Tag Archives: #USA

The US Government (ICE) is Punishing a Family for Crimes they didn’t Commit!

What was their offense? The mother of the male who has been detained served as an interpreter for Iran during the 1979 hostage crisis. Unbelievable. The man arrested hadn’t even been born yet and he and his wife were legal, permenant residents until the US State Dept. revoked their status because of his mother.

This administration is the most corrupt and horrible government in US history. These people were LEGAL and yet the US Govt. can make anything up at any time to get people deported. Horrible. Woe unto those who call evil good and good evil! From the Nation Magazine on FB. Pray for these folks to be released and all charges dropped!

My name is Maryam Tahmasebi, and I am a professor of psychology and statistics at Los Angeles Pierce College—or, I was, until April 9, when my life, and my family’s lives, changed forever. On that day, I was teaching a class when my son texted me, saying that my husband hadn’t picked him up from school and wasn’t answering his phone, which is very unlike him. I picked my son up from school, came frantically back home, and called the police, thinking that something horrible must have happened to him. Even so, it never occurred to me that he could have been detained by ICE. We are legal permanent residents with valid green cards. My husband, Eissa Hashemi, is also a professor, and has dedicated his life to mentoring PhD students in the Business Psychology department of The Chicago School. The government had decided to punish my husband for being the son of a woman who was a translator for the Iranian hostage takers in 1979, before Eissa was even born.

My son and I have spent over 120 days in the Dilley Immigration Processing Center, away from my husband, who was taken to the South Texas Detention Center in Pearsall, Texas. We have been put through hell for the past four months, and our physical and mental health have deteriorated in ways that might not be reversible for years. We are only allowed to speak with my husband for 10 minutes every two weeks, under supervision.

We are in tremendous pain and have been trapped in an unendurable, unending nightmare. I want my son to have a normal life, not spend his days in this awful detention center in Dilley. No child deserves this. No human deserves this. We are asking anyone with a conscience to help us end this nightmare. There are more things I want to say, but this is the shackled version of what I feel safe saying right now. I will end on this: If this could happen to us, a law-abiding family of two professors and a young boy, it can happen to anyone. Read more from Maryam Tahmasebi: https://www.thenation.com/…/maryam-tahmasebi-iran-ice…

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

NATO to Double or Triple US Nuclear Sharing Warheads, Normalize a Confrontation Which Could Lead to Thermonuclear War

dramatic fire and explosion scene outdoors

By Drago Bosnik from Global Research

NATO is no longer even bothering to hide that it wants to expand its nuclear footprint on the “old continent”. Namely, the most aggressive racketeering cartel in recorded history is sliding into an increasingly dangerous nuclear posture, with the shift being sold as “routine deterrence”. In reality, the change is a deliberate widening of escalation options aimed at upending Russia.

Combined with France’s preparation of a base for nuclear-capable “Rafale” fighter jets, this process is effectively a (geo)political and military masterclass in “normalizing” a confrontation that could bring about thermonuclear annihilation of humanity. With the new “Eastern Front” closer to a hair-trigger condition than ever before, this sort of escalation is virtually guaranteed to deliver what Western warmongering oligarchies have wanted for centuries – an all-out war with Russia.

Firstly, it should be understood that even from a theoretical point of view, this is not static deterrence, but an active preparation for offensive nuclear warfare.

New infrastructure, upgraded airbases, greater readiness for nuclear-capable assets, massive expansion of delivery options and systems, etc., none of which are “administrative measures” or “senseless red tape”.

This changes the strategic equation by making it easier to initiate nuclear escalation at shorter notice, giving Russia little to no time to evaluate response options and forcing it to rely on absolute use of its devastating firepower. In simpler terms, the Kremlin is left with no choice but to launch its entire strategic arsenal, by far the largest and most powerful in the world, if any incoming missile from NATO-occupied Europe is detected.

The general public, largely oblivious to the current nuclear posture developments, is actively being lied to that these steps are “defensive”, because Moscow is “aggressive”.

