Just as the UN rolls out a plan to seize more power in case of “global emergencies”. Combine all of this with the new WHO Pandemic Treaty rules that are coming out and you have your NWO system ready to roll. All of that and more are in today’s video report. Prayed up and prepped up, time is short!
🚨BREAKING: The IMF has launched their own CBDC known as the Universal Monetary Unit, symbolized as the character Ü 👀😱 pic.twitter.com/RvCnc2XEkW
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The new buy me a coffee link is below.
Editors Note: First we had the WHO pandemic treaty and now here comes the UN seeking new emergency powers. Gee you’d almost think all of this was planned?!? Of course it was. They put the finishing touches on their BEAST systems while everyone was locked down “flattening the curve” 3 years ago. From theepochtimes.com.
Lawmakers and critics are sounding the alarm, but the White House supports the agenda
The United Nations is seeking vast new powers and stronger “global governance” tools to deal with international emergencies such as pandemics and economic crises, a new U.N. policy brief has revealed, and the Biden administration appears to support the proposal.
The plan to create an “Emergency Platform,” which would involve a set of protocols activated during crises that could affect billions of people, has already drawn strong concern and criticism from U.S. policymakers and analysts.
Among those expressing concern is House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), whose committee oversees U.S. foreign policy and involvement in international organizations.
“We must be sure that any global protocol or platform operated by the U.N. respects U.S. national sovereignty and U.S. taxpayer dollars,” McCaul told The Epoch Times.
He also noted his concern that the proposed platform expands the authority and funding of the U.S. and the definitions of “emergency” and “crisis” to include, for instance, climate change.
U.N. documents and statements released in March by key leaders of the global organization make clear that climate change is a major piece of the U.N. emergencies agenda.
Other critics who spoke with The Epoch Times expressed concern about the influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) within the U.N., the global organization’s well-documented corruption problems, and its track record of dealing with previous emergencies.
“Allowing the U.N. to deal with this is the equivalent of putting the CCP in charge of global emergencies,” former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations Kevin Moley told The Epoch Times. Read the rest by clicking here.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The new buy me a coffee link is below.
Nothing is sacred anymore and their agenda is out in the open. They want you dead or a complete slave to them. In today’s video you’ll see HOW they will achieve this and in fact already have achieved it through their nanotech! All of the links will be below.
A dystopian glimpse at the potential future of Hackable Humans: "The government has subpoenaed employee brainwave data from the past year […] They are looking for co-conspirators through synchronized brain activity": #wef23 'Ready for Brain Transparency?' session pic.twitter.com/EtIwjzk4b2
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon and PayPal are gone so now we have Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The new buy me a coffee link is below.
The West with their hubris and hypocrisy know no bounds. Johnny
Ahmed Adel, Cairo-based geopolitics and political economy researcher
The latest addition to a series of delusional statements made by the Kiev regime is that Russia illegally became a member of the United Nations and the UN Security Council. Even more ridiculous, this claim comes just one day after Russian President Vladimir Putin said he was open to negotiations with “acceptable solutions”, thus demonstrating that Ukraine is not seriously pursuing peace.
“We are ready to negotiate with everyone involved about acceptable solutions, but that is up to them—we are not the ones refusing to negotiate, they are,” Putin told Rossiya 1 state-television on Christmas Day.
Although Western media and leaders immediately dismissed the idea that Putin is willing to negotiate, it was Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry who published a letter on December 26 that called for Russia’s removal from the UN and revocation of its permanent member status on the UN Security Council due to supposed questions surrounding its legitimacy following the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 that supposedly left the issue of international rights and obligations “unresolved”.
“31 years ago Russia abused the UN Charter and usurped [the] USSR’s seat at the UN Security Council — bypassing the only legitimate procedure set by the Charter. Russia’s presence at the UNSC and the UN as a whole is illegitimate,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba falsely claimed in a tweet.
