Tag Archives: Palestine

Video: Secret Plan to Commit Genocide against the People of Palestine. Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic

In this video production, Michel Chossudovsky and Drago Bosnic focus on a detailed plan to commit genocide against the People of Palestine under the guise of a fake “responsibility to protect” humanitarian mandate. In a recent July 2025 statement (see below), in a controversial AI video production, Gila Gamliel, who was Israel’s Minister of Intelligence in 2023-24 (appointed by Netanyahu on January 2, 2023), confirmed the adoption of a so-called “Voluntary Immigration Plan” by the Netanyahu Cabinet on October 13, 2023.

Exposure: This is what Gaza will look like in the future.

Voluntary Gazan migration only with Trump and Netanyahu.

It’s us or them!

Link to the voluntary immigration plan from Gaza that I submitted to the cabinet in the first week of the ‘Iron Swords’ war on 13.10.23 ”

***

What this entails is that there was a detailed intelligence and military agenda to “Wipe Gaza off the Map”, planned well in advance on October 7, 2023; the objective of which was to “Expel All Palestinians from Gaza.”

Our objective is to reach out to people worldwide.

Subtitles in 11 languages.  

Forward the video directly to your friends worldwide. click below: languages with hyperlinks

English (original), Français, عربيHebrew, Italiano, FarsiРусский, Español, 中文Deutsch, Turkish, 

Our longstanding commitment is to world peace and “true democracy.”

We are in solidarity with the people of Palestine. 

From Globalresearch.ca reposted with permission.

“The views and opinions expressed in this guest post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Don’t Speak News or John Storm.”

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

POTUS DJT–‘We’re going to take care of the Palestinians and make sure they’re not murdered’

Times of Israel

US President Donald Trump insisted on Sunday that he is determined to buy and own the Gaza Strip, but said he could allow sections of the war-ravaged land to be rebuilt by other states in the Middle East.

‘I’m committed to buying and owning Gaza. As far as us rebuilding it, we may give it to other states in the Middle East to build sections of it; other people may do it, through our auspices, but we’re committed to owning it, taking it, and making sure that Hamas doesn’t move back.’

Trump made his remarks to reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to New Orleans to attend the National Football League Super Bowl championship.

He was referring to his plan to relocate all of Gaza’s population and rebuild the Strip to create ‘the Riviera of the Middle East.’

‘There’s nothing to move back into. The place is a demolition site. The remainder will be demolished. Everything’s demolished,’ he said.

Trump also said he was open to the possibility of allowing Palestinian refugees into the United States, but would consider such requests on a case-by-case basis.

‘We’re going to take care of the Palestinians and make sure they’re not murdered,’ he said.

Izzat al-Rishq, a member of the Hamas political bureau, condemned Trump’s remarks in a statement issued by the terror group. Hamas started the war with its onslaught of October 7, 2023, in which 251 were taken as hostages to the Strip.

‘Gaza is not a property to be sold and bought. It is an integral part of our occupied Palestinian land,’ and Palestinians will foil displacement plans, Rishq added.

Trump last week floated the idea of the United States taking over Gaza and engaging in a massive rebuilding effort.

His statement was vague on the future of Palestinians and it was unclear under what authority the United States would take claim of Gaza. Trump’s announcement drew immediate rebukes from several nations.

Earlier on Sunday, Israeli President Isaac Herzog said Trump was set to meet with Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi and possibly Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, although he gave no dates for the talks.

The comments, delivered in an interview with Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo, came in response to a question about Trump’s proposal to take over and redevelop Gaza.

Herzog did not say when or where the meetings would take place, nor did he discuss their potential content. He also noted that Trump is due to meet with Jordan’s King Abdullah in the coming days, which Jordan’s state news agency has already reported.

‘President Trump is due to meet with major Arab leaders, first and foremost the king of Jordan and the president of Egypt and I think also the crown prince of Saudi Arabia as well,’ Herzog said.

‘These are partners that must be listened to, they must be discussed with. We have to honor their feelings as well and see how we build a plan that is sustainable for the future,’ Herzog said.

