Category Archives: Biometrics

Trump’s DHS Targets ICE Critics on Social Media

Posted on by Leave a comment

By Kurt Nimmo of Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Did you criticize ICE on Google, Meta (Facebook and Instagram), and Reddit social media platforms? Did you express your contempt when the federal government summarily executed two American citizens for the crime of exercising the First Amendment? If you did, you may be in the gunsights of the Department of Homeland Security.

A New York Times investigation, reported by Gizmodo and echoed by TechCrunch, revealed that the DHS has issued a series of administrative subpoenas to tech platforms in recent months seeking to identify information associated with accounts that are critical of ICE. From The New York Times:

The Department of Homeland Security is expanding its efforts to identify Americans who oppose Immigration and Customs Enforcement by sending tech companies legal requests for the names, email addresses, telephone numbers and other identifying data behind social media accounts that track or criticize the agency.

The “legal requests,” administrative subpoenas, violate the Fourth Amendment. Federal agencies such as ICE and DHS are not permitted to unreasonably “search and seize” information without probable cause and a judicial warrant. In October, an administrative subpoena was issued against a 67-year-old retiree. The DHS demanded Google hand over the man’s

IP address and home address; a list of all Google services he had used; the date, time and duration of his online sessions; and other identifiable information, including his usernames, Social Security number, credit card data and driver’s license number.

DHS Admits Violating First Amendment 

The federal government circumvented the Constitution when it enacted the Inspector General Act of 1978. Prior to this, during the Nixonian war on drugs, the DEA was granted administrative subpoena authority under the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970.

In 1996, the FBI issued administrative subpoenas, known as national security letters. The Stored Communications Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, and Right to Financial Privacy Act authorize the federal government to collect information relevant to a national security investigation. The Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control has frequently used administrative subpoenas in civil investigations of alleged US economic sanctions violations.

Beginning in the first Trump administration, ICE used administrative subpoenas to force state governments to provide information on Americans opposed to deportation. Between 2025 and 2026, during the second Trump administration, DHS began using administrative subpoenas to reveal the names of anonymous users on the internet. DHS officials admit they have targeted people for their speech, a direct violation of the First Amendment.

In a complaint filed in the US District Court of the Northern District of Illinois by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem were accused of coercing tech companies into removing a large amount of content. The purpose behind this removal was to control what the public could see, hear, or say about ICE operations.

In 2025, a memo was issued by Acting Director of ICE, Todd Lyons, allowing the use of administrative warrants (Form I-205, Warrant of Removal/Deportation) to enter private residences in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Prior to Trump, DHS and ICE (an agency under DHS) were required to specify probable cause and obtain a court issued search warrant. A Supreme Court ruling in Abel v. United States in 1960, however, allowed ICE to increase the use of non-judicial administrative subpoenas. The memo does not provide a legal rationale for violating the Fourth Amendment.

Trump’s Contempt of the Bill of Rights 

Donald Trump’s contempt for constitutional law became apparent in 2020 after he lost the election. He said the election was stolen and proposed shutting down the Constitution in response.

“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,” Trump posted to his Truth Social.

The president faces numerous accusations he has undermined the Constitution and the rule of law. He is accused of using the military for personal political gain; of illegally reallocating federal funds to support his policies; and publicly attacking federal judges and undermining their authority. Trump’s approach to the law has resulted in legal challenges. The challenges center on his unlawful firing of civil servants, and pardons of political allies, campaign donors, and wealthy individuals convicted of white-collar crimes.

Individuals receiving “Executive Grants of Clemency” include Dinesh D’Souza (author and filmmaker convicted of making illegal campaign contributions), Michael Milken (bond financier convicted of financing mechanisms that were criminal schemes), Edward DeBartolo, Jr. (owner of the San Francisco 49ers, convicted of a felony regarding payment demanded for a riverboat casino license), Bernard Kerik (Commissioner of the New York Police Department, convicted of fraud and for making false statements), Rod Blagojevich (former Governor of Illinois, convicted of offering an appointment to the Senate in exchange for campaign contributions), and others.

Trump has converted ICE into a paramilitary force that targets Americans exercising their First Amendment right. In addition to social media monitoring systems, ICE has used cellphone location tracking and facial recognition software. “Official surveillance, whether its purpose be criminal investigation or ongoing intelligence gathering, risks infringement of constitutionally protected privacy of speech,” the Supreme Court noted.

Free Speech as Domestic Terrorism 

The National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-7) on Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence was released on September 25, 2025. It followed by three days President Trump’s “Executive Order” designating Antifa as a “domestic terrorist organization,” despite the fact Antifa does not exist as an organization. NSPM-7 allows AG Pam Bondi to single out groups for designation as “domestic terrorist organizations.”

