Tag Archives: Propaganda

Show Faith by Works, Massive Zionist Propaganda Campaign

Guest Post by Helena Glass at Global Research. Reposted with permission.

HAVAS Media is owned and operated as a foreign agent of the Israeli government. It is one organization within a conduit that includes, Winiversary, LLC, Show Faith By Works, LLC, Friends of Ffc of California, and Graystone Public Affairs, LLC – all located at the same address in Beaumont, California. Chad Schnitger is a registered agent for three of these companies.  HAVAS Media has ties to Bridge Partners, LLC and is funded thru HAVAS Group headquartered in France.   

The Bollore Family owns HAVAS Group and is of the Breton lineage with Jewish lineage thru the matrons of the Goldschmidt family. The CEO of HAVAS, Bollore, is also CEO of Vivendi founded by Napolean III, the last Emperor of France. The Goldschmidt Family is of nobility and originates from the Holy Roman Empire.  Their lineage is interwoven with the Rothschild family tree and what is now BNP Paribas. Additional noble interlocked ancestry includes the Rosnay Family and the Bischoffsheim Family. Elite bankers who built their empires funding wars.

HAVAS Media provides the branding and media parlay for Show Faith By Works, LLC. Show Faith By Works submit an 86-page FARA application to the Department of Justice Attorney General Bondi. It details where they will deploy throughout California, Nevada, Colorado and Arizona and targets for ‘geofencing’ and critical campaigns listing hundreds of churches, Christian events, concerts, directing web traffic, SEO-manipulated, social media, and even how they will ensure mass dumping of Israeli propaganda over Christmas.

Christian athletes and celebrities will be paid endorsers, pastors too, with a targeted Christian population in the churches within these four states of just under four million and Christian Colleges of three million including 219 mega churches. The list of churches is 11 pages long and in addition to the four states targeted includes Texas, Utah, and Wyoming. The denominations include: Baptist, Presbyterian, Lutheran, nondenominational, Calvary, independent, Methodist, and Anglical.

Their purpose as described in the FARA document states:

  • Counter new and evolving pro-Palestinian messaging as the global narrative shifts
  • Increase awareness of Palestinian ties to Hamas and support for terrorism within Evangelical populations
  • Educate Christians on the historical importance of Israel and its significance in the region
  • Use biblical arguments to highlight the importance of Israel and the Jewish People to Christians
  • Combat low American Evangelical Christian approval of the Nation of Israel

Their goals as stipulated are:

  1. Use a combination of personal and professional outreach to the Christian Community, combined with digital targeting and social media outreach to increase positive associations with the Nation of Israel while linking the Palestinian population with extremist factions.
  2. Large-scale Christian Outreach and Education to individual Christians and to Christian leaders (Pastors and Professors).
  3. Impressive physical displays of Pro-lsrael educational materials.
  4. Comprehensive Digital targeting and heavy Geofencing of ALL Christian churches in select markets

The FARA Application is basically a Protocol of Deception in order to ‘re-educate’ Christians and turn them into secular Jews.  The funding from HAVAS will be in ten installments of $325,896. The list of celebrities and pastors they intend to harvest for this PR include:  Chris Pratt, Jon Voight, Tim Tebow, Stephen Curry, Clayton Kershaw, Pastor Mark Driscoll, Pastor Rick Warren, Pastor, Greg Laurie, social media influencers and the distribution of resource packages for every church pastor. 

In addition, an NGO, Canary Missions, is creating a database and publication of persons they deem antisemite for purposes of deportation, targeting, blocking, and removal from universities and employment. They are funded by a large number of anonymous donors as well as by Michael Leven, Megamot Shalom, and the Central Fund of Israel.

This is the PR campaign Trump had demanded of Netanyahu when the media fallout became obvious. Did Charlie Kirk refuse to be a part of this campaign of mass hypnosis? Was that what the intervention was about days before his assassination? Is this why Twitter/X feeds are 99% Israel propaganda? Every talking point has already been scripted, including that Israel has been the sole protector of Christians and Christian Groups. In addition, a twelve point response theme delineates how to create a hostile anti-Palestine argument, including statements blaming Palestinians for killing aid workers, stealing aid (we saw that satellite image on Twitter yesterday). 

