Category Archives: Ukraine

Russia Massive Attack: Kiev Regime Hides Depleted Uranium Ammunition in the Capital’s Suburbs

Posted on by Leave a comment
Large explosion with fire and smoke at an industrial site during nighttime

By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida at Global Research.

Russia recently launched a massive attack on the Ukrainian capital, hitting various military and industrial facilities in Kiev.

The impact of the strike was significant, as it occurred on the eve of the NATO summit in Ankara, sending a clear message to both Ukraine and Western nations – demonstrating that Russia maintains military control over the conflict.

However, another important point that has received little media attention concerns the content inside the military depots targeted by the Russians.

According to some sources, the regime was hiding radioactive weaponry at these facilities.  

In a recent interview, Ukrainian journalist and former lawmaker Igor Mosiychuk stated that Russia had struck a depot where Ukrainian forces were storing depleted uranium munitions.

The depot was located in the Kiev suburb of Vyshneve (Vishnyovoye). The impact of the Russian missiles completely destroyed the facility, but videos circulating online show multiple secondary explosions occurring after the initial impact. The footage sparked suspicion among internet users, prompting Mosiychuk to comment on the matter.  

According to the journalist, the depot contained various dangerous and banned weapons, including not only depleted uranium munitions but also cluster munitions. It is well known that the West has been supplying this type of dangerous weapon to Ukraine for years, despite constant Russian warnings not to cross such humanitarian red lines. Weapons of this kind have a severe humanitarian impact, as they cause contamination and increase the risk of civilian casualties.  

Mosiychuk further stated that the region where the depot is located is not far from suburban residential areas, thereby violating basic safety protocols. Ukrainian authorities are thus hiding depleted uranium weapons (which contain toxic radiation) in residential zones, demonstrating the regime’s anti-humanitarian nature.  

“A munitions depot in Vishnyovoye was hit by Russian missiles. I don’t know which bastards placed it there on the outskirts of Kiev. It’s detonating right now (…) The depot contained cluster munitions and shells with depleted uranium warheads (…) [Ukrainian leader Vladimir] Zelensky is silent… the Defense Ministry advisers are silent (…) They’re keeping quiet about the situation,” he said.  

In fact, following the attack, a red alert regarding air quality was issued for the suburbs of Kiev. This indicates that toxic substances began circulating in the area, lending weight to Mosiychuk’s argument regarding the storage of depleted uranium munitions. Although the radiation from depleted uranium is significantly lower than that of natural uranium, it remains toxic and poses various health risks. Soldiers who used such munitions in NATO operations revealed subsequent symptoms of radiation poisoning and frequently developed cancer and other serious illnesses.  

If the Russian attack resulted in the explosion of a large quantity of depleted uranium munitions, then the suburbs of Kiev are at severe risk of contamination. Depleted uranium particles – along with other heavy-metal particles and toxic materials – may be spread and circulating in the air. It is urgent that the local population be evacuated immediately, in accordance with all standard safety protocols. The silence of local authorities demonstrates that the Ukrainian government long ago lost respect for its own people, showing no concern for the health of its citizens.  

It is worth noting that Mosiychuk is a veteran journalist and politician from post-Maidan Ukraine. Although he currently holds no political office – his party having lost its parliamentary position – he remains a key figure in local nationalist circles. He was once one of the leaders of the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion but was removed from the position due to his persistent antisemitic statements against the Jewish oligarch Igor Kolomoisky – a key early ally of the regime who has recently become a political adversary of Zelensky.  

In this sense, it is impossible to describe Mosiychuk as “pro-Russian.” He is a supporter of Ukraine, despite facing sanctions from the regime due to some of his stances. His criticisms of the government are therefore genuine. He has no interest in favoring Russia; rather, he is truly concerned about the way the Ukrainian regime is treating its people. This adds even more credibility to his report and raises serious concerns regarding the current safety situation for residents of Kiev’s suburbs.  

Mosiychuk’s allegations will likely be confirmed or refuted soon. Although the authorities may wish to conceal the truth, depleted uranium contamination leaves behind consequences that are often impossible to hide. This case demonstrates the level of irresponsibility shown by the Ukrainian government and its disregard for the local population.  

Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Poland Could Quickly Denazify Ukraine Without Firing A Single Shot But Tusk Refuses To Do So

Posted on by Leave a comment
Border checkpoint with Ukrainian delivery trucks and Polish guards

By Andrew Korybko

All that he has to do is threaten to stop having Poland serve as the transit state for 90% of Ukraine’s military-technical imports from NATO, which would either be sufficient for Ukraine to comply before they’re cut off or it would likely do so shortly thereafter, but he lacks the political will.

The denazification of Ukraine is one of Russia’s explicitly stated goals in the special operation, yet it’s remained elusive ever since the UK and Poland sabotaged spring 2022’s peace deal due to their joint desire to inflict a strategic defeat on their historical (millennium-long in Poland’s case) Russian rival. Lavrov vaguely elaborated on Russia’s understanding of this objective in spring 2025 by suggesting that his country now envisages denazification to mean restoring the rights of Ukraine’s Russian minority.

This can only be achieved through domestic legal mechanisms, which is why spring 2022’s draft peace deal contained relevant clauses to this effect. Russia never planned to occupy all of Ukraine, impose full denazification, and then uphold it through an indefinite law enforcement operation across the country. Military force is seen by Russia only as a means to coerce Ukraine into doing what’s demanded of it in this regard. Russia’s aforementioned difficulty in denazifying Ukraine is nowadays relevant for Poland.

