Category Archives: Europe

President Trump’s Ultimate Intent: The Annexation of Canada, The Annexation of Greenland, the Militarization of the Arctic. Militarization of the Western Hemisphere

Posted on by Leave a comment

Guest Post written by Prof Michel Chossudovsky from Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Editors note: While this post was updated at the end of December its more than relevant considering what just happened in Venezuela! And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? Rev. 13:4

Author’s Introduction

Update: The article below is of utmost relevance, specifically pertaining to  President Donald Trump’s stance with regard to the Annexation of both Canada and Greenland.

We recall Donald Trump’s statement last December at  his luxury Mar a – Lago residence, in a conversation with Canada’s former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. 

President Elect Donald Trump had intimated in no uncertain terms that Prime Minister Trudeau should become Governor of the 51st state of the United States of America.

This was no joking matter. Canada described as the 51st State of the USA signifies the outright Annexation of Canada.

The takeaway from Trudeau's trip to Mar-a-Lago: For Trump, fentanyl is ...

Trump and the National Security Strategy (NSS). “Combat Command” Entities

In recent developments, December 2025, coinciding with the launching of the Pentagon’s National Security Strategy (NSS),

“the War Department (DoW) is now envisaging the most significant changes in the US military’s history” including the merger of several of the regional combat command entities Worldwude. 

CENTCOM (US Central Command), EUCOM (US European Command) and AFRICOM (US Africa Command) are slated to be integrated. 

According to Drago Bosnic: “It seems all three will be merged into the new US International Command (presumably with the acronym INTERCOM), marking the first-ever reduction in the number of American “combatant commands” (currently standing at 11)”

The Sovereignty of Canada and U.S NORTHCOM

The issue of annexation of Canada –which is now being cautiously addressed by the Canadian media– goes back to 2004. It relates to the instatement of US Northern Combat Command.

Prime Minister Jean Chretien refused to negotiate with the Bush Adminstration, more specifically with Donald Rumsfeld.  He resigned in 2004 in the wake of the war on Iraq. A new Prime Minister was appointed.

That same year, I addressed the issue in an article entitled: Is the Annexation of Canada part of Bush’s Military Agenda? (November 23, 2004) (which at the time was the object of censorship by the Canada’s mainstream media).

See also

Canada’s Sovereignty in Jeopardy: “51st State”, Déjà Vu: The Militarization of North America under President Donald Trump

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, April 04, 2025

Jean Chrétien

We will also recall the powerful statement of former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien in his Letter to Donald. “From One Old Guy to Another”.  

A few days prior to Trump’s inauguration, Jean Chrétien in an open letter to Trump pointed to:

“The totally unacceptable insults and unprecedented threats to our very sovereignty from U.S. president-elect Donald Trump”. 

“I have two very clear and simple messages. To Donald Trump, from one old guy to another: Give your head a shake! What could make you think that Canadians would ever give up the best country in the world … to join the United States?

I can tell you Canadians prize our independence. We love our country.

We also had the guts to say no to your country when it tried to drag us into a completely unjustified and destabilizing war in Iraq.”[March 2003] (complete text of letter)

Jean Chretien intimated with astute foresight what is now unfolding under the Trump Presidency:

“Now there is another existential threat.

And we once again need to reduce our vulnerability.

That is the challenge for this generation of political leaders “ 

The Process of US Militarization of Canada under USNORTHCOM

Jean Chrétien was opposed to USNORTHCOM, which implied the militarization of Canada.

Most Canadians are unaware that under the clauses of US Northern Command –which were accepted and by Prime Minister Paul Martin– following the resignation of Jean Chrétien, the U.S. had acquired  the de facto right to “invade” both Canada and Mexico. (see map below). 

The map below reveals the territory of USNORTHCOM, which allows the US military to deploy from southern border of Mexico and part of the Caribbean up to the North West territories and Canada’s Artic, not to mention the strategic waterways in Canada’ Northern territories.

The second map indicates USSOUTHCOM

These two immense militarized Combat Command Territories are slated to be merged and integrated. They are described as “Areas of Resposibility” from the military standpoint.

USNORTHCOM

USSOUTHCOMMap: U.S. Southern Command's Area of Responsibility. (DoD image)

Monroe Doctrine 2.0. “Combat Command”

In the context of Trump’s Monroe Doctrine 2.0 and the expansion of U.S. military operations in the Western hemisphere (e.g. Venezuela), the merger of USNORTHCOM (US Northern Combat Command based in Colorado) and USSOUTHCOM (US Southern Command based in Florida) into the new US Americas Command is contemplated (presumably with the acronym AMERICOM).

Is this part of a U.S. Hegemonic Agenda which consists in imposing a Combat Command Entity at the level of the entire continent.

No agreements or negotiations with independent nation states. It’s a process of hegemonic intrusion, in derogation of international law. 