However, the practical reasoning is to deepen the permanence of nuclear tensions in Europe. The role of Paris is especially telling, as it exposes the contradictions at the heart of the EU’s nuclear posture. Namely, France likes to frame its strategic arsenal as an “instrument of sovereignty” that’s supposedly separate from NATO’s wider nuclear posture. And yet, the timing of preparing airbases for nuclear strikes involving its “Rafale” fighter jets tells a very different story. What conclusion is Russia supposed to make given that the processes are concurrent? Would anyone with an ounce of “grey matter” view it as “purely coincidental”?

Thus, it can only be expected that Moscow will not view any of this as a series of isolated incidents. In the current geopolitical climate, this is clearly part of NATO’s wider doctrinal shift aimed at projecting strategic pressure, complicating Russian deterrence planning and tightening the nuclear dimension of European security. The nuclear integration of the US, EU and NATO is where the danger multiplies and grows exponentially. When nuclear-capable jets, forward operating bases and broader coordination are normalized at once, the line between deterrence and provocation effectively vanishes. In which twisted universe can doubling (if not tripling) the number of deployed nuclear warheads be seen as defensive? And to say nothing of the fact that they’re going to be placed in Finland, Poland and Lithuania.

Namely, all three countries border Russia. In practice, this means there would be a “nuclear wall” stretching from the Arctic all the way to the heart of Central Europe. That’s around 3,800 km of frontline that could explode into a thermonuclear annihilation at virtually any moment. Any move presented as “deterrence” could lead to cataclysmic consequences, meaning there’s zero room for error. And yet, NATO’s constant belligerence has reduced diplomatic contacts with Moscow to exchanging protest notes. The more the “old continent” is wired for nuclear war, the less response time leaders on both sides have in an escalating crisis. This dramatically increases the chance that what could be a temporary geopolitical flare-up becomes a military emergency before anyone can stop it or at least slow it down.

In addition, NATO’s wider nuclear build-up perfectly fits the Pentagon’s “geopolitics of controlled chaos”. In practice, that translates into a NATO-occupied Europe that’s mainly useful as a springboard for strategic pressure against the Kremlin. The overall nuclear posture keeps moving closer to the point where peace is maintained only by the threat of immediate catastrophe. This sort of “logic” is precisely what drove the world to the edge of the abyss during the (First) Cold War. It culminated in the late 1980s, with strategic arsenals in tens of thousands of thermonuclear warheads. NATO’s aggressive posture and forward deployment of offensive weapons forced the Soviet Union to build nearly 50,000 thermonuclear warheads, the largest and most destructive strategic arsenal in human history.

Hopeful that long-term peace with the political West was possible, Russia reduced this massive strategic asset to just about 12% of what it was at the time. What did it get instead? Only more belligerence and truly unprovoked aggression, while being presented as a “threat”. Not to mention the total disregard for its most basic national security interests, including NATO-backed terrorist attacks on Russian civilians and energy infrastructure. Faced with such odds, Moscow had no choice but to dramatically increase the effectiveness of its thermonuclear arsenal. Namely, while the Soviet arsenal had around 60% of missiles with MIRV (multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle) warheads, modern Russia has upward of 90% of MIRV-ed missiles, demonstrating how NATO aggression keeps making the world less safe.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Iran Blows up American Base in Saudi Arabia

Military airbase with multiple explosions, thick black smoke, aircraft, and defense activity during sunset

Iran took out a B2 Stealth Bomber on the ground in the process of destroying the base.

Iran is dictating how this war goes, not the US and Israel. They’ve lost the initiative and they’re out of ammo.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

US Resumed Aggression against Iran. Woeful Military Incompetence. “Hiding The Scale of American Losses”

Falling cracked Roman column with debris, fires and soldiers running through burning ancient city ruins

Editors Note: I’ve been saying it since the war against Iran begain again in Feb. of this year, that the Pentagon is hiding the casualties of the war in Iran from the American people. They quietly changed the numbers last weekend but I don’t believe those are accurate either, I believe they’re much higher as does the author of this post. We may never know how many Americans have died fighting for fake Israel.

Mystery Babylon America is headed for destruction very soon.

By Drago Bosnik of Global Research. Posted with permission.

