The SVR is newly alleging that France and the UK are plotting to secretly arm Ukraine with a nuclear weapon.
According to the agency, British and French officials are considering the “covert transfer of relevant European-made components, equipment, and technologies to Ukraine” – and are in parallel laying the groundwork for an information campaign that would misrepresent the nuclear capacity as domestically developed.
Russian sources and state media strongly suggest their belief that this is still just in planning stages, and that several options are being considered, including that Ukraine could be provided with a French TN 75 warhead, currently in the the French Navy’s submarine-launched ballistic missiles.
There’s also the option of Western assistance to help Kiev build a ‘dirty bomb’ – which has long been a feared weapon in the context of the grinding Ukraine conflict, given it spreads radioactive material far and wide, among urban areas.
TASS and others have cited the SVR in framing this as an act of desperation given Ukrainian forces are being rolled back piecemeal on the battlefield:
According to its information, the British and French elites are unwilling to accept defeat. “It is believed that Ukraine should be supplied with a ‘Wunderwaffe’ (German for ‘miracle weapon’ – TASS). Kiev would be able to aspire to more advantageous terms of ceasing the hostilities if it possesses a nuclear or at least a so-called ‘dirty’ bomb,” the statement said.
The suggestion is that the Western allies supporting Ukraine would do anything rather than admit defeat, even the unthinkable.
Here’s more from an official state media translation from the SVR’s media office:
“At present, according to the information available to the Russian SVR, London and Paris are actively working over the issue of providing Kiev with a weapon of this kind, as well as with means of its delivery. This involves a covert transfer of relevant European-made components, equipment and technologies to Ukraine. As an option, the French small-size TN-75 warhead from the M51.1 submarine-launched ballistic missile is being considered,” the press bureau pointed out. At the same time, “Berlin has prudently refused to take part in this dangerous venture.”
According to the Foreign Intelligence Service, the British and the French realize that their plot is “a gross violation of the international law, first of all the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and carries the risk of destroying the global non-proliferation system.” “Consequently, the Westerners’ main efforts are focused on making Kiev’s possession of nuclear weapon look like it was developed by the Ukrainians themselves,” the statement said. “Great Britain and France are aware that the situation developing in Ukraine leaves no chances for them to achieve the ardently desired victory over Russia with the hands of the Ukrainian armed forces,” the SVR noted.
The statement concludes by an allegation that NATO countries are “losing touch with reality” their reckless efforts to impose defeat on Russia in Ukraine, and so are willing to seriously contemplate a ‘dirty bomb’ – as losses mount.
The Kremlin has meanwhile not been forthcoming with any specific evidence, and the SVR has not revealed the types of sourcing underlying its serious allegations.
Deputy Chairman of the Russian Federation Council, Dmitry Medvedev, BLUNTLY said today, “Russia will nuke Ukraine, France, and the UK if this takes place.”
No mincing words. No room for any misunderstanding.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
This shows how there are no legal or moral limits to the West’s actions against Russia.
By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida at Global Research. Reposted with permission.
Apparently, the illegal US action against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro is “inspiring” the war plans of British authorities – not against Latin American countries or developing states, but against the Russian Federation. Recently, UK Defense Secretary John Healey stated that he would like to kidnap Russian President Vladimir Putin if given the opportunity. This shows how irrational and dangerous the plans of Western elites against Moscow are.
In an interview with a Ukrainian newspaper, the British official said he would like to “take” Putin, if possible. According to him, Putin is a politician who needs to “be stopped”. Healey made it clear that he only refrains from implementing a real plan to kidnap Putin because it does not seem feasible – considering Russia’s military power and the possibility of a nuclear conflict as a consequence of such an action.
“I would take (Russian President Vladimir) Putin into custody and hold him account for war crimes (…) This is a man who must be stopped. This is a war that must be stopped. And our mission is to support Ukraine in its fight today and to help work to secure the peace for the moment,” he said.
Healey attempted to justify his words with “humanitarian” rhetoric. He mentioned, among the alleged “crimes” of the Russian president, the recent incidents of drone attacks against the Ukrainian capital. According to him, the recent wave of attacks “tells you all you need to know about President Putin and his determination not just to wage a war on Ukraine, but to target civilians, cities, the infrastructure that people absolutely critically depend on in the middle of winter.”