“Combat Command”: Unspoken Process of “Military Occupation”.

“It will most likely be the largest and most important command, encompassing not only the entire Western Hemisphere, but also the Arctic, where Western powers have become increasingly aggressive in desperate attempts to challenge Russia’s northern dominance. When implemented, the plan will reduce the number of US military commands to “just” eight.

Reports indicate that the Pentagon also discussed creating a separate Arctic Command at one point. The idea was for it to be a “junior” command that would be subordinate to AMERICOM, but the plan never left the drawing board.” (Drago Bosnic, December 19, Global Research, 2025)

What is unfolding is an extensive US Americas Combat Command territory with the acronym AMERICOM –which extends from Canada’s Northern territories in the Arctic to the tip of Argentina in South America and The Antartica, whiich hosts a U.S. military facility.

This militarized  AMERICOM territory project under the auspices of the War Department is based on the merger of USNORTHCOM and USSOUTHCOM. It extends over more than 45 countries and territories. Indelibly it constitutes an encroachment of the fundamental rights of sovereign nation states.

Historically the Monroe Doctrine consisted in confronting the intrusion of competing colonial powers in the Americas, namely Spain, the British Empire and France.

In contrast, Monroe Doctrine 2.0 is a hegemonic agenda directed against independent nation states. It consists in regime change coupled with the militarization of the entire continent from the Artic to the Antarctic.

The Annexation of Greenland

In March 2025, President Donald Trump: “renewed his threat of using military force to annex Greenland“.

“saying in an NBC News interview he wouldn’t rule it out to make the self-governing Danish territory a part of the United States”

It’s the latest in Trump’s many comments about seizing control of the resource-rich island, which he insists the US needs for national security purposes.

 “I don’t rule it out,” he told NBC News’ Kristen Welker in an interview that aired on Sunday. “I don’t say I’m going to do it, but I don’t rule out anything.”

The Annexation of Canada 

President Trump has been persistent in his intent: As confirmed in an incisive October CBC report: the Annexation of Canada is so to speak “on the Table”.

“Is [Trump] trying to change political views in this country?

If so, that’s foreign interference,” said Dick Fadden, who also headed CSIS and served as national security adviser to former prime minister Stephen Harper.” (CBC)

A recent report by the Globe and Mail  (October 3, 2025) examines the Annexation issue in detail. Professor Franklyn Griffiths intimates that “A Trump Annexation would likely start in the North” 

In other words, it would have an impact on “Canada’s maritime sovereignty”.

“Canada needs to consider the possibility that U.S. President Donald Trump will soon, and without our permission, send American warships into and through the waterways of the Canadian Arctic archipelago, commonly known as the Northwest Passage.

We owe it to ourselves to imagine what an imminent show of American force (rather than an invasion) would mean. We should also use the prospect to deal with and not write off Mr. Trump’s threats to annex us.” (Professor Griffiths)

51st State is “No Joking Matter” 

On October 8, Prime Minister Carney meets President Trump in Washington D.C.

On a positive side:

“The Prime Minister and the President welcomed the progress achieved to date in building a new economic and security relationship between their nations. Canada currently has the best trade agreement of any U.S. trading partner, with 85% of Canada-U.S. trade now tariff-free, and our cooperation is further improving border security” (pm-gc-ca PM of Canada)

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, October 17, 2025, Updated on December 20, 2025.

Poland & Hungary Are Threatened By Ukraine Yet Still Remain Divided By It

Posted on by Leave a comment

Guest Post by Andrew Korybko. Reposted with permission.

The Ukrainian ultra-nationalists and intel agents that infiltrated their societies under the cover of refugees might carry out acts of terrorism against them, which could be averted by closer cooperation between their security services, but they still remain divided by Ukraine to its geopolitical benefit.

Poland and the other EU countries like Hungary that host Ukrainian refugees are poised to face more trouble from them after the conflict ends. As of February 2025, official police data showed that Ukrainians committed more crimes in Poland than any other foreigners. Some have also been accused of carrying out national security ones on behalf of Russia, which Russia denied while its media has instead suggested that they’re either anti-Polish ultra-nationalists (fascists) or Ukrainian intel agents.

Whatever the truth may be, former President Andrzej Duda warned in an interview with the Financial Times in early 2025 that “Ukraine’s Traumatized Troops Could Pose A Security Threat To All Of Europe”. Last fall, “The Ukrainian Ambassador To Poland Admitted That His Co-Ethnics Don’t Want To Assimilate” just before one of his country’s prominent online outlets predicted that “An Ethnic Ukrainian Lobby Might Soon Take Shape In The Polish Sejm”, which could altogether pose serious threats to Poland.

Instead of trying to thwart them, Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski encouraged Ukrainians to “knock out” the Druzhba pipeline supplying Hungary and Slovakia with Russian oil, thus earning him the nickname “Osama Bin Sikorski” from Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. As explained in the preceding hyperlinked analysis, this could backfire on Poland by inciting terrorism against it by those ultra-nationalists who lay claim to its southeastern parts where many Orthodox East Slavs used to live.