American aggression on Iran has once again laid bare deep structural failures in the Pentagon’s strategy, force planning and mission oversight. Instead of a short, decisive “shock & awe” victory we usually see in pathetic Hollywood propaganda,

Washington DC finds itself bleeding personnel, money and exorbitantly expensive precision-guided munitions in ways that weaken its broader power and image while delivering very few (if any) evident strategic gains. The casualty data itself is highly unreliable, but still signals a fundamental miscalculation. According to CNN, by late July at least 18 US soldiers have been killed and 624 wounded since America launched its truly unprovoked aggression against Iran on February 28.

While the figures are nowhere near catastrophic by historical standards, they are (geo)politically significant in a conflict sold as “limited and tightly controlled”. The fact that the Pentagon initially allowed casualty numbers in its own database to decrease before quietly correcting them, and then introduced a vague new “overseas operations” category without clearly linking it to its Iran war, suggests an institutional reluctance to confront or honestly explain the human cost. A government that cannot be straight with its own public about casualties undoubtedly lost sight of institutional (and legal) accountability. Worse yet, the actual irrecoverable casualties could be (and most likely are) exponentially greater.

At the operational level, the war reveals a gaping mismatch between the Trump administration’s ambitions and the capabilities of the US Military Industrial Complex (MIC). As military sources report, the Pentagon wasted over 800 “Patriot” interceptors in just 3-5 days against the Iranian military, rapidly depleting one of the most sophisticated air defense inventories in NATO. Annual production of PAC-3 interceptors is around 600, which is nowhere near enough to replace what was used in about half a week, especially when production is already committed to foreign orders, including for the Kiev regime. The situation is so bad that the US military actually decided to resume purchases of cheaper, but much older and less capable PAC-2 interceptors.

This comes after a 30-year pause in PAC-2 production and signifies that the decision is certainly not a sign of adaptive wit, but an admission that decades of procurement focused exclusively on exorbitantly expensive small batches of supposedly “super-advanced” PAC-3 missiles. It left the US woefully unprepared for a sustained, high-intensity war, especially against a heavily armed country like Iran. Such chronic shortages have triggered cascading strategic compromises. To keep “Patriot” and THAAD batteries across the Middle East operational, Washington DC even suspended arms deliveries to vassals and satellite states around the world and pulled other key systems out of the increasingly contested Asia-Pacific region.

This includes the redeployment of the USS “Tripoli” and its F‑35B-equipped Marine air wing from areas near China to combat operations against Iran, illustrating how the US aggression against Iran is directly eroding American positions in the Asia-Pacific region. For a Pentagon that has repeatedly declared Beijing its “pacing challenge”, stripping offensive assets from the increasingly contested region to fight Tehran is a stark indictment of America’s strategic incoherence. Financially and in terms of readiness, the war looks increasingly self-defeating. War Secretary Pete Hegseth has acknowledged that it already cost nearly $40 billion and is forcing cuts to training unless the US Congress approves tens of billions more in emergency funding.

Just like with attempts to hide the true scale of American losses (both in terms of personnel and military equipment), even those figures likely understate the actual cost of this completely pointless and avoidable war of aggression. Namely, the price tag of interceptors alone almost certainly exceeds official figures, while the infrastructure damage resulting from Iranian retaliatory precision strikes is completely omitted from publicly available reports. The true damage includes dozens of aircraft and technical personnel (and quite possibly even pilots). In the meantime, the US military is cutting flight hours, live-fire exercises and deployments in other hotspots to save funds for continued hostilities with Iran.

Needless to say, this directly undercuts the combat proficiency of pilots and entire units at a time when Chinese aviators are logging more flight hours than ever before. In other words, Washington DC is sacrificing long-term readiness against its most capable rivals to sustain a costly, grinding conflict with a regional power. Just imagine how the Pentagon would fare against global superpowers like Russia and/or China when it continues to suffer one humiliation after another against Iran. Taken together, these developments point to a string of systemic failures, not just tactical, operational, strategic and/or doctrinal miscalculations. All this also demonstrates a massive slump in the quality of American leaders and their ability to make meaningful decisions.

