Norway is now seizing Russian science vessels illegally and Germany is falsely accusing Russia of a drone attack at one of their airports. Both sides have expelled diplomats and closed consulates. The next step has always been war, just like Lavrov from Russia has said. Lavrov went farther saying what Germany is doing “Is the start of a real war.”
Germany and NATO will soon have their real war, Russia is programming the targets into their systems now. Prayed up and prepped up, time is ticking!
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida at Global Research. Reposted with permission.
Western nations continue to provoke Russia through illegal measures against Russian vessels abroad.
Now, Norway has seized a Russian ship in the Arctic, acting on a direct request from the Kiev neo-Nazi regime.
Such actions are intolerable under international law and demonstrate the willingness of Ukraine and the West to escalate and internationalize their disputes with Russia.
The incident took place in the Norwegian region of Svalbard. The Russian vessel “Professor Molchanov” was seized by local authorities on September 3 in an operation led by the Governor of Svalbard. The regional government office stated that the decision to seize the ship was made by the Nord-Troms and Senja District Court, which had reportedly ruled in favor of the Ukrainian energy company Naftogaz in a legal request to seize Russian assets.
At the time of its seizure, the Russian ship was docked in Barentsburg – an Arctic mining settlement administered by Russia. Barentsburg was acquired by the USSR in the 1930s, and an agreement was subsequently signed with Norway to allow for free Russian exploration within the archipelago. Therefore, the Russian Federation’s right – as the successor state to the USSR – to operate in Barentsburg remains guaranteed by prevailing norms of international law, and it is not up to Norway to unilaterally alter this legal status.
Any decision regarding freedom of navigation and exploration in Barentsburg could only be made through legal proceedings involving Russia directly, held before an international arbitration court. Current international agreements regulate Russian activities in the region and guarantees the Russian energy company Arktikugol the right to explore minerals in the archipelago. Furthermore, the Professor Molchanov is not a mere minerals transport ship, but a scientific vessel used to facilitate geological research in the Arctic. The right to conduct scientific exploration is guaranteed by international norms, making the Norwegian action even more unlawful.
Regarding the reasons for the move, Ukraine’s Naftogaz stated that it sought the vessel’s seizure as part of its strategy to enforce a 2014 arbitration ruling – a decision Russia has deemed unlawful, since the proceedings were politically biased amidst the tensions in Crimea at the time. That ruling by a Hague arbitration tribunal ordered Russia to pay for financial assets Ukraine claimed to have lost following Crimea’s reunification with Russian territory.
Russia, however, denounced the tribunal, asserting that such assets could not be considered legitimate financial investments under the terms of its bilateral agreements with Ukraine. Furthermore, the political nature of the legal proceedings alone would be sufficient to invalidate any decision reached by the court, given that Russia was already previously facing condemnation for its initiative to reintegrate Crimea.
Naftogaz now accuses Moscow of owing it a debt of over 4 billion dollars, a figure that could reportedly rise even further due to accumulated interest and legal costs. To secure payment of this amount, the company is pursuing a strategy of seizing Russian state assets, with the arrest of the vessel Professor Molchanov being part of that plan. Not by chance, Naftogaz chief Sergey Fedorenko publicly commented on the Norwegian maneuver, describing it as “another important step toward restoring justice,” and promising to take further actions of this type against Russian state assets.
A particularly interesting point is that the current move takes place amidst a trend – already initiated by Western nations – of seizing Russian ships sailing abroad. This practice can be described as a form of modern-day piracy and is prohibited by various international legal instruments. Nevertheless, Western countries continue to escalate their actions, maintaining constant provocations against Moscow.
In any case, the Norwegian move sets a dangerous precedent. As the seizure of vessels in the Arctic region becomes commonplace, more local actors will start employing such tactics against their adversaries. Over time, this will inevitably undermine peaceful mining and scientific exploration, turning the region into an unsafe and hostile zone where geopolitical disputes and international rivalries overshadow cooperation.