Circling back to his post, some of the Ukrainian ultra-nationalists and/or intel agents that infiltrated the EU under the cover of refugees could attack Druzhba infrastructure in Hungary, knowing that they could then receive sanctuary in Poland just like the Nord Stream suspect that it refused to extradite to Germany. Although Poland and Hungary have a millennium of shared history and almost 700 years of friendship, Poland’s ruling duopoly nowadays despises Hungary for its pragmatic policy towards Russia.

Taking a cue from Sikorski, they might therefore turn a blind eye towards these “refugees” planning such an attack from their territory and/or plotting Color Revolution unrest in Hungary ahead of spring’s next parliamentary elections. About that scenario, Sikorski’s Hungarian counterpart Peter Szijjarto warned in mid-August that the EU could lead this effort, which came a day after Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service warned about the role that Ukrainians could play in advancing regime change there.

The EU, Ukraine, and Poland all want Viktor Orban out, the goal of which could be furthered by “refugees” (ultra-nationalists and/or intel agents) sabotaging the Druzhba pipeline within Hungary ahead of the next elections and then the economic consequences sparking large-scale preplanned protests. To be clear, none of this might materialize, but the point is that such a scenario is nonetheless credible for the reasons that were explained. Hungarian counter-intelligence would naturally do well to remain alert.

Closer coordination between the Polish and Hungarian security services for thwarting these threats from Ukrainian “refugees” is unlikely due to liberal-globalist Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s and new conservative President Karol Nawrocki’s shared hatred of his pragmatic policy towards Russia. A rapprochement between them through the Visegrad Group is therefore unrealistic, thus leaving their countries vulnerable to these hybrid threats and keeping them divided to Ukraine’s geopolitical benefit.

DOLLAR CRASH AND WW3 INCOMING? The Bankers Always Know First

Posted on by Leave a comment
selective focus photo of silver and gold bitcoins

Todays video will feature extremely important financial news and serious developments on the war fronts. Prayed up and prepped up, time is short!

Patrick Lancaster Report

Economic Strangle of Venezuela

Putin warns world about Kaliningrad

Five Headed Angel on FB

Bankers always know first article

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Germany and the UK are Full Blown Surveillance States

Posted on by Leave a comment
a person reading a book

Germany granted itself legal permission to use AI technology to aggressively monitor the entire population in real-time. The Berlin House of Representatives passed amendments to the General Security and Public Order Act (ASOG) that grants government access to citizens’ personal data by any means necessary, including forcibly entering their private homes.

The British government wants to expand surveillance measures in public spaces even further: cameras are planned that analyze movements and emotions. As with many other measures, this is justified by crime prevention.

It’s all bad and it’s coming soon to a neighborhood near you! Prayed up and prepped up!

Cameras in the UK

German Police State

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

CENSORSHIP IN THE UK! SUBSTACK CAVES IN TO THE ONLINE SAFETY ACT!

Posted on by Leave a comment
woman lying on her back covering her mouth with a marked hand

The U.S. version of the online safety act is known as the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA). It is formally designated as H.R. 7891 in the House of Representatives and S. 1409 in the Senate, with the Senate version being part of the broader Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (KOSPA) package. The House version, introduced by Reps. Gus Bilirakis (R-FL) and Kathy Castor (D-FL), mirrors the Senate bill but includes a tiered approach, limiting the “duty of care” obligations to “high impact” platforms with significant revenue or user numbers. It is almost identical to the UK’s version.

To those of you who say it can’t happen here in the USA you better think again. They closed the entire country 5 years ago over a fake pandemic, a hoax. They will do it again but this time to keep you in line with their agendas. As I’ve said MANY times, it has nothing to do with keeping kids online safe but rather its all about controlling everything you do including what you’re allowed to view online.

https://thewinepress.substack.com/p/substack-capitulates-to-uks-online?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=832192&post_id=181052466&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=fh3ja&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

NATO’s Threat to Wage “Preemptive Strikes” Against Russia. Towards “Barbarossa 2.0”? How Will The Kremlin React?

Posted on by Leave a comment
pexels-photo-27794291.jpeg

Guest Post by Drago Bosnic at Global Research.

Feature image:  Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of NATO’s Military Committee

Around the Napoleonic era, Prussian (German) general and military theorist Carl von Clausewitz wrote a book called “On War”. One of his most compelling arguments was the postulate that “war is a mere continuation of policy by other means”. In essence, war is not some sudden, isolated event that just happens randomly, but rather an instrument of political goals that are pursued when diplomatic solutions are no longer viable or wanted by either side.

Clausewitz’s argument emphasizes that war is fundamentally a deliberate political act with a carefully calculated purpose, rather than a purely emotional or violent undertaking. The latter two are merely used for mass manipulation that serves to convince the populace that the war is “just”.

