update on his situation in Cyprus yesterday and just in case you missed it here is the video. There is another update below the video.
Leeland sent me an email this morning saying that because of the Easter Holiday in Cyprus everything has been closed up until today. He hopes to hear about his case today when everything reopens. He is in good spirits and he’s praising the Lord like always! Please keep Leeland in your prayers for his safety and for getting this resolved quickly.
According to my research there’s usually a 200 Euro fine and deportation. He may or may not face a lifetime ban for overstaying his visa, but as long as you pay the fine that usually doesn’t happen. I’ll keep you all updated as I get them as I know I have a lot of Leeland supporters on the website.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
The EU has no tolerance for real nationalists and the diplomats that represent them.
Leaked calls between Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto and his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov recently circulated in which he’s shown to have discussed his country’s attempts to remove Russians from the EU’s sanctions list. He posted on X that they only “proved that I say the same publicly as I do on the phone”, namely that “Hungary will never agree to sanction individuals or companies essential for our energy security, for achieving peace, or those with no reason to be on a sanctions list.”
That’s true, and they also prove that he’s Europe’s last real diplomat in the sense that he engages with Russia despite Hungary voting against it at the UNGA, which shows that he understands the importance of dialogue for achieving peace and ensuring his country’s objective national interests. The longer that the conflict rages, the more tenuous Hungary’s energy security becomes due to its reliance on easily disrupted Ukrainian-transiting Russian supplies, ergo his and Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s peace efforts.
Nevertheless, these same efforts have been dishonestly misportrayed as “treason” per the Mainstream Media’s framing of Szijjarto’s leaked calls with Lavrov, the perception of which is aimed at manipulating voters into casting their ballot for the opposition ahead of the upcoming parliamentary elections. The EU wants to subordinate Hungary, the continent’s last remaining conservative-nationalist outpost, to liberal-globalism. Here are five background briefings about how they’re meddling in the upcoming elections:
Discredited Russiagate conspiracy theories like the one that’s lent false credence by Szijjarto’s leaked calls with Lavrov are aimed at delegitimizing Orban’s potential re-election, which can then justify any of the five ways in which the EU is already preparing to handle Hungary in that event. Politico reported on them here, which boil down to: changing how the EU votes; introducing a multi-speed Europe; more financial pressure; suspending Hungary’s voting rights; and possibly even expelling it from the EU.
Just like Szijjarto is Europe’s last real diplomat, so too is Orban its last real nationalist who always puts his country’s interests first, which is why he authorized Szijjarto’s diplomacy with Lavrov. Circling back to that, there’s nothing scandalous about helping a partner’s unjustly sanctioned nationals nor in updating them about how ties could change due to their obligations to the bloc in which they’re a part. Szijjarto therefore did nothing wrong, but rather, he did everything right and that’s why he’s being targeted.
The EU has no tolerance for real nationalists and the diplomats that represent them, which contextualizes its campaigns against not only Orban and Szijjarto, but also Germany’s AfD, Poland’s conservative and populist-nationalist opposition parties, and Romanian nationalists too, et al. The difference between them and Hungary is that its nationalists are in power and actively advancing national interests, which is why the EU is actively working to remove them by hook or by crook.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