The US political system that keeps obscuring real casualty figures, a procurement philosophy that cannot support major wars against remotely capable opponents and a global strategy that cannibalizes one theater to support forces in another are a true testament of that. American aggression against Iran has not only failed to truly degrade Tehran’s capabilities (key missile bases and stockpiles remain largely intact after months of fighting), but also exposed how fragile US power becomes when rhetoric about “limitless capacity” finally collides with industrial and political reality. It seems no power in the political West (including the US) has learned anything from the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

IRGC says US Casualties in the HUDREDS, as Iran Destroys Amazon Data Center in Kuwait

Firefighters extinguishing a large fire at a data center labeled 'Secure Systems' at night

Iran destroyed another Amazon data center Friday and that US deaths are in the hudreds! The IRGC says wave 27 of Operation Nasr 2 targeted an Amazon data center and an ammunition depot at the Ali Al-Salem US base in Kuwait.

IRGC FINISHES OFF DATA CENTER

Weekend Special on Substack Subscriptions

How Hydrogen Water Helps our Pets

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

EU Nations Close Embassies in Tehran, Ukraine Negotiations Fail

Group of civilians carrying luggage escorted by military personnel near a helicopter

Something wicked this way comes. Trump says he’s going to hit Iran with a “massive” attack and the UK, France, Germany have closed their embassies or ceased operations (same difference) and rumor has it Turkey is following suit. We shall see.

Also US Sec. of State Rubio says that the “Anchorage negotiations have failed” between the US and Russia. I would expect that war to escalate as well.

Prayed up and prepped up!

Embassies Closing

Rubio: Negotiations from Anchorage Have Failed . . .”

Trump places new condition on signed Saudi nuclear deal, says country must join Abraham Accords

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Congress Blocks Debate: Section 219 of the NDAA Remains Intact

Lightning bolt hitting Washington Monument at night in Washington DC

America is done. This puts the final nail in the coffin of it’s sovereignty, it’s all over but the crying. America you are now owned by Israel and the bankers lock, stock and barrel.

Congress BLOCKED its own members from even voting on the plan to merge U.S. and Israeli military supply chains… -The House rules committee refused to allow a vote on the amendment challenging Section 219, the NDAA provision integrating American military technology and supply chains with Israel’s -Massie’s account: “No debate or vote was allowed on section 219, integration of US military technology and supply chains with Israel’s” -Khanna: “We do not even have the chance to vote in the House to stop Israel and the United States from co-producing weapons.

We need to now fight to strip this amendment in the conference between the House and the Senate” -The provision advances as the $38 billion aid era winds toward its 2028 “partnership” replacement, and after the House rejected Massie’s separate aid-cut amendment 314-104 Whatever one thinks of integration itself, this process is indefensible.

Binding American defense production to any foreign state, ally or not, is exactly the kind of sovereignty question the House exists to debate, and the rules committee answered it by forbidding the debate. A measure confident of its merits wins a floor vote; a measure smuggled past one admits it can’t.

@RoKhanna

@RepThomasMassie / Writer: Daniel

This cartoon I found underneath the main tweet above sums things up perfectly!

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Trump Says Salafi Head Choppers in Syria will Disarm Hezbollah

Destroyed city buildings with smoke and fire at sunset including mosque silhouette

Ahmed al-Sharaa’s jihadi terrorists no match for Hezbollah.

By Kurt Nimmo at Global Research.

Ahmed al-Sharaa, aka Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, is a gentleman, according to the President of the United States. We get along very well with the president of Syria,” Trump said. “I wouldn’t be surprised if this gentleman’s going to do a job just like that. He’s done a very good job.”

The job Trump has in mind is going up against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

“He would like to come in and do something with Hezbollah,” Trump continued during a press conference with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. “They’ve been fighting—he’s been fighting Hezbollah for a long time. I think it’d be very effective.”

Syria is no match for Hezbollah. It remains in disarray following the civil war engineered and financed by the United States, its European allies, and Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. Jabhat al-Nusra, also known as the al-Nusra Front, was a Sunni jihadist group that emerged in Syria during the civil war. It quickly became one of the most formidable rebel factions opposing the Syrian government.