Although written over two centuries ago, such a timeless argument perfectly encapsulates how warfare functions (and has functioned since the dawn of mankind).

This is particularly true for the political West and its centuries-old aggression against the entire world. Since the dawn of the classical colonial era to the modern (or perhaps even postmodern) neocolonial system, the world’s most vile power pole has killed, maimed and enslaved billions of people at virtually every corner of this unfortunate planet. Entire native populations (particularly in the Americas and Australia) have either been wiped out entirely or brought to the point of extinction, robbing the world of their unique societies and civilizations.

.

Carl Von Clausewitz Quote: War Is Not An Independent, 47% OFF

.

It was from this brutal colonialism that countries like the British Empire and the United States emerged, bringing more misery, death and destruction to other “undiscovered” regions of the world, particularly in Africa and Asia, where genocidal Western policies continued with the same ferocity. Clausewitz’s point that warfare is a very deliberate act has been proven time and again, with one caveat being that the political West has become increasingly sophisticated at causing wars and making them seem like they’re unrelated to Western aggression against the world. Whenever any given opponent is too strong for a head-on engagement, the political West resorts to “low blows” and strategic sabotage in an attempt to gain the upper hand.

This has been particularly true for Russia and China, the two global superpowers that Western colonialists were always terrified of fighting directly.

That’s precisely the reason unrest, revolutions and local wars were used against both, starting at least in the early 19th century and continuing to this day (Opium Wars, Crimean War, revolutions in Russia and China financed by Western capital, neocolonial wars and attempts to dismember both countries, etc). Although both Moscow and Beijing refused to give up and kept fighting, the damage done to their societies is virtually impossible to quantify. China lost well over a century from the early 19th to the late 20th century and is yet to fully regain its rightful place in the global arena.

Russia also lost more than a century after its victory in WWI was stolen, pushing it into at least half a decade of civil war, followed by WWII not even 20 years later. The guns were still hot in Europe and the Pacific when the US and the crumbling British Empire conceived “Operation Unthinkable” and dozens of similar plans that involved dropping at least 300 nuclear bombs on Moscow alone. Russia uncovered the plot and pre-empted it by developing its own atomic weapons, forever stifling Western wet dreams about “imposing the will of Anglo-Americans” on the Kremlin through the use of nuclear hellfire. However, these monstrous plans were never really dropped, but merely postponed and left for “better times”.

The political West seems to think those times have come and that the Eurasian giant is greatly weakened due to the unfortunate dismantling of the Soviet Union. NATO’s crawling “Barbarossa 2.0” is strategically almost identical to the original launched by its geopolitical (and literal) Nazi predecessor, albeit conducted through far more sinister and truly Machiavellian policies. However, the endgame is precisely how Clausewitz described it – the continuation of the same policies by different means. Still, while the political West’s cold-blooded calculus is meticulously executed, it’s also fundamentally dominated by one of the most dangerous delusions in human history – that Russia can be defeated.

Namely, Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of NATO’s Military Committee, just told Financial Times that NATO is considering “more proactive measures in response to Russia’s escalating hybrid warfare”. He cited an alleged “rise in Russian-backed cyberattacks, sabotage operations and airspace violations over Europe – which NATO could mirror and more, as any potential ‘pre-emptive strike’ on Russian targets would be justified”. In order to justify this “pre-emptive strike”, Admiral Dragone insisted that such an attack could “under certain circumstances and context be classified as a defensive action”. He also added a laughable claim that this would be “further away from our normal way of thinking and behavior”.

undefined

The very idea that unadulterated, bloodthirsty belligerence is somehow “out of the ordinary” for the most murderous racketeering cartel in human history makes any normal human being lose their breath and convulse due to excessive laughter. Namely, for anyone who hasn’t been living under a rock for the past three to four decades, how many NATO wars can you count off the top of your head alone? Without even considering previous wars and starting only with the post-Cold War era and the direct aggression on Iraq (twice), Serbia/Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, now Venezuela, etc, there have been dozens of official invasions and unofficial NATO-orchestrated “civil” wars that resulted in millions of civilian deaths.

Obviously, not a single NATO official or military officer was ever held accountable for the sea of blood left in their wake. All they ever talk about are “mistakes”, but no “international criminal court” has ever found these admissions peculiar enough to warrant the attention of “international law and justice”. Quite the contrary, the political West (ab)used the so-called “rules-based world order” to the maximum in order to justify NATO’s destruction of the said countries and even presented all of it as some sort of a “noble humanitarian mission”. The world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel is now dead set on pushing the narrative that yet another “just cause” is there, only this time once again against Russia (for God knows which time in the last 800 years).

Moscow’s “evil oppression of poor little NATO” is the ultimate bait for Western audiences in what Washington DC, London and Brussels apparently see as their “last chance to defeat Russia.”