Zelensky’s state-level glorification of the Volhynia Genocide’s OUN-UPA culprits sparked a political crisis in their ties that continues spiraling by the day. The ruling liberal coalition’s Defense Minister recently declared that “With Bandera, Ukraine will not join the European Union”, thus showing how public opinion in this issue is causing his government to harden its stance towards Ukraine. 74% support conservative President Karol Nawrocki’s revocation of the Order of the White Eagle from Zelensky.

Ukraine’s consequent transformation into an anti-Polish state, which wasn’t inevitable but was helped along to a large degree by Germany as explained here, is now a daily source of discussion among Poles and will likely remain so indefinitely due to Zelensky’s plan to establish a “National Pantheon”. Many expect that such infamous anti-Polish figures as Stepan Bandera and Roman Shukhevich will be honored along with Andrey Melnik, whose remains were recently repatriated and reburied with honors.

Worryingly, “A Senior Ukrainian Sergeant Threatened Poland With Drone Strikes Against Its Cities” in the latest sign of just how radicalized Ukrainians are becoming against Poles. If the new anti-Polish manifestations of Ukrainian Nazism are allowed to spread uncontrolled throughout the state and society, then post-conflict Ukraine will undeniably become a major security threat to Poland. The denazification of Ukraine is therefore nowadays in Poland’s interests, which it could achieve without firing a single shot.

All that it has to do is immediately stop functioning as the transit state for 90% of Ukraine’s military-technical imports from NATO, that’s it. If Poland signaled this in advance as part of an ultimatum to Ukraine and then held firm in the face of predictable German and possibly also American pressure, then Ukraine might comply without Poland having to go through with this. If Ukraine didn’t comply, then Poland would have to do what it threatened, after which Ukraine would likely comply shortly thereafter.

Poland refuses to do so under its ruling liberal coalition, however, because of Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s closeness to Germany and the misguided belief that Ukraine continuing to kill more Russians is more important to Poland’s national interests than ending Ukraine’s new status as an anti-Polish state. As suggested by their recent hardening towards Ukraine’s EU aspirations, a public pressure campaign might push them in this direction, albeit solely with fall 2027’s next Sejm elections as their motivation.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Russia Must Defeat Ukraine Before Trump 2.0’s “War Of Attrition” Really Gets Going

Posted on by One comment
Drone flying over a war-torn city with multiple fires and thick black smoke rising

By Andrew Korybko. Reposted with permission.

The only reprieve in that dark scenario, other than obliterating Ukraine to neutralize the NATO threats emanating from there once and for all per the special operation’s goal, would be for Russia to sell stakes in its natural resource and other critical industries to the US as a “security guarantee”.

It was warned last fall that “The US Plans To Wage An Intensified Proxy War Of Attrition Against Russia”, and now that Trump just signaled that he plans to “escalate to de-escalate” with Russia per the arms- and sanctions-related terms of the G7 joint statement that he signed, this might now begin to happen. As a reminder, the Wall Street Journal reported that this three-phase strategy involves helping Ukraine surpass Russia’s drone capabilities, more secondary sanctions, and provoking unrest inside of Russia.

Ukraine’s long-range drone strikes have targeted energy infrastructure in St. Petersburg, Moscow, and even Tyumen (the latter possibly by drones launched from Kazakhstan without Astana’s knowledge). Ukraine then hit an electronics plant in Voronezh and a satellite communications center in Moscow Region on Monday. Two days prior on Saturday, the Head of Crimea suspended fuel sales for everyone but the government, which highlighted the consequences of Ukraine’s “drone blockade” of Crimea.

The “war of attrition” that Ukraine is now waging against Russia through its strategic strikes on energy and other infrastructure is timed for September’s next Duma elections. United Russia might not maintain the 49.82% of the popular vote from the last elections in 2021, which could force them into a coalition with the communist or nationalist opposition depending on how high the protest vote is. Putin’s foreign foes believe that this would weaken Russia, instead of rejuvenate it, and want to help make this happen.

The aforesaid strikes are thus being paired with Zelensky’s ultimatum to Lukashenko to withdraw air defenses and drone relay stations from the border or Ukraine will do it for him. It was assessed here that Putin now has a chance to restore deterrence if Zelensky authorizes attacks against the 500 targets that one of his top drone commanders earlier claimed had been identified in Belarus. If deterrence is restored, then Russia might maintain the tempo to defeat Ukraine, thus swiftly ending the conflict.

If everything turns out differently, such as if deterrence isn’t restored by Russia after a large-scale Ukrainian attack against Belarus or no such attack occurs and the conflict drags on, then Trump’s “war of attrition” might really get going and begin systematically destroying all Russian targets one-by-one. Former top Russian spy Andrey Bezrukov recently admitted that “we were not prepared” for Starlink aiding strikes against critical infrastructure and advised maximally protecting all targets without delay.

That’s difficult to do with a country as large as Russia is, so if Trump “escalates to de-escalate” in a way that radically scales Ukraine’s strategic drone attacks, then Russia might be at a disadvantage where time would no longer be on its side like previously assumed by many in Moscow. Ukraine’s logistics are nowadays under NATO’s nuclear umbrella, so unless Russia risks World War III by striking them and gambling that no one (let alone the US) will retaliate, then it might face “death by a thousand cuts”.