To date, the Ukrainian side has failed to prove any deliberate Russian attacks against civilian targets in Kiev. What has been happening is a wave of drone and missile attacks against military, strategic, and energy facilities throughout the country – including the capital. Obviously, every military attack, even a legitimate one, can have some impact on civilian infrastructure as a side effect.
This is especially critical in Ukraine, as Kiev is known to maintain strategic facilities around some residential areas – attempting to use its own people as human shields. The Russian attacks are highly precise, as this conflict is recognized by experts for its low number of civilian casualties. However, local propaganda strives to say otherwise.
Furthermore, the British official mentioned the already widely refuted cases of Bucha and the alleged “kidnapping of children” by Russian authorities. According to Healey, Putin should be arrested for the “massacre of civilians” in Bucha and the “abduction of Ukrainian children” in Irpen. All these cases have already been proven false, with witnesses from the Ukrainian side itself reporting that bodies from different regions of the country were transported to Bucha to simulate a massacre, as well as several children said to be “missing” who were later found in Europe – having likely arrived there through illegal international “adoption” schemes with the consent of the Kiev authorities themselves.
It’s important to remember that Healey made this statement a few days after the American attack on Venezuela. Ukrainian journalists asked him who he would choose as a target “given the option of being able to kidnap any world leader.” Similarly, the illegitimate Ukrainian president Vladimir Zelensky also publicly called for a joint Western-Ukrainian operation to capture the president of Russia’s Chechen Republic, Ramzan Kadyrov. Apparently, Ukrainians and Westerners already consider it possible to publicly contemplate the possibility of kidnapping high-ranking politicians and heads of state.
This is a result of the dangerous precedent set by the American action. However, something like that would never be possible against a country like Russia. Any attempt to violate Russian territory to kidnap local leaders would be met with massive attacks. The consequence of this type of Western crime would be the beginning of an international conflict, possibly nuclear. Not by chance, Healey comments on the subject only as an unattainable hypothesis – a kind of “dream” for the British officer.
However, considering that the Ukrainian side has already attempted to assassinate the Russian president on at least two occasions during the current conflict – the most recent being when 91 long-range drones were launched against one of Putin’s residences in the Novgorod region – it is possible to say that even the “plans” and “dreams” of the enemy are a serious threat to Russia. The western Ukrainian side shows that it is willing to use terror against Russia and that it is not constrained by international law – only by force.
In this sense, it is legitimate for Russia to further intensify its operations against Ukraine – especially Western assets on Ukrainian soil – in the near future, as a response to these irresponsible and threatening statements. Only by neutralizing the enemy’s ability to reach Russian territory will there be security for Moscow.
This article was originally published on InfoBrics.
Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram. He is a regular contributor to Global Research
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
With a maximum range of 300 km, the ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System) is a serious threat to any undefended Russian settlement. At least four missiles were launched from the Kharkov oblast (region), targeting civilian infrastructure in the adjacent Voronezh oblast, prompting a swift Russian defensive response and retaliatory precision strikes.
The incident underscores the intensifying role of US/NATO weapon systems in the Kiev regime’s attacks on Russia proper.
The sequence began at approximately 14:31 Moscow time (11:31 UTC) on November 18, when the Kiev regime forces fired four ATACMS missiles from a position near Volosskaya Balakleya in the Kharkov oblast, approximately 50 km southeast of the city of Chuguyev.
This launch site, later identified by Russian ISR, used two US-made which are compatible with ATACMS munitions.
“The Ukrainian Armed Forces have reported the first launch of an MGM-140 Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) ballistic missile strike into internationally recognised Russian territory, with the system’s reliance on Western advisors and satellite guidance indicating that the United States has approved this escalation of the country’s attacks. Commenting on the attack, the Ukrainian Armed Forces General Staff pledged: “The use of long-range strike capabilities, including systems such as ATACMS, will continue.”
Unconfirmed reports indicate that the target may have been the Pogonovo training area in the Voronezh region, although Russian sources reported that the missiles were launched against civilian targets.