NSPM-7 reorients the machinery of national security toward the policing of belief, writes the Cobb Courier.

The First Amendment generally prevents the government from punishing people for unpopular opinions. It also protects the ability for people to associate to advance public and private ideas in pursuit of political, economic, religious or cultural goals… any definition of terrorism that includes ideological components risks criminalizing people or groups based on belief rather than based on violence or other criminal conduct.

During his first term, Donald Trump promised he would protect free speech and the First Amendment. Following his second election victory, his pledge gave way to “threats and calls for retaliation, as administration officials promise to go after anyone they accuse of hateful or even uncivil commentary about the conservative activist [Charlie Kirk] and his Republican allies.”

The Pentagon said it would look into federal employees mocking the assassination of Kirk while the State Department warned it would revoke visas over social posts that celebrate Kirk’s death. Attorney General Pam Bondi said Americans who post “hate speech” will be pursued by the Justice Department, particularly in the context of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Following Kirk’s death, widespread disciplinary and retaliatory actions were taken against individuals who were seen as celebrating, justifying, or trivializing it.

Trashing the Fourth Amendment

Since the events of September 11, 2001, government surveillance in the United States, particularly by agencies like the NSA, has undergone a significant transformation. This transformation has resulted in an increase in the powers of the NSA, FBI, and CIA to conduct surveillance activities, including wiretapping and data collection, without the need for warrants. Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allows the government to spy on American citizens.

In 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in United States v. Mohamud that surveillance (under FISA) and a subsequent FBI sting operation did not violate the Fourth Amendment. However, in 2025, the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled in United States v. Hasbajrami that warrantless queries (searches) conducted under Section 702 are a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

For Trump and MAGA, the Constitution and the rule of law are irrelevant. The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 calls for consolidating executive power and taking control of the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Department of Commerce, the Federal Trade Commission, and other agencies. Critics argue the project undermines the rule of law, separation of powers, separation of church and state, and the Bill of Rights. Kevin Roberts, the president of Project 2025, characterizes the plan for a radical overhaul of government as “institutionalizing Trumpism.”

Project 2025 advocates restrictions on the First Amendment, specifically in regard to “harmful speech” and pornography. Critics warn the Heritage Foundation initiative poses substantial risks to free expression in America. It promotes policies that will result in censorship. These actions will ultimately stifle dissenting voices and limit access to diverse viewpoints, threatening the very foundations of free speech and the First Amendment.

Trump Declares Criticism of His Policies is “Illegal” 

In November, 2025, Trump revealed his opinion on the First Amendment right of his critics and adversaries. He declared that criticism of him and his policies are “illegal.” The remark came after late-night comedian Seth Meyers mocked Trump. Massachusetts Democrat Senator Edward Markey asked for unanimous consent to pass a resolution condemning Trump’s remark.

“Let me be clear: in America, criticizing the President is not a crime. It is a constitutional right,” Markey said.

According to Burt Neuborne, a civil liberties professor at New York University law school, the Trump administration is “trying to frighten Americans out of exercising their First Amendment rights by denying them benefits if they dare to do something that Trump doesn’t like.” The net result would be “a society that is not exercising their First Amendment rights. The First Amendment rights are there, but it’s too costly to exercise them.”

Trump tried to intimidate opponents in 2023.

“If you go after me, I’m coming after you!” he posted in all caps on his Truth Social account.

The threatening post was described as “the definition of political speech” by a Trump spokesman. The post raised concerns on the part of Jack Smith and the legal team investigating the then former president. Prosecutors argued an order preventing dissemination of discovery materials was required because “the defendant has previously issued public statements on social media regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him.”

Ordinary Americans: An Enemy Within

During his 2024 campaign, Trump denounced millions of Americans as an “enemy within.” The candidate told Fox News if “radical left lunatics” disrupt the election, “it should be very easily handled by—if necessary, by National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.” At another rally prior to the election, he sounded like Hitler. “We pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country,” he told a crowd in New Hampshire.

Last April,

“Trump openly signed executive orders—in full view of the press—directing the Department of Justice to criminally investigate two people who publicly disagreed with him. He has also issued numerous orders targeting law firms for representing clients he does not favor, constituting clear shakedown attempts,” Reason reported. “Trump has been very clear that his second term would be all about retribution—payback on those he feels wronged him since his first term.”

Trump’s Enemy List: A Hallmark of Authoritarianism

Donald Trump’s effort to destroy the lives of his critics is reminiscent of Nixon’s enemies list that became public in 1973. According to the White House Counsel’s Office at the time, the purpose was to “screw” Nixon’s political enemies. Congressmen, journalists, union bosses, and others were targeted. Nixon’s list was kept secret, while Trump makes his threats public.