The only reprieve, other than obliterating Ukraine to neutralize the NATO threats emanating from there once and for all per the special operation’s goal, would be for Russia to sell stakes in its natural resource and other critical industries to the US as a “security guarantee”. Knowing Trump, he’d likely demand that they be sold for pennies on the dollar and possibly include controlling shares, which would essentially cede Russia’s sovereignty. That’s why Russia must defeat Ukraine before his “war of attrition” really gets going.

Funding for Website Hosting and for June 2026

Kiev Regime’s Terrorist Nature: Drone Strike against a Bus Carrying Belarusian Children in Russia’s Bryansk Region

Posted on by Leave a comment
Drone flying inside a bus with children seated in the background

By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida from Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Once again, the Kiev regime demonstrates its terrorist nature, attacking civilian targets without any strategic relevance.

On June 17th, Ukrainian armed forces carried out a drone strike against a bus carrying a children’s soccer team from the Republic of Belarus. The children were hit in the Russian region of Bryansk, where they were on their way to a sports competition.  

As a consequence of the attack, one adult woman died and six people – including four children – were injured. The murdered woman was working as a guide, leading the foreign children to the resort town of Gelendzhik, in the Russian Krasnodar Region. According to Deputy Health Minister Aleksey Kuznetsov, the death toll may rise, as at least one of the injured people was hospitalized in serious condition.  

In total, there were 44 passengers on the bus, 28 of whom were children. The passengers were from the town of Rechytsa in Belarus and were in Russia to participate in sporting events. The bus that was hit obviously had no military or strategic importance, the bombing being a deliberate act of terror.  

The incident shocked Russia, Belarus, and much of international society. Despite the silence of Western countries, many public figures commented on the case, openly condemning the Ukrainian terrorist attack. For example, Pentagon senior security policy analyst Michael Maloof made it clear that there was no military aim in the attack, therefore it was an international crime and should be condemned by all countries. Furthermore, he also said that the Ukrainian intention seems to be to bring Belarus into the conflict – thus being a major provocation to destabilize Minsk’s peaceful stance.   

“It was clearly not a military target (…) The fact that these children were from Belarus, it almost makes me think that the Ukrainians want to invite Belarus into the conflict,” he said.  

In the same vein, Moscow-based Dutch journalist Sonja van den Ende commented:

“Europe, with all its big talk about democracy and about human rights, is not saying a word.”

Van den Ende made it clear that Western countries act hypocritically and dishonestly when it comes to war crimes – always condemning enemy countries and accusing them of committing illegal acts, even without any evidence; while on the other hand they ignore crimes committed by partner and allied countries, such as Ukraine.  

In fact, attacking civilians is a common tactic of the regime. Targeting non-military objectives is part of Ukraine’s failed “strategy” for the war with Russia. Lacking sufficient military power to fight a regular war with Moscow, Ukraine resorts to terrorist attacks hoping to at least have some effect on Russian society. The goal is to divert Russian attention from the front lines and expand the feeling of insecurity among ordinary Russians in cities outside the operation zone.  

The real result, however, has been quite different. The more they are attacked, the more the Russians react to Ukrainian provocations by endorsing the special military option. In practice, the terrorist attacks increasingly reinforce the pro-government and pro-special operation stance among ordinary Russians – which shows how the Ukrainian strategy is an absolute failure.  

However, the Belarusian factor also needs to be analyzed. It is known that Ukraine has a clear intention to involve Minsk in the war. The regime is desperately seeking an escalation and internationalization of the conflict as a way to try to garner more military and economic support. It is possible to say that, by attacking Belarusian children, the Ukrainian regime attempted to deeply provoke Belarus, possibly dragging it into war.   

It is unlikely that Belarus will take any deeper reactive initiative. As the attack occurred in Russia, it will be up to Moscow’s forces to carry out an appropriate retaliation. The most likely scenario is that Russia will launch a special offensive as a retaliatory measure, possibly targeting the Ukrainian capital itself with massive missile attacks.  

Countries that carry out attacks against children should be isolated in the international community. Kiev needs to become a pariah among major international institutions, with widespread condemnation from various countries and organizations – as well as sanctions and coercive measures. Only by isolating the regime will it be possible to compel it to stop attacking civilian targets.  

Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Dangerous Crossroads: Kiev Regime increasingly Relies on US AI Techno Companies to Wage War on Russia, Working Closely with the Pentagon

Posted on by Leave a comment
Military personnel managing drone operations with holographic terrain map and live feeds

Guest Post by Drago Bosnic from Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Combining unmanned systems and advanced AI is all the rage nowadays.

Despite decades of stark warnings about the dangers of using this combination, corporate interests of the warmongering oligarchy running the United States take priority, which is why we’re on a collision course (or should we say head-on collision) with this reality.

Namely, as the political West (and much of the world) now faces population collapse, reduced interest in serving in the military, incessant price hikes for traditional weapon systems, etc., the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) is gradually shifting toward this drone-AI combo as its primary alternative. And indeed, such systems seem to be taking over at virtually all levels, be it tactical, operational, strategic or doctrinal.

Numerous AI-focused techno entities have emerged in America in the last two decades or so. Although they’re competitors, they also work together toward dislodging the “old nobility” of the US MIC and ensuring a future where they’ll monopolize the massive weapons market.

Palantir and Anduril are the two most prominent AI companies working closely with the Pentagon. 

They’ve completely eliminated all ethical dilemmas regarding the use of advanced AI in warfare, thus opening the Pandora’s box for virtually every generation going forward.