Although the ATACMS has been used to significant effect multiple times in the past, it has been restricted to targets in disputed territories claimed by both Russia and Ukraine in the Donbas regions and on the Crimean Peninsula.
Long Hand Family of #UAarmy has been enlarged: the first MLRS M270 have arrived! They will be good company for #HIMARS on the battlefield. Thank you to our partners . No mercy for the enemy.
The US/NATO missiles were directed at non-military targets in the Voronezh oblast, including the regional geriatric center and an orphanage, signaling an intent to terrorize civilian populations rather than disrupt military operations.
The Map below indicates the Voronezh target within Russia’s territory as well as the Ukraine-Russia border.
The distance between the Russia-Ukraine border and Voronezh is of the order of 70 km.
Act of War against the Russian Federation, Under International Law?
This is not the first time that the Kiev regime (with the support of US/NATO) has targeted urban areas in Russian territory (eg. Kursk and Belgorod).
What is distinct in this attack is the deliberate targeting of civiliansinthe city of Voronezh which has a population of more than one million people.
Without Russia’s S-400 Missile Defense System coupled with its advanced air force interception technologies, civilian deaths would have been exceedingly high.
An Act of War “includes any military incursion, no matter how temporary”
Namely, as Russian air and missile defenses reacted almost instantaneously, they shot down all four ATACMS missiles.
Mere minutes after the launch, the S-400 long-range SAM (surface-to-air missile) and the “Pantsir” hybrid air defense systems detected and engaged the incoming US/NATO threats.
Renowned for its unprecedented 600-km detection radius and 400-km range hypersonic interceptors, the S-400 tracked ATACMS (flying at speeds up to Mach 3) and promptly neutralized them, saving countless lives.
All four missiles were successfully eliminated before reaching the airspace of any major city.
Eyewitness accounts and publicly available footage captured four distinct plumes of smoke rising over Voronezh, visible from ground level and corroborating the interception timeline. Debris was scattered across the area, causing minor structural damage but no human casualties. Falling shrapnel punctured the roofs of the Voronezh Regional Geriatric Center, a nearby orphanage and a single private residence.
Launched from approximately 200 km away and reaching its target in less than a minute, the unrivaled weapon slammed into the launch site with a high-explosive warhead. The strike obliterated at least two M270 launchers, their accompanying ammunition trailers and an estimated 10 servicemen (presumably Ukrainians, although the presence of NATO personnel is also highly likely). The Russian Ministry of Defense released comprehensive visual evidence to substantiate these claims. At 09:47 Moscow time, official photos were disseminated showing wreckages of the downed ATACMS missiles: twisted metal fragments riddled with shrapnel holes from S-400 and “Pantsir” interceptors, including tail sections marked with American serial numbers.
These images provided definite proof of these interceptions, precluding potential Western denials. Footage from the Voronezh oblast depicted the interception sequence: the missiles’ vapor trails arcing toward the city, followed by bright flashes and smoke clouds from the defensive engagements. Additional footage from the subsequent “Iskander-M” precision strike showed the initial impact plume, a massive fireball from detonating ATACMS stockpiles and lingering smoke over the cratered launch site. The response serves both as a warning and deterrent: by publicizing the launcher’s destruction, Russia signaled its ability to track and neutralize Western-supplied assets, thus discouraging further strikes.
Casualty figures from the “Iskander-M” hit are yet to be acknowledged by the Kiev regime, but local sources report “logistical disruptions” in the Kharkov oblast (unsurprisingly, without providing specifics or any additional information). Comically enough, NATO, which sponsored the attack, “expressed concern over escalation risks”. In reality, it was mainly concerned that one of its most potent missile systems not only failed, but was also destroyed mere hours after the unsuccessful launch. The destruction of four ATACMS demonstrated Moscow’s air and missile defense prowess, while the near-instantaneous retribution will likely temper ambitions of further ATACMS, M270 and HIMARS deliveries by the US.
Russia’s Retaliation
Visibly there are divisions within the Trump administration. Was the attack against Voronezh on November 18 intended to side track peace negotiations? The Kremlin retorted on November 19, 2025. An official statement by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation regarding the “attack by long-range American missiles on the city of Voronezh”.