The effort by the DHS to reveal the personal information of Trump’s critics and either make that information public or use it to destroy the lives of journalists, activists, and ordinary Americans is a hallmark of authoritarianism.

The Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the rule of law will not stop Trump and MAGA from attacking critics. The summary execution of Alex Pretti and Renee Nicole Good by ICE—in addition to eight others also murdered by Trump’s goons—should serve as a wakeup call. Now that DHS is coercing social media platforms to reveal information about critics, we can expect more warrantless raids, more violence, more destroyed lives, and the possibility of more people shot to death for exercising their natural-born rights under the First Amendment.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

Kurt Nimmo is a journalist, author, and geopolitical analyst, New Mexico, United States. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). Visit the author’s blog.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Kim.com says Palantir was hacked

Posted on by Leave a comment
people hacking a computer system

He says they have dirt on EVERYONE, especially world leaders. Kim says Palantir has become the most dangerous company in the world. He’s probably right.

For those who don’t have or use X, here you go.

Palantir was allegedly hacked. An AI agent was used to gain super-user access and here”s what the hackers allegedly found:

Peter Thiel and Alex Karp commit mass surveillance of world leaders and titans of industry on a massive scale.

They have thousands of hours of transcribed and searchable conversations of Donald Trump, JD Vance and Elon Musk.

They have backdoored the devices, cars and jets of world leaders and accumulated the biggest archive of blackmail material.

Palantir is creating nuclear and bio weapon capabilities for Ukraine and is working closely with the CIA to defeat Russia. They believe they are one year away. They plan to achieve this by keeping Russia busy with meaningless peace negotiations.

Palantir is responsible of the majority of Palestinian deaths in Gaza. They have developed the AI targeting for Israel.

Palantir is an arm of the CIA and all data from international clients is copied into a CIA spy cloud.

Palantir has become the most dangerous company in the world. If you work there you have the right to know that this is what Palentir AI is used for, without your knowledge.

The Palentir data the hackers allegedly gathered will be given to Russia and/or China. I was chosen as a trusted partner for this publication. I’m not involved in the Palentir hack and I don’t know the hackers. But I do know that the hack happened.

There you have it. It looks like Palantir isn’t just the most dangerous company in the world, but also one of the most EVIL in the world.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

The War Intervention and Weaponization: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Data Centers, and the Environment

Posted on by Leave a comment
close up of a person holding a smartphone displaying chatgpt

By Aaron Kirshenbaum at Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Early on Saturday, January 3rd, Venezuela was attacked on behalf of oil, mineral, tech, and weapons profiteers in a regime change operation.

Since then, the Trump administration has threatened Iran, Greenland, Cuba, Colombia, and Mexico.

What unites these threats? The U.S.’s quest for endless resource extraction to power its increasingly deadly global empire. And it’s not slowing down.

These resource wars and “operations” are emerging as the AI drive also ramps up. In July, Palantir and the Pentagon signed a 10-year, $10 billion agreement. In April 2025, Palantir won a $30 million contract with ICE — a significant development in their decade-plus-long partnership that we are now seeing play out in their increasingly militarized, unrestrained murders and abductions in Minneapolis and around the country. This increasingly inextricable partnership between AI and the war economy is throwing us into a fast track of climate and environmental chaos that threatens us all. 

In August, I learned about an AI program created by the U.S.-armed Israeli military called “Where’s Daddy.”

The program is designed to track individuals Israel is targeting in order to kill them at home with their families. In October 2023, the AI war giant Palantir entered into a contract with the Israeli military. Since 2021, the Israeli Occupation Forces have been working with tech companies like Google on AI programs such as Project Nimbus, used to surveil and murder Palestinians. “Where’s Daddy” and other overlapping systems represent the newest phase of this. The program characterizes the families of these alleged combatants as “collateral damage” and is often far from accurate, killing entire families without the “intended targets” even being there. The tech companies developing these programs do not have anyone’s “safety” or “security” in mind; they are solely motivated by profit. This cruelty is no surprise— these companies are the same ones building toxic data centers across the U.S., largely in working-class and Black and Brown communities, in the newest phase of environmental injustice.

We’ve been hearing about AI more and more as it enters the commercial market in increasingly pervasive ways. In particular, much has been reported about AI data centers entering communities and the opposition to them. Many of these fights have been taken up by environmental organizations; it’s estimated that data centers could consume approximately 21% of global energy by 2030. In order to sustain this energy use, data centers need cooling. Mid-sized data centers use as much water as a city of 50,000 people. Meta’s Hyperion data center in Louisiana is projected to use as much water as the entire city of New Orleans. Another Meta center in Cheyenne, Wyoming, is projected to use more power than the state of Wyoming itself.