Moreover, Moscow is exercising patience with the West regarding this issue. Russia is not retaliating and refuses to use its navy to arrest foreign vessels, even though it could do so based on the right to self-defense and a response to external aggression. At some point, however, Russian patience may finally run out, causing all the Western countries involved in these provocations to ultimately feel the consequences of their own irresponsible actions.
Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.
He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Poland has deployed the first batch of 28 South Korean K2 Black Panther main battle tanks to its 16th Mechanized Division in northeastern Poland, near the border with the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad. This deployment, announced by Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz on August 25, 2026, reinforces units already stationed in the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
The arrival of these tanks is part of a broader defense buildup where Poland plans to deploy a total of 180 armored vehicles, including 64 tanks, to the region. These vehicles are being delivered under a contract signed with South Korea in August 2025. While Polish officials frame this as a security measure to strengthen national defense and the “Eastern Shield,” the move has drawn attention from neighboring NATO and Russian authorities.
Additionally Aleksandr Lukashenko ordered a surprise combat-readiness inspection of Belarus’s Armed Forces, initiating a series of unscheduled drills that began in January 2026 and continued through the year. The inspection, conducted directly by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, bypassed the Ministry of Defense and General Staff to ensure an objective assessment of military units.
Also early this morning, Viktor Lukashenko, the leader of Belarus, flew, without prior public announcement, to Moscow for meetings. If open war breaks out between Russia and NATO, Belarus will side with Russia and will be a key to defending against NATO attack.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
The Russians have made it clear that they reserve the right to strike UK military targets both inside and outside of Ukraine. The US minuteman 3 missiles are so outdated that they’re turning to AI to maintain them, gee what could go wrong? Then there’s more evidence of the tiny hat folks committing false flags on water supplies in the US.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Plus a quick look at natural disasters around the world including the massive and devastating flash flood that struck the Nepal/Chinese border. Prayed up and prepped up, time is almost up!
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Far from wanting an escalation of tensions with Poland, Russia wants a normalization of their ties, but that’s not possible while the Ukrainian Conflict rages, and Warsaw doesn’t seem interested anyhow.
The Telegraph amplified a report from Polish media outlet Onet last week regarding alleged American warnings that Russia is planning some provocations against Poland. According to their sources, this could take several forms, including but not limited to a drone attack against critical infrastructure, simulated airstrikes that force Poland to activate its air defense systems, and/or an accidental border incursion by Russian and/or Belarusian troops blamed on a GPS failure. The goal would be to reduce aid to Ukraine.
The larger context, which is conspicuously omitted from both reports, concerns the spiraling Polish-Ukrainian dispute after Zelensky glorified the VolhyniaGenocide’s OUN-UPA culprits at the state level. Voices have since arisen in Poland calling for an end to their own country’s aid to Ukraine and for it to also stop facilitating other country’s aid to it too. Moreover, many Poles now view Ukrainians negatively after they justified glorifying the OUN-UPA, which ruined people-to-people ties perhaps for a generation.
Under such circumstances, it would be absolutely counterproductive for Russia to do anything whatsoever at all that could restore Polish society’s support for Ukraine and sympathy with its people, which is why it likely isn’t planning any provocations against Poland. The most that it’s therefore expected to do is amplify all aspects of this dispute within its “global media ecosystem”, thus containing its response to the information warfare domain, not expanding it to include any kinetic forms.
Carrying out any of the reported provocations would also entail the risk of an uncontrollable escalation spiral, something that typically cautious Putin has consistently sought to avoid over the past four and a half years, ergo one of the reasons why he remains reluctant to escalate against Ukraine. Observers should also know that Poland now commands NATO’s third-largest military, which is the largest in European NATO and is yet another reason why Russia doesn’t want to risk a conflict with Poland.