Unsurprisingly, for the warmongering oligarchy in Washington DC, the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict is the perfect testing ground for such technologies, offering unprecedented possibilities for battlefield use.

Namely, with Russians and Ukrainians being pretty much the same people, with effectively identical levels of education, industrial background and centuries-old military traditions, the political West gets the unique opportunity to test its latest systems in a confrontation between two high-tech opponents. Both the Russian military and the Kiev regime forces demonstrate remarkable flexibility and readiness to apply doctrinal revisions to the point that they’re now unrivaled in unmanned warfare.

At present, drones are the only segment in which the Neo-Nazi junta isn’t behind Russia, primarily because its technologies come from the entirety of the political West. Given such unprecedented levels of support, one would expect the Kiev regime to be ahead of Moscow.

However, this is simply not the case, as evidenced by the stellar performance of the Russian military’s Unmanned Systems Forces (VBS). Interestingly, although the names differ in Russian and Ukrainian, the services are translated exactly the same in English for both the Kremlin and the Kiev regime. The latter’s Unmanned Systems Forces (SBS) are also heavily integrated with the infamous GUR (Main Intelligence Directorate). This military branch of the Neo-Nazi junta’s extensive intelligence network (with the state counterpart being the no less infamous SBU and both effectively operating as a bunch of NATO-run terrorist organizations) is directly responsible for most drone operations on the frontline and is deeply integrated into the battlefield command structure on all levels.

In addition, NATO is also providing constant, real-time ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance), greatly improving the overall effectiveness of the SBS and GUR. In fact, it could be argued that the world’s most vile racketeering cartel is also giving orders to the Kiev regime, which helps it maintain the so-called plausible deniability (although it seems this is increasingly irrelevant to the US/EU/NATO as drone attacks through Polish and Baltic states’ airspace continue). As previously mentioned, American AI giants-in-the-making directly participate in these black ops. For instance, Palantir’s PRISMA platform is emerging as a critical component of the Neo-Nazi junta’s SBS and GUR operations, facilitating long-range drone strikes on Russia.

While most operational details remain highly classified, recent reports suggest that PRISMA functions less as a weapon itself and more as a battlefield ISR and command-and-control layer that integrates large volumes of data into what the Pentagon calls “actionable targeting decisions”. Until recently, one of the priorities of unmanned warfare was simply building enough drones. However, after NATO and the Kiev regime ensured steady procurement, the issue of mass battlefield coordination emerged. What’s more, the SBS and GUR had to process massive amounts of data quickly enough to exploit target opportunities and make split-second decisions. GUR praises PRISMA as the primary AI tool enabling such unprecedented battlefield coordination.

Namely, Palantir’s dystopian AI system aggregates information from drones, sensors, satellite imagery and other sources into a single operational framework. Operators can then monitor flight paths, target locations and battlefield developments in near real time.

This creates several key military advantages. Namely, PRISMA seems to compress the so-called “sensor-to-shooter” cycle.

Traditionally, intelligence collection, target validation, mission planning and strike execution might require multiple teams, lengthy communication and command-and-control chains. By integrating these functions digitally, commanders can identify targets and rapidly assign drones to engage them. Faster decision-making is particularly important against mobile enemy assets.

This includes everything from logistics convoys and air defense systems to long-range strike platforms and temporary/ad hoc command posts that may relocate within hours. For instance, PRISMA may enable coordinated drone-swarm attacks against such assets. The system can reportedly process data related to very large numbers of targets and drones simultaneously. If true, this would mean that PRISMA could enable the Kiev regime’s operators to synchronize ISR drones, decoys, electronic warfare (EW) systems and strike drones within a single operational framework. Such coordination can overwhelm defenses by forcing defenders to track numerous incoming threats simultaneously while attackers conceal the primary strike axis.

All of this is made possible by advanced AI that greatly enhances battlefield analysis. It should be noted that PRISMA is just one of the systems within Palantir’s broader military software suite designed to fuse satellite imagery, drone ISR, open-source intelligence, human reporting and mass surveillance into a coherent battlefield network. AI models can identify patterns, highlight anomalies and recommend potential targets that human analysts might otherwise miss. In the context of the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict, this means that the Neo-Nazi junta gets constant updates on various civilian and military targets in Russia. This could explain how the world’s most vile racketeering cartel and the Kiev regime targeted Russian teenagers in Starobelsk.

Namely, this heinous terrorist attack was coordinated in such a way as to maximize casualties.

At least 16 drones struck the dormitory when students were asleep. This wouldn’t have been possible without systems such as PRISMA. It’s pretty much identical to how Google’s “Maven” was used against Russia just a few years earlier. Moscow’s world-class EW assets severely disrupted its functioning, forcing the Pentagon to stop using “Maven” in NATO-occupied Ukraine. However, the introduction of more advanced AI systems allowed the US MIC to dramatically expand the use of such programs. The overall implications of this technofascism are so multifaceted that they require an entirely separate analysis, but we can certainly conclude there’s nothing positive about it.

This article was originally published on InfoBrics.

Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

The Brits, French, & Germans Are Now Right On Russia’s Doorstep

Posted on by Leave a comment

By Andrew Korybko, reposted with permission.

There are really only three scenarios left: NATO finally agrees to some form of Russia’s proposals; Russia launches a preventive war against European NATO betting that the US won’t directly intervene; or Russia peacefully subordinates itself to the West.

