Tag Archives: NATO

Welcome to the War Department. “War is Peace”. Hegseth’s “Hot War” to “Ensure Peace”

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky at Global Research

When war becomes peace, when concepts and realities are turned upside down, when fiction becomes truth and truth becomes fiction, 

When a global military agenda is heralded as a humanitarian endeavor, when the deliberate killing of children is upheld as “collateral damage,”  

When those who resist the US-NATO-led invasion of their homeland are categorized as “insurgents” or “terrorists,” 

When tactical nuclear weapons are heralded by the Pentagon as “harmless to the surrounding civilian population,”

When the Commander-in-Chief of the largest military force on planet earth is presented as a global peace-maker.”

Take action worldwide against Global Warfare and the derogation of fundamental human rights.

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here.” —William Shakespeare“The Tempest”, 1623

My response to Shakespeare: “Send the devils back to where they rightfully belong.”

Michel Chossudovsky, October 2, 2025

***

Pete Hegseth’s “Hot War” to “Ensure Peace”

“Good morning and welcome to the War Department because the era of the Department of Defense is over.

….The origin dates to fourth century Rome and has been repeated ever since, including by our first commander in chief, George Washington, the first leader of the War Department. It captures a simple yet profound truth. To ensure peace, we must prepare for war.  Pete Hegseth

Nonsensical, Uninformed and Dangerous Statement

The United States of America is now officially on a  war path which –if applied– threatens the future of humanity. The agenda is to “ensure peace”.

Hegseth proposes an all out war at a global level as a mean to achieving peace. The use of nuclear weapons as well as “A.I. military decision-making” are an integral part of this global military agenda.  

“From this moment forward, the only mission of the newly restored Department of War is this: warfighting, preparing for war and preparing to win”,

Hegseth is also intent upon eliminating the peace movement. 

“That’s why pacifism is so naive and dangerous. It ignores human nature and it ignores human history”.

In the words of George W. Bush

“I just want you to know that,

when we talk about war,

we’re really talking about peace,”

Engaging in war as a means to achieving peace?  Since 9/11, propaganda statements abound:

  • The conduct of  “humanitarian wars”,
  • America’s “War on Terrorism”,
  • Going after Al Qaeda,
  • Going After Weapons of Mass Destruction
  • Responsibility to Protect (R2P),
  • The “Just War”

Video: Pete Hegseth’s  Speech


Continuity: From the Truman Doctrine To MAGA Trump

Successive Democratic and Republican administrations, from Harry Truman to George W. Bush, Barack Obama and now Donald Trump have been involved in carrying out a hegemonic blueprint for global domination, which the Pentagon  calls the “Long War”.

The Truman Doctrine formulated by George Kennan at the outset of the Cold War hinted

“to the importance of not only articulating a military solution but in maintaining the people of Asia in a state of poverty.”

What Kennan had also envsaged was a strategy of creating divisions as well as ensuring that Asian countries do not establish a relationship with the Soviet Union which would hinder US hegemonic interests.

According to Kennan:

“The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered by idealistic slogans, the better”

There are obvious similarities of Hegseth’s statement to both the Truman Doctrine as well as the Project of the New American century (PNAC) released in September 2000 a few months before the accession of George W. Bush to the White House.

The PNAC was a neo-conservative think tank linked to the Defense-Intelligence establishment, the Republican Party and the powerful Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which plays a behind-the-scenes role in the formulation of US foreign policy.

The PNAC’s declared objective was:

“Fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous theater wars”.

Those proposed wars were not to be conducted in a “consecutive” fashion. One after the other. They were to be conducted simultaneously in different regions of the world. “And we shall win those wars”.

What is distinct in Hegseth’s War Department is that the “War is Peace” doctrine is now official. The  fake “Peace Department” has been replaced by “the War Department”. War is presented as an instrument of peace. Diplomacy and international relations are defunct.

…” warfighting, preparing for war and preparing to win, unrelenting and uncompromising in that pursuit not because we want war, no one here wants war, but it’s because we love peace.

We love peace for our fellow citizens. They deserve peace, and they rightfully expect us to deliver.”

Global warfare is presented as a  means to achieving peace. This forcloses de facto peace negotiations and diplomatic dialogue.

Is this not tantamount to an “unofficial” declaration of  World War III? 

In the words of Hegseth quoting Trump “we have the strongest, most powerful, most lethal and most prepared military on the planet. That is true, full stop. Nobody can touch us. It’s not even close”.

The above statement is all the more dangerous inasmuch as Hegseth fails to comprehend  that the United States’ military arsenal exhibits significant weaknesses in comparison to that of the Russian Federation.

“…we owe our republic a military that will win any war we choose or any war that is thrust upon us.

Should our enemies choose foolishly to challenge us, they will be crushed by the violence, precision and ferocity of the War Department. In other words, to our enemies”,  FAFO”

America’s “enemies” will continue to challenge Washington’s hegemonic agenda through peaceful means.

US-NATO interference as well as Worldwide attempts to instrument “regime change” or color revolutions will continue to be challenged.

What is the meaning of FAFO within the US Armed Forces

FAFO is an acronym that stands for “F— Around and Find Out.”

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Trump says Hamas has ‘three or four days’ to respond to Gaza plan or ‘pay in hell’

NO! The Insurrection Act is not a good thing it’s martial law and if you think Trump is bad now just wait until he had total and complete power! I forgot to include that part in today’s video which is bad enough on its own as we discuss current events including Noahide laws, upcoming wars with Iran, Russia and more.

