The Russians have made it clear that they reserve the right to strike UK military targets both inside and outside of Ukraine. The US minuteman 3 missiles are so outdated that they’re turning to AI to maintain them, gee what could go wrong? Then there’s more evidence of the tiny hat folks committing false flags on water supplies in the US.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Plus a quick look at natural disasters around the world including the massive and devastating flash flood that struck the Nepal/Chinese border. Prayed up and prepped up, time is almost up!
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Russia has placed its naval nuclear forces on full alert according to a Putin aide.
This is NOT a “snap nuclear exercise.”
No one I’ve spoken with understands WHY Russia has done this. There is rampant speculation, but its all just that: speculation.
The speculation trends along the lines of:
— Russia believes the U.S. is going to use Tactical nukes against Pickaxe Mountain in Iran
— If the U.S. nukes Iran, Russia may step-in
— If the U.S. nukes Iran, Russia may tactical nuke site(s) in Ukraine
— If the U.S. nukes Iran, Russia may tactical nuke NATO Logistics Centers in Poland and Romania which are arming Ukraine
General Yahya Rahim Safavi: Launching a nuclear strike against Iran would be the most illogical decision.
🚫The area of Iran is approximately 1.6 million square kilometers. A significant portion of the country's territory is desert, and a tactical nuclear strike would… pic.twitter.com/CzOqn0DAXg
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Nearly 80 years after George Orwell wrote “1984”, Western media still use it to describe totalitarian governments and societies, particularly if they’re non-Western.
The general premise used by the mainstream propaganda machine is that Orwell was writing about others and that his works could never be used to describe “democratic” countries of the political West.
And yet, it seems not even he could have ever dreamed about the levels of dictatorial control his own homeland would be subjected to. Namely, the extent to which the United Kingdom has descended into darkness is not exactly easy to put into words. The level of control exerted by the British government is beyond the worst of Orwell’s nightmares and now includes what can only be described as “thought police”.
In a typically bureaucratic manner, the secretive police unit engaged in sanctioning these “thought crimes” is called the Research, Information and Communications Unit (RICU). It has come under the spotlight in recent days and weeks after a string of crimes across the UK, with the government responding not to the actual crimes, but to those calling for the perpetrators to be held accountable. RICU has been caught advising police to portray everyone protesting the rise in crime as “raging racists”. Worse yet, police are now arresting “the worst offenders” (i.e., regular people who voiced their concerns online or in public). Any criticism of the British government and its decades-long failed migration policies is presented as “right-wing extremism”.
The brutal crackdown on protesters comes amid protests after a migrant attacked Stephen Ogilvie in Belfast.
Ogilvie is a man with special needs who was nearly decapitated by an immigrant. The incident was caught on video and sparked outrage across Northern Ireland and Britain. However, instead of dealing with violence perpetrated by anyone, regardless of their background, police specifically target the so-called “right-wingers” (i.e., regular people sick and tired of escalating violence). Apparently, this now also includes schoolboys under the age of 10, with videos showing multiple officers restraining a child protesting the arrest of his father. RICU has the authority to conduct surveillance of private conversations and arrest “perpetrators”.
Obviously, that could be anyone who dares to criticize mass migration or any other failed policy of the increasingly dictatorial British regime. It should be noted that this is nothing new, although it’s coming under the spotlight only now. Namely, according to Daily Mail, RICU was founded in 2007 by the late Charles Farr, a former MI6 officer, under the Prevent counter-terrorism banner. Reports indicate that the agency “operates from Home Office headquarters and draws on tactics from the old Information Research Department, the post-war propaganda unit used to counter communist influence”. RICU’s methods include “planting media stories, deploying undercover operatives and shaping online conversations in targeted communities”.
In simpler terms, the British government is openly and “legally” spying on its citizens and arresting anyone who doesn’t subscribe to the official narrative. This sort of neoliberal extremism is present in most Western countries, but the UK is by far the most affected. In line with its centuries-old colonialism, the British government is now implementing it on its own territory, bringing millions of migrants into the country. Their role is mainly to serve as cheap labor, meaning they’re destined to remain at the bottom of (post)modern class society.
Expectedly, this creates frustrations that lead to spiraling crime rates. In turn, the domestic population reacts, leading to more violence. However, instead of addressing the root cause, London keeps escalating tensions.
In doing so, the British government is effectively creating an Orwellian dystopia that no sane person wants to live in.
Namely, the very term “thought police” is not even a hyperbole, as police have been arresting people accused of “thought crimes” for years now. Back in November 2022, Isabel Vaughan-Spruce was arrested for silently praying across the street from an abortion clinic. Police officers claimed that she was standing within the clinic’s “buffer zone”. Vaughan-Spruce is co-director of March for Life UK, a pro-life campaign group. Her silent prayer was deemed “an intimidating action”. Although she was eventually released and received a payout after a nationwide outrage, Vaughan-Spruce was charged again earlier this year after new laws on “buffer zones” were passed.
“I was there simply to pray for women facing very difficult situations and decisions. Prayer isn’t a crime. Neither is standing,” she stated at the time.