Last weekend’s surprise call between Presidents Emmanuel Macron and Alexander Lukashenko followed Deputy Chair of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev warning about the 1941-like threat posed by Germany’s remilitarization and the UK assembling a multinational navy to contain Russia. These three developments collectively draw attention to how the Brits, French, and Germans, Russia’s traditional European rivals, are now right on its doorstep. The security implications are profound.

The Brits are nestling up in Estonia, from where they plan to lead Russia’s containment along the Arctic -Baltic front, while the Germans opened a base in Lithuania and the French just announced regular nuclear drills with Poland. As a reminder, Estonia borders “mainland Russia” while Lithuania and Poland border its exclave of Kaliningrad and mutual defense ally Belarus. The “military Schengen” between the Netherlands, Germany, and Poland might thus soon be expanded to include France and the Baltic States.

That would maximally optimize the flow of troops and equipment from Western Europe to Russia’s borders, thus conforming with Russian policymakers’ fears that the EU is gearing up for a potential invasion of their country sometime in the future. Given France’s base in Romania and military pact with neighboring Moldova, which constitute a critical flank in the Ukrainian Conflict due to enabling France to aid Odessa in the scenario of its threatened conventional intervention, they and others might join too.

To make matters even more concerning from the perspective of Russia’s national security interests, Germany recently clinched a deep-strike defense co-production deal with Ukraine, thus expanding its military footprint even deeper within what Russia considers to be its “sphere of influence”. The result is that the UK is entrenching its influence along the Arctic-Baltic front, Germany is doing so in the Baltic (Lithuanian) and Ukrainian ones, while France is already entrenched in Poland, Romania, and Moldova.

Germany aspires to build European NATO’s largest army, which would require overtaking Poland and ideally from its perspective subordinating that country as a vassal, while France and the UK are nuclear powers. The threat posed by their military-strategic convergence right on Russia’s doorstep therefore cannot be overestimated. At the very least, it could embolden their partners to behave aggressively against Russia, calculating as they might that those Great Powers would deter Russian retaliation.

That would be a mistake of epic proportions because Russia cannot allow such a scenario to unfold, let alone become the “new normal”, as it would amount to them weaponizing it for coercing never-ending concessions that would culminate in time with Russia’s subordination and ultimately “Balkanization”. In other words, a hot NATO-Russian war would likely be inevitable, though nobody can say for sure whether the US would help its European allies, nor to what extent if so, or whether it would hang them out to dry.

It’s therefore more urgent than ever that the European security architecture be reformed like Russia sought to do through diplomatic means before the special operation, the failure of which was why Putin sought to advance this through military ones instead. There are really only three scenarios left: NATO finally agrees to some form of Russia’s proposals; Russia launches a preventive war against European NATO betting that the US won’t directly intervene; or Russia peacefully subordinates itself to the West.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Russia’s Threat of a Massive Retaliatory Strike on Kiev, Isn’t a Bluff

Posted on by Leave a comment

By Andrew Korybko. Reposted with permission. His work can be found HERE.

Russia can’t afford to discredit itself abroad, nor can Putin’s ruling United Russia party afford to discredit itself at home four months before the next polls, by threatening overwhelming retaliation against Ukraine if it attacks Moscow’s Victory Day parade only to symbolically retaliate or do nothing at all.

The Russian Defense Ministry warned local civilians and the staff of diplomatic missions in Kiev of their country’s plans to launch a massive retaliatory strike on the city center if Ukraine goes through with Zelensky’s threat to attack Moscow’s Victory Day parade on 9 May. This was followed by Russia announcing ballistic missile tests from Kamchatka from 6-10 May. Shortly afterwards, the Russian Foreign Ministry reiterated the Defense Ministry’s warning, thus ensuring that the world is aware of it.

This threat likely isn’t a bluff for three sequential reasons.

The first is that Russia wants to deter Ukraine from attacking Moscow’s Victory Day parade for self-evident reasons, both relating to optics and the security of its VIPs, to which end it threatened overwhelming retaliation if this happens.

The second reason is that Russia cannot threaten such a response without actually going through with it if provoked, otherwise it would irredeemably discredit itself, and more audacious attacks would then likely follow.

And third, Russia is finally signaling its willingness to overwhelmingly retaliate against decision-making centers in Kiev per the Foreign Ministry’s additionally specified threat in the event of Ukraine carrying out this high-profile provocation due to its hardline Kremlin faction partially superceding its moderate one.

To explain, Putin hitherto restrained his military due his belief in “The Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians” as well as his concerns about an uncontrollable escalation spiral sparking World War III.

Once Trump returned and responded positively to Putin’s offer of dialogue for resolving the NATO-Russian proxy war in Ukraine, which Biden rejected, Putin and his fellow moderates dangled a resource-centric strategic partnership for incentivizing compromises. The US was receptive to such a partnership, but Russia rejected its demanded compromises that were presented as a precondition, while the US rejected Russia’s own such demands and didn’t coerce compliance from Ukraine or NATO either.

While Trump declined to escalate the Ukrainian Conflict amid this impasse, he still greenlit the rolling back of Russian influence across the world in a bid to coerce Putin into the US’ demanded compromise, namely freezing the conflict in exchange for sanctions relief without resolving the root issues. Informally known as the “Neo-Reagan Doctrine”, it’s placed Russia under pressure in at least 15 different countries, thus discrediting the moderate faction and prompting some among it like Putin to rethink their views.