Trump Hosts Chabad at WH

Trump says Hamas has 3-4 days to respond or “pay in hell”

Dozens more tankers fly to Europe

The Noahide Laws began in the states when Jimmy Carter signed Education Day USA into Law (https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/816546/jewish/The-Start-of-Education-Day-USA.htm)

Ronald Reagan signed the proclamation to make all people aware of the 7 Universal Noahide Laws (https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/6427457/jewish/President-Ronald-Reagans-First-Education-Day-USA.htm)

George H.W. Bush Signed “Education Day USA” which included the Noahide Laws (https://www.chabad.org/therebbe/article_cdo/aid/1167653/jewish/Education-Day-USA-1991.htm)

George W. Bush endorsed Education Day USA (Noahide Laws) (https://www.chabad.org/news/article_cdo/aid/665300/jewish/President-Proclaims-Education-Day.htm)

Obama Commemorated Education Day USA (Noahide Laws) with Chabad Lubavitch (https://www.chabad.org/news/article_cdo/aid/2930527/jewish/President-Obama-Commemorates-Education-and-Sharing-Day-With-Chabad-Leaders.htm)

Trump Endorsed the Noahide Laws as Education Day USA 2020 (https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/proclamation-education-sharing-day-u-s-2020/)

A Rabbi gave the Noahide Prayer at Trump 2024 Vegas Rally (https://t.me/Revelations_and_Rabbit_Holes/14059)

Trump Prayed at Rebbe Menachem Schneerson’s Grave (https://t.me/Revelations_and_Rabbit_Holes/13396?single)

Trump Honors Rabbi Schneerson on Education & Sharing Day USA 2025 (https://www.chabad.org/news/article_cdo/aid/6857486/jewish/President-Donald-J-Trump-Honors-the-Rebbe-Proclaims-April-9-Education-and-Sharing-Day-USA.htm)

The Israeli Sanhedrin called on Trump to establish an International Divine Noahide Court for all nations (https://t.me/Revelations_and_Rabbit_Holes/17181?single)

Rabbi Pinchus Ciment, the Regional Director of Chabad Lubavitch of Arkansas’, cites the Noahide Laws to the US House of Representatives (https://t.me/Revelations_and_Rabbit_Holes/19722)

Under the Noahide Laws all Christians will be beheaded.

The rise in antisemitism was always part of the (((PsyOp))) to help bring in these 7 laws.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Assessing Reports That Ukraine Is Preparing A False Flag Drone Provocation Against NATO

flying white drone tilt shift lens photography

By Andrew Korybko Reposted with permission.

Having captured Russian drones bomb NATO logistics hubs in Poland and Romania via a modern-day “Gleiwitz incident” could achieve Ukraine’s goal of sparking a hot NATO-Russian war.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova raised global awareness of Hungarian media reports about a planned Ukrainian false flag drone provocation against NATO in her Telegram post on Friday. She hyperlinked to one of the outlets, Pesti Srácok, a little more than two hours after they published their editorial. It ended by citing unspecified Telegram posts about Ukraine’s plans to bomb logistics hubs in Poland and Romania with captured Russian drones and then blame Moscow.

Accordingly, there’s no solid intelligence about this, just social media reports that were picked up by the Russian Foreign Ministry and amplified by their spokeswoman. Nevertheless, this doesn’t mean that such a scenario isn’t credible, especially given the larger context. Trump just greenlit NATO downing Russian jets that violate the bloc’s airspace, which could arguably embolden some members to attempt this on false pretexts, thus risking a major escalation of NATO-Russian tensions exactly as Ukraine wants.

Likewise, if the most zealously anti-Russian ones along the alliance’s eastern frontier ultimately get cold feet after fearing that Trump might hang them out to dry, Ukraine could nudge them in the direction of offensive operations against Russia disguised as “reciprocal retaliation” via this false flag plot. The essence is similar to what Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service warned about twice over the summer regarding joint British-Ukrainian plots to stage false flag provocations in the Baltic Sea.

According to their sources, this would involve Ukrainian-transferred Soviet/Russian torpedoes hitting a US ship there or at least exploding in close proximity to it and/or fishing up Ukrainian-transferred Soviet/Russian mines, either of which could suffice for pulling Trump into mission creep. They could also falsely justify offensive actions on the grounds of “reciprocal retaliation”, albeit at sea in these scenarios, while the latest one that Zakharova warned about could include drones, airstrikes, and/or a no-fly zone.

Russia continues to gradually gain ground in the special operation zone, and while no breakthrough has yet to occur, the military-strategic dynamics are clearly in its favor and decisively against Ukraine’s. Taken to its conclusion, this trend will inevitably result in Russia controlling all the disputed territory with time, thus enabling Moscow to end the conflict on more of its terms by then. Ukraine wants to avert that scenario so it’s desperately trying to engineer the game-changer of direct NATO intervention to that end.

It’s only through such a dramatic development that the abovementioned dynamics could possibly be altered to at the very least freeze the conflict, which Ukraine and the West have demanded of Russia to no avail since that would leave unmet many of its goals in the conflict, ergo Ukraine’s false flag motives. Having captured Russian drones bomb NATO logistics hubs in Poland and Romania via a modern-day “Gleiwitz incident” as Zakharova described Ukraine’s reported plans to be might easily achieve that.