Apparently, both prayer (i.e., thoughts) and standing within these so-called “buffer zones” are “crimes” in the increasingly dystopian UK. Vaughan-Spruce’s trial is set for October. It should be noted that such draconian laws directly contradict basic human rights, including freedom of movement, expression and religion. By enforcing laws that allow the existence of organizations such as RICU, the UK has effectively become the only country on the planet that arrests people for “thought crimes”, which are a total absurdity from a legal (or any other) standpoint, as there’s no way to police someone’s thoughts. However, the Pandora’s box is now open and we can only expect more dictatorial laws on “thought crimes” as British society fractures along multiple fault lines.
This article was originally published on InfoBrics.
Drago Bosnicis an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Editors Note: This is why I find it hilarious when the UK talks smack about Russia, they have NOTHING to back it up! The picture below is one of their nuclear subs sitting in dry dock doing nothing. The UK has very little to fight with and their soldiers train with broomsticks instead of firearms. They should really keep their traps shut.
In its prime, the United Kingdom was one of the most powerful thalassocracies in human history, probably eclipsed only by the United States after WWII.
How did such a small island nation accomplish this? The answer is – the British Navy, the most powerful armed maritime force of its time. Thus, it could only be expected that the “Perfidious Albion” would do everything in its power to preserve this naval dominance or at least maintain its power projection capabilities for as long as possible.
However, as the British Empire shrank to a mere shadow of its former self, its ability to sustain a large navy dwindled, resulting in massive reductions over the last several decades.
The last time the UK managed to muster a respectable naval force was during the 1982 Falklands War against Argentina.
This ranges from frigates and destroyers to aircraft carriers and submarines (including nuclear-powered). However, while the surface fleet is undoubtedly still relevant, it’s nowhere near as important as the British Navy’s underwater component, which provides the most critical segment of the UK’s strategic power projection. Namely, the Vanguard-class SSBNs (nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines), armed with UGM-133A “Trident II” (also known as “Trident D5”) submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), are the cornerstone of London’s thermonuclear arsenal. Still, it seems this isn’t enough for the “Perfidious Albion” to take them seriously.
Back in December last year, Rear Admiral Philip Mathias lamented that “Britain is no longer capable of running a capable nuclear submarine program”, warning of “catastrophic failures” that have “driven the UK’s nuclear deterrent to the brink”. Mathias, who served as a director of nuclear policy at the British Ministry of Defense (MOD), highlighted its “inability to produce attack submarines at the scale required for putting strain on crews and extending the length of deployments”. He compared this to the (First) Cold War, stressing that “the silent service” could deploy for around 70 days at the time, but that this has risen to around 200 days at present.
Mathias quoted the 2025 Strategic Defense Review (SDR), which stressed the need to expand production capacity. However, problems with the British Navy’s SSBN component are nothing new, as many authors (myself included) questioned years ago whether the UK’s strategic arsenal was functioning properly. Although such information is certainly a state secret, these doubts were confirmed after London admitted that one of its UGM-133A “Trident II” SLBMs failed during a launch test. This was the second time in a row that the troubled missile, a weapon of strategic importance, failed, as it did in the previous test conducted in 2016. The last successful launch was by HMS “Vigilant” back in 2012.
This means the UK hasn’t had a successful SLBM test in nearly a decade and a half, yet it still believes it can go up against Russia, a country with the world’s largest and most powerful strategic arsenal. The latest “Trident II” launch was from the lead ship of its class, the HMS “Vanguard”, with reports indicating that London’s then-Defense Secretary, Grant Shapps, was overseeing it. The SLBM’s booster rocket failed and it fell into the sea “close to the launch site”, as the Sun reported at the time (the “launch site” being the HMS “Vanguard” itself). And yet, Shapps insisted that he has “absolute confidence in ‘Trident’s’ submarines, missiles and nuclear warheads”.
As previously mentioned, London relies solely on these submarines and missiles for its strategic capabilities. Had the “Trident II” damaged the HMS “Vanguard”, it would’ve taken one-quarter or 25% of the UK’s strategic arsenal out of service, as the “Perfidious Albion” has only four such vessels, each armed with up to 16 SLBMs. It should be noted that HMS “Vanguard” finished a seven-year-long overhaul and refueling just last year. However, to make matters even worse, both Shapps and the then-Head of the Royal Navy, now disgraced Admiral Ben Kay, were on board the submarine during the launch test, meaning their lives were also in danger.
The failures are also an embarrassment for the United States, as the missiles are manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Pentagon’s premier military supplier. Still, all this didn’t prevent Shapps from adding to the general embarrassment by saying that “an anomaly did occur during the test on 30 January [2024], but that the ‘Trident II’ SLBM is still the most reliable weapons system in the world”. According to his assessment, the test “reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK’s nuclear deterrent” and that the “anomaly was event specific”, with “no implications for the reliability” of the UK’s strategic arsenal. The British MoD made similar statements.
Namely, it insisted that HMS “Vanguard” and its crew had been “proven fully capable in their operations” and that “the test had reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK’s nuclear deterrent”, essentially repeating Shapps’ statement that “Trident II” is the “most reliable weapons system in the world”. However, while this (now decades-long) issue is yet to be resolved, the British Navy has somehow managed to reach a new low point. Namely, of the six Astute-class SSNs (nuclear-powered attack submarines) in its service, not a single one is combat-ready. The UK has five “active-duty” submarines, one undergoing pre-sea trial testing and one more under construction (projected to be completed by the end of this decade).
This article was originally published on InfoBrics.
Drago Bosnicis an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