Saudi Arabia has flatly rejected Trump’s Gaza plan, as have many world leaders.

Jordan’s King Abdullah plans to tell Trump during their planned February 11 meeting in Washington that the proposal is a recipe for radicalism that will spread chaos through the Middle East and jeopardize the kingdom’s peace with Israel, Reuters reported last week.

Trump’s Gaza Proposal Takes A Page From Ralph Peters’ “Blood Borders”

Guest Post by Andrew Korybko

He might have convinced himself that ethnically cleansing the Palestinians is the only way to decisively end the conflict, ensure Israel’s long-term security, and restore regional business opportunities like the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor.

Ralph Peters is a former US Army analyst who became famous in the mid-2000s for his article “Blood Borders: How A Better Middle East Would Look”, which proposed redrawing the region’s borders according to local identities. He justified this on the basis that “Ethnic cleansing works.” Even though Peters wrote that Israel should return to its pre-1967 borders, the overall gist of his piece might have inspired Trump’s latest proposal to “just clean out” Gaza by sending its people to Egypt and Jordan.

He isn’t influenced by moral or humanitarian arguments when formulating his country’s policies, only practical ones, which in this case are driven by his interest in decisively ending the conflict and then restoring regional business opportunities in its wake. All references to moral and humanitarian arguments, such as him telling the Davos elite that he wants to end the Ukrainian Conflict just for the sake of stopping the killing, are just attempts to make his envisaged proposals more publicly acceptable.

That’s why he has no qualms about suggesting something that essentially amounts to ethnically cleansing the Palestinians from their homeland, but there are several problems in his latest proposal. For starters, there’s no way to coerce them into exile without risking another conflict. The nascent ceasefire calls for allowing the Palestinians to return to their homes and permitting hundreds of aid trucks into the strip each day. Hamas is expected to resume hostilities if Israel reneges on these crucial parts of the deal.

Bibi might feel emboldened to do this though due to how unpopular the ceasefire is at home, after Trump’s de facto ethnic cleansing proposal, and upon receiving the 2000-pound bombs from the US whose Biden-era hold was just lifted over the weekend. In that event, Israel could cut off aid to the strip and remain on its side of the border wall to bait Hamas out into the open while waiting until civilians become desperate enough to flee to Egypt, but that requires Cairo’s complicity in this possible plot.

It refused to open its borders to refugees during the latest war citing security threats, which Alt-Media dishonestly spun as principled opposition to ethnic cleansing, but Trump could leverage the US’ foreign aid to Egypt to coerce it into agreeing. After all, Egypt was just exempted from the US’ 90-suspension of foreign aid alongside Israel, while Jordan (which used to control the West Bank and also receives over $1 billion in US foreign aid a year) has yet to receive a notice of aid suspension at the time of writing.

Accordingly, he could either threaten to curtail existing aid to them if they don’t go along with this and/or offer to increase some of their aid to help pay for it, the latter of which could be bolstered by those three’s shared Saudi ally contributing to these resettlement efforts. Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS) might also invite some of the Palestinians to live in his Kingdom, not only out of ethno-religious solidarity, but more importantly to cushion the criticism connected to his potential recognition of Israel.

He’s expected to make serious concessions on his country’s officially strict position of only recognizing Israel once Palestine receives independence since this move is required for unlocking the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). That megaproject was announced at the G20 Summit in Delhi less than a month before Hamas’ sneak attack abruptly suspended work on it. MBS is eager get IMEC back in action since his country’s (likely delayed) “Vision 2030” development plans are dependent on it.

To that end, it’s imperative for him to assist with a swift resolution of the conflict even if it involves the de facto ethnic cleansing of Gaza, which is why he’s expected to play a direct (resettlement) and/or indirect (financing) role in this if Trump coerces all players to do so. While he’ll certainly be lambasted by Western activists and the Iranian-led “Resistance Axis’” media surrogates for this, he might wager that most Arabs will breathe a sigh of relief that this dimension of the conflict has finally been resolved.