Therefore, while there’s no proof in support of the claim that Ukraine is preparing a false flag drone provocation against NATO, it still can’t be ruled out. Zakharova’s post was meant to expose this plot and thus deter Ukraine, but in the event that it still happens, Trump shouldn’t let himself be manipulated by Zelensky into a disaster of epic proportions by involving the US in NATO’s faux “reciprocal retaliation” or pledging to defend the bloc ahead of Russia likely teaching it an unforgettably painful lesson afterwards.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

NATO Might Try To Down Russian Jets On The False Pretext That They Violated Its Airspace

Guest post by Andrew Korybko

If it turns out that Trump’s flip-flop on Ukraine was just him paying lip service to NATO’s goal of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia and he doesn’t ultimately escalate US involvement, then some of the bloc’s members might try to down Russian jets over the Baltic in order to finally force his hand.

Trump declared on the sidelines of the UNGA that he supports NATO shooting down Russian jets that enter its airspace but added that American backing afterwards would depend on the circumstances. Secretary of State Marco Rubio signaled earlier in the day that the US wouldn’t support this “unless [the Russian jets] are attacking.” NATO released a statement around the same time implying its willingness to shoot down Russian jets, which chief Mark Rutte later clarified would be decided on a case-by-case basis.

All of this came a day after Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski mockingly requested during an emergency UNSC meeting that Russia not “come here and whine” if its missiles or aircraft are shot down over the bloc’s airspace. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk also said on the same day that “We will take the decision to shoot down flying objects when they violate our territory and fly over Poland – there is absolutely no discussion about that” but then qualified his comment just like Rubio and Rutte later did.

He added that “When we’re dealing with situations that aren’t entirely clear, such as the recent flight of Russian fighter jets over the Petrobaltic platform – but without any violation, because these aren’t our territorial waters – you really need to think twice before deciding on actions that could trigger a very acute phase of conflict. I also need to be absolutely certain… that all allies will treat this in exactly the same way as we do.” The larger context concerns two dubious Russia-related incidents as of late.

The first occurred in early September when several Russian drones entered Polish airspace, yet that was arguably due to NATO jamming ahead of the then-upcoming Zapad 2025 drills in Belarus, while the damage that a local home experienced was revealed to have been caused by a wayward Polish missile. As for the second, Estonia alleged shortly after that three Russian jets violated its maritime airspace, which it has politically self-serving reasons vis-à-vis the US to lie about this as explained here.

Trump lent credence to the above upon pledging that the US would defend those two from Russia if it keeps escalating as he believes is the case. This was followed by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth telling his Estonian counterpart that the US “stands with all NATO allies and that any incursion into NATO airspace is unacceptable.” US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz also said during the earlier cited emergency UNSC meeting that “The United States and our allies will defend every inch of NATO territory.”

These statements of support in the scenario of NATO trying to down Russian jets, in spite of depending on the circumstances in which this might unfold per Trump and Rubio, could embolden Poland, Estonia, and other Baltic allies to attempt this over that sea on the false pretext that they violated its airspace. The purpose would be to prompt Russia into retaliating against NATO in order to spark a nuclear brinksmanship crisis that they expect would end by forcing Russia into a lopsided ceasefire in Ukraine.

Trump’s flip-flop from declaring that Zelensky “doesn’t have the cards” to win to now declaring that he could reconquer all of Ukraine’s lost land and maybe even some of Russia’s universally recognized land too with NATO’s support hasn’t yet led to any meaningful escalation of US involvement. If it turns out that he was just paying lip service to NATO’s goal of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia, however, then some of the allies above might try to down Russian jets over the Baltic in order to finally force his hand.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Trump says he ‘hates’ his opponents at Charlie Kirk memorial

All kinds of blasphemous signs and speeches were given at the Charlie Kirk memorial, much of it driven by the NAR movement or Christian nationalism.

Thailand Freezes over 3 million bank accounts

Trump says he hates his opponents

Trump says Ukraine can win it all back

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Russia and the Collective West: The Global Politics of the Cold War 1.0/2.0

Russia as the phoenix in global politics

After the end of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia became a less popular area of study and dealing with in comparison to before the end of the Cold War (1949‒1991). In the West, it was believed that after 1991, Russia was simply “finished” as Moscow was no longer the capital of a great power state (of the USSR) which had an important influence in global politics and international relations after WWII. In other words, the Western policymakers thought that after 1991, Russia would remain irrelevant as both economic and political power in global politics, and, therefore, for instance, many universities’ studies programs on Russia in the USA and Western Europe were either canceled or downsized under the explanation that studying Russia was no longer important for international relations (IR) and global security.   

However, all of those who shared an opinion that Russia was “irrelevant” in global politics and international relations since the end of the Cold War realized at least from the 2008 Russo-Georgian War[i] onward their fatal mistake of judgment. Russia is “back,” and subsequently, Washington and Brussels declared a new Cold War (2.0) on Russia in 2008[ii] as they clearly understood that Russia is back as a military, economic, and political great power. In other words, the Collective West, especially (and led by) the USA, made a critical experiment of provoking Russia on the international stage, and they received a very clear answer. The second fatal experiment of challenging Russia was on the soil of the (Soviet) Ukraine from 2014 to 2022, when reborn post-Cold War 1.0 Russia accepted the thrown “white glove” in February 2022 by launching a Special Military Operation (SMO) against the Russofrenic neo-Nazi political regime in Kiev, directly politically, logistically, financially, and militarily supported by the Collective West since the 2014 EuroMaidan’s cup.   