.
“On November 18, 2025, at 14.31 Moscow time, the Kiev regime attempted to launch a missile attack on civilian targets deep in the territory of the Russian Federation. The enemy used four US-made ATACMS tactical missiles in the city of Voronezh. … The fallen fragments of the destroyed missiles damaged the roofs of the Voronezh Regional Gerontological Center and an orphanage for orphaned children, as well as one private household. There are no casualties among civilians,” the Defense Ministry stated.What the western media fails to acknowledge is the following:
.
“The Iskander-M combat crew launched a missile strike on the missile position of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as a result of which two MLRS launchers with ammunition, as well as combat crew personnel (up to 10 people), were destroyed,”
.
In other words, the Kremlin launched a Retaliatory Strike “Iskander-M Targets Ukrainian MLRS on November 19 following the intercepted attack on Voronezh. “Russian forces identified the launch site of the missiles near the settlement of Volosskaya Balakleya in the Kharkov region”.
“The strike reportedly destroyed two US-made MLRS launchers, along with their ammunition and up to ten personnel. The Iskander-M is a highly accurate, mobile missile system known for its ability to overcome various defense systems. Its use in this instance signals a clear message of escalation from Moscow.” (Archyde)
“War and Peace”. Trump’s 28 Point Peace Plan
Are there divisions within the U.S administration, not to mention America’s so-called European Allies?
The timing of this operation officially supported by Washington was carried out on November 18, 2025 two days prior to the formal announcement by Trump of a detailed 28 point Peace Plan (November 20, 2025)
Was this an intent to sabotage Trump’s Peace Plan? Trigger an Act of War against the Russian Federation as a means to undermine the Peace Project.
“US President Donald Trump says he is giving Ukraine [Zelensky] until next Thursday [November 27, 2025] to accept a peace plan the US drafted with Russia.
The White House has reportedly threatened to withdraw American support for Ukraine if the deadline is not met.
The 28-point plan is closely aligned with Russian demands.
It calls for Ukraine to give up territory to Russia, shrink its own military, and drop its plans to join NATO – concessions military analysts say would make Ukraine more vulnerable to any future attack.”
Transcript (Excerpts and Quotations)
President Zelensky
“The pressure on Ukraine is among the heaviest it has ever been. Ukraine may soon face a very difficult choice. Either the loss of dignity or the risk of losing a key partner, either a complex set of 28 points or an extremely difficult winter, the hardest one yet, followed by further risks. A life without freedom, without dignity, without justice. It’s almost 4 years since Russia launched its full-scale invasion”.
Ukraine’s EU-NATO Allies
Ukraine’s European allies were quick to reiterate their support for President Zelensky.
“The EU is providing military support to Ukraine to help to defend itself and we will continue to do so.”
President Vladimir Putin
In Moscow, Russian President Vladimir Putin gave his cautious backing to the plan, but said that further discussion was needed. He added that both Ukraine and Europe needed to understand what would happen if Kiev refused.
“I believe the text can be used as the basis for a final peace settlement, but it has not been discussed with us in detail, and I can guess why. The US government has so far failed to secure Ukraine’s consent. Ukraine is against it.
If Kiev does not want to discuss President Trump’s proposals and refuses to do so, then both they and the European war mongers must understand that the events that took Kubansk will inevitably be repeated in other key areas on the front”
The 28 Points Peace Plan. Informative Video, Biased? Produced prior to the attack on Voronezh.
28 Points of Pain: The Plethora of Problems with the U.S./Russia Peace Plan
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
I guess coercion is as good a way as any to deal with Ukraine and Zelensky since he and his entire government is corrupt to the core. Ukraine’s Zelensky has been given an ultimatum, accept the peace deal that is presented to you or else! What’s the or else? If he refuses, US intelligence, weapons and support will be stopped. He doesn’t have much choice as Ukraine would collapse in days if the US cuts him off.