As for the much larger one regarding the West Bank’s final status, he might settle for vague promises of future autonomy from Israel, or he might go along with another Gaza-like plot to push those Palestinians into Jordan. In any case, what he’s not expected to do is oppose the joint American-Israeli imposition of “Blood Borders” onto Palestine, whether Gaza and/or the West Bank. He didn’t do anything but mildly complain during the latest war so precedent suggests that he won’t do more if another one breaks out.

It can’t be ruled out that hostilities won’t resume either considering the ease with which Israel could violate the ceasefire after the return of the remaining living hostages (or possibly after all the remaining bodies of the dead hostages too if it wants to wait longer). This could take the form of cutting off aid to the strip in order to coerce civilians into fleeing to Egypt, from where some could then be resettled to Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and/or elsewhere within the “Ummah” (international Muslim community).

Trump might have convinced himself that this is the only way to decisively end the conflict, ensure Israel’s long-term security, and restore regional business opportunities like IMEC. It doesn’t mean that he’ll succeed, but just that there’s a probable chance that he’ll attempt it, which could bring about a new war. If Egypt is coerced by the US’ foreign aid leverage into opening its borders to refugees, then the de facto ethnic cleansing of Gaza could proceed, after which the US might approve of Israel annexing it.

While the last-mentioned would be easier said than done considering how difficult the latest war with Hamas was for Israel, the large-scale exodus of civilians that the US might engineer per a deal with Egypt could change the next conflict’s dynamics. Trump might give Bibi the greenlight to go all out in bombing Hamas after a certain time has passed on the pretext that all civilians had the chance to evacuate to Egypt by then so all that remains are supposedly only armed Hamas members.

Israel was accused of targeting civilians during the last war but it could have absolutely gone much further if it felt that it had full American support, which it didn’t receive from the Biden Administration, whose members remained somewhat sensitive to global opinion and also wanted to overthrow Bibi. Trump doesn’t care about global opinion and, despite his personal problems with Bibi, doesn’t want to carry out regime change in Israel by placing a Democrat-backed liberal-globalist in power there.

For these reasons, it’s very possible that Trump might make good on his proposal to have Israel “just clean out” Gaza by coercing the Palestinians there into fleeing to Egypt and thenceforth to other “Ummah” countries, which is why observers should take his “Blood Borders”-inspired plan seriously. Any moves that he and Israel might take towards implementing it won’t be stopped by public condemnation, but only possibly by Hamas, though it might be too weak by now to prevent ethnic cleansing there.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we havePayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The new buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

Trump’s New Middle East Advisor–‘Starting January 20th, Negotiations begin for creation of a Palestinian State’

I put some Biblical commentary/context after the key parts of this story. Donald Trump is the Antichrist and one of his first priorities will be to begin the Abraham Accords process again and to establish a Palestinian State. The story also discusses what the Trump admins policy will be on the hostages in Gaza and Iran.

From the J. Post

The first priority for the Trump administration will be the release of the hostages immediately, with no further delay, President-elect Donald Trump‘s newly-appointed Middle East adviser, Massad Boulos, told French paper Le Point in an exclusive interview on Tuesday.

Boulos added that while the release of the hostages should be separate from issues relating to the future of Gaza, a hostage deal should come within the framework of a temporary ceasefire.

“The president believes that the hostages must be released immediately and that there must be no further delay,” he told Le Point. “According to him, their fate should not be linked to other issues related to the day after in Gaza. Several countries are currently helping to achieve this goal, whether it is Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, or even Turkey.”

However, Boulos stressed that Turkey should not replace Qatar’s role as mediator but that it did have influence over Hamas’s decision-making, given it now houses the terror group’s key officials.

When asked whether the incoming administration might support Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich’s plan to annex the West Bank, Boulos said that Trump has yet to publicly address this issue, and the administration has not yet implemented a policy.

However, Boulos did say that “starting January 20th, there will be a very clear and very specific policy on this subject, which must be respected.”