While Kiev is seeking to expel Russia from the UN, the regimes authorities are also proposing a “peace summit” under the auspices of the United Nations in order to present Russia as an aggressor to the international community and Ukraine as a country that supposedly advocates for peace. However, Ukrainian authorities are desperate for a peace summit, with all of their terms fulfilled, because they anticipate a major Russian offensive next year that they will not be able to stop.
The Kremlin, unlike Kiev, has never rejected negotiations. However, if this peace summit takes place, it will be on Kiev’s terms and will likely include ridiculous conditions, like the transfer of Crimea from Russia to Ukraine. With the expectation of ridiculous demands, Moscow does not take Kiev seriously.
In addition, the peace summit will not even have legal force if it is held without the presence of Russia. With Kiev now pushing a narrative that Russia’s status in the UN Security Council is in question, it highlights the farce that Ukraine’s proposed peace summit will be.
According to Dmitry Polyanskiy, First Deputy Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, Kiev’s diplomatic stupidity has become a trademark of the permanent representative of Ukraine to the UN, Sergiy Kyslytsya.
“What can a ‘peace summit’ be like without Russia? However, it is very easy to imagine without Ukraine. This is precisely what represents a nightmare scenario for the cottagers and sorrels, which forces them to present similar initiatives, and they bring them closer to that scenario. Non-existent diplomacy,” said Polyanskiy.
It is recalled that Kuleba said that Ukrainian authorities would like to hold a peace summit at the end of February, most likely under the auspices of the United Nations and with António Guterres acting as mediator. However, according to Kuleba, Kiev believes that Russia should only be invited to such a summit only after an international trial, thus already rendering the whole process as a big waste of time.
To Kiev’s disappoint, the very obvious answer given by Guterres is that he is ready to mediate on the issue of holding a summit on Ukraine only with the consent of all parties, including Russia. Despite Ukraine obviously putting roadblocks on peace talks, it has not stopped the West’s propaganda apparatus from blaming Moscow.
In one example, retired US General Mark Hertlin said that Russia blaming the lack of peace talks on Ukraine and the West is part of its history of deflection.
“Even in small things, [Russian] officials don’t negotiate…they demand, then they lie, and then they renege on agreements,” Hertling tweeted on Christmas Day.
It is comical that only a day later, his statement was completely disproven when Kiev made its ridiculous claim that Russia is mistakenly a permanent member of the UN Security Council. In fact, by Guterres refusing to entertain the ludicrous claims made by Kiev, it also points to a growing frustration in the West against Ukraine – its constant propaganda and outlandish claims.
Although this does not mean that rhetorical or diplomatic support for Ukraine will end, there is a lot more willingness to speak out or be less tolerant to the whims of Kiev. In one example, retired US General Mark Hertlin had to admit that “[Ukraine is a] corrupt, f****d-up society (…) I have a Ukrainian flag tied to my bag, but I’m not like ‘oh my God, Ukraine is so awesome,’ because I understand that there are plenty of f****d up people running Ukraine (…) [I am] not a big fan [of Ukraine].”
Although the West is consumed by Russophobia, Kiev takes propaganda and smearing efforts to a whole new level. There is very little prospect that Ukraine will find support in usting Russia from the UN Security Council, even from Washington. Rather, these outlandish outbursts from Ukrainian authorities will have an undesired effect as Westerners are fatigued by events in Ukraine and are becoming less patient with propaganda, which they have had to endure since the first days of the war, such as the “Ghost of Kyiv” and “Snake Island” scenarios.
According to the “fact checkers” there’s nothing to see here, move along now.
The United Nations has declared war on conspiracy theories, describing the rise of conspiracy thinking as “worrying and dangerous”, and providing the public with a toolkit to “prebunk” and “debunk” anybody who dares to suggest that world governments are anything but completely honest, upstanding and transparent.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so we have PayPal and Cash App left to us below. We have also added a new monthly support option through the website. That link is below as well. Thank you again and God bless!