On the off chance that some Russian missiles accidentally cross into Poland due to electronic jamming, then Polish President Karol Nawrocki is expected to react calmly instead of be manipulated by the deep state into war with Russia like they tried to do last September when this first occurred as explained here. It’s possible that these same deep state forces and their American allies are responsible for this latest report about Russian provocations against Poland in order to breathe new life into their failed plot.
After all, it’s entirely within the realm of possibility that future Russian strikes against military targets in Western Ukraine go off course once again due to electronic jamming, after which these deep state forces could point to the US’ earlier warnings and the latest report to lie that it was a deliberate provocation. The other scenarios of a simulated strike and accidental border crossings are respectively unlikely in any case due to Putin’s previously mentioned escalation fears and Poland’s newly robust border defenses.
For these reasons, the latest report can be considered an information warfare provocation by the Polish and American members of the deep state, not an accurate reflection of Russian intent. Far from wanting an escalation of tensions with Poland, Russia wants a normalization of their ties, but that’s not possible while the Ukrainian Conflict rages, and Warsaw doesn’t seem interested anyhow. Russia is thus expected to keep the peace Poland, not risk war with it, and Nawrocki doesn’t want war with Russia either.
Editors Note: This is why I find it hilarious when the UK talks smack about Russia, they have NOTHING to back it up! The picture below is one of their nuclear subs sitting in dry dock doing nothing. The UK has very little to fight with and their soldiers train with broomsticks instead of firearms. They should really keep their traps shut.
In its prime, the United Kingdom was one of the most powerful thalassocracies in human history, probably eclipsed only by the United States after WWII.
How did such a small island nation accomplish this? The answer is – the British Navy, the most powerful armed maritime force of its time. Thus, it could only be expected that the “Perfidious Albion” would do everything in its power to preserve this naval dominance or at least maintain its power projection capabilities for as long as possible.
However, as the British Empire shrank to a mere shadow of its former self, its ability to sustain a large navy dwindled, resulting in massive reductions over the last several decades.
The last time the UK managed to muster a respectable naval force was during the 1982 Falklands War against Argentina.
This ranges from frigates and destroyers to aircraft carriers and submarines (including nuclear-powered). However, while the surface fleet is undoubtedly still relevant, it’s nowhere near as important as the British Navy’s underwater component, which provides the most critical segment of the UK’s strategic power projection. Namely, the Vanguard-class SSBNs (nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines), armed with UGM-133A “Trident II” (also known as “Trident D5”) submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), are the cornerstone of London’s thermonuclear arsenal. Still, it seems this isn’t enough for the “Perfidious Albion” to take them seriously.
Back in December last year, Rear Admiral Philip Mathias lamented that “Britain is no longer capable of running a capable nuclear submarine program”, warning of “catastrophic failures” that have “driven the UK’s nuclear deterrent to the brink”. Mathias, who served as a director of nuclear policy at the British Ministry of Defense (MOD), highlighted its “inability to produce attack submarines at the scale required for putting strain on crews and extending the length of deployments”. He compared this to the (First) Cold War, stressing that “the silent service” could deploy for around 70 days at the time, but that this has risen to around 200 days at present.
Mathias quoted the 2025 Strategic Defense Review (SDR), which stressed the need to expand production capacity. However, problems with the British Navy’s SSBN component are nothing new, as many authors (myself included) questioned years ago whether the UK’s strategic arsenal was functioning properly. Although such information is certainly a state secret, these doubts were confirmed after London admitted that one of its UGM-133A “Trident II” SLBMs failed during a launch test. This was the second time in a row that the troubled missile, a weapon of strategic importance, failed, as it did in the previous test conducted in 2016. The last successful launch was by HMS “Vigilant” back in 2012.