Personally I don’t believe the war will end, not really. There might be a temporary agreement or ceasefire but the powers that be want war and we are in the end times leading up to Armageddon worldwide, not just in Israel. I can definitely smell a false flag coming. If it does I expect a doozy and Russia will be attacked by NATO directly after it happens. After that all bets are off. Next Thursday is Thanksgiving in the USA. It might not be so peaceful, we shall see.
Prayed up and prepped up, time is short!
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
The use of AI across all areas of the US government is extremely concerning and is part and parcel of the expanding military police state. At the same time Trump is expanding AI integration across Federal agencies he’s also expanding domestic use of the military in case people don’t like what he’s doing. (Hint if you don’t like it you’ll get a JACK BOOT TOTHE FACE) Russia and the rest of the world are no better as you will see in today’s video.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
In the order that they were mentioned, each corresponding move is aimed at: 1) bolstering Ukraine’s air defenses in order to decelerate the pace of Russia’s continual on-the-ground gains; 2) helping Ukraine reconquer some of its lost land; and 3) coercing China and India into pressuring Russia into a ceasefire. The first two goals are self-explanatory, with the second being unrealistic given the failure of Ukraine’s much more heavily armed counteroffensive in summer 2023, while the third requires some elaboration.
China and India’s large-scale imports of discounted Russian oil have served as crucial valves from Western sanctions pressure by helping to stabilize the ruble and thus Russia’s economy in general. Even though these imports also help their own economies, Trump is wagering that they’ll at the very least curtail them in order to avoid his threatened 100% secondary sanctions. He might make an exception for the Europeans and Turks, who also purchase Russian resources, on the pretext of them arming Ukraine.
By focusing on Russia’s two largest energy importers, Trump is trying to greatly reduce the budgetary revenue that the Kremlin receives from these sales while sowing further divisions within the RIC core of BRICS and the SCO, expecting as he is that at least China or India will partially comply at minimum. Prior to his deadline, he envisages that their leaders – who are years-long close friends with Putin – will try to pressure him into the ceasefire that the West wants, though it’s unknown whether they’d succeed.
In any case, Trump is poised to place himself in a dilemma entirely of his own making if one of them doesn’t comply with his demand to stop trading with Russia, or if one or both only do so in part. He’d either have to delay the imposition of his threatened 100% secondary sanctions on all their imports, lower the level, or reduce the scale to only apply to their companies that still trade with Russia otherwise there could be serious blowback, especially if China is the one that doesn’t fully comply.
His preliminary trade agreement with China, which he described in early May as a “total reset” in their ties, could collapse and thus raise prices across the board for Americans. As regards India, their ongoing trade talks could collapse too, which could create an opening for advancing the nascent Sino-Indo rapprochement whose existence was cautiously confirmed by its top diplomat on Monday. Each case of blowback, let alone both of them at the same time, could be very detrimental to American interests.
Trump’s attempt to thread the needle therefore isn’t just clumsy, but it could also majorly backfire, thus raising the question of why he agreed to do so. It looks like he was misled into thinking that Putin would agree to a ceasefire that doesn’t resolve the root security-related causes of the conflict in exchange for a resource-centricstrategic partnership. When Putin declined, Trump took it personally and imagined that Putin was playing him, which led to Trump’s advisors manipulating him into this escalation as vengeance.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Lindsay Graham and the other neocon war mongers were making the rounds of the Sunday talk shows where they were absolutely gleeful that Trump wanted to start getting tough with Russia.
“For months, President Trump has tried to entice [Russian President Vladimir] Putin to the peace table. He’s put tariffs against countries that allow fentanyl to come in our country, other bad behavior — he’s left the door open regarding Russia. That door is about to close,” Graham said on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.”
Graham outlined that he and Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat who also appeared Sunday on “Face the Nation,” are leading 85 cosponsors on a sanctions bill that he said would make a “sledgehammer available to President Trump to go after Putin’s economy and all those countries who prop up the Putin war machine.”
The South Carolina Republican explained that countries like China, India and Brazil buy oil and other goods from Russia, saying “that’s the money Putin uses to prosecute the war.” Graham said the sanctions package would give the president the ability to impose 500% tariffs on any country that helps Russia. And he noted that the president would have the discretion to dial the tariffs up or down, giving him “maximum flexibility.”