This is how they will dominate the governments of the world and force them into compliance with the NWO, the Pandemic Treaty of the WHO. Also here is a link to the petition you can sign regarding this treaty. https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/who/
Please take seriously the severity of this existential threat to everything free people hold dear. Do everything in your power to pass this report on to others and to find ways to communicate with and to influence people to stop empowering WHO to take over our national sovereignty and freedom.
On May 22-28, 2022, ultimate control over America’s healthcare system, and hence its national sovereignty, will be delivered for a vote to the World Health Organization’s governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).
This threat is contained in new amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, proposed by the Biden administration, that are scheduled as“Provisional agenda item 16.2” at the upcoming conference on May 22-28, 2022.1
These amendments will empower WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.
If passed, the Biden Administration’s proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the United States. The same threat looms over all the U.N.’s 193 member nations, all of whom belong to WHO and represent 99.44% of the world population.2
These regulations are a “binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”3 U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them.
How It Became Official
On January 18, 2022, with no public awareness, officials from the Biden Administration sent the World Health Organization these extensive amendments to strengthen WHO’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations.4 The U.S. amendments cross out a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…”5 By eliminating that, and other clauses (see below), all the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to declare health emergencies at will.
The amendments would give WHO the right to take important steps to collaborate with other nations and other organizations worldwide to deal with any nation’s alleged health crisis, even against its stated wishes. The power to declare health emergencies is a potential tool to shame, intimidate, and dominate nations. It can be used to justify ostracism and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation.
Although sponsored by an American administration, WHO’s most significant use of this arbitrary authority to declare national emergencies will be used against the United States if our government ever again dares to take anti-globalist stands as it did under the Trump administration.
How Much Time Do We Have to Stop the Amendments?
The contents of the proposed amendments were not made public until April 12, 2022,6 leaving little time to protest before the scheduled vote. As noted, the amendments are scheduled and almost certainly will be enacted May 22-28, 2022.
The existing WHO regulations then provide for an 18-month grace period during which a nation may withdraw its “yes” vote for amendments, but the current proposed amendments would reduce that opportunity to six months. If the U.S.-sponsored amendments are passed, a majority of the nations could, in the next six months, change their individual votes and reverse the approval. But this is a much more difficult proposition than stopping the whole process now.
We must act now to prevent the passage of the amendments, including putting sufficient pressure on the United States to withdraw them from consideration. If that fails, and the amendments are approved at the May meeting of the WHO governing body, we must then make the effort to influence a majority of the nations to change their votes to “no.”
Without Organized Resistance, the Amendments Will Definitely Pass
On January 26, 2022, the same U. S. Permanent Mission to the United Nations in Geneva sent a one-page memo to WHO confirming that the amendments had been sent. It also contained a brief report by the same Loyce Pace, Assistant Secretary for Global Affairs HHS.7 Most importantly, the memo listed all the nations backing the U.S. amendments. The size and power of the group guarantee that the amendments will be passed if unopposed by significant outside pressure.
Here are the 20 nations, plus the European Union, listed by the U.S. as supporting the amendments:
Albania, Australia, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, India, Jamaica, Japan, Monaco, Montenegro, Norway, Peru, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay, Member States of the European Union (EU).
The European Union, a globalist organization, has been among the biggest backers of increasing WHO’s global power. The EU includes the following 27 Western nations:
Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden.
That’s a total of 47 nations supporting the U.S.-authored amendments. All of them have endorsed empowering WHO to declare a possible or potential health emergency or crisis within any nation despite its objections and refusal to cooperate. To repeat, these amendments will pass unless American citizens, as well as citizens worldwide, mount a very strong opposition.