Boulos agreed that discussions around a “roadmap leading to a Palestinian state” would be a key part of discussions between the US and Israel. However, he said that so far, Saudi parties were not demanding the establishment of a Palestinian state. The Lord isn’t happy with those who scattered His people and who are trying to divide His land. See: Joel 3:2

He referenced Trump’s 2020 plan, which spoke of a proposed Palestinian state, the details of which “were rejected by both sides.”

Boulos continued that the president-elect’s priority is “to resume discussions on the Abraham Accords, with, of course, Saudi Arabia first. Because we know very well, and the president has said so, that once we reach an agreement with Saudi Arabia on Israel, there will be at least twelve Arab countries that will be immediately ready to follow suit.” And he shall confirm the covenant with many Daniel 9:27

Plans for Iran
Speaking on Iran, Boulos said that Trump was adamant on preventing the regime from having a nuclear program. He stressed that Trump would put “maximum pressure” on Iran again and added that he felt Iran had changed tact since the former President was re-elected.

However, Boulos said that Trump was mainly focused on the nuclear deal and not the regime itself, which he was prepared to negotiate with.

“Nevertheless, there are three very important points for him: Iran must absolutely not have nuclear power; Iran’s ballistic missiles pose a risk not only to Israel, but also to the Gulf countries; and finally, the problem posed by Iranian proxies in the region, whether in Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq or Yemen. Apart from these three axes, President Trump did not talk about regime change.”

Lebanese-American businessman Massad Boulos was recently appointed by Trump as his Middle East adviser. The Republican is father to the president’s sons-in-law, the husband of his daughter Tiffany Trump.

Speaking on his appointment, Boulos told Le Point that “it was a great honor” and a “great responsibility.”

The vision is to achieve lasting peace in the Middle East. We have four years to work and we hope to achieve something that will be sustainable for the future and generations to come,” he added. “While people are saying “peace and security” then sudden destruction will come upon them as labor pains come upon a pregnant woman and they shall not escape!” 1 Thessalonians 5:3

Land of Israel” and Palestine:

The First Phase of the Creation of Der Judenstaat

Guest Post by Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic

The historical background of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict goes back to 1917 (the Balfour Declaration) and the establishment of the British protectorate over Palestine (the Palestine Mandate) after WWI with its provision for a national home for the Jews, although formally not to be at the expense of the local inhabitants – the Palestinians. Nevertheless, it became in practice the focal problem to keep an appropriate balance between these stipulations to be acceptable to both sides – the Jews and the Palestinians.

The people and the land

Since the time of the Enlightenment followed by Romanticism, in Western Europe emerged a new trend of group identification of the people as ethnic or ethnocultural nations different from the previous feudal trends from the Middle Ages based on religion, state borders, or social strata belonging.[i] Over time, a new trend of people’s identification as a product of the capitalistic system of production and social order became applied across the globe following the process of capitalistic globalization.[ii] As a direct consequence of such development of the group identities, the newly understood nations, especially in the areas under colonial foreign rule, started to demand their national rights but among them, the most important demand was the right to self-rule in a nation-state of their own. In other words, the ethnic or ethnic-confessional groups under foreign oppression demanded the rights of self-

21st Zionist Congress Geneva 1939

Since around 1900, both the Jews and the Arab-Palestinians became involved in the process of developing ethnonational consciousness and mobilizing their nations for the sake of achieving national-political goals. However, one of the focal differences between them regarding the creation of a nation-state of their own was that the Jews have been spread out across the world (a diaspora) since the fall of Jerusalem and Judea in the 1st century AD[iv] while, in contrast, the Palestinians were concentrated in one place – Palestine. From the very end of the 19th century, a newly formed Th. Herzl’s Zionist movement had a task to identify land where the Jewish people could immigrate and settle to create their own nation-state. For Th. Herzl (1860‒1904),[v] Palestine was historically logical as an optimal land for the Jewish immigrants as it was the land of the Jewish states in the Antique.[vi] It was, however, an old idea, and Th. Herzl in his book pamphlet which became the Bible of the Zionist movement was the first to analyze the conditions of the Jews in their assumed to be “native” land and call for the establishment of a nation-state of the Jews in order to solve the Jewish Question in Europe or better to say to beat traditional European anti-Semitism and modern tendency of the Jewish assimilation. But the focal problem was to somehow convince the Europeans that the Jews had the right to this land even after 2.000 years of emigration in the diaspora.  