“We’re going after the people who keep Putin in business, and additional sanctions on Russia itself,” Graham said. “This is truly a sledgehammer available to President Trump to end this war.”
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
The mainstream media reported June 19, 2025) that “Putin Says Russia Could Help Broker a Deal between Iran and Israel.” (See Ames Jordan and Harriet Morris, AP News)
Speaking to senior news leaders of international news agencies, Putin noted that “it’s a delicate issue,” but added that “in my view, a solution could be found.”
Asked how Russia would react if Israel kills Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Putin refused to answer, saying that “I don’t even want to discuss such a possibility.”
Khamenei has rejected U.S. calls for surrender in the face of more Israeli strikes and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause “irreparable damage to them.” (AP News)
What is the significance of this action on the part of Vladimir Putin?
First of all, Putin has a long standing personal relationship (friendship) with Netanyahu. Second, Iran and Russia are allies from the military standpoint.
The Russian Federation is acutely aware that Netanyahu is a US proxy and that the threat directed against Iran emanates from the US military and intelligence apparatus.
Who calls the shots in the U.S.? Is it Trump or is it the “Shadow government” affiliated to the Democrats who in turn have links to their “partners” in EU-NATO including the UK (Starmer), Germany (Mertz) and France (Macron).
What is at stake is a complex system of alliances and cross-cutting coalitions.
Russia is an ally of Iran. While Russia has no formal military alliance with Israel, this longstanding personal relationship between Netanyahu and Putin is certainly playing a key strategic role.
“During his 12 years as prime minister, Netanyahu had close relations with Putin, speaking to the Russian president on the phone every few weeks and meeting in person every few months.” (Axios)
In his book, Netanyahu writes positively about Putin and describes him as “smart, sophisticated and focused on one goal – returning Russia to its historical greatness.” (Ibid)
What is unfolding: The President of the Russian Federation is using his friendship with Netanyahu as a means to weaken the US-NATO-Israel “alliance” and to prevent Israel’s IDF from continuing to bomb Iran on behalf of the Pentagon.
Meanwhile, the personal relationship between President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu is in crisis.
The recent attacks on Iran were carefully planned by US-NATO-Israel.
Since 2005, in the wake of the 2003 Iraq war, Israel has been actively involved in the US-NATO alliance.
As conveyed by Dick Cheney in 2005, America needs Israel ‘to do the dirty work for us’ and that suggests that Washington has a stranglehold over Prime minister Netanyahu.
“The Israelis might well decide to act first, and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterwards”
.
We are beyond the threat of a “diplomatic mess.” And Trump has skillfully created another “diplomatic mess.”
Bear in mind, 15% of the population of Israel (1.3 million) are of of Russian descent. Israeli Russians many of whom had dual citizenship have been routinely recruited in Israel’s IDF.
Israel is an undeclared nuclear power acting on behalf of Washington.
And there are “people” within the US administration and the US Congress who are firmly committed to the use of tactical nuclear weapons against Iran.
Moreover, several of America’s European allies –which are non-nuclear States– are involved in the deployment of U.S tactical nuclear B61 (11, 12, 13) weapons on behalf of the Pentagon. These military bases are intent upon deploying tactical nuclear weapons against Iran.
.
Triple Entente, Triple Alliance. Remember World War I. Today’s structure of alliances and cross-cutting coalitions is far more complex than those prevailing at the outset of World War I.
The friendship between Putin and Netanyahu is of a geopolitical nature. In regard to Russia, it is nonetheless strategic.
It could lead to weakening the US-sponsored structure of political alliances namely US-NATO-Israel.
Will it change the course of history?
What is now abundantly clear is that the Ukraine-Russia war theater and that of the Middle East are integrated.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
Russian sources are completely discounting this as British Propaganda. Russians say the limo was ***NOT*** one from the Putin Motorcade, but rather a privately owned Aurus “Senat” limousine, parked at curbside and running outside a club in Moscow. The vehicle suffered an engine fire.
They say the vehicle was not occupied at the time, no one was hurt and this has nothing at all to do with Putin.
You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below. Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options. The buy me a coffee link is below.