Russia, as a country with tremendous energy resources, nuclear power, educated and talented people, simply cannot be ignored in global politics by the Collective West, as was the practice in the years from 1991 to 2008. It became true especially from the very point of fact that Russia has been actively since 2008 pursuing its own national interests and security policy near its borders (within the space of the ex-USSR). Nevertheless, it became totally wrong to believe that the post-Cold War Russia was going to be an adversary to the American “New World Order”, as reborn Russia after 2000 clearly shows to be a respectful Eurasian global power with national interests and aspirations of her own to be both acknowledged and respected. It was finally proven by the start of the Russian Special Military Operation on the territory of Eastern (Soviet) Ukraine populated by the Russian speakers in February 2022. This operation, at the same time, clearly showed the Global West that Russia once again (after the dissolution of the Soviet Union) became a member of the top global powers in global politics and, therefore, its influence in IR cannot be ignored anymore.      

Transformation of post-Soviet Russia into a Great Power

It is a historical law that each state changes with time. However, only a few states experience such dramatic change during the short period of time as Russia has over the last 30+ years. In other words, Russia has changed as a state, nation, and military power, followed by its fluctuating position in global politics and international relations. From 1991 to today, Russia has transformed peacefully and rapidly its entire political and economic system, which is a relatively rare example in history. When the USSR dissolved in 1991, Russia was left to be one of its 15 constituent republics, which proclaimed independence forced to substantially redefine its role in global politics. The 1990s were very painful for Russia’s position in international relations as the country’s foreign policy was, in fact, supervised and directed by Washington and Brussels as the case of NATO aggression on Serbia and Montenegro in 1999, for instance, clearly showed but since 2008 Russia’s foreign policy once again became an independent and gradually returning the country to the club of the Great Powers.  

The importance of Russia´s influence in the world in the arena of global politics is based on the fundamental fact that Russia is one of the strongest international actors that is determining the global political agenda. It means that Russia is once again a member of the Great Power club as „a great power state is a state deemed to rank amongst the most powerful in a hierarchical state-system“.[iii] Russia, in this respect, surely fits the conventionally accepted academic criteria that define a Great Power:

  1. A Great Power state is in the first rank of military capacity.
  2. A Great Power state has the capacity to maintain its own security and to influence other states on how to behave.
  3. A Great Power state is economically powerful, although this is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for membership in the Great Power club (the cases of Japan or Germany are the best illustrations of this claim).
  4. A Great Power state has global but not only regional spheres of national interest and action.
  5. A Great Power state is running a „forward“ foreign policy and, therefore, it has a real but not only potential influence on international relations and global (world) politics.[iv]
  6. A Great Power is a state (at least according to the 18th-century concept) that could not be conquered even by the combined might of other Great Powers.[v]

Russia surely belongs today to the club of key global powers having powerful nuclear weapons, a growing economy, and prospective economic capacities, being one of the leading BRICS members. However, what is most important and different to others, Russia possesses almost endless natural resources (many of them are probably still even not discovered). For instance, in September 2025, the Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that Russia has reserves of coal for the next one thousand years. From a geopolitical viewpoint, Russia is occupying the crucial segment of the Heartland – the focal geopolitical part of the world.[vi] Russia, with its rich history and national traditions, is today in the process of defining its new political role in the current century. Behind Russia’s policies, there is a comprehensible strategy based on a firm vision of the contemporary world and the protection of the Russian national interests.  

The six factors of Russian power in IR

A contemporary history of Russia starts after the dissolution of the USSR by Mikhail Gorbachev (according to the agreement with Ronald Reagan in Reykjavík in October 1986),[vii] which marked at the same time the beginning of the political and economic turmoil in the 1990s, when Russia under Boris Yeltsin and his pro-Western liberals was a puppet state of the Collective West. However, the country gradually emerged from the period of instability since 2000 mainly due to the well-combined six factors, which a new administration of President Vladimir Putin skilfully exploited to the full extent:

  1. Substantial mineral resources, particularly of oil, gas, and coal.
  2. Significant military power, based on the second greatest nuclear potential in the world.
  3. Relatively well-educated, productive segment of the population.
  4. A high-quality scientific and technological base that survived in several industries.
  5. Permanent membership in the UNSC, the G8, and the G20.
  6. Important political and economic influence on the territory of the former Soviet Union.                                     

It is predicted that Russia will remain in the future as one of the focal and strongest international actors on the same or above level of influence, together with the US, EU, China, and rising Islamic cultures, especially Iran and Turkey. Russia’s natural resources and capabilities may allow it to follow an independent line in foreign policy and security national interests, both in the post-Soviet regions and in some key areas of the world: Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and the Middle East. Predictably, however, Moscow’s interests will inevitably clash with those of other major actors – especially the US and its European clients. That is for sure that world order in international relations is going to continue to function according to World Systems Theory: a variant of structuralism that conceptualizes world order as being structured into 1) A rich and developed core, 2) Poor and underdeveloped periphery, and 3) A number of intermediary or semi-peripheral states. Russia is going to improve its own position within the first (leading) group, which includes all Great Powers who are hopefully (after the 2025 meeting of the Shangai Cooperation Organization-SCO) going to govern international relations and global politics according to the principle of Balance of Power which refers to a mechanism whereby Great Power’s states collaborate with each other in order to maintain their interests against threats from those who would seek systemic dominance.

Why study and respect Russia?