This means the UK hasn’t had a successful SLBM test in nearly a decade and a half, yet it still believes it can go up against Russia, a country with the world’s largest and most powerful strategic arsenal. The latest “Trident II” launch was from the lead ship of its class, the HMS “Vanguard”, with reports indicating that London’s then-Defense Secretary, Grant Shapps, was overseeing it. The SLBM’s booster rocket failed and it fell into the sea “close to the launch site”, as the Sun reported at the time (the “launch site” being the HMS “Vanguard” itself). And yet, Shapps insisted that he has “absolute confidence in ‘Trident’s’ submarines, missiles and nuclear warheads”.
As previously mentioned, London relies solely on these submarines and missiles for its strategic capabilities. Had the “Trident II” damaged the HMS “Vanguard”, it would’ve taken one-quarter or 25% of the UK’s strategic arsenal out of service, as the “Perfidious Albion” has only four such vessels, each armed with up to 16 SLBMs. It should be noted that HMS “Vanguard” finished a seven-year-long overhaul and refueling just last year. However, to make matters even worse, both Shapps and the then-Head of the Royal Navy, now disgraced Admiral Ben Kay, were on board the submarine during the launch test, meaning their lives were also in danger.
The failures are also an embarrassment for the United States, as the missiles are manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Pentagon’s premier military supplier. Still, all this didn’t prevent Shapps from adding to the general embarrassment by saying that “an anomaly did occur during the test on 30 January [2024], but that the ‘Trident II’ SLBM is still the most reliable weapons system in the world”. According to his assessment, the test “reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK’s nuclear deterrent” and that the “anomaly was event specific”, with “no implications for the reliability” of the UK’s strategic arsenal. The British MoD made similar statements.
Namely, it insisted that HMS “Vanguard” and its crew had been “proven fully capable in their operations” and that “the test had reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK’s nuclear deterrent”, essentially repeating Shapps’ statement that “Trident II” is the “most reliable weapons system in the world”. However, while this (now decades-long) issue is yet to be resolved, the British Navy has somehow managed to reach a new low point. Namely, of the six Astute-class SSNs (nuclear-powered attack submarines) in its service, not a single one is combat-ready. The UK has five “active-duty” submarines, one undergoing pre-sea trial testing and one more under construction (projected to be completed by the end of this decade).
This article was originally published on InfoBrics.
Drago Bosnicis an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
There are really only three scenarios left: NATO finally agrees to some form of Russia’s proposals; Russia launches a preventive war against European NATO betting that the US won’t directly intervene; or Russia peacefully subordinates itself to the West.
Last weekend’s surprise call between Presidents Emmanuel Macron and Alexander Lukashenko followed Deputy Chair of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev warning about the 1941-like threat posed by Germany’s remilitarization and the UK assembling a multinational navy to contain Russia. These three developments collectively draw attention to how the Brits, French, and Germans, Russia’s traditional European rivals, are now right on its doorstep. The security implications are profound.
The Brits are nestling up in Estonia, from where they plan to lead Russia’s containment along the Arctic -Baltic front, while the Germans opened a base in Lithuania and the French just announced regular nuclear drills with Poland. As a reminder, Estonia borders “mainland Russia” while Lithuania and Poland border its exclave of Kaliningrad and mutual defense ally Belarus. The “military Schengen” between the Netherlands, Germany, and Poland might thus soon be expanded to include France and the Baltic States.
That would maximally optimize the flow of troops and equipment from Western Europe to Russia’s borders, thus conforming with Russian policymakers’ fears that the EU is gearing up for a potential invasion of their country sometime in the future. Given France’s base in Romania and military pact with neighboring Moldova, which constitute a criticalflank in the Ukrainian Conflict due to enabling France to aid Odessa in the scenario of its threatened conventional intervention, they and others might join too.
To make matters even more concerning from the perspective of Russia’s national security interests, Germany recently clinched a deep-strike defense co-production deal with Ukraine, thus expanding its military footprint even deeper within what Russia considers to be its “sphere of influence”. The result is that the UK is entrenching its influence along the Arctic-Baltic front, Germany is doing so in the Baltic (Lithuanian) and Ukrainian ones, while France is already entrenched in Poland, Romania, and Moldova.