However, what was Th. Herzel’s Eretz Yisrael in reality? For all Zionists and the majority of Jews, it was the Promised Land of milk and honey but in reality, the Promised Land was a barren, rocky, and obscure Ottoman province since 1517 settled by the Muslim Arabs as a clear majority population. On this narrow strip of land of East Mediterranean, the Jews, and the Arab Palestinians lived side by side at the time of the First Zionist Congress some 400.000 Arabs and some 50.000 Jews.[vii] Most of those Palestinian Jews have been bigot Orthodox[viii] who entirely depended on their existence on charitable offerings of different Jewish societies in Europe which have been distributed to them by the communal organizations set up mainly exactly for that purpose.

Palestine

Palestine is a historic land in the Middle East on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea between the River of Jordan and the Mediterranean seacoast. Palestine is called Holy Land by the Jews, Christians, and Muslims because of its spiritual links with Judaism, Christianity as well as Islam.

The land experienced many changes and lordships in history followed by changes of frontiers and its political status. For each of the regional denominations, Palestine contains several sacred places. In the so-called biblical times, on the territory of Palestine, the Kingdoms of Israel and Judea existed until the Roman occupation in the 1st century AD. The final wave of Jewish expulsion to the diaspora from Palestine started after the abortive uprising of Bar Kochba in 132−135. Up to the emergence of Islam, Palestine historically was controlled by the Ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, Persians, the Roman Empire, and finally by the Byzantine Empire (the East Roman Empire) alongside the periods of the independence of the Jewish kingdoms.

The land became occupied by the Muslim Arabians in 634 AD. Since then, Palestine has been populated by a majority of Arabs, although it remained a central reference point to the Jewish people in the diaspora as their “Land of Israel” or Eretz Yisrael. Palestine remained under Muslim rule up to WWI, being part of the Ottoman Empire (1516−1917), when combined the Ottoman and German armies became defeated by the Brits at Megiddo, except for the time during the West European Crusades from 1098 to 1197.[ix] The term Palestine was used as the official political title for the land westward of the Jordan River mandated in the interwar and post-WWII period to the United Kingdom (from 1920 up to 1947).

However, after 1948, the term Palestine continues to be used, but now in order to identify rather a geographical than a political entity. It is used today, particularly in the context of the struggle over the land and political rights of Palestinian Arabs displaced since Israel became established.[x]

The Jewish migrations to Palestine in 1882−1914

As a consequence of renewed pogroms in East Europe in 1881, the first wave of Jewish immigration into Palestine started in 1882 followed by another wave before WWI from 1904 to 1914.[xi] The immigration of the Jewish settlers was encouraged by the 1917 Balfour Declaration, and very much intensified since May 1948 when the Zionist State of Israel was proclaimed and established.

There were historically two types of motives for the Jews to come to Eretz Yisrael (In Hebrew, the “Land of Israel”):

  1. The traditional motive was prayer and study, followed by death and burial in the holy soil.
  2. Later, since the mid-19th century, a new type of Jew being secular and in many cases idealistic began to arrive in Palestine but many of them have been driven from their native lands by anti-Semitic persecution.       

In 1882 there was the first organized wave of European Jewish immigration to Palestine. Since the 1897 First World Zionist Congress in Basel, there was an inflow of European Jews into Palestine especially during the British Mandate time followed by the British-allowed policy of land-buying by the Jewish Agency which was, in fact, indirect preparation for the creation of the Jewish nation-state – Israel.[xii] In other words, such a policy was designed to alienate land from the Palestinians, stipulating that it could not be in the Arab hands.