There are at least four focal and most important reasons for both studying and respecting Russia’s importance in global politics and international relations today:

  1. Geopolitical position and the size of the country: Russia is the largest country in the world, stretching over 17 million sq. km and covering 11 time zones. Russia borders the Baltic Sea in the west, the Black Sea and Caspian Sea (in fact, the lake) in the south, the Arctic Ocean in the north, and the Pacific Ocean in the east. Russia is both a European and Asian country, which, in fact, occupies the crucial geopolitical position in the world – the core of the Heartland. Russia shares borders with six NATO member states (Poland, Norway, Lithuania, Estonia, Finland, and Latvia), faces a seventh one across the Black Sea (Turkey), and is geographically separated by only 85,30 km wide Bering Strait from the USA (also a member of NATO). Russia borders 16 internationally recognized states, which is the largest number of neighbors that one country has in the world. A geopolitical factor of Russia can be shortly understood if we know that anything that is happening on the territory of Eurasia from Central Europe to Japan is affecting to a certain extent Russia and, therefore, Moscow has to react by some means to that.[viii]
  2. Regional power: Russia is surely a regional power within the perimeter of Heartland, which is striving to realize its own political, economic, national, and security interests. Russia, after 2000, succeeded in developing its own independent policies toward other states, including NATO and the EU’s members. The “problems” with Russia in global politics and international relations started when, since 2008, Russia’s foreign policy did not in many segments correspond with the strategic interests of the USA and its European and other clients of NATO and the EU. To the full level of dissatisfaction by Washington and Brussels, Russia maintains friendly relations with the three main American enemies and competitors – North Korea, China, and Iran. The most “problematic” issue of Russian foreign policy in the region for Washington is the fact that Moscow is continuing its efforts to build multi-state economic and political coalitions with neighboring countries, including super-powerful China, followed by rising powers of Iran and India. Russia, China, and India are already members of the international bloc, the BRICS, together with Brazil and South Africa as founders, followed by newly accepted member states.[ix] The Collective West finally 2008 recognized Russia’s claim to have “privileged interests” within the post-Soviet territories, except in those countries that joined the EU and NATO before (the Baltic States).[x]       
  3. Military power: With the total dissatisfaction by the Pentagon and Brussels, Russia still even during overwhelming economic, financial, and other sanctions by the Collective West introduced since 2022, remains a very strong military state with stable economic growth, respectful military and nuclear capacity, and developing potentials which are keeping it as one of the Great Powers (even a Super Power) in global politics. It is quite understandable that even after Cold War 1.0, when bare American imperialism received its full expression at least till 2008, Moscow continues with its security policy based on the priority of having strong military capacities. Historically, for the Russian authorities is quite clear that after NATO’s establishment in 1949, Russia’s survival, independence, and sovereignty depended only on its military power, especially the nuclear one.[xi] Russia (at that time the USSR) started to produce nuclear weapons in 1949 when the US created its imperialistic military bloc of Western puppet states and reached nuclear parity with the US at the beginning of the 1970s. Russia is today maintaining a nuclear arsenal and delivery systems that are comparable to the arsenal of the US.[xii] Unfortunately, due to the US’ policy of open gangsterism in international relations after the end of the Cold War 1.0, the so-called Western liberal democracies (the EU and NATO) are still an enemy to both Russia’s and global security and, therefore, one of the most important tasks for the near future in global politics has to be the creation of new reliable policies of common security based on justice, democracy, and friendship – a kind of multilateral global politics or at least the international relations founded on the form of the balancing power among the Great Powers.  
  4. Economic power: Russia remains a global economic power with a growing economy index higher than many Western countries, having a population of some 142 million, which makes it one of the ten most populous states in the world. Her GDP per annum is selecting Russia among the world’s top 10 economies. In 2007, the private sector, with 5 million private enterprises, contributed 65% of Russia’s GDP. Although an economic slowdown is possible, Russia is most likely to continue with its economic growth in the near future, regardless of the harsh economic and other sanctions imposed by the Collective West since 2022 onward. The main source of revenue (80%) is the exploitation of natural resources (and selling them to the world market), followed by a wide range of different industries. The most important Russian export of natural resources is oil, gas, coal, timber, and metals. We have to keep in mind that, for instance, Russia has 23% of the total world’s forested land[xiii] and is in the 8th place in the world according to the oil reserves (the first is Venezuela). After 2000, Russia became as well as one of the biggest world’s energy suppliers and the exporter of weapons (among the top 3). The potential economic power of Russia comes from the fact that this country possesses vast reserves of natural resources on its territory, for example, 30% of global gas reserves. The country is quite near to the Arctic’s gas and oil reserves, a large but still unexplored source of energy, which is probably going to be mainly under Russian exploitation in the future. It is not so difficult to claim that energy resources are going to be the focal reason for the conflicts in international relations.        

Current reality of Russo-Western relations in IR

Questions about the nature of Russia’s political and economic systems and Russia’s policy after 2000 are of crucial importance in understanding its place in both Eurasia and the world (BRICS+), and assessing the prospects for dealing with some of the focal challenges to regional and global security. The policymakers of the Collective West understood this truth only after Russia’s military intervention in the Caucasus in August 2008, which was intended to clearly demonstrate that further incorporation of areas of special interest to Moscow into the Western client zone was totally unacceptable. What the same Western policymakers also understood was that this intervention was a clear counterpunch to Western-sponsored Kosovo’s proclamation of “independence” in February of the same year. 