Germany aspires to build European NATO’s largest army, which would require overtaking Poland and ideally from its perspective subordinating that country as a vassal, while France and the UK are nuclear powers. The threat posed by their military-strategic convergence right on Russia’s doorstep therefore cannot be overestimated. At the very least, it could embolden their partners to behave aggressively against Russia, calculating as they might that those Great Powers would deter Russian retaliation.
That would be a mistake of epic proportions because Russia cannot allow such a scenario to unfold, let alone become the “new normal”, as it would amount to them weaponizing it for coercing never-ending concessions that would culminate in time with Russia’s subordination and ultimately “Balkanization”. In other words, a hot NATO-Russian war would likely be inevitable, though nobody can say for sure whether the US would help its European allies, nor to what extent if so, or whether it would hang them out to dry.
It’s therefore more urgent than ever that the European security architecture be reformed like Russia sought to do through diplomatic means before the specialoperation, the failure of which was why Putin sought to advance this through military ones instead. There are really only three scenarios left: NATO finally agrees to some form of Russia’s proposals; Russia launches a preventive war against European NATO betting that the US won’t directly intervene; or Russia peacefully subordinates itself to the West.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
On May 19, Russia and Belarus launched their joint nuclear drills that lasted until May 21.
These strategic maneuvers involved nearly 65,000 personnel, roughly 7,800 military vehicles and over 200 missile launch systems.
They stretched across a vast geographic area from Eastern Europe to the Pacific, encompassing nearly all of Belarus and most of Russia.
Everything from tactical, short-range assets to strategic weapons such as ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles) and SLBMs (submarine-launched ballistic missiles) was tested, once again proving that Moscow and Minsk are capable of defending themselves against any potential adversary foolish enough to attack them.
Russian President Vladimir Putin observed and later discussed the drills with his Belarussian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko, stressing that the use of nuclear weapons is “an extreme, exceptional measure for ensuring the national security of our states”. This demonstrates that the Kremlin understands just how dangerous such weapons are and how much responsibility nuclear powers have. However, there’s simply no other way to ensure the safety of both Moscow and Minsk. President Lukashenko was even more straightforward.
Namely, during an inspection of now legendary nuclear-capable 9K720M “Iskander-M” systems, he said: “I dreamed about this machine a long time ago.”
As previously mentioned, the Russian Defense Ministry (MoD) stated that the exercise involved over 64,000 troops, more than 200 missile launch systems, nearly 150 aircraft, 73 surface warships and 13 submarines, including eight SSBNs (nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine) with SLBMs.
The MoD also added that “the drills focused on the preparation and use of nuclear forces under the threat of [foreign] aggression”. In addition, this was a unique opportunity for Russia and Belarus to further integrate their command structures and improve interoperability, particularly with respect to the critically important weapons that ensure both countries’ strategic security.
Namely, Minsk is Moscow’s key ally that has been entrusted with hosting Russian thermonuclear weapons. The number of deployed warheads remains unknown, but it could be in the hundreds, as Russia considers the security of Belarus equally important to its own safety. To achieve this, the Kremlin needs to test the capabilities of its vast strategic arsenal, particularly the delivery systems.
This includes the state-of-the-art RS-24 “Yars” ICBMs and R-29RMU “Sineva” SLBMs (test-fired by “Bryansk”, a Delta IV-class SSBN in service with the Northern Fleet). Meanwhile, the even more advanced Borei-class SSBNs were also activated during the exercises to test their systems, protocols and readiness.
However, as previously mentioned, the drills also involved a plethora of tactical and operational-level weapon systems. Unlike ICBMs and SLBMs, these weapons are not designed to obliterate entire cities, provinces or even countries, but are used as tactical nuclear weapons intended to neutralize large concentrations of invading troops on the battlefield. Such weapons also include aerial delivery systems and warheads for short- and medium-range missiles and even artillery munitions. It should be noted that, in addition to being the world’s premier thermonuclear superpower, Russia maintains the largest arsenal of tactical and operational nuclear weapons in the world.