Obviously, they never listened to the advice of their late Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, whose rule 1, on page 1 of the book of war, was: “Do not march on Moscow.” It’s extremely difficult to imagine that people like Admiral Dragone never heard of this advice (effectively a command). However, it seems their arrogance makes them think they know better than one of the people who fought an actual war and defeated Nazi armies in North Africa and Western Europe.

He knew full well that those forces were still only a fraction of German power, which was heavily focused on Russia.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

This article was originally published on InfoBrics.

Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

Feature image:  Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of NATO’s Military Committee

The US’ Latest Energy Power Play Could Worsen Russian-Turkish Tensions

Posted on by Leave a comment

By Andrew Korybko Reposted with permission.

Russia wouldn’t just lose tens of billions of dollars’ worth of yearly revenue if the US’ plans succeed, but tensions with Turkiye might become unmanageable if the complex energy interdependence that tied them together till now is broken, which could destabilize the South Caucasus and Central Asia.

Zelensky announced last month that Ukraine will import American LNG from Greece via the “Vertical Gas Corridor” pipeline. This project complements Poland’s joint LNG plans with the US and to a lesser extent Croatia’s to lay the basis for American LNG completely replacing Russian gas in Central & Eastern Europe (CEE) one day. Although it’s much more expensive, policymakers on the continent are going along with this on energy security pretexts, but US pressure upon them likely played a major role in their decision.

The US’ latest energy power play could also put an end to Russia’s Turkish gas hub plans. These were announced in late 2022 after talks between Putin and Erdogan, but Bloomberg reported last June that they’d been shelved due to technical difficulties in supplying CEE from Turkiye as well as disagreements between it and Russia. Neither party confirmed their report, but now that the US captured more of the CEE market through the “Vertical Gas Corridor” pipeline, the odds of this hub being built have declined.

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou wrote an insightful post on X about this, which importantly noted that the “Eastern Mediterranean (Israel and Cyprus) is watching the start of this vertical corridor closely as it can be utilized to sell future EastMed gas into Europe.” The “EastMed” refers to the proposed underwater pipeline of the same name for exporting Israel’s enormous offshore gas reserves to the EU. Its completion would likely eliminate the need for Russian gas in CEE for good when combined with US LNG.

To make matters even more concerning for Russia, Reuters reported last month that “Turkey’s gas shift threatens Russia and Iran’s last big European market”, which drew attention to how increased domestic production and LNG imports could greatly reduce Turkiye’s future need for Russian gas via TurkStream. Trump’s threatened sanctions on all those who continue importing Russian energy without provably weaning themselves off of it, which could take the form of up to 500% tariffs, could accelerate this trend.

Russia wouldn’t just lose tens of billions of dollars’ worth of yearly revenue if all the aforementioned American plans succeed, but tensions with Turkiye might become unmanageable if the complex energy interdependence that tied them together till now is broken. It’s already expected that Turkiye will inject Western influence into Central Asia through the new TRIPP corridor, thus posing challenges along Russia’s entire southern periphery, which will further complicate Turkish-Russian ties.

If their complex energy interdependence weakens by then, such as if their gas hub plans essentially remain frozen or are officially canceled and Turkiye begins importing less Russian gas from TurkStream, then Turkiye might be emboldened to more aggressively challenge Russia on this front. After all, the scenario of Russia cutting off gas exports in order to coerce concessions from Turkiye during a crisis would be less effective, which could result in more hardline Turkish positions that raise the risk of war.

Russia should therefore seek to revive their gas hub plans and reach an agreement with the US, perhaps as part of the grand deal that they’re trying to negotiate right now, to secure Russia’s gas market share in Turkiye and possibly restore part of it in CEE. That would almost certainly require Russia compromising on some of its maximalist goals in Ukraine, and the US’ word can’t be taken for granted since future presidents could rubbish any deal, but Russia should still consider this possibility instead of ruling it out.

Were The Brits Behind Bloomberg’s Russian-US Leaks?

Posted on by Leave a comment

Guest post by Andrew Korybko. Reposted with permission.

Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service warned earlier the same day as Bloomberg’s report that the Brits are hellbent on discrediting Trump in order to undermine his latest peace efforts for resolving the conflict from which they profit.

Bloomberg shared what it claimed to be the transcripts of calls between Trump’s Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Putin’s top foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov as well as between Ushakov and Putin’s other advisor Kirill Dmitriev about the Ukrainian peace process. The gist of the Witkoff-Ushakov call was Witkoff’s proposal to have Putin suggest a Gaza-like 20-point peace deal for Ukraine during an upcoming call with Trump while the Ushakov-Dmitriev one implied that the leaked draft was Russian-influenced.