These centers not only increase electricity bills for communities that can’t afford them, but they also generate significant air, water, and noise pollution. Some centers regularly use diesel “emergency” generators to meet increased demand. Each generator is the size of a railcar, and thousands are littered across data center hotspots like Northern Virginia. As a result, toxic chemicals are seeping into the lungs of residents, causing asthma and long-term illness. Data centers are known to create noise pollution, with constant hums that can lead to hearing loss, anxiety, cardiovascular stress, and a host of other long-term issues. Furthermore, equipment is certain to break down and lead to toxic waste and electronic pollution. 

“Critical” minerals are required for the operation of these data centers. The process of obtaining these minerals, supposedly also used for green technology, requires the militarization, destabilization, and total plunder of mineral-rich regions. These minerals are supposedly “critical” for energy transitions, and some have advocated more “sustainable” methods for maintaining data centers through “green” technologies. 

The use of these minerals is clear: The Pentagon recently became the largest shareholder in MP Minerals, one of the largest mining companies in the Western Hemisphere. Why? Aluminum for fighter jets. Titanium for missiles. And copper, lithium, cobalt, and many others for data center batteries and semiconductors. The more data centers are built, the more minerals are needed. This process of extraction has murdered millions in the Congo, destroying the soil, water, and forest: one of the largest “lungs” of the planet. It has led to the newest phase of imperialist aggression on Venezuela, a mineral-rich country with the largest oil reserves in the world (oil, of course, is also essential for data centers). Additionally, it has led to the attempted subordination of the Philippines to semiconductor production. The U.S. also seeks to use the archipelago as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” for the U.S.’s looming war with China, its largest competitor in the AI and mineral race.  

These are the impacts we already know to be devastating. But this is also new technology, which means there’s a lot we don’t know and a lot that’s being intentionally hidden. Lack of transparency is the norm in this industry. As data centers rapidly expand and buy up land around the country, the actual companies behind them hide behind non-disclosure agreements. This is not dissimilar to the intentional concealment of the military’s role in global emissions, enacted through U.S. pressure at the third U.N. Climate Change Conference in 1997. Decades later, the issue of militarism is still left out of climate conversations. 

The parallel makes sense, considering how the AI industry has fused with the war machine. The U.S. military is one of the most environmentally destructive forces on the planet. In its oil consumption alone, the U.S. military is the world’s largest institutional polluter. The U.S.’s 800+ bases in 80 countries globally are known to regularly leak jet fuel and cancer-causing PFAS chemicals, along with a toxic cocktail of hundreds of other chemicals. While training exercises like RIMPAC in the Asia-Pacific region authorize the deaths of thousands of sea creatures, in environmental sacrifice zones like Camp Lejeune in North Carolina, toxic waste from military facilities has killed infants hours after birth. In bomb testing sites like Vieques, off the coast of mainland Puerto Rico, lung cancer and bronchitis rates have been shown to be 200% higher than on the mainland for men, and 280% for women. And the oil-motivated “war on terror” emitted 1.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide from 2001-2017. 

Now we are entering a new era of resource wars that will further destroy the planet as the AI race with China accelerates. The relationship between AI and the U.S. military goes beyond the Pentagon’s contracts with Palantir, Meta, and Microsoft: last June, executives Shyam Sankar (Palantir), Andrew Bosworth (Meta), Kevin Well (OpenAI), and Bob McGrew (Thinking Machines Lab, previously OpenAI) were sworn into the U.S. Army as lieutenant colonels. Michael Obadal, executive of the AI-war manufacturing company Anduril, is now the Under Secretary of the U.S. Army, still with hundreds of thousands in Anduril stock. Peter Thiel, co-founder of Palantir, is himself a major funder of Anduril. In June 2025, OpenAI, Google, xAI, and Anthropic entered into $200 million contracts with the Department of War. The more you look at the partnerships between such companies and their executives, the Pentagon, governmental departments, and other entities, the more tangled this military-tech-industrial complex all becomes.

Many organizing groups are rightfully building power against the data centers that literally fuel it all, pushing for increased regulation and transparency. At the same time as Palantir makes new deals with the Pentagon, regulations in sacrifice zones are being thrown out the window. On December 18th, the House of Representatives passed a bill backed by Microsoft, Micron, and OpenAI to fast-track data centers. The bill significantly reduces the number of environmental and financial factors that can be considered in permitting processes. It’s simple. These communities are becoming the Camp Lejeunes of a new age: the new toxic waste dumps in the belly of the beast used to power the war machine. They must be fought against at all costs. 