Syria’s Jolani was Leader of al-Qaeda Offshoot

Jolani, Trump’s “gentleman,” was the emir of al-Nusra Front, later Jabhat Fatah al-Sham. In 2013, during the Syrian civil war, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, head of the Islamic State in Iraq, announced al-Nusra Front was “part of al-Qaeda,” according to the BBC. The jihadist paramilitary group aimed to overthrow the government of Bashar al-Assad and establish an Islamic state based on Sharia law.

According to Amnesty International and other human rights groups, al-Nusra Front is responsible for serious war crimes, including abductions, torture, and summary executions. Jolani’s group, while designated as terrorist by the US, nonetheless “received weapons, cash, and logistical support via CIA-vetted programs in Jordan and Turkey, blending seamlessly with so-called Free Syrian Army units,” writes Omid Souresrafil.

“Jolani maintained his allegiance to al-Qaeda,” according to News18. “From the beginning, he prioritized winning Syrian support, distancing himself from IS’s brutality and stressing on a more pragmatic approach to jihad.”

He began his career at Camp Bucca, the US internment camp in Iraq, described as an incubator that programmed jihadists. The camp was a critical node in the military intelligence network established in Iraq during the US occupation.

John Kiriakou, a former CIA officer who went to prison for exposing CIA torture, “has now said publicly what many of us have long argued: Jolani is, in all likelihood, a CIA asset,” Kevork Almassian writes. In 2012, the Obama administration commissioned Operation Timber Sycamore, an effort by the CIA to arm, fund, and train rebel groups in Syria, including Jolani’s al-Nusra Front.

Operation Timber Sycamore

“Abu Mohammad al-Jolani did not ascend to the presidency of Syria by accident,” Cyrus Nezakat posted to X. “He is the direct product of Operation Timber Sycamore’s success; a program that helped engineer the fall of the Assad regime by channeling support to al-Nusra, the al-Qaeda splinter group he himself founded.”

On July 21, Kan News and other sources reported Syria was making contingency plans, including “potential cross-border military action,” against Hezbollah. Fox News reported Trump as saying “Israel is incapable to deal with Hezbollah, I am close to giving this task to Syria because he would do a more precise job.”

Trump may or may not know of the division between the Sunni and Shia branches of Islam. Sunni Salafist Muslims consider the Shia and Syrian Alawite as apostates. Jabhat al-Nusra regarded the Shia as sectarian adversaries instead of a protected community, exhibited by anti-Shia rhetoric, assaults on Shia civilians, and acts of violence directed at Shia religious sites and leaders.

However, if Trump believes a CIA and State Department proxy in Damascus has the ability to confront Hezbollah, he probably is not receiving a fair assessment from his Israel-first advisors on the military strength of Hezbollah.

Syria No Match for Hezbollah

Hezbollah, widely regarded as one of the most proficient non-state armed groups in West Asia, boasts an estimated 40,000 to 50,000 active combatants, complemented by a reserve force of 30,000 to 50,000. Its combat experience, well-defined command structure, Iranian support, and substantial weapons stockpile collectively render it more formidable than a typical militia. In 2026, Reuters reported that Hezbollah has persisted in its rearming efforts and adaptation to losses, including a shift back towards guerrilla-style operations.

In addition to a large number of combatants, Hezbollah possesses one of the world’s largest non-state arsenals. This arsenal is centered around tens of thousands of rockets and missiles, supplemented by drones, anti-ship and air-defense systems, and extensive light infantry weapons. As of early 2026, Hezbollah’s rocket and missile holdings were estimated to be around 11,000–13,000. However, prior to the recent war, in 2024, it was estimated that Hezbollah had between 120,000 and 200,000 missiles.

Finally, Hezbollah acquired significant combat experience in Syria by engaging with ISIS and various insurgent groups in collaboration with the Assad regime, particularly during border and mountainous operations in areas such as Qalamoun, Aleppo, Homs, and Damascus. This experience enhanced its battlefield coordination, small-unit tactics, and capacity to function in an extended multi-front conflict.

In contrast, Syria shows military effectiveness in limited internal campaigns, yet it has not reached a level of full professionalism, unity, or stability as a national military entity. The force is still in the process of being constructed from a mix of former rebel factions and defectors, which results in ongoing issues with cohesion and command discipline. It is capable of applying pressure on weaker local adversaries, but encounters with Syrian Defense Forces in Aleppo and the northeast reveal its struggles against a more organized and determined opponent, such as Hezbollah.