Ushakov declined to comment on his talks with Witkoff but said that “Somebody tapped, somebody leaked, but not us” whereas Dmitriev flat-out described his purported call with Ushakov as “fake”. For his part, Trump defended Witkoff’s alleged “coaching” of Ushakov on how Putin should deal with him by reminding everyone “That’s what a dealmaker does. You got to say, ‘Look, they want this – you got to convince them with this.’ That’s a very standard form of negotiations.”

As regards the possibility that the draft framework was Russian-influenced, the notion of which has been pushed by the legacy media to discredit the proposed mutual compromises therein, that was already debunked. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who also serves as National Security Advisor, said that “The peace proposal was authored by the U.S. It is offered as a strong framework for ongoing negotiations It is based on input from the Russian side. But it is also based on previous and ongoing input from Ukraine.”

Therefore, neither transcript is scandalous even if their contents were accurately reported, yet the question arises of who might have tapped and leaked these calls. Intriguingly, earlier the same day that Bloomberg later published their report, Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service warned that the UK “aims to undermine Trump’s efforts to resolve the conflict by discrediting him.” Readers will recall the UK’s role in Russiagate, which they conspired with the CIA, FBI, and the Clinton camp to cook up to against him.

Seeing as how they can no longer collude in this way with their three prior conspirators, the UK might therefore have resorted to leaking those two calls with Ushakov that they might have tapped (possibly among many others) as a last-ditch attempt to discredit the latest unprecedented progress towards peace. This provocation might also have been meant to make Trump panic and fire Witkoff out of fear of another Russiagate 2.0 investigation if this scandal helps the Democrats flip Congress next year.

Firing Witkoff, who’s been central to the recent progress towards peace, could ruin the process right at its most pivotal moment as Zelensky is reportedly considering meeting with Trump very soon to finalize the details of the US-mediated peace framework with Russia. By holding firm, Trump is therefore obstructing efforts to ruin everything that he’s achieved thus far on a Russian-Ukrainian peace deal and consequently revive the Russiagate hoax for helping the Democrats during next year’s midterms.

Accordingly, Bloomberg’ Russian-US leaks can be considered a British intelligence operation for derailing the peace process and perpetuating the conflict from which the UK profits, not to mention meddling in the midterms by giving a fake news-driven boost to the Democrats. Trump revealed that Witkoff will meet with Putin on Monday and might even be joined by his son-in-law Jared Kushner, who helped negotiate the Gaza deal, so more British provocations are expected out of desperation to ruin their talks.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

BREAKING: “U.S. Has Approved This Escalation”. Kiev Regime Attacks Civilians Within Russian Territory. Russia Downs U.S. Tactical Missile System (ATACMS). Act of Sabotage of Trump’s Peace Plan?

Posted on by Leave a comment

Guest Post by Drago Bosnic and Prof Michel Chossudovsky. Reposted with permission.

In the afternoon of November 18, 2025 the Kiev regime and Ukraine’s Armed forces (controlled by two neo-Nazi parties) once again escalated the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict by firing the US-made MGM-140 ATACMS missiles at undisputed Russian territory (specifically Voronezh).

With a maximum range of 300 km, the ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System) is a serious threat to any undefended Russian settlement. At least four missiles were launched from the Kharkov oblast (region), targeting civilian infrastructure in the adjacent Voronezh oblast, prompting a swift Russian defensive response and retaliatory precision strikes.

The incident underscores the intensifying role of US/NATO weapon systems in the Kiev regime’s attacks on Russia proper.

The involvement of Western ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) assets is virtually guaranteed, as the Kiev regime lacks such capabilities. The attacks came at a time when its frontlines are collapsing, prompting desperate measures, such as “PR victories” and terrorist/sabotage attacks.

The sequence began at approximately 14:31 Moscow time (11:31 UTC) on November 18, when the Kiev regime forces fired four ATACMS missiles from a position near Volosskaya Balakleya in the Kharkov oblast, approximately 50 km southeast of the city of Chuguyev.

This launch site, later identified by Russian ISR, used two US-made  which are compatible with ATACMS munitions.

ATACMS Missile and Launch Vehicle

“U.S. Has Approved This Escalation”

According to the U.S. based  Military Watch Magazine:  November 19, 2025

“The Ukrainian Armed Forces have reported the first launch of an MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) ballistic missile strike into internationally recognised Russian territory, with the system’s reliance on Western advisors and satellite guidance indicating that the United States has approved this escalation of the country’s attacks. Commenting on the attack, the Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff pledged: “The use of long-range strike capabilities, including systems such as ATACMS, will continue.”

Unconfirmed reports indicate that the target may have been the Pogonovo training area in the Voronezh region, although Russian sources reported that the missiles were launched against civilian targets.

Although the ATACMS has been used to significant effect multiple times in the past, it has been restricted to targets in disputed territories claimed by both Russia and Ukraine in the Donbas regions and on the Crimean Peninsula. 

The US/NATO missiles were directed at non-military targets in the Voronezh oblast, including the regional geriatric center and an orphanage, signaling an intent to terrorize civilian populations rather than disrupt military operations.