A list of churches can be found here.

It is given that Trump, Patel, Bondi, et. al are all briefed on this massive schism of deceit. The military under Hegseth will be the ‘enforcer’ and it would not be far from reality to think that free speech will be deemed terrorism. And people will disappear.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

Helena Glass is Former CPA & Series 7, with emphasis in Real Estate and Financial Planning. Two brains in one: former Bronze Sculpter and Danseuse. Visit the author’s blog. 

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Video: Censorship, Propaganda and Fake News. Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic

Guest Post by Drago Bosnic and Michel Chossudovsky Reposted with permission.

“Censorship is now so vital to the ruling oligarchy in  Washington DC that it’s become the “new normal” in universities, government offices and virtually all other public institutions”.  Drago Bosnic

“When the Lie Becomes the Truth, There Is No Moving Backwards”, Michel Chossudovsky

Censorship, Propaganda and Fake News go hand in hand. They are instruments of modern warfare. Independent media is under attack Worldwide. 

The mainstream media are routinely involved in distorting the facts and turning realities upside down. 

The Lie becomes the Truth. 

Propaganda under Nuremberg is a crime against humanity. 

Draconian measures against free speech and free expression are unfolding. 

A “false flag” is a complex military-intelligence undertaking which consists in triggering events which enables a Nation State to blame their enemy for having started the war.

It’s an instrument of deception which in recent history has enabled US-NATO-Israel to justify launching numerous “humanitarian wars” or so-called “Just Wars”. Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine. The victims of US-NATO as well as Israeli led wars are categorized as the “Aggressors” (Resposibility to Protect, R2P)

Subtitles in 11 languages

English (original)

Français, عربيРусский, Español, 中文,  Српски日本語DeutschItaliano한국어   [October 14,  8k+ views]

Our objective is to reach out to people worldwide.

Forward the video directly to your friends worldwide. click below: languages with hyperlinks

Our longstanding commitment is to world peace and “true democracy.”

To contribute to Lux Media, click here and then click: Faire un don. 

To contribute to Global Research’s Donor Box, click here.

English

Français,

عربي 

 中文

Español,

Русский

 Српски

Deutsch

Italiano

日本語

한국어 

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic, Global Research, 2025

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

NETFLIX is not what you think it is…

Netflix was founded by the people who have been writing the propaganda in America for a century plus! The question then becomes “who’s their daddy?” I think you’ll find the answers very interesting, especially if you know anything about the history of psycho babble, pedophilia, and propaganda in the United States. These sickos are all cut from the same cloth it seems and the apple definitely doesn’t fall far from the tree.

This is just another reason to cancel Netflix. Get this garbage out of your house, it’s NOT just entertainment.

I found this on Telegram but it may be from the Reese Report. Blessings to you all.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we havePayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

Buy Steens Raw Manuka Honey HERE

Get NordVPN HERE

German press fomented anti-Russian mentality when covering special operation in Ukraine

It wasn’t just the Germans! Johnny

Lucas Leiroz, researcher in Social Sciences at the Rural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro; geopolitical consultant.

The irresponsible and destabilizing work done by some Western journalists concerning the Ukrainian conflict is well known. However, recent data show that the reality appears to be even worse. A study carried out by the University of Mainz revealed that the main German media outlets acted decisively in the dissemination of anti-Russian thoughts in society, making public opinion accept the pro-war actions of the German government. Indeed, there appears to be an extremely complex coordinated effort in which state agents and the private media work together in order to incite the anti-Russian mentality.

The study showed how journalists spread pro-war ideas, with a speech in favor of NATO, inducing readers to support the anti-Russian policy that became the main characteristic of the German government since February. The research focused on journalistic coverage made in the initial months of the Russian operation, between February 24 and May 31, evaluating the content of more than 4,300 different articles published by the eight largest German newspapers and TV stations: FAZ, Suddeutsche Zeitung, Bild, Spiegel, Zeit, ARD Tagesschau, ZDF Today and RTL Aktuell.