Regulation is crucial. It’s also far from a long-term solution. There is a lot that we don’t know, because a lot is hidden: just how much of these companies are tied up with weapons manufacturers, the Pentagon, and proxies like Israel; the environmental destruction caused by military usage of AI; the specific usage of all of these data centers. But it is obvious that AI is becoming inseparable from war-making, that increased AI means increased war-making, and that increased war-making is resulting in new and increased forms of unfathomable environmental destruction to communities around the world and here within the belly of the beast. 

AI has been creeping up our necks. The horrific “Where’s Daddy” program existed long before I heard of it. It seems like these products are popping up in every corner of the market before we can even start discussing them. Their emergence has been intentionally designed to not only conceal their role in environmental destruction, but also their role in the militarism destroying communities from Virginia to Gaza. 

No part of this is sustainable — not the war economy, not unending extraction, regardless of how much “green tech” it produces, and not an AI-driven speculative economy. We cannot afford to have splintered conversations either; these AI and tech companies are war profiteers. The new Cold War on China drives this. The genocide in Palestine drives this. The war on Venezuela, Latin America, and the Caribbean drives this. And so our organizing must be unified against the impacts, mechanisms, and causes. Against data centers and the wars that drive them. We need to stop the blood. But we can’t lose sight of why and how the bullets are fired. 

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

Aaron Kirshenbaum is CODEPINK’s War is Not Green campaigner and East Coast regional organizer. Based in, and originally from, Brooklyn, New York, Aaron holds an M.A. in Community Development and Planning from Clark University. They also hold a B.A. in Human-Environmental and Urban-Economic Geography from Clark. During their time in school, Aaron worked on internationalist climate justice organizing and educational program development, as well as Palestine, tenant, and abolitionist organizing.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

The Mark of the Beast is Already Here

Posted on by One comment

It was and is the Covid19 shots. I have countless posts showing that to be the case but very few want to believe it and many get very angry at me because of it. So be it I report what I’m shown. They don’t need Elon’s brain chip, it was built into the vaccines. They don’t need a quantum tattoo, it was already built in. Here is more proof.

I found this on Facebook at this link.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Mind Controlled Manchurian Candidates

Posted on by 3 comments
halloween candy inside a skull

This is a clip from the documentary “Mind Control” from YouTube channel Cognitive Liberty. They have 2 videos on mind control and targeted individuals and the weapons they use. Of course the jabs have made this job much easier and once they activate it or make it “stand” in the holy place (your body/mind) we will have a zombie apocalypse.

Watch both of their documentaries on their YouTube channel called Cognitive Liberty.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

IT’S LAW: The New Bill To Ban Money Just Passed

Posted on by Leave a comment
people holding money

This happened late last Tuesday while we were all sleeping. From what I’m hearing all of this will take effect by April 1 2026. You’ve been warned, prepare accordingly.

A legislative vote just occurred that most Americans don’t even know about, and it could fundamentally change how money works in this country. While mainstream media focused on political headlines, a critical committee advanced legislation that creates the infrastructure for a completely digital financial system. This isn’t about making cash illegal on paper—it’s about building a framework that makes using physical money practically impossible. The new bill mandates real-time transaction reporting to the IRS, establishes the foundation for Central Bank Digital Currency implementation, and creates incentives for businesses to go entirely cashless. What does this mean for your savings, your privacy, and your financial freedom? In this detailed analysis, we break down the actual provisions of the legislation, examine how the FedNow payment system enables unprecedented financial surveillance, and explore why high-denomination currency is being systematically eliminated from circulation. We also discuss programmable money, negative interest rates, and the 2026 implementation timeline that policy documents are targeting. Most importantly, we provide strategic insights on how business owners, entrepreneurs, and everyday citizens can position themselves during this critical transition period. The digital cage is being constructed right now, but the door isn’t locked yet. Understanding what’s happening and taking informed action today could be the difference between financial autonomy and complete dependence on a system designed for control, not freedom. This is economic intelligence you need to know.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Nanotechnology in the Water supply

Posted on by Leave a comment

The pictures that you’re looking at on this post are from some water I put in our crockpot on low heat. I did that to moisturize the air as it’s very dry from the heat registers in the winter time. It didn’t take long before the nano technology showed itself.

Then I got curious about nano technology and the water supply and did some simple searches. The results are below.

First, I did a Google search on nano technology and how it’s being used in water. Here is what the Google AI brought back to me.

Nanotechnology is used in city water systems primarily for 

advanced purification, filtration, and monitoring, leveraging unique properties like huge surface areas to remove tiny contaminants (viruses, heavy metals, chemicals) more efficiently, improve desalination, and enable real-time quality checks, making water safer and more accessible, though research continues on potential impacts. 