The Map below indicates the Voronezh target within Russia’s territory as well as the Ukraine-Russia border.

The distance between the Russia-Ukraine border and Voronezh is of the order of 70 km.

Act of War against the Russian Federation, Under International Law?

This is not the first time that the Kiev regime (with the support of US/NATO) has targeted urban areas in Russian territory (eg. Kursk and Belgorod).

 What is distinct in this attack is the deliberate targeting of civilians in the city of Voronezh which has a population of more than one million people.

Without Russia’s S-400 Missile Defense System coupled with its advanced air force interception technologies, civilian deaths would have been exceedingly high.

An Act of War “includes any military incursion, no matter how temporary”

Similarly, the bombardment of another state’s territory by land, sea, or air forces constitutes a clear act of war.

Source: Google Map

Visita Voronezh: scopri il meglio di Voronezh, Oblast di Voronezh, nel ...

City of Voronezh

According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, the strikes were part of a broader strategy to divert Moscow’s attention and resources away from frontline advances in the Donbass, where the Russian military continues to move forward and recapture key territories.

The importance of these areas is confirmed even by the Western media which keeps trying to present them as “diminished in strategic value” (a standard operating procedure used as a coping mechanism).

Attempts to diminish the importance of Moscow’s effective counter-attacks, don’t really change anything in practice, as the situation on the ground keeps deteriorating for the Kiezv regime. This is no different from the claims that its air and missile defenses “intercept” more missiles and drones than the Russian military actually fires. In stark contrast, when the Kremlin says it intercepted something, it rarely does so without providing undeniable evidence.

Namely, as Russian air and missile defenses reacted almost instantaneously, they shot down all four ATACMS missiles.

Mere minutes after the launch, the S-400 long-range SAM (surface-to-air missile) and the “Pantsir” hybrid air defense systems detected and engaged the incoming US/NATO threats.

Renowned for its unprecedented 600-km detection radius and 400-km range hypersonic interceptors, the S-400 tracked ATACMS (flying at speeds up to Mach 3) and promptly neutralized them, saving countless lives.

All four missiles were successfully eliminated before reaching the airspace of any major city.

Eyewitness accounts and publicly available footage captured four distinct plumes of smoke rising over Voronezh, visible from ground level and corroborating the interception timeline. Debris was scattered across the area, causing minor structural damage but no human casualties. Falling shrapnel punctured the roofs of the Voronezh Regional Geriatric Center, a nearby orphanage and a single private residence.

This outcome highlighted ATACMS’s vulnerability to modern systems. Despite its advanced features designed to evade air and missile defenses, the missile’s predictable trajectory allowed Russian radars to calculate the exact flight path and counter it more effectively. Russian ISR assets then pinpointed the exact launch coordinates in the Kharkov oblast, with space-based assets, high-altitude reconnaissance drones and electronic warfare units providing real-time data on the MLRS’s position, also revealing the presence of ammunition stockpiles and up to 10 personnel. In a calibrated (no pun intended) retaliatory move, Russian forces deployed a 9K720M “Iskander-M” system that fired one of its 9M723 hypersonic missiles.

Launched from approximately 200 km away and reaching its target in less than a minute, the unrivaled weapon slammed into the launch site with a high-explosive warhead. The strike obliterated at least two M270 launchers, their accompanying ammunition trailers and an estimated 10 servicemen (presumably Ukrainians, although the presence of NATO personnel is also highly likely). The Russian Ministry of Defense released comprehensive visual evidence to substantiate these claims. At 09:47 Moscow time, official photos were disseminated showing wreckages of the downed ATACMS missiles: twisted metal fragments riddled with shrapnel holes from S-400 and “Pantsir” interceptors, including tail sections marked with American serial numbers.

These images provided definite proof of these interceptions, precluding potential Western denials. Footage from the Voronezh oblast depicted the interception sequence: the missiles’ vapor trails arcing toward the city, followed by bright flashes and smoke clouds from the defensive engagements. Additional footage from the subsequent “Iskander-M” precision strike showed the initial impact plume, a massive fireball from detonating ATACMS stockpiles and lingering smoke over the cratered launch site. The response serves both as a warning and deterrent: by publicizing the launcher’s destruction, Russia signaled its ability to track and neutralize Western-supplied assets, thus discouraging further strikes.

Casualty figures from the “Iskander-M” hit are yet to be acknowledged by the Kiev regime, but local sources report “logistical disruptions” in the Kharkov oblast (unsurprisingly, without providing specifics or any additional information). Comically enough, NATO, which sponsored the attack, “expressed concern over escalation risks”. In reality, it was mainly concerned that one of its most potent missile systems not only failed, but was also destroyed mere hours after the unsuccessful launch. The destruction of four ATACMS demonstrated Moscow’s air and missile defense prowess, while the near-instantaneous retribution will likely temper ambitions of further ATACMS, M270 and HIMARS deliveries by the US.