Defining “Health” and WHO’s Domain of Authority
According to the Foreward to WHO’s regulations, there is no specific limit to what constitutes a health emergency, and it is certainly not limited to pandemics. WHO’s domain includes:8
a scope not limited to any specific disease or manner of transmission, but covering “illness or medical condition, irrespective of origin or source, that presents or could present significant harm to humans…
WHO’s powerful reach is also defined by the number of other organizations it is authorized to cooperate with once it has declared an emergency or health crisis: “other competent intergovernmental organizations or international bodies with which WHO is expected to cooperate and coordinate its activities, as appropriate, include the following: United Nations, International Labor Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Civil Aviation Organization, International Maritime Organization, International Committee of the Red Cross, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, International Air Transport Association, International Shipping Federation, and Office International des Epizooties.”9
The Preamble to the WHO Constitution (separate from the International Health Regulations) summarizes WHO’s concept of what is included under its mandate of improving, guiding, and organizing world health:10
WHO remains firmly committed to the principles set out in the preamble to the Constitution
Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition.
The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is dependent on the fullest cooperation of individuals and States.
The achievement of any State in the promotion and protection of health is of value to all.
Unequal development in different countries in the promotion of health and control of diseases, especially communicable diseases, is a common danger.
Healthy development of the child is of basic importance; the ability to live harmoniously in a changing total environment is essential to such development.
The extension to all peoples of the benefits of medical, psychological, and related knowledge is essential to the fullest attainment of health.
Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.
Governments have a responsibility for the health of their peoples which can be fulfilled only by the provision of adequate health and social measures.
Given WHO’s assessment of the breadth of its health concerns, mandates, and goals — almost any kind of problematic situation that affects the people of a nation could be considered a health problem. Indeed, under WHO’s approach, it would be difficult to find any important national issue that was not a potential health problem. With the imminent passage of the American-sponsored amendments to the International Health Regulations, WHO will have free reign for using these expansive definitions of health to call a crisis over anything it wishes in any nation it desires.
WHO’s Sweeping New Powers
The sweeping new powers will be invested in the Director-General of WHO to act on his own. The Director-General is Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, commonly known as Tedros.Tedros, the first non-physician director-general of WHO, is an extremely controversial Marxist activist and politician from Ethiopia installed by the Chinese Communist Party. Despite the fact that his role as the cover-up apologist for the Chinese Communists at the onset of COVID-19, this “dear friend of Anthony Fauci” was re-elected without opposition in 2022 to a second five-year term.11 His original election in 2017, followed by his re-election without opposition in 2022, is an ominous display of Chinese Communist influence over WHO,12 which makes further empowering the U.N. agency extremely dangerous.
Under the new regulations, WHO will not be required to consult with the identified nation beforehand to “verify” the event before taking action. This requirement is stricken by the U.S. amendments (Article 9.1). The amendments require a response in 24 hours from the identified nation, or WHO will identify it as “rejection” and act independently (Article 10.3). If the identified nation “does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO shall … immediately share with the other State Parties the information available to it…” (Article 10.4).
Indicating the breadth of WHO’s scope of power, the agency will be given the right to involve multiple other U.N. agencies, including those related to food and agriculture, animal health, environmental programs, “or other relevant entities” (Article 6.1). This, too will not require the permission of the identified nation. The targeted nation is also required to send to WHO any relevant genetic sequence data. And as we have seen, the Foreward to these regulations presents a much larger array of potential collaborating agencies.
Under the proposed regulations, WHO itself would develop and update “early warning criteria for assessing and progressively updating the national, regional, or global risk posed by an event of unknown causes or sources…” (New article 5). Notice that the health-endangering event may be so nonspecific as to have “unknown causes or sources.” Thus, Tedros and any future Director-Generals of WHO will be given unrestricted powers to define and then implement their interventions.
The proposed regulations, in combination with existing ones, allow action to be taken by WHO, “If the Director-General considers, based on an assessment under these Regulations, that a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern is occurring…” (Article 12.2). That is, Tedros need only “consider” that a “potential or actual” risk is occurring.
Global Supporters of WHO
WHO is not a global powerhouse by itself. Early in the pandemic, it acted as a front group for the international exploiters of humanity, whom we describe in our new book COVID-19 and the Global Predators. In particular, it made certain the Chinese Communists could hide the seriousness of the pandemic while spreading to the world on passenger airplanes from its major cities, including Wuhan itself. We have already noted and documented that the Chinese Communist Party and Xi Jinping have enormous influence over WHO.