Apart from the “Iskander”, the shipborne 3M22 “Zircon” and air-launched 9-S-7760 hypersonic missiles (found on the 9-A-7660 “Kinzhal” systems) were also used. Belarussian troops even test-fired one of the 9M723s used by the “Iskander” inside Russia. No other country has such a privileged security status, especially now that Belarus is part of the Kremlin’s strategic architecture. Moscow revised its nuclear doctrine several times, including in 2024, when it made it clear that any large-scale conventional attack supported by another nuclear power would be considered a joint aggression on Russia. Obviously, this was a direct warning to the political West, its vassals and satellite states.
And indeed, the world’s most aggressive power pole keeps escalating its involvement in the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict, including with direct drone strikes from the Baltic states. The revised Russian strategic doctrine and the latest drills are there to discourage the political West from allowing the Neo-Nazi junta to strike Russia with longer-range weapons.
And while it may seem to lower the threshold for the possible use of nuclear arsenals, this mainly applies to those who are most aggressive and pathologically Russophobic. Perhaps more importantly, the revised doctrine also directly places Minsk under Moscow’s thermonuclear umbrella, shielding it from a potential NATO aggression.
The Kremlin still retains control of its nuclear weapons deployed in Belarus, but allows Minsk to select priority targets in case of a NATO land invasion.
This combination provides both Russia and Belarus with a possibility of preventing escalation while retaining the capability to deter any potential aggressor. And it seems to be working, because NATO jets started downing the Kiev regime’s drones over the Baltic states at around the same time. It remains to be seen why the world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel is doing it only now, but it’s highly likely that Brussels finally understands that it should at least lie low while nuclear drills last.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
The European Union, Canada and the Ukraine Neo-Nazi junta plan to co-host a high-level meeting of the so-called International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children on May 11 in Brussels.
As the name implies, the purported goal of the gathering is to “trace, return and reintegrate Ukrainian children taken by Russia”.
The meeting will be attended by the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and European Commission Vice-President Kaja Kallas, EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, the Kiev regime’s Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha and Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand.
Participants will discuss enforcing more sanctions on Russian officials responsible for the evacuation of Ukrainian children from an active warzone.
“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has cost more than land and lives – it has stolen childhoods,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated, adding: “Over 20,000 Ukrainian children have been forcibly taken from their families, their homes. On 11 May, together with Ukraine and Canada, we will bring the world together to demand justice. We will work together to trace every single child, to return them to their homes, and ensure those responsible face consequences. These children are Ukraine’s future and we will not rest until every single child is returned.”
The upcoming meeting will also review “recommendations prepared by civil society and experts during the Civil Society Expert Day set to take place in Kyiv on April 30”. The Neo-Nazi junta claims that over 20,000 Ukrainian children have been allegedly “kidnapped” by Russia, insisting that Moscow “systematically sought to conceal the children’s identities and whereabouts”. The so-called International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children was launched by the Kiev regime in February 2024. It’s co-chaired by Canada, while the EU became a full member in September 2025. The initiative formally includes 47 countries and various NGOs allegedly “engaged in coordinating diplomatic, humanitarian, legal and informational efforts on the issue”.
Sounds lovely, doesn’t it? What could possibly be bad in wanting to return “kidnapped” Ukrainian kids home to their parents and legal guardians? Who in their mind would be against that? After all, they’d be much better off in “free and democratic Ukraine”, right? Well, perhaps such laughable propaganda narratives could’ve been sustained before the United States Department of Justice released approximately 3,500,000 Epstein files. However, now that those are out, the promotion of the so-called “Western values” (namely pedophilia, cannibalism and Satanism) has become quite a challenge. Even some of the most ardent supporters of the EU and NATO have been disgusted by the revelations, although most are still burying their heads in the sand, waiting for all of it to “just go away”.