Even before the First Zionist Congress in Basel, Th. Herzl tried to recruit prosperous and rich Jews (like the Rothschild family) to finance his plan of the Jewish emigration and colonization of Palestine but finally failed in his attempt. Th. Herzl decided to turn to the little men – hence his decision to convene the 1897 Basel Congress where according to his diary, he founded the Jewish state. After the congress, he did not waste time in turning his political program into reality. Still, at the same time, he strongly disagrees with the idea of peaceful settlement in Palestine, or according to his own words “gradual Jewish infiltration”, which, in fact, already started even before the meeting of the Zionists in Basel.

At that time, Palestine as an Ottoman province did not constitute a single political-administrative unit. The northern districts have been parts of the province of Beirut, and the district of Jerusalem was under the direct authority of the central Ottoman Government in Istanbul because of the international significance of the city of Jerusalem and the town of Bethlehem as religious centers equally important for Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.[xiii] A vast majority of the Arabs either Muslims or Christians have been living in several hundred villages in a rural environment. Concerning the town settlers of Arab origin, the two biggest of them were Jaffa and Nablus together with Jerusalem as economically the most prosperous urban settlements.[xiv]

Until WWI, the biggest number of Palestinian Jews was living in four urban settlements of the most important religious significance to them: Jerusalem, Hebron, Safed, and Tiberias. They have been followers of traditional, Orthodox religious practices spending much time studying religious texts and depending on the charity of world Jewry for survival.[xv] It has to be noticed that their attachment to Eretz Yisrael was much more of religion than of national character and they were not either involved in or supportive of Th. Herzl’s Zionist movement emerged in Europe and was, in fact, brought to Palestine by the Jewish immigrants after 1897. However, most of the Jewish immigrants to Palestine after 1897 who emigrated from Europe have lived of secular type of life having commitments to the secular goals to create and maintain a modern Jewish nation based on the European standards of the time and to establish an independent Jewish state – modern Israel but not to re-establish a biblical one. During the first year of WWI, the total number of Jews in Palestine reached some 60.000 of whom some 36.000 were settlers since 1897. On the other hand, the total number of the Arab population in Palestine in 1914 was around 683.000.

The second wave of Jewish immigration to Palestine (1904−1914) had many intellectuals and middle-class Jews but the majority of those immigrants have been driven less by a vision of a new state than by the hope of having a new life, free of pogroms and persecutions.

Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic

Ex-University Professor

Research Fellow at Centre for Geostrategic Studies

Belgrade, Serbia

http://www.geostrategy.rs

sotirovic1967@gmail.com                                                                                                                                                                                                       © Vladislav B. Sotirovic 2024

Personal disclaimer: The author writes for this publication in a private capacity which is unrepresentative of anyone or any organization except for his own personal views. Nothing written by the author should ever be conflated with the editorial views or official positions of any other media outlet or institution. 


References:

[i] About ethnicity, national identity, and nationalism see in [John Hutchinson, Anthony D. Smith (eds.), Nationalism, Oxford Readers, Oxford−New York: Oxford University Press, 1994; Montserrat Guibernau, John Rex (eds.), The Ethnicity Reader: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Migration, Malden, MA: Polity Press, 1997]. 

[ii] About globalization see in [Frank J. Lechner, John Boli (eds.), The Globalization Reader, Fifth Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, 2014].

[iii] In the science of politics, self-determination as an idea emerged out of the 18th-century concern for freedom and the primacy of the individual will. In principle, it can be applied to any kind of group of people for whom a collective will is to be considered. However, in the next century, the right to self-determination is understood exclusively to nations but not, for instance, to the national minorities of confessional groups as such. National self-determination was the principle applied by the US’s President Woodrow Wilson to break three empires after WWI. It is included in the 1945 Charter of OUN, in the 1960 Declaration on the Granting of Independence of Colonial Countries and Peoples, and the 1970 Declaration of the Principles of International Law. However, self-determination, as taken to its most vicious extremes, leads in practice to phenomena such as, for instance, “ethnic cleansing” that was recently in the 1990s done, for example, against the Serbs in neo-Nazi-fascist Croatia of Dr. Franjo Tuđman or in NATO’s occupied Kosovo-Metochia after the 1998−1999 Kosovo War. In short, self-determination is the right of groups in political sciences to choose their own destiny and to govern themselves not necessarily in their own independent state [Richard W. Mansbach, Kirsten L. Taylor, Introduction to Global Politics, London−New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2012, 583].

