Tag Archives: turkey

SCO+ Summit 2025 – Towards a New Global Reality. Towards A Multipolar World Order?

What the 20th Century was to the West — the next 100 Years will be to the Global South *Editors note* That’s assuming we have 100 years left, we don’t. Time is short! That being said the power structure of the world has shifted from the West to the East, just I’ve been saying for years! JS

By Dr. F. Andrew Wolf, Jr. Reposted with permission by globalresearch.ca

History will record the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Tianjin, China this year as a pivotal moment in the evolution towards a new world order.

The SCO’s burgeoning role as a critical player in the development of a multipolar world was demonstrated this week. It illustrated the Global South’s solidarity with its defining principles: the recognition of sovereignty, non-interference and a rebuttal to the West’s hegemonic model of globalization under the guise of ‘liberal democracy’.

Significance of the event was also connoted through its symbolism —its proximity to the September 3 military parade in Beijing, marking not just the end of World War II but the 80th anniversary of China’s victory in the Sino-Japanese War.

Russian President Vladimir Putin was conspicuous as an omnipresent figure at both the summit and parade events – carrying both symbolic weight and strategic meaning.

Moscow continues to advance its role as a reliable interface between nations across Asia and the Middle East – a role of consequence, especially today, given the shifting center of gravity in geopolitical affairs toward Asia and the Global South.

The Russian president’s remarks at the summit were characteristic of his vision of the future; he reiterated the import of adopting and implementing the SCO Development Program through the remainder of the decade. It defines the group’s strategic path towards establishing a carefully-conceived foundation for orchestrating economic and infrastructure initiatives.

Perhaps of equal significance was Moscow’s enthusiastic support for Beijing’s proposal to establish an SCO Development Bank. In addition to financing infrastructure projects, it would assist member countries in reducing their dependence on Western financial institutions and lessen the impact of Western sanctions – pressures which – with varying degrees of severity — Russia, China, Iran, India and others continue to experience.

The imagery from China indicates how the Russian president’s attendance at the summit carried both concrete and symbolic significance: As occurred previously in May, Moscow and Beijing continue to signal their determination to defend historical – not revisionist – truth.

The arrival in Tianjin of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi brought into specific relief New Delhi’s strategic flexibility and willingness to revisit and advance its relationship with China. In the face of unmitigated pressure from US President Donald Trump, the visit amounted to a definitive statement of India’s shift from historical non-alignment to strategic autonomy.

Modi’s talks with Xi Jinping – his first visit to China in seven years – symbolized their intent to resolve differences. Their continuing border dispute notwithstanding, the countries signaled a willingness to remove obstacles – and move closer. 

Xi remarked to the Indian prime minister that true ‘normalization’ between their nations had actually begun last year at the BRICS summit in Kazan, when both nations deescalated a tense situation. The two sides should “not let the border issue define the overall China-India relationship,” Xi said, adding that economic development should be their main focus.

Modi, referring to relations with Beijing as a ‘partnership’, announced the resumption of direct flights and even voiced an intent to reduce India’s trade deficit with China. 

A priority for India lies in multilateral relationships that augment a multipolar system concerning geopolitical affairs. New Delhi has consistently defended its right to pursue a multi-directed, autonomous foreign policy, viewing Global South initiatives (e.g. SCO and BRICS+) as pivotal in strengthening its sovereignty, pragmatism of strategic autonomy and global relevance.

While India attempts to eschew diplomatic issues with the US, its message is categorical: New Delhi will not accept ‘bullying’, especially with issues impacting national and regional priorities.

The symbolism of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, also being present at the gathering, was evident. The leader of a NATO-member state attending the SCO summit connoted to the Western alliance that Ankara intends to assert a more sovereign, self-defined foreign policy. 

This reflects Türkiye’s concept of ‘strategic flexibility’, in which the SCO is viewed as more than a forum for regional cooperation; rather, it is a platform for extending Turkish influence and securing access to key assets – from transport corridors to energy markets.

The Tianjin summit welcomed as well the presidents of Belarus, Iran and Pakistan along with Malaysia, Armenia and Azerbaijan signaling their interest in full membership. The wide geographical mix of attendees illustrates that the SCO is moving beyond Eurasia — developing toward a nucleus of an alternative global order.