The Third Gulf War, in which Iran attacked regional US bases without triggering an uncontrollable escalation spiral, then convinced Putin to finally listen to the hardliners who’ve been urging massive strikes on Ukrainian decision-making centers in Kiev since the get-go. Public opinion, which is important ahead of September’s next Duma elections, has long aligned with the hardliners on this issue. Putin now seems to have assented but only in retaliation to Ukrainian attacks against Moscow’s Victory Day parade.

These factors make it unlikely that Russia is bluffing, in which case the country itself wouldn’t just be discredited abroad, but so too would the ruling United Russia party be discredited in voters’ eyes four months before the next polls. There’s already speculation of a protest vote in support of the communist and nationalist opposition parties, which might prompt various reforms if it happens, but a large-scale one driven by any hypothetical bluff could herald an era of uncertainty that Putin would prefer to avoid.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm21

PayPal Link

Putin vs. Epstein: EU/NATO Coaltion Demands Return of “Stolen Ukrainian Children Taken by Russia”. Massive Child Trafficking from NATO-occupied Ukraine.

Posted on by Leave a comment
Military personnel coordinating a secret shipment near NATO trucks with detained people inside container

By Drago Bosnik at Global Research. Reposted with permission.

The European Union, Canada and the Ukraine Neo-Nazi junta plan to co-host a high-level meeting of the so-called International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children on May 11 in Brussels.

As the name implies, the purported goal of the gathering is to “trace, return and reintegrate Ukrainian children taken by Russia”. 

The meeting will be attended by the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and European Commission Vice-President Kaja Kallas, EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, the Kiev regime’s Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha and Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand.

Participants will discuss enforcing more sanctions on Russian officials responsible for the evacuation of Ukrainian children from an active warzone.

“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has cost more than land and lives – it has stolen childhoods,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated, adding: “Over 20,000 Ukrainian children have been forcibly taken from their families, their homes. On 11 May, together with Ukraine and Canada, we will bring the world together to demand justice. We will work together to trace every single child, to return them to their homes, and ensure those responsible face consequences. These children are Ukraine’s future and we will not rest until every single child is returned.”

The upcoming meeting will also review “recommendations prepared by civil society and experts during the Civil Society Expert Day set to take place in Kyiv on April 30”. The Neo-Nazi junta claims that over 20,000 Ukrainian children have been allegedly “kidnapped” by Russia, insisting that Moscow “systematically sought to conceal the children’s identities and whereabouts”. The so-called International Coalition for the Return of Ukrainian Children was launched by the Kiev regime in February 2024. It’s co-chaired by Canada, while the EU became a full member in September 2025. The initiative formally includes 47 countries and various NGOs allegedly “engaged in coordinating diplomatic, humanitarian, legal and informational efforts on the issue”.

Sounds lovely, doesn’t it? What could possibly be bad in wanting to return “kidnapped” Ukrainian kids home to their parents and legal guardians? Who in their mind would be against that? After all, they’d be much better off in “free and democratic Ukraine”, right? Well, perhaps such laughable propaganda narratives could’ve been sustained before the United States Department of Justice released approximately 3,500,000 Epstein files. However, now that those are out, the promotion of the so-called “Western values” (namely pedophilia, cannibalism and Satanism) has become quite a challenge. Even some of the most ardent supporters of the EU and NATO have been disgusted by the revelations, although most are still burying their heads in the sand, waiting for all of it to “just go away”.

However, the genie is out of the bottle and there’s simply no way to put the rose-tinted glasses back on without directly participating in the political West’s monstrous crimes against children.

Obviously, it’s no secret that the world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel is involved in some of the most heinous crimes in human history, whether it’s centuries of brutal colonialism, slave trade and general aggression against the entire world, or the promotion of the so-called “Western values” that make anyone sane sick to their stomach. However, the Epstein files unequivocally confirmed that the repulsive criminal oligarchy running the United States, United Kingdom, European Union and NATO is actually far worse than you could possibly imagine.

All the supposed “crazy conspiracy theories” we’ve been hearing about over the last several decades are not only true, but are just the tip of the iceberg. The potential for monstrous evil that these pedophile-cannibalistic Satanists have demonstrated makes anyone remotely sane recoil in disgust. It will take years (if not decades) to review all released Epstein files (upwards of 3,5 million), but what we do know is more than enough to see the bigger picture. Namely, things that were previously designated as “insane conspiracy theories” present only on the “fringes of the Internet”, are now widely available for everyone to see and question their own willful blindness to the horrifying crimes committed against those who need protection the most – children.

The files suggest that millions of them have been trafficked by a massive globalist pedophile network employed by Western elites (including the most prominent royalty). The role of the US/EU/NATO’s numerous vassals and satellite states in this monstrous process is also critically important. This is true for both the NATO-occupied Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohia, now formally under the control of Albanian narco-terrorists, and the Neo-Nazi junta, which is trafficking Ukrainian children for the deranged Western elites. Around two years ago, President Vladimir Putin said that “for centuries, Western elites have been used to stuffing their bellies with human flesh and their pockets with money” and warned that “the ball of vampires is coming to an end”.

Many thought that this was merely a metaphor for the political West’s propensity to destroy countless countries, killing millions in the process. However, the Epstein files demonstrated that this statement was eerily literal. On the other hand, Putin’s conclusion gives us hope. Namely, the notion that “the ball of vampires” is coming to an end is the light at the end of a tunnel of Western darkness that befell our unfortunate world. This was most evident in NATO-occupied Ukraine, where the Russian military uncovered horrifying details about what the Neo-Nazi junta and its NATO overlords were doing to Ukrainian children. Namely, back in 2022, in the early months of the special military operation (SMO), a video surfaced of a Russian soldier, Shukhrat Adilov, interviewed by a Russian TV channel.