Russia is a leading political subject, a strong economic and military power, a rich energy producer and supplier, an extremely important player in global politics, which is still building its position in the post-Cold War 1.0 era (that, in fact, is already the era of the Cold War 2.0). Russia is and is going to be for a long period of time in the future both one of the crucial players in international relations and one of the most important decision-makers in global politics. However, up to 2022, Russia’s post-Cold War 1.0 geopolitics was forced to be accommodated to the behavior of NATO.[xiv] Nevertheless, since February 2022, when the SMO of Russia started, in fact, against the Collective Western Russofrenic imperialism, on the territory of the Soviet (Greater) Ukraine, NATO and the rest of the Collective West are forced to accommodate their politics on the global arena to the Russian behaviour.

Personal disclaimer: The author writes for this publication in a private capacity, which is unrepresentative of anyone or any organization except for his own personal views. Nothing written by the author should ever be conflated with the editorial views or official positions of any other media outlet or institution. 

Dr. Vladislav B. Sotirovic

Ex-University Professor

Research Fellow at Centre for Geostrategic Studies

Belgrade, Serbia

© Vladislav B. Sotirovic 2025

http://www.geostrategy.rs

sotirovic1967@gmail.com


Endnotes:

[i] On this war, at least from the Western perspective, see in [Roger E. Kanet (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, 101−178].

[ii] Edward Lucas, The New Cold War: Putin’s Russia and the Threat to the West, London‒New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

[iii] Andrew Heywood, Global Politics, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, 7.

[iv] About world politics, see in [Jeffrey Haynes et al, World Politics, New York: Routledge, 2013].

[v] Richard W. Mansbach, Karsten L. Taylor, Introduction to Global Politics, Second Edition, London−New York: Routledge, 2012, 578.

[vi] About geography and history, see in [Halford John Mackinder, “The Geographical Pivot of History”, The Geographical Journal, 23, 1904, 421−437; Pascal Venier, „The Geographical Pivot of History and Early 20th Century Geopolitical Culture“, Geographical Journal, 170 (4), 2004, 330−336].

[vii] About R. Reagan and M. Gorbachev’s relations, see in [Jack F. Matlock Jr., Reagan and Gorbachev: How the Cold War Ended, New York, Random House, 2005].

[viii] On Eurasia and Great Powers, see in [Roger E. Kanet, Maria Raquel Freire (eds.), Key Players and Regional Dynamics in Eurasia: The Return of the Great Game, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010].

[ix] The BRICS is an acronym first used by the investment firm Goldman Sachs in 2003 (as the BRIC). Taking their rapid economic development, Goldman Sachs predicted that these economies are going to be wealthier by 2050 than the world’s current economic powers.

[x] About the foreign policy of Russia in the 21st century from the Western perspective, see in [Robert Legvold (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century and the Shadow of the Past, New York: Columbia University Press, 2007; Roger E. Kanet (ed.), Russian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011].

[xi] About this issue, see in [Richard Pipes, Survival is not Enough: Soviet Realities and America’s Future, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984].

[xii] Robert Legvold, “The Russian File: How to Move Toward a Strategic Partnership”, Foreign Affairs, July/August 2009, 78−93.

[xiii] World Resource Institute: http://www.globalforestwatch.org/english/russia (2009).

[xiv] About the post-Cold War 1.0 geopolitics of Russia, see in [Срђан Перишић, Нова геополитика Русије, Београд: Медија центар „Одбрана“, 2015]. About the new Cold War 2.0, see in [Robert Legvold, Return to Cold War, Cambridge, UK−Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2016].

The Reported Russian Drone Incursions Into Poland Might Have Been Due To NATO Jamming

Guest Post by Andrew Korybko

It’s unlikely that Russia would risk rallying the West around a no-fly zone over Ukraine by staging a deliberate provocation against Poland or even just carrying out a recon mission in NATO airspace.

Poland claimed to have shot down several Russian drones on Wednesday morning that reportedly crossed into its airspace during the latest large-scale strikes against Ukraine. This occurred amidst the ongoing Polish, Lithuanian, and NATO drills involving 30,000 Polish troops and just ahead of the upcoming Russian-Belarusian Zapad 2025 drills. Some therefore suspect that this was either a deliberate provocation by Russia or a botched recon mission, but it might have just been due to NATO jamming.

It was recently argued that “There Might Be More To The Von Der Leyen-GPS-Russia Hoax Than Scoring Cheap Infowar Points” after the dramatic claim that Russia supposedly jammed her plane while it attempted to land in Bulgaria was debunked by Sofia itself and Western media. The alternative theory put forth was that this false narrative was meant to justify aggressive signals jamming in Kaliningrad, though this could also be directed towards Belarus given its hosting of the upcoming Zapad 2025 drills.

Such interference might have thus caused Russian drones to veer off course into Poland during the latest large-scale strikes against Ukraine. Aggressive signals jamming could also precede implementation of reported plans for imposing a no-fly zone over at least part of Ukraine in connection with the West’s security guarantees for that country. Although nowhere as foolproof as patrols over Ukrainian airspace and authorizing NATO-based Patriots to protect its skies, it would carry much less of an escalation risk.

Moreover, if NATO expected that its speculative signals jamming – possibly ramped up after the von der Leyen-GPS-Russia hoax, which might have been timed to coincide with the upcoming Zapad 2025 drills – would cause Russian drones to veer off course, then this might be part of a preplanned escalation. The objective could be to rally support for the abovementioned no-fly zone proposal or even begin the gradual process of implementing it on the pretext of “proactive defense” in light of this incident.