The Tianjin Declaration, delineating the principles uniting SCO member states was a pivotal outcome of the summit – delineating non-interference in internal affairs, respect for sovereignty, rejection of the use or threat of force and opposition to unilateral sanctions as instruments of coercion. It expressed the common vision of the organization.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov commented:

“The main outcome of the SCO and SCO+ summits is the shared determination to uphold our rights, without yielding to provocations, in full compliance with international law, the UN Charter, and the principles of the international monetary, financial, and trade systems – the very principles once promoted by the West itself.”

The summit in China manifested more than imagery and words – it confirmed the reality of a multipolar world order – a concept Putin has advanced for years. One thing is certain — it can no longer be treated theoretically. The SCO has given ‘multipolarity’ institutional integrity – steadily expanding, gaining influence and authority throughout the Global South.

The organization is reviewing applications from some ten countries seeking observer or dialogue partner status – indicating a burgeoning interest in the SCO as an alternative center of power in geopolitical affairs.

And one must not overlook rising interest in the SCO from the Arab world. Bahrain, Egypt, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are already SCO dialogue partners – nations central to the Middle East’s energy and investment hierarchy. This indicates that a new geopolitical axis linking Eurasia and the Middle East is becoming a reality – with the SCO emerging as a viable alternative to the West’s hegemonic model.

The SCO today is no longer a regional structure; rather, it is a strategic center of gravity in geopolitical affairs. What was once disparaged by the West as a mere ‘regional club’ has matured into a meaningful platform for the Global South – a geopolitical entity with expanding membership, burgeoning economic vigor and a shared political horizon – a new political reality.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

F. Andrew Wolf, Jr. is director of The Fulcrum Institute, a new organization of current and former scholars, which engages in research and commentary, focusing on political and cultural issues on both sides of the Atlantic. After service in the USAF (Lt.Col.-Intel) Dr. Wolf obtained a PhD-philosophy (Wales), MA-theology (Univ. S. Africa), MTh-philosophical theology (TCU-Brite Div.). He taught philosophy, humanities and theology in the US and S. Africa before retiring from university.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

6.1M Earthquake Rattles Turkey, Buildings Destroyed at least 50 Injured

A 6.1 magnitude earthquake struck Turkey on Sunday, August 10, 2025, with its epicenter located in the Sındırgı district of Balıkesir province in the Marmara region. The tremor occurred at approximately 7 PM local time (Istanbul time) and was felt across a wide area, including the major city of Istanbul, located about 200 kilometers (125 miles) away. The shallow depth of the quake, reported at 11 km (7 miles), contributed to its strong impact near the epicenter.

  • Impact and Damage: Reports indicate that at least one building collapsed in Sındırgı, and local media cited an unnamed mayor stating that 10 buildings had been destroyed by the quake. Footage from social media showed a property caved in, and search and rescue operations were underway. The extent of injuries and damage is currently developing, with some sources reporting no immediate injury or damage reports  , while others confirm at least 35 injuries from a similar past event  , highlighting the need for updated information.
  • Seismic Activity: The earthquake was followed by several aftershocks, including one measuring 4.6, prompting Turkey’s Disaster and Emergency Management Agency to urge citizens not to enter damaged buildings. The region lies on active fault lines, including the North Anatolian Fault, making it prone to seismic activity.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

Armenia deepens its submission to the West

Armenia is willing to cede part of its territory to the control of foreign powers.

Lucas Leiroz, member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert.

Armenia’s political subordination to the Collective West continues to advance. The Pashinyan regime is increasingly implementing measures that threaten national sovereignty and favor NATO expansionism in the Caucasus and the post-Soviet space. This creates an atmosphere of constant tension and instability, damaging the regional security architecture within the Russian strategic environment.

Western media recently announced that Armenia is discreetly negotiating the transfer of a strategic portion of its territory to direct US control. The area is located in Armenia’s central region, more specifically in the 42-kilometer Zangezur Corridor connecting Azerbaijan to the exclave of Nakhichivan. Local disputes have intensified since 2023, when Azerbaijan assumed full control of the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh (called Artsakh by Armenians). Baku’s territorial ambitions have been expanding, as has Armenia’s desperation for Western support to address this issue.

Essentially, the terms of the agreement stipulate that Armenia must hand over local security management to an American private military company (PMC). The goal would be to receive international support in the face of a possible Azerbaijani incursion—something many analysts expect to happen in the near future if tensions escalate again.