Even after Donald Trump slashed the U.S. contribution to WHO in February 2020, the U.S. remained the largest donor to WHO. On March 31, 2020, the U.S. contribution was $115.8 million, followed by China at approximately one-half that amount, followed by Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, and Brazil.13
Then in early July 2020, Trump notified Congress and the U.N. that it was formally withdrawing from WHO. Bill Gates quickly announced he was increasing his contribution from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to $250 million.14
After the Communist Chinese Party, Bill Gates probably has the most influence over WHO. In our book, COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey, we describe in Chapter 15 how Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, and the giant medical foundation Wellcome Trust created CEPI — The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. This became the center of global predatory activities in preparation for the anticipated pandemic. It brought together key U.S. agencies, including the FDA, CDC, NIAID, NIH, the U.N., WHO, giant pharmaceutical companies, banks, and multiple other sources of wealth and power.
In 2017, or earlier, CEPI made an agreement called a memorandum of understanding with WHO. CEPI then presented a PowerPoint presentation to WHO in July 2017, in effect dividing up the world between the Gates’ CEPI and WHO in the coming pandemic. Gates would handle the financing, supply, and distribution of the vaccines, and WHO would control and monitor the scientific and medical community. Among the stipulations of the PowerPoint, which the Gates-created foundation presented, was that the pharmaceutical companies would be reimbursed for all direct and indirect costs by the government for developing their high-speed manufacturing platforms.
WHO was highly effective during COVID-19 in implementing the aims of the global predators, led by the groups around Bill Gates and the Chinese Communist Party, in their organized assault and terror campaign against the Western democracies. This purposely resulted in the vast weakening of any potentially anti-globalist, freedom-oriented, patriotic nations, including the U.S., Great Britain, Australia, Canada, and others. That success may explain why the global predators chose WHO to now deliver a major and potentially lethal death blow to the sovereignty of the world’s nations.
Europeans Call for Additional Further Increases in WHO’s Power
There is a growing debate over further increasing the power of WHO to punish uncooperative or dissident nations.15 Some “have sounded the alarm about giving the WHO too much power at the expense of national sovereignty.” Some have voiced concern about China’s influence on WHO: “Not only has it increased its payment to the WHO in recent years, but it also enjoys a special relationship with its leader.” Read the rest at the source here.
This is it everyone, your new world order/government. Have no doubt they will make digital IDS mandatory to participate at some point, especially now that the governments of the world are experimenting with their own version of digital money/bitcoin. Here is a link to an NBC story from March 2022 about Biden taking big steps to a central bank run digital currency. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/crypto/us-government-digital-currency-rcna19248
While the war drags on in Ukraine and the mass shooters and abortion protesters distract you, stay ready, time is short! Understand we are at the end of this age and the following scripture definitely applies to what we see in the world today! The powers that be are setting everything up for the Antichrist (who I still believe is Trump, he’s coming back with or without being President) who will take over the reigns of the world government after stands in the new temple claiming to be God.
And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. Revelation 13:7
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so we have PayPal and Cash App left to us below. We have also added a new monthly support option through the website. That link is below as well. Thank you again and God bless!
During the 41st session of the committee Dr. Astrid Stückelberger, a Swiss health scientist and researcher, blew the whistle on the inner workings of the WHO, where she worked for 20 years.
In a stunning confession, she says Switzerland is the center of corruption, and that GAVI and Bill Gates have total immunity from everything they do.
She talks about the “suspicious” activities of Bill Gates and the reservations she has about the actions of the WHO, GAVI and Gates.
Worse, when the pandemic began, she found that many breaches to international health regulations were occurring, and more.
The rules under which countries work with WHO virtually put WHO in charge of all rules and formal edicts and announcements — with Gates being right there as part of the executive board like an unofficial member state, making decisions that affect the entire world.