Over 3,5 years into the special operation, Russia would have by now presumably gamed out everything that could realistically follow the scenario of several of its drones crossing into Poland, with policymakers thus likely being aware that this could be exploited to advance the no-fly zone plot. The aforesaid insight accordingly reduces the odds that this was a deliberate provocation or a botched recon mission, either of which would have probably been carried out in force to make the cost-benefit tradeoff more worthwhile.

This is a similar logic as what was recently shared in this analysis here arguing that Russia probably didn’t deliberately target the Cabinet of Ministers building in Kiev so as to avoid fueling the no-fly zone plot. While that particular incident might have been randomly caused by drone debris, the latest one could have been planned to a much greater degree if NATO jamming was indeed responsible as conjectured. It remains to be seen, however, whether Poland will participate in any no-fly zone over Ukraine as a result.

Former President Andrzej Duda recently revealed that Zelensky tried to manipulate Poland into war with Russia over November 2022’s Przewodow incident, which he refused to fall for, while his successor Karol Nawrocki pledged ahead of the second round not to deploy troops to Ukraine. This policy continuity, which aligns with Poles getting fed up with Ukrainian refugees and this neighboring conflict, could foil NATO’s plans to manipulate Poland into this even though it might still agree to ramp up signals jamming.

Editors Note: If Russia is going to attack NATO proper it won’t do it with a couple dozen UNARMED drones. These drones were recon drones, not armed attack drones. Their primary mission is to distract air defenses away from the drones that are armed, all of which were sent against Ukraine. With all of the radar and GPS jamming being done on the borders in the warzone is it any wonder that a few veer off course?

This is why I didn’t jump on the hype bandwagon the other night when this was going on. My God given instincts told me it was a nothing burger because when Russia does attack NATO and the US it will be with hypersonic weapons, kinetic energy weapons and nukes, not unarmed drones. It will be MASSIVE and done in coordination with Iran, China, N. Korea, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba, Mexico and more.

I believe that day is rapidly approaching! Prayed up and prepped up, time is short!

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Macron becoming increasingly unpopular

According to recent data, Macron has never been so poorly supported by French voters.

Lucas Leiroz, member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert.

Apparently, the way European leaders are governing their countries is deeply displeasing ordinary people. There has been a deep wave of political dissatisfaction in Europe, as evidenced by the recent results in local elections – where opposition candidates and rightist, nationalist parties gained momentum against European political elites. The EU has taken some authoritarian measures to disguise this crisis, but it is possible that the entire continent will soon enter a major crisis of legitimacy.

Recent data shows that President Emmanuel Macron’s popularity rating has fallen below 20% for the first time since taking office. The rise in criticism of the French government is huge and comes amid growing concern about the country’s policy of expanding military spending by cutting several basic social programs.

Macron currently has an approval rating of 19%. The data is even more worrying when combined with the approval rating of French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou’s government, which has only 18% of popular support. Even during the most turbulent moments of Emmanuel Macron’s presidency, such as during the Yellow Vest protests, his approval rating had never fallen so low.

This entire decline in popularity has a very simple explanation: ordinary French people no longer want to participate in Western war efforts and NATO-led military paranoia. The beginning of Macron’s political decline was precisely during Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine, to which the French president reacted irrationally, leading a hawkish campaign for which the people were not prepared.

Since 2022, Macron has become increasingly unpopular among the French voters, with his approval rating falling 12 percentage points. Even more disturbing for Macron is the loss of support in the business sector, which is traditionally favorable to his liberal policies. Among executives and business leaders, his approval ratings have fallen 8 and 18 points, respectively, signaling disillusionment even among those who, in theory, benefit from his agenda.

Bayrou’s political situation is even more fragile. He was chosen for the position precisely after the collapse of Michel Barnier’s government in late 2024. At the time, Paris was facing serious corruption problems, with a massive scheme by politicians and businesspeople to take advantage of the pension reforms being implemented in France aimed at solving the budget deficit.

As expected, corruption made it impossible to achieve any gains. Currently, the French budget deficit stands at 43.8 billion euros (48 billion dollars). Efforts to reverse this situation need to be comprehensive, and Macron seems uncertain about his ability to lead such a project – especially considering his uncompromising public stance on the conflict in Ukraine, which has led him to prioritize international issues over domestic ones.

Once again, Ukraine is posing a major problem for a European country. Ordinary French no longer want Macron in office because he is threatening France’s stability and future by prioritizing foreign policy over the country’s social and financial affairs. In the midst of a crisis and fear of war escalation (possibly with French direct involvement), ordinary citizens are no longer endorsing their president and his main allies.

In fact, once the root of the problem is known, it is easy to reverse. All Paris needs to do in order to halt this crisis of legitimacy is stop supporting Ukraine with weapons and money, as well as abandon NATO’s military projects. France can regain a path to prosperity and stability, and Macron can regain his popularity and approval rating if Russophobic rhetoric is banned and the country returns to investing in actual social issues instead of unnecessarily accelerating its arms production.

Unfortunately, popularity does not seem to be a priority in the West. Europe is increasingly becoming a continent of dictators, where unpopular politicians make completely illegitimate decisions to serve private and foreign interests. Macron is not concerned about the legitimate interests of the French people, which is why he is expected to continue prioritizing Ukraine in his government plans.