The news of the agreement was expectedly denied by the Armenian government, but Yerevan failed to provide concrete evidence of its real plans for the region. This makes the Armenian denial a weak narrative, sounding like mere cover-up. The media has been reporting on the case, claiming to have received reliable information from sources familiar with the matter in France – a country where the ethnic lobby of the Armenian diaspora is massive and exerts significant influence over foreign policy.

Furthermore, US officials have made ambiguous statements, suggesting that a major change in Armenia’s territorial configuration is imminent. For example, the US ambassador to Turkey recently commented on a proposal to hand over southern Armenia to the US. Furthermore, the ambassador stated that the agreement was negotiated in partnership with Turkey – which is Azerbaijan’s biggest supporter.

“They are arguing over 32 kilometers of road, but this is no trivial matter. It has dragged on for a decade – 32 kilometers of road (…) So what happens is that America steps in and says: ‘Okay, we’ll take it over. Give us the 32 kilometers of road on a hundred-year lease, and you can all share it’,” he said.

For years, the situation in the South Caucasus has been progressively worsening. Historically, Armenia and Russia have enjoyed strong and stable relations, but this has changed since the rise of Pashinyan, who promoted a pro-Western shift as a way of distancing his country from Moscow. The result was clear: the military defeat in Nagorno-Karabakh and heightened tensions, leading to an escalation of foreign interventionism in the region.

For the foreign powers involved in the geopolitics of the Caucasus, Russia increasingly appears as a common adversary. While France and the US influence the Armenian decision-making process, Turkey, which is also a NATO member despite its ties with Moscow, is interested in a military occupation of the Caucasus through Azerbaijan.

This NATO expansionism violates the legitimate strategic interests of the Russian Federation in the post-Soviet region. In this sense, it is clear that inviting an American PMC into the Zangezur Corridor poses a major threat to Russia – as well as to Iran, a country with access to the Caucasus and in open enmity with the US.

Once again, it is clear that tensions in the Caucasus are carefully planned by NATO powers to generate regional instability against their geopolitical enemies. While Russia and Iran want peace and stability in their shared strategic environment, countries like France and the US see the heightened historic tensions between Azerbaijan and Armenia as an opportunity to advance their geopolitical projects in the region.

In the end, Armenia fell into a real trap. The country was persuaded by its Western “partners” to abandon Russia, its historic ally, and is now being militarily occupied by foreign powers. It seems only a matter of time before any vestige of sovereignty disappears from the Armenian state.

To stop this wave of public demoralization, submission to foreign powers, and political defeats, Armenia must halt the legacy of Westernization initiated by the Pashinyan regime. It is up to Armenian citizens to seek the necessary changes to save their own future.

You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.

infobrics.org

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

Turkish political crisis rapidly escalating

Turkish polarization reflects international contradictions and could have multiple geopolitical impacts.

Monday, April 21, 2025

Lucas Leiroz, member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert.

The political crisis in Turkey is becoming increasingly serious. Internal tensions in the country are worsening, especially regarding the rivalry between President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu. As a result, the situation in Turkey is rapidly destabilizing, which could have significant geopolitical consequences in several areas of Turkish influence.

Turkish authorities recently arrested Ekrem Imamoglu, accusing him of corruption and links to organized crime and terrorist organizations. Imamoglu was already previously detained in March, but the Istanbul court had at the time dismissed the charges, citing a lack of evidence. Now, however, the campaign against the mayor is clearly intensifying.

The campaign came just in time to prevent Imamoglu from being confirmed by the Republican People’s Party (CHP) as its presidential candidate in the 2028 elections. The Istanbul mayor has been gaining popularity recently mainly due to his rivalry with Erdogan. Many Turkish and foreign analysts see Imamoglu as a public figure “capable of defeating Erdogan,” which has certainly worried the local government.

This political background has made Imamoglu’s arrest extremely controversial. Opponents of Erdogan accuse the government of conducting a politically motivated witch hunt, targeting rival leaders. The government, in its defense, claims that the judiciary acts independently and that there is no political interference in legal matters. This division between supporters of Erdogan and Imamoglu has created a worrying atmosphere of tension within domestic politics, expanding a dangerous scenario of national polarization.