Russia’s Retaliation

Visibly there are divisions within the Trump administration. Was the attack against Voronezh on November 18 intended to side track peace negotiations? The Kremlin retorted on November 19, 2025. An official statement by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation regarding the “attack by long-range American missiles on the city of Voronezh”.

.

“On November 18, 2025, at 14.31 Moscow time, the Kiev regime attempted to launch a missile attack on civilian targets deep in the territory of the Russian Federation. The enemy used four US-made ATACMS tactical missiles in the city of Voronezh. … The fallen fragments of the destroyed missiles damaged the roofs of the Voronezh Regional Gerontological Center and an orphanage for orphaned children, as well as one private household. There are no casualties among civilians,” the Defense Ministry stated.What the western media fails to acknowledge is the following:

.

“The Iskander-M combat crew launched a missile strike on the missile position of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as a result of which two MLRS launchers with ammunition, as well as combat crew personnel (up to 10 people), were destroyed,”

.

In other words, the Kremlin launched a Retaliatory Strike “Iskander-M Targets Ukrainian MLRS on November 19 following the intercepted attack on Voronezh. “Russian forces identified the launch site of the missiles near the settlement of Volosskaya Balakleya in the Kharkov region”. 

“The strike reportedly destroyed two US-made MLRS launchers, along with their ammunition and up to ten personnel. The Iskander-M is a highly accurate, mobile missile system known for its ability to overcome various defense systems. Its use in this instance signals a clear message of escalation from Moscow.” (Archyde)

“War and Peace”. Trump’s 28 Point Peace Plan 

Are there divisions within the U.S administration, not to mention America’s so-called European Allies?

The timing of this operation officially supported by Washington was carried out on November 18, 2025 two days prior to the formal announcement by Trump of a detailed 28 point Peace Plan (November 20, 2025)

Was this an intent to sabotage Trump’s Peace Plan? Trigger an Act of War against the Russian Federation as a means to undermine the Peace Project. 

“US President Donald Trump says he is giving Ukraine [Zelensky] until next Thursday [November 27, 2025] to accept a peace plan the US drafted with Russia.

The White House has reportedly threatened to withdraw American support for Ukraine if the deadline is not met.

The 28-point plan is closely aligned with Russian demands.

It calls for Ukraine to give up territory to Russia, shrink its own military, and drop its plans to join NATO – concessions military analysts say would make Ukraine more vulnerable to any future attack.”

Transcript (Excerpts and Quotations)

President Zelensky

“The pressure on Ukraine is among the heaviest it has ever been. Ukraine may soon face a very difficult choice. Either the loss of dignity or the risk of losing a key partner, either a complex set of 28 points or an extremely difficult winter, the hardest one yet, followed by further risks. A life without freedom, without dignity, without justice. It’s almost 4 years since Russia launched its full-scale invasion”.

Ukraine’s EU-NATO Allies 

Ukraine’s European allies were quick to reiterate their support for President Zelensky.

“The EU is providing military support to Ukraine to help to defend itself and we will continue to do so.”

President Vladimir Putin 

In Moscow, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave his cautious backing to the plan, but said that further discussion was needed.  He added that both Ukraine and Europe needed to understand what would happen if Kiev refused.

“I believe the text can be used as the basis for a final peace settlement, but it has not been discussed with us in detail, and I can guess why. The US government has so far failed to secure Ukraine’s consent. Ukraine is against it.

If Kiev does not want to discuss President Trump’s proposals and refuses to do so, then both they and the European war mongers must understand that the events that took Kubansk will inevitably be repeated in other key areas on the front”

The 28 Points Peace Plan. Informative Video, Biased? Produced prior to the attack on Voronezh.

28 Points of Pain: The Plethora of Problems with the U.S./Russia Peace Plan

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

BREAKING NEWS! Ukraine told to Accept Trump Peace Deal or Else!

Posted on by Leave a comment
pink peace light sign

I guess coercion is as good a way as any to deal with Ukraine and Zelensky since he and his entire government is corrupt to the core. Ukraine’s Zelensky has been given an ultimatum, accept the peace deal that is presented to you or else! What’s the or else? If he refuses, US intelligence, weapons and support will be stopped. He doesn’t have much choice as Ukraine would collapse in days if the US cuts him off.

Personally I don’t believe the war will end, not really. There might be a temporary agreement or ceasefire but the powers that be want war and we are in the end times leading up to Armageddon worldwide, not just in Israel. I can definitely smell a false flag coming. If it does I expect a doozy and Russia will be attacked by NATO directly after it happens. After that all bets are off. Next Thursday is Thanksgiving in the USA. It might not be so peaceful, we shall see.

Prayed up and prepped up, time is short!

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

« Older Entries Recent Entries »