The great risk of this kind of authoritarian attitude is that at some point, escalation becomes inevitable. It is impossible to prevent mass protests in France – as well as in other European countries – demanding an end to support for Ukraine and remilitarization policies. The people are showing that they are not satisfied and that they want change – and if change does not happen, the citizens’ patience will run out.

You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.

infobrics.org

Editors Note: This is why Macron is trying to deflect attention to his statement on a 2 state solution for Palestine and Israel. It has NOTHING to do with Macron actually giving a rip about the genocide in gaza beause he doesn’t. None of them do, their consciousnesses are seared.

Ther’s also his “wife” to consider and Candace Owens has done a great job at exposing that sick secret, that Macron’s wife is really a man. He desperately wants that to go away! Johnny

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

Sweden implementing desperate militarization measures, even without war

The country is considering recruiting the elderly in order to achieve its military goals.

Lucas Leiroz, member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert.

Militarization plans in Europe continue to expand. Amid the Russophobic madness affecting the continent, some governments are taking drastic measures to “prepare for war.” In Sweden, the government is even considering raising the age limit for military mobilization, anticipating that, in a possible situation of real open conflict, there will be a shortage of soldiers in its ranks.

Swedish state television reported that the country’s government wants to “drastically” raise the maximum conscription age for former military officers. According to the plan, the maximum age for recalling reserve soldiers will be 70. Currently, the law sets a limit of 47, thus representing a very radical change in Swedish military policy.

The proposal is being supported by the most bellicose and anti-Russian politicians and officials in Swedish society. Since 2022, Stockholm has experienced a wave of severe anti-Russian fanaticism. The paranoia fueled by Americans and Europeans about a possible Russian invasion of European territories after the conclusion of the operation in Ukraine motivated Sweden and Finland to intensify their military processes and Russophobic radicalization – a fact that became especially clear with their NATO accession.

In the specific case of this measure, the proposal was created by a special commission established by the Swedish government itself, tasked with dealing with long-term military issues. The group’s main task is precisely to resolve the country’s conscription problems so that Sweden can achieve NATO’s combat readiness objectives. In this regard, the commission proposes changing the law to allow elderly people to return to military service.

In addition to expanding the draft period, the proposed change also provides for a lessening of training regulations. Currently, former officers who have been without training for more than ten years are removed from the military reserve. The government-appointed commission seeks to amend this law to allow any active-duty or reserve member of military age, with at least one year of training, to be eligible for service at any time. In other words, to achieve its militarization goals, Sweden is willing to conscript even untrained individuals without the necessary combat capability.

In 2023, just a few months before joining NATO, Sweden maintained a military force of 60,000 soldiers. Upon joining the Atlantic military alliance in early 2024, the Swedish government set a goal of nearly doubling its strength by 2030, reaching 115,000 soldiers. These changes are occurring completely suddenly, considering that until a few years ago, Swedish foreign policy was guided by principles of peace and neutrality.

Until 2017, there was no compulsory military service in the country. In less than ten years, Sweden went from being an almost completely demilitarized country to one where even elderly citizens can be drafted, demonstrating the severity of the Russophobic mentality that is guiding local decision-making.

Unfortunately, Russophobia and militaristic paranoia are widespread. Currently, all Swedish parliamentary parties support the country’s commitment to allocate 300 billion kronor (more than 31 billion dollars) in an additional package to state defense budget. Sweden is fully committed to NATO’s military spending targets, as well as to the Brussels-led ReArm Europe initiative. The country not only wants to expand its ranks but also its direct and indirect military spending, striving to become a sort of European “military power.”

In principle, there’s nothing wrong with a country becoming a military power, as long as it’s motivated by legitimate patriotic interests. Unfortunately, this isn’t the case with Sweden. The Scandinavian country is militarizing because it believes this is the only way to protect itself from the so-called “Russian threat.” This “threat,” however, doesn’t exist. Moscow has repeatedly made it clear that it has no strategic or territorial interests in Western Europe.

The special military operation in Ukraine is the result of NATO’s expansion along Russia’s borders and the genocide of ethnic Russians that has been taking place in the country since 2014. There is no Russian “expansionist plan” toward Europe, which is why the “Russian threat” narrative is simply a mechanism used by NATO to spread fear and encourage militarization.

However, it is important to emphasize that Europe may be creating a kind of “self-fulfilling prophecy.” By militarizing to “counter the Russian threat,” Europe may itself become a threat to Russia. This cycle of militarization could lead to a dangerous escalation in the future, the consequences of which could indeed lead to open conflict. And Sweden will never be prepared to face this kind of situation if it relies on elderly and untrained military personnel in its ranks.

The best course of action, rather than pretending to become a “military power” through the mobilization of unprepared and combat-unfit individuals, is to simply de-escalate and resume diplomacy.

You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.

infobrics.org

German Major General Freuding announces that Germany delivers long-range missiles to Ukraine for deep strikes into Russia

I would expect Russia to strike Germany after these missiles are used against them. The next escalation of the war in Europe is coming soon.

Oh and lets not forget about China and Taiwan as the US is demanding that their allies declare what they will do if China invades Taiwan.

Breaking News! The Pentagon is urging Japan and Australia to clarify what role they would play if the U.S. and China went to war over Taiwan – The Financial Times

Looks like the US is preparing for another major war.

Prayed up and prepped up, time is short!

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

PayPal Link

« Older Entries Recent Entries »