In fact, Imamoglu’s arrest is not an isolated incident, but is part of a broader context of investigations into individuals allegedly linked to terrorist groups and criminal schemes in the city of Istanbul. According to data from the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, approximately 100 people have been arrested or are being investigated for their involvement in criminal groups. These individuals include journalists, businessmen and politicians. Imamoglu was one of the targets of such investigations, in addition to a separate court case in which he is accused of secretly supporting the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which is designated a terrorist organization in Turkey.

On the other hand, it is necessary to emphasize that Imamoglu has suffered a series of problems, not only in the legal sphere. He recently had his degree from Istanbul University revoked due to an alleged bureaucratic problem in his 1990 transfer from a private institution in Northern Cyprus. The mayor’s supporters claim that the country’s authorities are persecuting Imamoglu at every possible level, trying to tarnish his career and public image, thus preventing him from rivaling Erdogan.

The government also has some arguments in its favor. The country’s authorities accuse foreign agents, mainly Europeans, of influencing the Turkish domestic area by supporting Imamoglu and other opposition leaders and groups. This European support is supposedly linked to the recent frictions between the EU and the US. Trump has friendly relations with Erdogan and recently praised him as a “smart leader”. On the other hand, the EU endorses the Turkish opposition because it sees Erdogan as a politician incompatible with European liberal agendas. This international dispute can in fact be understood as the geopolitical environment behind the Turkish polarization.

Recently, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan stated that the controversy surrounding Imamoglu’s case is hypocritical. His criticism was directed at foreign governments that have spoken out on the issue condemning Erdogan. Fidan said that the disapproval of these states exposes the selective condemnation of the EU – which remains silent in the face of political crimes within the bloc while at the same time tries to interfere in Turkish internal affairs.

“In France, a woman party leader was imprisoned for corruption. Did you criticize it? No. In Romania, a candidate who won the election was tried before the second round and was politically banned. In Moldova, you imprisoned an elected regional head. Did you condemn it? No,” Fidan said.

Ultimately, the Turkish scenario remains uncertain and complex. The government is waging a campaign against foreign agents linked to the opposition. However, given the current Turkish government’s hesitant, unstable and unpredictable behavior, it is possible to say that Erdogan is increasingly running out of external allies. Trump’s praise and friendly relations do not seem to be enough to guarantee him a hold on power. In the same vein, recent Turkish actions in Syria have damaged Russian confidence in Erdogan, which is why Turkey is likely to become even more isolated.

In the same vein, it is important to remember that what happens in Turkey has broad international influences. Turkish politics directly influences actors in the Middle East, Africa and especially in the ethnically Turkish countries of Central Asia – as well as ethnic Turkish minorities in Russia, China and several other countries. An unstable Turkey could become a time bomb for the entire Eurasian region, considering the ethnic and religious Turkish factions spread throughout the region.

There is a real impasse in Turkey. The government is weakened and reacting radically against an opposition strongly supported by the EU, while counting on the support of a US government that, despite its praise for Erdogan, seems truly uninterested in international interventionism. The Turkish government’s criticism of the behavior of European leaders is correct, but it remains to be seen how long Erdogan’s coalition will be able to withstand the growing pressure at home and abroad.

You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.

infobrics.org

Azerbaijan Signaled That It Might Be Preparing Its Own Special Operation Against Armenia

Armenia is widely recognized as the first nation to adopt Christianity as its state religion. According to historical tradition, Christianity was introduced to Armenia by the apostles Bartholomew and Thaddeus in the 1st century AD. Armenia officially established Christianity as its state religion in 301 AD, when King Tiridates III was convinced to convert by St. Gregory the Illuminator. This event is traditionally dated to 301 AD and marks Armenia as the first country to adopt Christianity as its state religion, predating the Roman Empire’s adoption of Christianity by several decades.

Now the first Christian nation’s very existence is threatened, just as we predicted it would be when the world stood by and let Azerbaijan take over Armenian territory bit by bit over the past 7 years. I said then that doing nothing would embolden Azerbaijan to simply take over the entire country of Armenia. That time has arrived.

Guest post by Andrew Korybko

Azerbaijan demands that Armenia demilitarize, denazify, no longer contain it on behalf of foreign (Western) powers, stop obstructing regional trade routes, and allow ethnically cleansed Azeris to return.

Azerbaijani President Ilhan Aliyev gave a nearly three-hour-long interview to several local TV channels last week, during which time he signaled that his country might be preparing its own special operation against Armenia along the lines of Russia’s ongoing one in Ukraine. He of course didn’t use that term, but describing Armenia as a fascist state whose foreign-backed military buildup poses a threat to regional security very closely resembles Putin’s words about Ukraine ahead of large-scale hostilities.