Rubio Admits Syria Incapable of Disarming Hezbollah

The Trump administration may have backed off its desire to use Syria to go up against Hezbollah. Rubio, speaking at the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) summit in Manila, has signaled that Syria is not up to the task.

“The Syrian authorities are not big fans of Hezbollah, but what we’ve encouraged Syria to do is to focus on its own internal challenges and building a nation-state,” said the Secretary of State.

The internal situation in Syria is both fragile and unstable. The transitional government following the overthrow of Assad is attempting to strengthen its authority while contending with renewed conflicts in the northeast, ongoing jihadist operations, and intermittent bombings in Damascus. Additionally, the nation is grappling with issues of displacement, inadequate services, and profound political distrust that spans across sectarian and regional divides.

Kurt Nimmo is a journalist, author, and geopolitical analyst, New Mexico, United States. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). Visit the author’s blog.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

‘Khamenei’s Funeral One of the Most Impressive Things I Have Ever Witnessed’ – Brazilian Military Officer

Large crowd at funeral procession carrying black flags in a city square

A Brazilian Navy officer witnessed the return of war in Iran firsthand.

By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida at Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Recently, the Islamic Republic of Iran held the funeral ceremony for Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who was killed in a missile attack on the first day of the illegal war waged by the US-Israel coalition. Iranian authorities waited months to hold the funeral, as the critical security situation prevented the preparation of large-scale events; Tehran then used the temporary ceasefire to finally bury Khamenei in what became the largest funeral ceremony of the modern era, drawing tens of millions of people across Iran and Iraq.   

In the final moments of the burial, the war resumed, with the US carrying out various attacks on civilian targets across Iran. Tehran responded by heavily bombing American infrastructure in Gulf countries. The conflict is now once again in an active phase, confirming the predictions of various military analysts regarding the fragility of the now-defunct Islamabad Memorandum.   

During these events, Robinson Farinazzo – a Brazilian Navy commander and a public figure regarding military affairs in Latin America – was on the ground in Iran, attending funeral rites and visiting some of the cities affected by the war. Farinazzo was in the country when the US resumed its attacks and witnessed the effects of American aggression firsthand. I had the opportunity to interview him on this subject.   

Lucas Leiroz (LL): Tell us a little about how the trip. How were you invited, and what were your objectives in Iran?  

Robinson Farinazzo (RF): I had always wanted to visit Iran. I never believed the mainstream media narratives, and I wanted to see the country with my own eyes so that I could examine the details myself and speak about the subject with greater authority.  

Then I was invited by an Iranian religious organization based in São Paulo, Brazil, to make this trip. I accepted, and my objective in Iran was precisely to report on the country’s military and political aspects and to understand the feelings of the population. I think that objective was more than fulfilled. In fact, I was surprised by many things in Iran. It was a very educational trip.   

LL: How was Ali Khamenei’s funeral ceremony? Tell us a little about what you saw there.   

RF: The funeral ceremony for Khamenei was one of the most impressive things I have ever witnessed. We [the Brazilian delegation] were the first Westerners to enter the funeral hall. It was very shocking because when we saw his granddaughter’s coffin, there was great emotion. It was truly heartbreaking to see a one-year-and-two-month-old child killed by American missiles.  

I also felt that we were very privileged to be the first Westerners there. We arrived at the funeral hall at 7:00 a.m., and I believe it was opened to the public only the following day. It was an incredibly impressive experience. The funeral viewing took place at the Mosalla of Tehran, a religious complex where people gather for Friday prayers.  

There was a distinct atmosphere throughout the entire city surrounding the funeral. There were millions of people – no one knows the exact number, but at least 15 million. There was also a great deal of volunteer work: people handing out water, spraying water on attendees because of the intense heat (over 40°C), many children participating, volunteers preparing banners, and people organizing food distribution for pilgrims and for those who could not afford meals. Overall, it was a moment of great emotion and tremendous solidarity on the part of Iranian society.   