Sovereignty is the claim to have the ultimate political authority or to be subject to no higher power concerning the making and executing of political decisions. In the system of international relations (the IR), sovereignty is the claim by the state to full self-government, and the mutual recognition of claims to sovereignty is the foundation of the international community. In short, sovereignty is a status of legal autonomy that is enjoyed by states and consequently, their Governments have exclusive authority within their borders and enjoy the rights of membership in the international political community [Jeffrey Haynes, Peter Hough, Shahin Malik, Lloyd Pettiford, World Politics, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2011, 714].  

[iv] About the fall of Jerusalem, see in [Josephus, The Fall of Jerusalem, London, England: Penguin Books, 1999]. Josephus Flavius (born as Joseph ben Matthias, c. 37−c. 100) was a Jewish historian, Pharisee, and General in the Roman army. He was a leader of the Jewish rebellion against the Roman Empire in 66 AD and was captured in 67. His life was spared when he prophesied that Vespasian would become an Emperor. Subsequently, Josephus received Roman citizenship and a pension. He is today well-known as a historian who wrote the Jewish War as an eyewitness account of the historical events leading up to the rebellion. Another of his historiographic works was Antiquities of the Jews – history since the Creation up to 66 AD.

There were two Jewish rebellions against the Roman power which inspired the Jewish diaspora from Palestine: in 66−73; and in 132−135 [Џон Бордман, Џаспер Грифин, Озвин Мари (приредили), Оксфордска историја Грчке и хеленистичког света, Београд: CLIO, 1999, 541−542].

[v] He was born on May 2nd, 1860 in Pest in the Austrian Empire at that time and was given the Hebrew name Binyamin Ze’ev, along with the Hungarian Magyar Tivadar and the German Theodor. In Pest, Th. Herzl attended the Jewish parochial school, where he became acquainted with some biblical Hebrew and religious studies. In 1878, he moved to Vienna where he studied law at the university and later worked for the Ministry of Justice. In 1897, Th. Herzl published his famous book Der Judenstaat, just a year before he convened the First Zionist Congress in Basle (Switzerland). In this book in the form of a political pamphlet, he wrote that: “The idea which I have developed in this pamphlet is a very old one: it is the restoration of the Jewish state” [Extracts from Theodor Herzl’s The Jewish State, Walter Laqueur, Barry Rubin (eds.), The Israel-Arab Reader, London, 1995, 6]. According to him, the borders of Israel as Judenstaat had to be between the River of Nile in Egypt and the River of the Euphrates in Iraq. These two rivers, as the borders of Greater Israel, have been symbolically presented on the state flag of Israel since 1948 with the two blue strips (one above and another below Dawid Star).  

[vi] Present-day Israel (est. 1948) is the third independent state of the Jews in Palestine. The biblical Kanaan was a tiny strip of land some 130 km in length between the Jordan River, Mt. Tiber, East Mediterranean littoral, and the Gaza Strip [Giedrius Drukteinis (sudarytojas), Izraelis: Žydų valstybė, Vilnius: Sofoklis, 2017, 13].  

[vii] Ahron Bregman, A History of Israel, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, 7.