Key Uses of Nanotechnology in Water:

  • Advanced Filtration: Nanoporous membranes act as extremely fine filters, blocking bacteria, viruses, and micro-pollutants that traditional filters miss.
  • Enhanced Adsorption: Nanomaterials like activated carbon or metal oxides have massive surface areas, allowing them to capture and remove specific pollutants (like arsenic or lead) more effectively.
  • Disinfection: Silver nanoparticles have antimicrobial properties, while nanocatalysts can break down organic pollutants using light.
  • Desalination: Nanotech-enhanced membranes can make removing salt from seawater more energy-efficient.
  • Pollution Monitoring: Nanosensors can detect contaminants at very low levels, alerting authorities to issues before they become widespread. 

Then I did a Google search on nano technology in water and how that is creating heavy metal poisoning in people. This is what Google brought back on that search.

Putting certain types of 

nanotechnology in water has the potential to cause heavy metal poisoning and a range of other adverse health effects, depending on factors such as the type, size, dose, and stability of the nanoparticles. 

Key Considerations

  • Toxicity Mechanisms: The primary concern with engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) containing metals (e.g., silver, zinc oxide, iron oxide) is that they can dissolve and release toxic metal ions, or the particles themselves can accumulate in the body. The body may not be able to clear these particles effectively, leading to bioaccumulation over time.
  • Health Impacts: Once in the bloodstream (via ingestion, inhalation, or skin contact), nanoparticles can travel throughout the body and lodge in organs such as the liver, kidneys, spleen, and brain. This accumulation can lead to:
    • Oxidative stress and inflammation.
    • Damage to DNA (genotoxicity).
    • Organ damage (liver, kidney, neurological).
    • Potential for cancer (carcinogenic effects).
  • Intended Use: It is important to note that nanotechnology is also actively being researched and used to remove heavy metals and other pollutants from contaminated water sources due to their high efficiency and large surface areas. The risk comes from the potential for these materials to escape water treatment facilities or be improperly disposed of, entering the environment and food chain.
  • Regulatory Challenges: Currently, there is a lack of globally harmonized regulatory frameworks and long-term studies on the safety of many commercially available nanomaterials in consumer products or the environment. 

In summary, while some engineered nanoparticles are designed to be safe or to clean up pollution, their specific properties and fate in the body and environment mean there is a significant, scientifically recognized potential for toxicity, including heavy metal poisoning, if not properly regulated and managed. 

All of that is a bit ironic don’t you think? On the one hand, the powers that be are using it for water filtration and say that it’s superior technology. Then on the other hand, it’s dangerous because of heavy metals building up in the organs of people.

All I know for sure is that it’s real and then it’s in our water and the pictures that I posted here on this particular posting are the proof. Go ahead and try it for yourselves. Pour some water and let it sit and see what happens.

Here are some more of my pictures from today.

Artificial Intelligence as the Operating System of Digital Totalitarianism

Posted on by Leave a comment

By Mark Keenan at Global Research. Reposted with permission.

Artificial intelligence is marketed as neutral, objective, and inevitable. We are told it will improve efficiency, manage complexity, and assist decision-making across society. However, a central question is not just what AI can or can’t do, but who controls it — and to what end.

AI is not an autonomous force. It is built, funded, trained, filtered, and deployed by governments, corporations, military agencies, and financial institutions. Like any administrative technology, it reflects the priorities of those who design and own it. What makes AI historically dangerous is not intelligence, but scale and centralization.

AI is rapidly becoming the operating system of a new form of power.

From Governance to Administration

Classical totalitarian systems relied on visible authority: laws, police, censorship offices, and coercion that could be identified and resisted. Digital totalitarianism—more accurately, an advanced form of the administrative state in which state and corporate power converge and are operationalized through technical systems—functions differently. 

Rather than demanding belief or public loyalty, it operates through systems of automated compliance, procedural dependency, and algorithmic decision-making.

It replaces overt force with administration.

Administration does not argue. It configures.

Rather than banning ideas outright, it filters visibility. Rather than issuing commands, it sets conditions. Rather than punishing dissent openly, it quietly restricts access. Compliance is produced not through fear, but through dependence on systems that cannot be negotiated with.

AI is uniquely suited to this role. It enables automated decision-making at scale, without human judgment at the point of enforcement. Responsibility dissolves into procedure. Power becomes difficult to locate, challenge, or appeal.

This is not a future scenario. It is already underway.

The Consolidation of Power Through Code

Power that was once distributed across institutions is now being consolidated through a single technological layer. AI-driven systems increasingly centralize control over:

  • information visibility
  • digital identity
  • financial access
  • surveillance and monitoring
  • automated enforcement

Like central planning in economics, algorithmic governance promises efficiency while quietly eliminating local knowledge, discretion, and accountability.