LL: Besides the funeral, what else did you have the opportunity to see in Iran? Did you visit the regions affected by the conflict?  

RF: We visited several cities in Iran. Besides Tehran, we went to Isfahan, Shiraz, Qom, and a small town called Lamerd, which had been bombed. We also visited the ruins of Persepolis. What stood out most was Lamerd. According to what we were told, the Americans used HIMARS-launched Precision Strike Missiles with submunitions during the bombardment. The streets were completely full of craters, and the houses had been destroyed, even internally. They also hit a gymnasium, killing 20 people and injuring more than 100.  

It was very moving because we spoke with the mother of a two-year-old girl who was killed in that attack. There was enormous grief among the population and great anger directed toward the US and Israel. The destruction was massive, and it’s difficult to understand why Lamerd was bombed, since it is a town of just over 30,000 inhabitants and has no military significance.  

LL: While you were in the country, the US attacked Iran and the war resumed. What was it like living through that period of tension? Were you ever in danger? How did the authorities protect foreign reporters?  

RF: Before the American attack began, we were planning to visit Minab, the Gulf city where a school had been attacked and 168 children had been killed. We also intended to reach the Strait of Hormuz. However, once the attacks began, the government prevented us from going because it feared for the safety of the journalists.   

.

Rescue workers and bystanders at the school after the attack (Mehr News Agency / CC BY 4.0)

.

What was curious, though, was that life continued normally in Iran. People kept going to work, shopping for groceries, attending mosques, and so on. Up until the moment I left, life was essentially normal, at least in the cities we visited. There is a great deal of anger among people, but it wasn’t affecting everyday life – at least not where we were.  

After we left, however, a bridge near Lamerd was bombed and destroyed – a bridge connecting Shiraz to southern Iran. It seems the Americans intend to cut communications with southern Iran. We’ll have to wait and see whether they succeed. It’s a remarkable feeling to look at photos and see a bridge that you yourself crossed only to find that it has since been bombed and destroyed.  

LL: Having visited Iran and as a military analyst, what are your expectations for the future of this conflict?   

RF: As a military analyst, here’s my assessment: I believe Iran needs to change its approach. In my view, it is not focusing enough on inflicting American casualties, and I think it should. I also believe it should target Donald Trump’s properties in the Gulf. He owns many assets there, and if he feels personally affected, he may think twice before making decisions. Another very important point is that I believe Iran needs to develop a nuclear bomb. In my opinion, the US has already demonstrated that it neither fears nor respects Iran, and Trump has made that clear. If Iran cannot inflict significant casualties on the US or create a credible deterrence power, then it could indeed suffer a major setback in this war.  

I think it is very unlikely that Iran could win a war against the US, but I also think it is quite unlikely that it would lose outright, because the Americans would have to force Iran into submission through air strikes alone, and I’m not sure that would be possible. I also believe Iran should adopt a more offensive posture by attacking American military ships, something that, in my view, has not been happening. I think Iran’s current cautious approach is not very effective. That is my assessment as a military analyst.   

We’ll have to wait and see how events unfold, especially since the Americans are very skilled at concealing their casualties. We really do not know the extent of their losses in terms of personnel and equipment.  

Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Massive Movement of US Refueling Aircraft to the Middle East

U.S. Air Force tanker refueling a fighter jet mid-flight with three other fighter jets flying nearby at sunset

60 US Military refueling aircraft are on the move to the Middle East, mainly Israel and Jordan. This is addition to what they already have in theater. The US is also deploying more fighter aircraft into Jordon, to a base that’s been hit hard by Iran in recent days. I have no idea if the extra fighter AC are replacing lost AC or are beefing up the presence that’s already there as I have no intel on the ground in Jordan.

For the US to commit this many refueling aircraft to the area means something massive is coming and the word is that Trump is going all out and is going to attack Iran’s infrastructure hard. Iran has no reason to hold back now so I would expect a major escalation from their side as well. We may soon know if Iran has a nuke or not because what’s coming will be a “use it or lose it” scenario for them. The US is out to bury them under a heap of rubble if they don’t respond and respond hard.

Stay ready, prayed up and prepped up!

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

« Older Entries