Aliyev began that part of his interview by defending Azerbaijan’s increased military budget as a response to the arms race that Armenia initiated. This is being partially fueled by the “European Peace Facility”, whose military loans are written off after a certain period, he said. Armenia is therefore basically receiving arms from the bloc for free. To make matters even more alarming, an Armenian-EU-US cooperation platform was launched last April, which Aliyev claimed has a de facto military component.

He then declared that “The independent Armenian state is actually a fascist state because this country has been led by proponents of fascist ideology for nearly 30 years.” As evidence of this, he cited its ethnic cleansing of Azeris from Armenia and Karabakh, which the first Armenian President bragged about in a newly unearthed video that was dubbed into Russian here while an excerpt was dubbed into English here. He added that Armenia is also “Islamophobic, Azerbaijanophobic, racist, (and) xenophobic”.

Aliyev upped the ante right after by thundering that “We are neighbors with such a fascist state, and the threat of fascism is not going away. Therefore, fascism must be destroyed. Either the Armenian leadership will destroy it or we will. We have no other choice.” The Azerbaijani leader suggested that “France and other countries that provide it with weapons must terminate and cancel these contracts. The weapons that have already been sent to Armenia must be returned. This is our condition.”

He hopes that his words will be heeded now that “The Soros era has ended in America” with Trump’s return. Aliyev said that “The Biden administration was, in fact, governed by the Soros method of governance. It is no coincidence that one of Biden’s last decisions was to present Soros with America’s highest award.” He also claimed later on in the interview that “the Soros government” was in power “during the eight years before Trump” in a clear allusion to Obama.

Other Armenian allies who’ve been “shamefully removed from the political scene” as Aliyev phrased it are Assad and Trudeau, while Macron is still hanging on by a thread, and this overall trend might lead to an Azerbaijani-Armenian peace treaty. For that to happen, the Minsk Group would have to be abolished, and Armenia has to amend its constitution due to a clause therein implying territorial claims to Azerbaijan. Aliyev said that Azerbaijan doesn’t need a peace treaty if these conditions aren’t met.

He also demanded that Armenia stops acting as a “geographical barrier between Turkiye and Azerbaijan”, to which end “The Zangezur corridor must and will be opened. The sooner they understand this, the better it is. Why should we have to go to Nakhchivan, an integral part of Azerbaijan, through different ways? We should have a direct connection, and this connection does not question Armenia’s sovereignty.” Aliyev implied that Armenia’s obstructionism is part of an imperialist divide-and-rule policy.

The West, specifically France whose “full control over Armenia is also a reality”, is behind this. His earlier words about how “we believe that the Organization of Turkic States can become a serious power center on a global scale” in the “new world order” that’s emerging suggests that Armenia is being exploited as their geopolitical tool for preventing that group from reaching its full strategic potential. This is similar to what Putin claimed three years ago about how the West was exploiting Ukraine to contain Russia.

Aliyev reminded his interviewers that “I once said that they should not upset us and understand that we are the ones who have the say here and that Azerbaijan is the leading economy, the leading military power and the leading state in the South Caucasus. In today’s world, the power factor is at the forefront and no one should forget this.” This too resembles Russian rhetoric in the sense of conveying what could soon come to pass if Azerbaijan’s national security and strategic interests aren’t respected.

The final demand that he made was for Armenia to accept the return of the 300,000 Azeris who were ethnically cleansed from Armenia, which he referred to as Western Azerbaijan since “All the toponyms there are of Azerbaijani origin” in Imperial-era maps. The total is “several times greater” when their descendants are included, but “Returning to those areas would not pose a significant problem” since “the majority of the villages where Azerbaijanis lived are now completely empty”, especially in Zangezur.

Although different in substance, Aliyev’s interest in the rights of ethnic Azeris in Armenia make observers recall Putin’s interest in the rights of ethnic Russians in Ukraine, thus representing another commonality between them which hints at Azerbaijan possibly preparing its own special operation. To summarize, Azerbaijan demands that Armenia demilitarize, denazify, no longer contain it on behalf of foreign (Western) powers, stop obstructing regional trade routes, and allow ethnically cleansed Azeris to return.