Each of these domains existed independently in the past. Their separation limited power. Civilizational-scale AI collapses those boundaries. Trillions of dollars of debt-based funding, created through monetary expansion, are being pumped into the creation of these systems.

When information systems are linked to identity systems, identity to financial systems, and financial systems to automated enforcement, control no longer requires political confrontation. It becomes infrastructural. The system governs by default.

This concentration of power has no historical precedent.

AI is becoming the operating system of a technocratic economy and administrative state — an infrastructure that integrates finance, industry, bureaucracy, and governance. This transformation has not emerged organically from market demand. It has been enabled by unprecedented monetary expansion and institutional backing, insulating AI-dependent systems from failure while transferring risk to the public. As financial access, employment, and administration become conditional on algorithmic systems, freedom does not disappear through overt coercion, but through participation that is scored, filtered, and managed.

When Code Replaces Law

Law is slow, imperfect, and accountable. Code is fast, opaque, and final.

Algorithmic systems now determine whether transactions are approved, content is visible, accounts are flagged, or access is restricted—not through adjudication, but through automated classification.
These decisions occur without explanation, appeal, or identifiable human authority.No official appears. No justification is issued.

Financial de-platforming, automated content moderation, algorithmic risk scoring, and eligibility filtering already operate this way. AI allows such mechanisms to scale beyond human administration.

Control advances not through authoritarian rhetoric, but through technical implementation.

The Myth of Neutral Intelligence

AI is often described as objective or evidence-based. This is misleading. AI systems do not reason or understand truth. They reproduce patterns from curated datasets under institutional constraints.

Every dataset reflects editorial decisions. Every model reflects policy choices. On politically sensitive topics, large categories of information are excluded through corporate risk management, government pressure, and technocratic consensus. What falls outside those boundaries quietly disappears.

These boundaries are shaped less by overt censorship than by platform risk frameworks and regulatory alignment. Information usually disappears not because someone says “ban this”, but because platforms align themselves with regulators and pre-defined legal risk, and quietly pre-empt anything that might cause trouble.

Bias does not appear as propaganda. It appears as absence.

Because machine output appears impersonal, it carries an authority that overt political messaging cannot. This is how narrative management evolves into automated governance.

Dependency as a Mechanism of Control

As societies become dependent on AI-mediated systems, opting out becomes increasingly costly — not because dissent is prohibited, but because access to economic, social, and administrative life is progressively routed through algorithmic interfaces.

Banking, employment, education, communication, and public services increasingly require interaction with automated systems. Participation becomes conditional. Withdrawal may be apolitical in intent, but it is treated by the system as a matter of access rather than belief.

This is how control stabilizes without coercion. People comply not because they agree, but because the system is seemingly unavoidable.

The Delegation of Judgment

The deepest danger posed by AI is not surveillance or job displacement alone. It is the delegation of human judgment.

AI excels at probability and optimization. It cannot grasp meaning, conscience, or moral consequence. Yet institutions increasingly outsource precisely these human faculties to machine processes — in finance, medicine, education, law, and governance.

Each delegation appears efficient. Together they produce a quiet transfer of authority from human discernment to automated procedure.

A society that automates judgment eventually forgets how to judge. Over time, populations repeat machine-generated narratives and priorities, mistaking them for their own. Public reasoning gives way to system outputs. Debate yields to compliance with algorithmic norms.

Totalitarianism Without Tyrants

This emerging order does not require dictators or mass ideology. It requires infrastructure, automation, dependency, and the normalization of convenience over autonomy.

Digital totalitarianism advances incrementally. Each system is justified as useful. Each integration is framed as progress. Each small loss of discretion is incremental; even when it is noticed and resisted, the system proceeds.

By the time the architecture becomes visible, it no longer feels optional.

These dynamics are examined in greater depth in the book The AI Illusion: Digital Totalitarianism, Technocracy, and the Global War for Human Consciousness.

Conclusion

AI is not becoming conscious. It does not need to.

Its power lies in becoming foundational — the operating system upon which technocratic, institutionally governedeconomic, informational, and administrative life increasingly depends. Once control is embedded at that level, it no longer needs to announce itself. It simply executes.

Judgment, responsibility, and self-government are already being displaced by automated systems whose authority is procedural rather than accountable. What is lost is not freedom in a dramatic sense, but the habit of human judgment itself. Once that habit erodes, power no longer operates through law or debate, but through systems that function automatically and without appeal.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.

Mark Keenan is a former United Nations technical expert and independent writer on the intersection of science, finance, and public policy. He is the author of The Debt Machine, The AI Illusion, and Staying Human in the Age of AI. He publishes at markgerardkeenan.substack.com and comments on X at @TheMarkGerard.

Is Our Memory and Thinking Capacity Being Intentionally Damaged by COVID and mRNA “Vaccines”?