[viii] The Orthodox Judaism is teaching that the Torah (the five books of Moses) contains all the divine revelation that the Jews as a chosen people require. In the case of Orthodox Judaism, all religious practices are strictly observed. When it is required the interpretations of the Torah, references are made to the Talmud. The followers of Orthodox Judaism are practicing strict separation of women from men in the synagogues during the worshiping. In Israel, exists only an Orthodox rabbinate. While a majority of the Orthodox Jews support the Zionist movement, however, they deplore the secular origins of it and the fact that Israel is not a fully religious state. The Orthodox Jews recognize one as a Jew only in two possible cases: 1) if he/she mother is a Jew; or 2) the person undergoes an arduous process of conversion. For the Orthodox Jews, it is prohibited to cut the beard, which probably originated in a wish to be distinguished from unbelievers. About Jewish history and religion, see more in [Дејвид Џ. Голдберг, Џон Д. Рејнер, Јевреји: Историја и религија, Београд: CLIO, 2003]. The Israeli Law of Return that is governing Jewish emigration back to Israel accepts all those with a Jewish grandmother as potential citizens of Israel. Alongside with the Orthodox Judaism exist Liberal Judaism and Reform Judaism.    

[ix] [Geoffrey Barraclough (ed.), The Times Atlas of World History, Revised Edition, Maplewood, New Jersey: Hammond, 1986].

[x] About the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians by the Israeli authority, see in [Ilan Pappe, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Oxford, England: Oneworld Publications, 2007]. About the general history of the Jews, see in [Дејвид Џ. Голдберг, Џон Д. Рејнер, Јевреји: Историја и религија, Београд: CLIO, 2003]. 

[xi] The term pogrom from a very general point of view is used to describe organized massacres of Jews in the 20th century but especially during WWII in the Nazi-run concentration camps during the Holocaust.

[xii] However, overwhelming of those Jewish emigrants came from Central and East Europe as well as from the Russian Empire. About the Jews in Central and East Europe, see in [Jurgita Šiaučiunaitė-Verbickienė, Larisa Lempertienė, Central and East European Jews at the Crossroads of Tradition and Modernity, Vilnius: The Centre for Studies of the Culture and History of East European Jews, 2006]. About the Jews in Russia, see in [Т. Б. Гейликман, История Евреев в России, Москва, URSS, 2015].

[xiii] The 1878 Ottoman census claims some 463.000 inhabitants of Jerusalem.

[xiv] The Ottoman population in 1884 was composed of 17.143.859 of which some 73.4% were Muslims [Reinhard Schulze, A Modern History of the Islamic World, London‒New York: I.B.Tauris Publishers, 1995, 22].

[xv] From the mid-18th century till WWII, Vilnius was known as the “Jerusalem of the North” and was a center of Rabbinic Judaism and Jewish studies. Almost half of the city population have been Jews but according to Israeli Cohen, a journalist, and writer who visited Vilnius just before the beginning of WWII, around 75% of Vilnius’ Jews were dependent on the support of charitable and philanthropic organizations or private benefactors [Israeli Cohen, Vilna, Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1943, 334]. In Jewish St. in the Old Town of Vilnius, it was established in 1892 the biggest Judaica library in the world – the Strashun Library (or the Jewish Library of Vilnius) by founder Mattityahu Strashun (1817−1885). The library was gone in 1944 as a consequence of the fight between the Germans and the Red Army. The Library collection reached 22.000 items by 1935 [Aelita Ambrulevičiūtė, Gintė Konstantinavičiūtė, Giedrė Polkaitė-Petkevičienė (compilers and authors), Houses that Talk: Everyday Life in Žydų Street in the 19th−20th, Century (up to 1940), Vilnius: Aukso žuvys, 2018, 97−100]. Vilnius up to WWII had and famous Great Synagogue. A well-known and respected Gaon of Vilnius – Elijah ben Salomon spent all of his life in Vilnius (1720−1797).

The importance of the Jewish Vilnius for the Zionist movement can be seen from the fact that the Zionist leader Th. Herzl visited Vilnius in 1903 when the Jewish representatives met him in the building of the Supreme Rabbi Board House of the Great Vilnius Synagogue [Tomas Venclova, Vilnius City Guide, Vilnius: R. Paknio leidykla, 2018, 122].