With Trump about to return in less than two weeks’ time, who Aliyev praised in his latest interview and made sure that his audience didn’t forget that he also did so over the summer before the debate with Biden when it wasn’t popular, it’s possible that America might finally restore its balanced regional policy. Aliyev mentioned that Biden sacrificed relations with Azerbaijan for relations with Armenia and implemented double standards against it vis-à-vis Ukraine as regards the principle of territorial integrity.

If the returning American leader corrects his predecessor’s mistakes, which were made due to Soros’ influence over the Biden Administration as can be intuited by what Aliyev shared in his latest interview, then Armenia might be pressured into complying with Azerbaijan’s demands. That would avert another regional war that Armenia is doomed to lose no matter how much some of its policymakers and citizens have convinced themselves otherwise due to Western political backing in recent years.

The West will not go to war against Azerbaijan, which could turn into a war with its Turkish ally that could tear NATO apart in an instant if it happens, over Armenia. If Trump signals a policy reversal towards the region, then the rest of the West will follow suit, possibly even France too with time. Even if it doesn’t, French arms won’t lead to Armenia defeating Azerbaijan and Turkiye, so the writing is on the wall and it’s therefore better for Armenia to do what Aliyev demands or risk total destruction.

Jerusalem Next’: Syrian Rebels’ Big Declaration Against Israel, Message To Gaza | Watch

It looks like Israel is going to be getting some blowback from the so called “rebels” they supported in Syria. This is a big reason why Israel is destroying as much Syrian weaponry as they can so they don’t have to fight against it later.

Armageddon continues to unfold! The return of Jesus Christ is at hand!

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we havePayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

Breaking News! Russia/Ukraine/NATO and Turkey/Israel Rumors of War

There are some big developments going on around the world in regard to worldwide Armageddon and the local Armageddon in Israel. All of it is in today’s video report!

Russian FM Statement

Russia ready to carry out massive attack in Ukraine

Turkey Cuts Ties with Israel

Ukraine admits defenses are crumbling

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we havePayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

Buy Steens Raw Manuka Honey HERE

Get NordVPN HERE

Rumble Link

Bitchute Link

Emergency alert! American nuclear bombers on full alert as Russia and Iran conduct naval drills

The world sits on the pacifist of all out Armageddon/World War III. I would expect it all to erupt within the next two weeks. Prayed up and prepped up, time is very very short.

The two Gog Magog Alliances C04-5-11 by Leeland Jones

Leeland sent this video my way today and in it he explains to us the Gog/Magog war and local/worldwide Armageddon. Leeland helps us make sense of what’s going on in the Middle East and the world.

Vimeo Link: https://vimeo.com/1019507071

Leelandjones.com

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

Turkey’s Erdogan calls for Islamic alliance against Israel

ISTANBUL, Sept 7 (Reuters) – Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said on Saturday Islamic countries should form an alliance against what he called “the growing threat of expansionism” from Israel, drawing a rebuke from the Israeli foreign minister.

He made the comment after describing what Palestinian and Turkish officials said was the killing by Israeli troops of a Turkish-American woman taking part in a protest on Friday against settlement expansion in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

“The only step that will stop Israeli arrogance, Israeli banditry, and Israeli state terrorism is the alliance of Islamic countries,” Erdogan said at an Islamic schools’ association event near Istanbul.

He said recent steps that Turkey has taken to improve ties with Egypt and Syria are aimed at “forming a line of solidarity against the growing threat of expansionism,” which he said also threatened Lebanon and Syria.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz said in a statement that Erdogan’s remark was “a dangerous lie and incitement,” and that the Turkish leader has been working for years with Iran to undermine the region’s moderate Arab regimes.

Erdogan hosted Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi in Ankara this week and they discussed the Gaza war and ways to further repair their long-frozen ties during what was the first such presidential visit in 12 years.

Ties between them started thawing in 2020 when Turkey began diplomatic efforts to ease tensions with estranged regional rivals, including the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

Erdogan said in July that Turkey would extend an invitation to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad “any time” for possible talks to restore relations between the two neighbours, who severed ties in 2011 after the outbreak of the Syrian civil war.

Israel’s military said after Friday’s incident that it was looking into reports that a female foreign national “was killed as a result of shots fired in the area. The details of the incident and the circumstances in which she was hit are under review.”

There was no immediate comment on Friday’s incident from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we havePayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Paypal Linkhttps://paypal.me/johnnystorm?country.x=US&locale.x=en_US

« Older Entries