Posted on by Leave a comment
vaccine bottles on blue background

Interview of Dr. Michael Nehls by Tucker Carlson. Introduction by Peter Koenig. Reposted with Permission.

Are we being programmed to become unthinking Zombies?

That’s what it looks like since a while; that’s why we are so vulnerable to manipulation; that’s why we lose or don’t have any memory of recent history, and maybe that’s why we fall into every trap put in front of us by those pulling the strings behind the executing agencies, WHO, World Economic Forum (WEF) – and yes, the very United Nations.

They are all under control of the Big Powers, money powers, in the first place. The power of dangerous psychopaths, “killerpaths”, you may call them.

They want to drastically reduce the world population but to facilitate this ghastly task, they must first make the bulk of humanity brain-dead, by any means possible.

That is precisely what had been planned way ahead, but is happening since 2020, the start of the UN agenda 2030 and the Great Reset.

They go and-in-hand. For those who are not aware, the UN has an agreement since June 2019 with the WEF to “cooperate” on the UN Agenda 2030.

In his brilliant interview with Tucker Carlson, Dr. Michael Nehls explains fear-mongering – coming World War III, ever new nuclear threats, the Russians are coming, the Russians are coming, sudden diseases that may come up, like COVID, the climate change, for which we humans are responsible for using excess hydrocarbons, instead of renewable energies, solar, wind sea…

Fear is the first step towards obedience, and obedience is the basis for a fake “deadly disease” to bloom and with it, so-called vaccinations can be imposed upon an entire world population. And would you believe, there are people, in the Global South, who could not get their “vaxx” fast enough. They traveled to the US to get their shot, to be “safe.”

Fear had taken over successfully.

These shots, causing myocarditis, turbo cancers, mind-numbing and more, were planned and prepared at least for the last 20 years, already with the “trial” of SARS-1 of 2001 / 2002 hitting China, to dull our minds, to eventually kill our capability to think clearly.

The spike protein – the active ingredient of the “new” mRNA injections, which by the way is the new basis for ALL vaccination, not just COVID – is entering the brain cells, making them insensitive to emotions, and depriving them from recognizing fact, from free thinking and especially from remembering past events, all of which could trigger resistance.

If the incidence of Alzheimer’s has increased exponentially in the past five years, it is not due to an aging population, but it can be linked directly to the mRNA-type, DNA-altering, spike-protein generating vaxxes.

Please listen to Dr. Michael Nehls fascinating interview with Tucker Carlson to the end. When asked whether the impact of those injected could be reversed, Dr. Nehls offers relatively simple solutions which the mainstream medical and pharma industry want to prohibit.

What else is new… you may still remember, with an unfoggy memory, when medial doctors were ordered under threat of license and job loss to forbid the use of such effective but simple medication as Ivermectin, chlorine dioxide solution (CDS) and more. Keep remembering as such prohibitions may come back in a different but still “scary” dress.

See this: Dr. Michael Nehl’s with Tucker Carlson: Zombie-Society: Why People after the “Vaccination” think differently; their brain’s immune system was killed by the “vaccine” injection, making humans controllable | German Dr. Nehls with Tucker Carlson:

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

Rise of the Safety State

Posted on by Leave a comment
photo of person peeking through the hole

Another excellent report by Greg Reese. Here is a link to his blog and here is more from the video.

Amazon Ring security cameras are now using facial recognition. They are calling it familiar faces. Whenever a person buys a cloud-based Amazon product, they are automatically brought into the Amazon Sidewalk network, which includes geospatial data that can track objects in  the neighborhood without the need for its own network or GPS module.

Amazon Ring security cameras have made a deal with Flock Safety, which will allow the police to more easily gain access to your home security cameras and your neighborhood Amazon Sidewalk network. Flock Safety’s founder and CEO, Garrett Langley, whose name just coincidentally translates  to Watchtower of the CIA, wants to rid the world of crime. 

I’ve warned fellow believers about Amazon and their Ring cameras for years but it fell on deaf ears for the most part. Most people are very reluctant to get rid of anything that makes their lives more convenient, no matter how much it invades their privacy. This is why most people around the world will accept digital IDs and all of the requirements that come with it, for convenience.

People who refuse will be ostracized and possibly committed to mental institutions as they will consider us to be abnormal for not wanting to go along with their dystopian BS. Prayed up and prepped up, time is short.

You can support this ministry and keep us on the internet using the links below.  Patreon is gone so now we have PayPal, Cash App and Buy me a Coffee as our online options.  The buy me a coffee link is below.

Free Ebook on Spiritual Warfare

Buy me a Coffee

Cash App ID: $jstorm212

« Older Entries Recent Entries »