The Mainz’s researchers noted that in 64% of the articles Ukraine was described positively, seeming like the “right side”. Specifically regarding Vladimir Zelensky, 67% of the coverage pointed him positively. While, on the other hand, in 88% of the cases Russia was portrayed in a negative way, in addition to Vladimir Putin being described as an “enemy” in 96% of the articles. Also, 93% of the articles point to Moscow as the “culprit” for the conflict, while only 4% place the West as “co-responsible” – the numbers pointing to Ukraine as the culprit are even smaller: 2%.

In only 10% of the analyzed texts, Russian reasons for starting its military operation were considered. The focus of 80% of news coverage was on the narrative exposed in official speeches by Ukrainian, European and American authorities. With this, the German people were practically forced to believe the baseless discourse that Moscow “unjustifiably invaded” Ukraine.

It must also be noted that before the Russian operation began, over the past eight years, the German media – and Western media as a whole – also ignored facts such as the 2014 coup d’état, the presence of neo-Nazi militias in Ukrainian territory and the ethnic genocide in Donbass. So, without knowing these previous facts, naturally German readers, when faced with the Russian bombings in February, believed in the “invasion” narrative, since they were not aware of the local military context.

Another interesting fact is that in 66% of the articles, anti-Russian economic sanctions were defined as the most efficient way to end the war. Regarding military support, 74% of the reports endorsed the “need” to send weapons to Ukraine. Diplomatic measures were mentioned very infrequently, with virtually no support of diplomacy and international dialogue among German journalists. The case is really curious as it reveals how the press tried to help the German government to convince public opinion about the efficiency of coercive measures.

Despite Germany having a political posture absolutely submissive to NATO, the decision to join the anti-Russian coercion would naturally not be seen with good eyes by the local population. The country is extremely dependent on Russian gas, and the end of energy cooperation is the cause of a real social and economic catastrophe. Currently, mass protests occur frequently in Germany, as with the arrival of winter the people begin to realize the negative impacts of the government’s stance. However, if the journalistic coverage had been operated honestly, without biased pro-war speeches, possibly the protests would have started earlier, and the people would have put pressure on Berlin not to get involved in the war plans of the Atlantic alliance.

In fact, the researchers showed something that many analysts had already previously denounced: there is cooperation between the main media outlets and the liberal governments in the NATO countries. It is media coverage with intense anti-Russian and pro-war propaganda that allows public opinion to accept the irresponsible measures taken by Western politicians. Whether this action is spontaneous or coordinated between government strategists and press editors is impossible to say. However, considering the high level of public-private cooperation in these countries, it is difficult to think that this is not a planned and strategically calculated action.

In parallel, the independent press, which shows the truth about events in Ukraine, is often censored, with complex intelligence operations in place to remove all forms of pro-Russian content from the internet. This shows how Western discourse on “liberal values” and “democracy” turns out to be a mere propaganda: NATO countries are only interested in ensuring Western unipolarity.

You can follow Lucas on Twitter and Telegram.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon and PayPal are gone so now we have Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below. 

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Journalist says a CBP officer withheld his passport until he agreed he writes ‘propaganda’

I’m sharing this story from the Stamford Advocate with a heavy heart. Our President via the propaganda phrase “fake news” has brainwashed our civil servants into believing the press (and American public at large) are the enemy. We are to be harassed to no end and if we resist or protest then we are detained for hours and questioned about our patriotism. This won’t stay confined to the press. Soon your government profile will tell the agents not only who you are but what you believe in. If it goes against what the current narrative is YOU are in a lot of trouble.

It took a moment for Ben Watson to realize the officer was not joking.

Watson had just told the Customs and Border Protection staffer reviewing his passport that he works in journalism. Then, the seemingly routine Thursday encounter at Virginia’s Dulles International Airport got tense.

“So you write propaganda, right?” Watson recalled the CBP officer asking.

“No,” the news editor at national security site Defense One says he replied. He affirmed again that he was journalist.

The officer repeated his propaganda question, Watson said.

“With his tone, and he’s looking me in the eye – I very much realized this is not a joke,” Watson told The Washington Post on Friday. The exchange that ensued as Watson returned from reporting trip in Denmark – the editor says he got his passport back only after agreeing with the “propaganda” charge to move on – has sparked alarm about rising hostility to journalists as the Trump administration continues to attack the media as “fake news.”