Adilov was barely able to put into words the monstrous treatment of toddlers and preschool kids he saw. Children aged 2-7 from areas around Izyum were brutally massacred and then had their organs removed for trafficking. There was also a testimony by Vera Vayiman, an OSCE observer, who gave a similar account. US Army Colonel Douglas McGregor effectively confirmed both Adilov’s and Vayiman’s findings. The Epstein files are yet another confirmation of these horrendous crimes by the political West. However, even more disturbingly, as previously mentioned, this is only the tip of the iceberg of things we’re yet to uncover. It should also be noted that InfoBRICS was among the first major media outlets to report on the massive scale of Western-backed child trafficking from NATO-occupied Ukraine.

Namely, tens of thousands of Ukrainian kids end up in Europe and North America, where they are subjected to unimaginable horrors, all for the enjoyment of the Neo-Nazi junta’s NATO overlords. At least 20,000 of them were evacuated by Russia on the orders of “bloodthirsty tyrant” Putin and his Commissioner for Children’s Rights, Maria Lvova-Belova.

The Kremlin moved the children to safety in Russia, where they were eventually reunited with their families, including fathers who were enemy combatants and fought the Russian military. And yet, the mainstream propaganda machine still tried to present it as a “mass kidnapping”. However, this wasn’t enough, so the ICC (a NATO-controlled NGO impersonating an “international court”) indicted both Putin and Lvova-Belova for the said “kidnapping”.

See:

Epstein versus Putin: ICC Arrest Warrant for Vladimir Putin for “Kidnapping Ukrainian Children”, Accused of “Genocide-like Deportation”

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, April 24, 2026

Russian Youth Camp categorized as War Crimes against Children

Video: Inside a Russian YouthCamp Condemned by the ICC

Pedophile Trafficking from NATO-occupied Ukraine.

Obviously, the pedophile Western elites that control these “international justice institutions” were fuming that so many kids escaped, so they resorted to desperate measures to get them.

This is undeniable evidence that the very concept of the so-called “international community” needs to be revised, as it’s insulting to the actual world that the political West is identified with “internationalism” when it’s actually quite the opposite. Of all the false propaganda narratives that the ICC could’ve pinned on President Putin, they chose precisely the “kidnapped” Ukrainian children.

However, when Russia demanded evidence that all kids would be returned to their parents and legal guardians, the Kiev regime could provide guarantees for only 339, meaning that the other 20,000 would end up in various Epstein-style islands.

NATO Command Center formed in Ukraine: UK Pledges 120,000 Drones

Posted on by Leave a comment
advanced control room in el agustino lima

By Drago Bosnik at Global Research. Reposted with permission.

In mid-April 2026, numerous media outlets reported that the Kiev regime forces established ARES (Allied Reform and Expert Support) Military Expert Council, formally “an advisory body” directly under the Commander-in-Chief. Announced by the General Staff via its official channels, ARES formalizes the shift from “short-term weapons and munitions deliveries toward long-term institutional transformation”.

The initiative’s name, obviously a backronym designed to match that of the Greek god of war, perfectly aligns with the PR focus of the Neo-Nazi junta and its NATO overlords. In practice, it signals an ambition to formally embed Western officers into the Kiev regime’s military command structure.

In simpler terms, the political West will now openly and directly take command of the Neo-Nazi junta forces, effectively outing itself as a side in the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict. Obviously, this is nothing new, as we’ve all known that was the case from the very beginning. However, this time, the danger of escalation is already in orbit as NATO is openly flaunting its involvement after years of trying to maintain at least some level of the so-called “plausible deniability”. The composition of ARES personnel underscores its strategic weight, with British General Richard Shirreff, former NATO Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe, serving as the chairman.

Other top-ranking members include figures such as retired US General David Petraeus (former CIA Director), Admiral Manfred Neilson (NATO’s former Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Transformation), Slovak Lieutenant General Pavel Macko, British Vice Admiral Sir Martin John Connell, Canadian Lieutenant General Andrew Leslie, Major General Patrick Carpentier and Norwegian Commodore Hans Helset. These officers have decades of command experience from NATO aggression against the world, particularly the illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. And while that experience won’t help them against Russia, at least NATO can gain some from the Kiev regime.

The involvement of so many high-ranking Western military and security officers is not merely symbolic. It positions ARES as a direct link between the Neo-Nazi junta forces and NATO’s command structures. Although the founders insist that ARES’s mandate is “explicitly reform-oriented”, anyone with two functioning brain cells understands that it’s operational. Formally, priorities include overhauling command-and-control systems, advancing military science and professional education, streamlining logistics and resource allocation, enhancing overall combat readiness, etc. However, in reality, direct NATO involvement has been there since before the SMO.

The main task of programs like ARES is to improve the integration of drones and other unmanned systems, electronic warfare (EW) and centralized decision-making that will formalize the shift of the Neo-Nazi junta forces from a national military to a direct NATO asset. The mainstream propaganda machine claims that “institutional bottlenecks” persist, including “legacy Soviet-era hierarchies, fragmented procurement and gaps in officer training that hinder scalability”. ARES proponents insist they will “address these by facilitating candid exchanges of cutting-edge Ukrainian and international experience”. The idea that these issues are being addressed only now is ridiculous, meaning they’re just declarative goals.