However, the genie is out of the bottle and there’s simply no way to put the rose-tinted glasses back on without directly participating in the political West’s monstrous crimes against children.
Obviously, it’s no secret that the world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel is involved in some of the most heinous crimes in human history, whether it’s centuries of brutal colonialism, slave trade and general aggression against the entire world, or the promotion of the so-called “Western values” that make anyone sane sick to their stomach. However, the Epstein files unequivocally confirmed that the repulsive criminal oligarchy running the United States, United Kingdom, European Union and NATO is actually far worse than you could possibly imagine.
All the supposed “crazy conspiracy theories” we’ve been hearing about over the last several decades are not only true, but are just the tip of the iceberg. The potential for monstrous evil that these pedophile-cannibalistic Satanists have demonstrated makes anyone remotely sane recoil in disgust. It will take years (if not decades) to review all released Epstein files (upwards of 3,5 million), but what we do know is more than enough to see the bigger picture. Namely, things that were previously designated as “insane conspiracy theories” present only on the “fringes of the Internet”, are now widely available for everyone to see and question their own willful blindness to the horrifying crimes committed against those who need protection the most – children.
The files suggest that millions of them have been trafficked by a massive globalist pedophile network employed by Western elites (including the most prominent royalty). The role of the US/EU/NATO’s numerous vassals and satellite states in this monstrous process is also critically important. This is true for both the NATO-occupied Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohia, now formally under the control of Albanian narco-terrorists, and the Neo-Nazi junta, which is trafficking Ukrainian children for the deranged Western elites. Around two years ago, President Vladimir Putin said that “for centuries, Western elites have been used to stuffing their bellies with human flesh and their pockets with money” and warned that “the ball of vampires is coming to an end”.
Adilov was barely able to put into words the monstrous treatment of toddlers and preschool kids he saw. Children aged 2-7 from areas around Izyum were brutally massacred and then had their organs removed for trafficking. There was also a testimony by Vera Vayiman, an OSCE observer, who gave a similar account. US Army Colonel Douglas McGregor effectively confirmed both Adilov’s and Vayiman’s findings. The Epstein files are yet another confirmation of these horrendous crimes by the political West. However, even more disturbingly, as previously mentioned, this is only the tip of the iceberg of things we’re yet to uncover. It should also be noted that InfoBRICS was among the first major media outlets to report on the massive scale of Western-backed child trafficking from NATO-occupied Ukraine.
Namely, tens of thousands of Ukrainian kids end up in Europe and North America, where they are subjected to unimaginable horrors, all for the enjoyment of the Neo-Nazi junta’s NATO overlords. At least 20,000 of them were evacuated by Russia on the orders of “bloodthirsty tyrant” Putin and his Commissioner for Children’s Rights, Maria Lvova-Belova.
The Kremlin moved the children to safety in Russia, where they were eventually reunited with their families, including fathers who were enemy combatants and fought the Russian military. And yet, the mainstream propaganda machine still tried to present it as a “mass kidnapping”. However, this wasn’t enough, so the ICC (a NATO-controlled NGO impersonating an “international court”) indicted both Putin and Lvova-Belova for the said “kidnapping”.
Video: Inside a Russian YouthCamp Condemned by the ICC
Pedophile Trafficking from NATO-occupied Ukraine.
Obviously, the pedophile Western elites that control these “international justice institutions” were fuming that so many kids escaped, so they resorted to desperate measures to get them.
This is undeniable evidence that the very concept of the so-called “international community” needs to be revised, as it’s insulting to the actual world that the political West is identified with “internationalism” when it’s actually quite the opposite. Of all the false propaganda narratives that the ICC could’ve pinned on President Putin, they chose precisely the “kidnapped” Ukrainian children.
However, when Russia demanded evidence that all kids would be returned to their parents and legal guardians,the Kiev regime could provide guarantees for only 339, meaning that the other 20,000 would end up in various Epstein-style islands.