Watson had heard a couple stories of similar encounters in the past, but says he did not realize until sharing his experience at Dulles just how many people in his field were reporting the same brand of harassment. U.S. airport border agents were at the center of several incidents that have raised reporters’s concerns this year.

“I’ve honestly never had a human attempt to provoke me like this before in my life,” Watson remembers telling his colleagues. “This behavior is totally normal now, I guess?”

Customs and Border Protection said in a statement that it is investigating the “alleged inappropriate conduct.”

“We hold our employees accountable to our core values of vigilance, integrity and service to country, and do not tolerate inappropriate comments or behavior by our employees,” the agency said.

Standards of conduct for the Department of Homeland Security, CBP’s parent agency, direct staff to “act impartially.”

An article from Defense One describes Watson’s full recollection of Thursday’s conversation. After the second alleged query by the CBP officer, Watson explained that he covers national security “with many of the same skills” he used as a public affairs officer in the Army.

“Some would argue that’s propaganda,” he added.

When the officer reiterated his question a third time, Watson says, he paused.

His wife had already circled the airport for 20 minutes. He figured he could get stuck for hours if he tried to call in the officer’s supervisor. So he gave in.

“For the purposes of expediting this conversation, yes,” he recalled telling the CBP officer.

The officer made Watson agree one more time before letting him through, Watson said. He says he’s filed a civil rights complaint with DHS.

“We are disappointed and concerned that any U.S. official would question a journalist, or any citizen, in this way,” Kevin Baron, Defense One’s executive editor, wrote to The Post.

Others in journalism circles and beyond were quick to point out chilling implications in the story.

Walter Shaub, an attorney who served as director of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics until 2017, tweeted that incident should go to the Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General office for review.

“A customs agent withholding the passport of a journalist until he agrees to say he writes “propaganda” is actionable misconduct, even in Trump’s America,” he said.

A growing list of journalists say they have been startled by government officials’s harassment in a country that prizes freedom of the press. The encounters are raising fears that hostile rhetoric led by President Donald Trump and his allies are damaging reporters’s ability to do their job unhindered.

This spring, the World Freedom Press Index called journalists’s treatment in the U.S. “problematic” for the first time in its 17 years of assessments – and singled out “President Trump’s anti-press rhetoric and continuing threats to journalists” as driving the deteriorating conditions. The U.S.’s spot in the ranking has fallen for the last three years.

Journalists have been reporting run-ins with border agents for years, too.

In 2016, the detention of a Canadian’s photographer for more than six hours on his way to cover protests in the U.S. made headlines. Ed Ou said airport officers took his cellphones away for search after he refused to unlock them, saying he needed to protect his sources. When Ou got the devices back, he suspected tampering and potential data-copying.

As Andrea Peterson reported in The Post:


If Ou had already been inside the U.S. border, law enforcement officers would have needed a warrant to search his smartphones to comply with a 2014 Supreme Court ruling. But the journalist learned the hard way that the same rules don’t apply at the border, where the government claims the right to search electronic devices without a warrant or any suspicion of wrongdoing.


Several other journalists have described difficulties getting through airports in 2019.

In February, CBP apologized to a BuzzFeed journalist questioned at a New York airport about their news organization’s coverage of Trump and Robert Mueller III’s special counsel investigation. A few months later, a freelancer said he was detained by CBP officials for hours at an airport in Texas.

Then, in August, British journalist James Dyer described an “unsettling experience” as he flew into California to cover a Disney event. The film and TV writer said a CBP officer at Los Angeles International Airport called him a member of the “fake news media” and asked if he’d worked for CNN or MSNBC, two frequent targets of Trump’s criticism.

“He aggressively told me that journalists are liars and are attacking their democracy,” Dyer wrote in a viral tweet-thread.

He said he was allowed to move on after explaining that he was just trying to write about Star Wars.

CBP’s response at the time was much like its statement on Thursday’s incident.

“Inappropriate comments or behavior are not tolerated, and do not reflect our values of vigilance, integrity and professionalism,” the agency said.

CBP did not address broader concerns about its officers’s treatment of journalists in its Friday statement on the Dulles Airport incident.