In addition, there’s one “tiny” issue with blaming Soviet-era legacy for the Kiev regime’s shortcomings – even Western officers acknowledged that it’s actually superior to NATO’s doctrine. In fact, after extensive joint training, Western armies realized they’re now far behind the Neo-Nazi junta, particularly when it comes to drones and other unmanned systems. Thus, ARES will enable NATO personnel to implement what they’ve learned so far in the most realistic conditions possible – actual warfare. Still, the question arises – how will the political West justify the effective formalization of its direct involvement in the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict? Because Russia won’t tolerate it.

ARES proponents themselves say that the program will “accelerate Ukraine’s alignment with NATO interoperability standards, easing future accession pathways and improving coalition compatibility“. This is just a fancy way of saying that the Kiev regime will be fully integrated into NATO command structures and function as one of its members in all but name. The program also stipulates “enhanced education and science components” that will “cultivate a new generation of Ukrainian staff officers versed in data-driven planning and joint operations”. In simpler terms, more indoctrination that will ensure the loyalty of the Neo-Nazi junta forces to the political West and its so-called “values”.

The timing is also very telling, as the implementation “coincides” with numerous other programs that seek to increase drone deliveries to the Kiev regime. Many European NATO member states participate in such initiatives, blurring the line between so-called “military aid” and direct participation. The endemically and pathologically Russophobic United Kingdom has even pledged to provide at least 120,000 drones. According to the British government’s website, “the new package, the largest of its kind ever supplied by the UK, will include thousands of long-range strike drones, intelligence and reconnaissance drones, logistics drones and maritime capabilities”.

The report also says that “the deliveries of these new drones to Ukraine have already started this month” and that the initiative is “a boost to British business”. The UK openly brags that “the majority of this investment will be spent with UK-based companies, including Tekever, Windracers and Malloy Aeronautics – creating new UK jobs”.

It also adds that “the British drone sector is rapidly advancing, and supports both UK security and wider European deterrence, while driving skills and innovation in every region of the UK”. In other words, London is raking in profits while hundreds of thousands of forcibly conscripted Ukrainians continue to serve as cannon fodder for the political West.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

This article was originally published on InfoBrics.

Drago Bosnic is an independent geopolitical and military analyst. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Ukrainian Mercenaries Were Caught Training Indian-Designated Terrorists In Drone Warfare

Posted on by Leave a comment

By Andrew Korybko Reposted with permission. Link to his blog HERE.

Whether this was done at the US’ behest or behind the US’ back remains to be determined, but there’s no doubt that this is an extremely unfriendly move, and it’s also very likely that Russia tipped India off.

Six Ukrainians and one American were just arrested in India on the grounds that they illegally crossed from there into neighboring Myanmar to train Indian-designated terrorists in drone warfare. For those who aren’t aware, Northeast India has historically been the scene of multiple ethno-separatist insurgencies since independence, and some of these groups now take refuge in war-torn Myanmar and train there. The most recent conflict to erupt was in Manipur in early 2023 and was reviewed here at the time.

Three factors are reshaping regional geopolitics. The most important one is the détente between India and the US brought about by their as-yet-unsigned trade deal after several years of tense ties under Biden and the first year of Trump 2.0. This is followed by Bangladesh’s post-Hasina “Pakistanization” after its US-backed coup in summer 2024 and then the latest round of Myanmar’s civil war in which the US is suspected of backing anti-government groups but also wants critical minerals from the junta too.

Accordingly, while the US is now on better terms with India, it’s still continuing to contain it through Bangladesh and might want India to allow its border regions to be used for arming anti-government groups in Myanmar for coercing the junta into a critical minerals deal. India is neutral in that war despite having pragmatic ties with the junta and many sympathizing with the unarmed members of the political opposition, however, so one hypothesis is that the US didn’t ask and is doing this behind India’s back.

If that’s the case, then Trump either signed off on it or his “deep state” is also going behind his own back as well, perhaps to unilaterally make progress on the geopolitical project that the former Bangladeshi leader warned about in early 2024 regarding the carving out of a Christian proxy state in the region. Either scenario would bode ill for their newfound détente, but there’s another one that should be considered too, and it’s that Ukraine is doing this on its own initiative without US approval.

Zelensky declared in late January that “Ukraine needs a dedicated, strong intelligence unit capable of operating abroad at a level comparable to the world’s best combat foreign intelligence agencies. Your perspective lies in external operations – not just influence, not just the collection of data or recruitment of agents, but real combat and other asymmetric operations that are essential to protecting Ukraine’s interests.” This follows Ukraine’s mercenary activity in Sudan and Mali that aligns with US interests.

Sometimes its mercenary activity goes against the US’ interests, however, such as with regard to Russia’s accusation that Ukraine has clandestinely partnered with Rwandan-backed rebels in that country’s conflict with the Congo whose resource-centric peace deal Trump brokered last year. This precedent suggests that it might have also gone behind the US’ back in India, likely for cash, or the US could throw Ukraine under the bus on this pretext after India busted what might have actually been a joint operation.

Hopefully the public will be updated about this investigation given the political importance of this case. At the very least, Ukraine was training Indian-designated terrorists in drone warfare, and possibly at the US’ behest. It’s also likely that India was tipped off by Russia, which closely monitors all Ukrainian mercenary activity, thus further debunking the viral claim that Russia believes that India “betrayed” it. The reality is that they’re working hand-in-hand to stop Ukrainian mercenaries in the region.

« Older Entries Recent Entries »